Literature DB >> 33211147

Machine learning in cardiovascular radiology: ESCR position statement on design requirements, quality assessment, current applications, opportunities, and challenges.

Thomas Weikert1, Marco Francone2, Suhny Abbara3, Bettina Baessler4, Byoung Wook Choi5, Matthias Gutberlet6, Elizabeth M Hecht7, Christian Loewe8, Elie Mousseaux9, Luigi Natale10, Konstantin Nikolaou11, Karen G Ordovas12, Charles Peebles13, Claudia Prieto14, Rodrigo Salgado15, Birgitta Velthuis16, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart17, Jens Bremerich18, Tim Leiner16.   

Abstract

Machine learning offers great opportunities to streamline and improve clinical care from the perspective of cardiac imagers, patients, and the industry and is a very active scientific research field. In light of these advances, the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR), a non-profit medical society dedicated to advancing cardiovascular radiology, has assembled a position statement regarding the use of machine learning (ML) in cardiovascular imaging. The purpose of this statement is to provide guidance on requirements for successful development and implementation of ML applications in cardiovascular imaging. In particular, recommendations on how to adequately design ML studies and how to report and interpret their results are provided. Finally, we identify opportunities and challenges ahead. While the focus of this position statement is ML development in cardiovascular imaging, most considerations are relevant to ML in radiology in general. KEY POINTS: • Development and clinical implementation of machine learning in cardiovascular imaging is a multidisciplinary pursuit. • Based on existing study quality standard frameworks such as SPIRIT and STARD, we propose a list of quality criteria for ML studies in radiology. • The cardiovascular imaging research community should strive for the compilation of multicenter datasets for the development, evaluation, and benchmarking of ML algorithms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Consensus; Diagnostic techniques, cardiovascular; Machine learning; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33211147     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07417-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  16 in total

1.  Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Radiology Editorial Board.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Linda Moy; Miriam A Bredella; Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Kathryn J Fowler; Vicky J Goh; Elkan F Halpern; Christopher P Hess; Mark L Schiebler; Clifford R Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement.

Authors:  J Raymond Geis; Adrian P Brady; Carol C Wu; Jack Spencer; Erik Ranschaert; Jacob L Jaremko; Steve G Langer; Andrea Borondy Kitts; Judy Birch; William F Shields; Robert van den Hoven van Genderen; Elmar Kotter; Judy Wawira Gichoya; Tessa S Cook; Matthew B Morgan; An Tang; Nabile M Safdar; Marc Kohli
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.248

3.  STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Herbert Y Kressel; Nader Rifai; Robert M Golub; Douglas G Altman; Lotty Hooft; Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-07

6.  Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data.

Authors:  Micah J Sheller; Brandon Edwards; G Anthony Reina; Jason Martin; Sarthak Pati; Aikaterini Kotrotsou; Mikhail Milchenko; Weilin Xu; Daniel Marcus; Rivka R Colen; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Automatic Coronary Wall and Atherosclerotic Plaque Segmentation from 3D Coronary CT Angiography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Ghanem; Ahmed H Hamimi; Jatin R Matta; Aaron Carass; Reham M Elgarf; Ahmed M Gharib; Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Machine learning in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: basic concepts and applications.

Authors:  Tim Leiner; Daniel Rueckert; Avan Suinesiaputra; Bettina Baeßler; Reza Nezafat; Ivana Išgum; Alistair A Young
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool.

Authors:  Abdel Aziz Taha; Allan Hanbury
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.

Authors:  Mark D Wilkinson; Michel Dumontier; I Jsbrand Jan Aalbersberg; Gabrielle Appleton; Myles Axton; Arie Baak; Niklas Blomberg; Jan-Willem Boiten; Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos; Philip E Bourne; Jildau Bouwman; Anthony J Brookes; Tim Clark; Mercè Crosas; Ingrid Dillo; Olivier Dumon; Scott Edmunds; Chris T Evelo; Richard Finkers; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran; Alasdair J G Gray; Paul Groth; Carole Goble; Jeffrey S Grethe; Jaap Heringa; Peter A C 't Hoen; Rob Hooft; Tobias Kuhn; Ruben Kok; Joost Kok; Scott J Lusher; Maryann E Martone; Albert Mons; Abel L Packer; Bengt Persson; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Marco Roos; Rene van Schaik; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Erik Schultes; Thierry Sengstag; Ted Slater; George Strawn; Morris A Swertz; Mark Thompson; Johan van der Lei; Erik van Mulligen; Jan Velterop; Andra Waagmeester; Peter Wittenburg; Katherine Wolstencroft; Jun Zhao; Barend Mons
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Epicardial and pericardial fat analysis on CT images and artificial intelligence: a literature review.

Authors:  Federico Greco; Rodrigo Salgado; Wim Van Hecke; Romualdo Del Buono; Paul M Parizel; Carlo Augusto Mallio
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anne A H de Hond; Artuur M Leeuwenberg; Lotty Hooft; Ilse M J Kant; Steven W J Nijman; Hendrikus J A van Os; Jiska J Aardoom; Thomas P A Debray; Ewoud Schuit; Maarten van Smeden; Johannes B Reitsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Niels H Chavannes; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-01-10

3.  Development and evaluation of machine learning models based on X-ray radiomics for the classification and differentiation of malignant and benign bone tumors.

Authors:  Claudio E von Schacky; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Valerie S Schäfer; Yannik Leonhardt; Matthias Jung; Pia M Jungmann; Maximilian F Russe; Sarah C Foreman; Felix G Gassert; Florian T Gassert; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carolin Mogler; Carolin Knebel; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Marcus R Makowski; Klaus Woertler; Rainer Burgkart; Alexandra S Gersing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 7.034

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.