Literature DB >> 33211109

Association Between Low-Dose Aspirin Use and Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Taiwan.

Hui-Min Diana Lin1,2, Pareen Vora3, Montse Soriano-Gabarró3, K Arnold Chan1,4,5.   

Abstract

Importance: Population-based East Asian data have corroborated reports from non-Asian settings on the association between low-dose aspirin and a lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Objective: To evaluate the association between duration and recency of low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested case-control study included individuals who initiated aspirin use and matched individuals who did not use aspirin. Data were collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance and Taiwan Cancer Registry from 2000 through 2015. CRC cases were age- and sex-matched in a 1:4 ratio with individuals in a control group, identified from a cohort of individuals who used and did not use aspirin through risk-set sampling. Data analysis was conducted from June 2018 to July 2019. Exposures: Low-dose aspirin use was defined as receiving less than 150 mg per day, whereas 100 mg/d was most commonly used. Based on duration and recency of low-dose aspirin use between cohort entry (initiation date of low-dose aspirin for aspirin use group or randomly assigned date for those who did not use aspirin) and index date (CRC diagnosis date for individuals in the case group and the diagnosis date for the 4 corresponding matched individuals in the control group), the 3 following mutually exclusive exposure groups served as the basis for analysis: (1) long-term current low-dose aspirin use, (2) episodic low-dose aspirin use, and (3) no low-dose aspirin use (the reference group). Main Outcomes and Measures: CRC risk among the 3 exposure groups.
Results: Among 4 710 504 individuals (2 747 830 [51.7%] men; median [interquartile range] age at cohort entry in initiator group, 61 [52-71] years; median [interquartile range] age at cohort entry in nonuse group, 59 [51-68] years), 79 095 CRC cases (1.7% of study cohort) were identified. Compared with no low-dose aspirin use, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for long-term current low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93); for episodic use, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.89). Adjusted ORs of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.61-0.67) were observed for long-term current use and episodic low-dose aspirin use within the subcohort of individuals who initiated low-dose aspirin between age 40 and 59 years. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, low-dose aspirin use was associated with 11% lower CRC risk in an East Asian population, and this association was larger when low-dose aspirin use started before age 60 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33211109      PMCID: PMC7677757          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in Asia has increased in recent years.[1] While the effects of low-dose aspirin use in reducing CRC risk have been studied extensively in Western populations,[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] evidence from East Asia has been limited, with 3 moderate-sized studies reported from Taiwan.[13,14,15] Studies from Western countries reported 13% to 42% lower CRC risk associated with low-dose aspirin use, and some findings suggested larger risk reduction associated with longer duration of aspirin use.[3,8,16] Furthermore, low-dose aspirin use was associated with lower risk of advanced stage CRC.[12] The association between low-dose aspirin use and different stages of CRC has not been evaluated in an East Asian population. With the need for more robust evidence on low-dose aspirin use and cancer risk in East Asia, we conducted a nested case-control study to evaluate the association between duration and recency of low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk overall and by CRC stages.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

This is a nested case-control study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI),[17,18] Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR),[19,20] and mortality data from 2000 through 2015. The NHI is a publicly funded single-payer health insurance program for all Taiwan residents and captures reimbursement records for outpatient and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, prescription drugs, and procedures. The TCR is a registry of all incident cancer cases diagnosed in hospitals with at least 50 beds and has information on date of diagnosis as well as pathology cell type and cancer stage according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer definitions.[20] The study was approved by the National Taiwan University Hospital Research Ethics Committee with a waiver of informed consent because deidentified data were used. The report was prepared according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cohort and case-control studies.[21] The study cohort included individuals aged 40 years or older who initiated low-dose aspirin and individuals who did not use aspirin who were age (by 10-year groups) and sex frequency matched in a 2:1 ratio annually from 2002 to 2010. In Taiwan, low-dose aspirin is a prescription drug indicated for cardiovascular disease prevention and is not available over the counter; its prescriptions are captured in the NHI. Cohort entry date was the first low-dose aspirin prescription for the initiator group and random dates within the same year for the nonuse group. Participants who died, had no NHI claims, had cancer, or had aspirin contraindications before cohort entry date were not eligible for frequency matching. Participants with history of aspirin use before 2002 were also excluded (Figure). Participants who were identified and matched in the nonuse group in an earlier calendar year and subsequently initiated low-dose aspirin would cross over to the aspirin cohort.
Figure.

Flowchart of Study Cohort

NHI indicates National Health Insurance.

Flowchart of Study Cohort

NHI indicates National Health Insurance.

CRC Cases and Risk-Set Sampling for Controls

CRC cases from 2002 through 2015 were ascertained through TCR. Risk-set sampling was used to identify individuals for the control group for each CRC case, and potential members of the control group were cohort members at risk of developing CRC at the time when the CRC case was diagnosed. A total of 4 individuals with the same sex and age (±1 year) as an individual in the case group were randomly selected from the risk set and included in the control group. For the 1 individual in the case group and the 4 individuals in the control group in each case/control quintet, the index date was the date of CRC diagnosis.

Aspirin Use and Covariates

A number of aspirin dosage forms are available in Taiwan, and we operationally defined low-dose aspirin use as receiving less than 150 mg per day. The 100 mg formulation given once a day was used most frequently. According to aspirin exposure before the index date, 3 mutually exclusive exposure groups were formed: (1) long-term current use of low-dose aspirin (ie, most recent use within 1 year before index date, ≥3 years of low-dose aspirin use, and >70% drug-day coverage during a 3-year look-back period from index date); (2) episodic uses of low-dose aspirin (ie, last use of aspirin >1 year from index date or <70% drug-day coverage during 3-year look-back time from index date); and (3) nonuse (ie, no low-dose aspirin use before index date). In addition, low-dose aspirin use for extended periods was evaluated regarding whether the 70% drug-day coverage threshold was reached within the specific duration prior to the index date; for instance, low-dose aspirin drug-day should exceed 70% of the 5-year period prior to index date to be considered having at least 5 years of low-dose aspirin exposure. The 70% threshold was adopted after descriptive assessment of low-dose aspirin use in NHI during study protocol development. The association of low-dose aspirin discontinuation and CRC risk was evaluated among patients whose last low-dose aspirin prescription was at least 1 year prior to index date, with individuals in the long-term current use group used as reference. Baseline characteristics for the study cohort included age, sex, comorbidities, concomitant medications, health care utilization (number of hospitalizations and outpatient and emergency visits), aspirin indications (study cohort), and CRC stages (for patients with CRC). Potential confounders were evaluated 1 year before the index date, and they included single point exposure of higher-dose aspirin formulations (used as analgesic or antipyretic), gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, and colonoscopy. Prior use of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), statins, antidiabetic agents, antihypertensive agents, antacids, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonists, and health care utilization during the previous year were also evaluated.

Statistical Analysis

We described baseline characteristics during a 1-year look-back period before cohort entry date among study cohort members and before index date for individuals in the case and control groups. Continuous variables were described with mean and SD or median and interquartile range (IQR). Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between CRC and groups of low-dose aspirin use, with nonuse as the reference group, while controlling for the covariates mentioned earlier. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated. CRC stage–specific analyses were carried out for participants whose staging information was available. All analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute). No statistical testing was conducted, so no prespecified level of significance was set. After the study protocol was finalized and on review of recently published reports, we repeated the analyses in a subcohort of participants who initiated low-dose aspirin between age 40 to 59 years. Sensitivity analysis was performed among individuals in the case and control groups without NSAID or COX-2 inhibitors use 3 years prior to index date to minimize confounding effects of anti-inflammation agents on CRC risk.

Results

Participants

The study cohort comprised 4 710 504 individuals, 2 747 830 (51.7%) were men, and the median (IQR) age was 61 (52-71) years among those in the low-dose aspirin initiator group and 59 (51-68) years in the nonuse group (Table 1). Among the 3 449 330 individuals in the nonuse group, 604 101 (17.5%) subsequently initiated low aspirin. More than 75% of low-dose aspirin use (1 468 352 of 1 865 275 [78.7%]) was initiated in ambulatory care clinics, and 1 647 042 patients (88.3%) had no cardiovascular indications recorded in health insurance claims before the initiation of aspirin. Among those in the low-dose aspirin initiator group with an apparent indication, the most common prior diagnoses were angina, ischemic stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. In comparison with the nonuse group, the low-dose aspirin initiator group had a higher prevalence of heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and liver failure, and the differences were also reflected in concomitant medications and number of visits to health care facilities.
Table 1.

Study Cohort Baseline Characteristics, 1 Year Prior to Cohort Entry Date

CharacteristicNo. (%)
Full study cohortSubcohort of individuals aged 40-59 y
Low-dose aspirin initiator group (n = 1 865 275)Nonuse group (n = 3 449 330)Low-dose aspirin initiator group (n = 547 068)Nonuse group (n = 1 094 136)
Men962 103 (51.6)1 785 717 (51.8)286 165 (52.3)572 330 (52.3)
Age
Mean (SD)62 (12.3)59 (11.6)51 (5.3)50 (5.3)
Median (IQR)61 (52-71)59 (51-68)51 (46-55)51 (45-54)
Cardiovascular indications at any time prior to cohort entry date
Ischemic stroke49 126 (2.6)33 810 (1.0)7059 (1.3)3998 (0.4)
Transient ischemic attack11 778 (0.6)7707 (0.2)1878 (0.3)982 (0.1)
Acute myocardial infarction7570 (0.4)3942 (0.1)1361 (0.3)405 (0.0)
Angina108 713 (5.8)66 958 (1.9)20 643 (3.8)10 012 (0.9)
Peripheral vascular disease57 864 (3.1)44 702 (1.3)9286 (1.7)6269 (0.6)
Revascularization3465 (0.2)2258 (0.1)568 (0.1)335 (0.6)
Stent1691 (0.1)362 (0.0)421 (0.1)29 (0.0)
Angioplasty2100 (0.1)682 (0.0)244 (0.0)69 (0.0)
Secondary prevention218 233 (11.7)NA38 590 (7.1)NA
Primary preventiona1 647 042 (88.3)NA508 478 (92.9)NA
Comorbidities
Congestive heart failure59 711 (3.2)30 729 (0.9)939 (0.2)3182 (0.3)
Hypertension774 363 (41.5)589 600 (17.1)185 146 (33.8)97 624 (8.9)
Diabetes347 769 (18.6)257 957 (7.5)86 320 (16.0)47 706 (4.4)
Kidney failure33 846 (1.8)21 194 (0.6)7264 (1.3)3383 (0.3)
Mild liver disease127 940 (6.9)145 211 (4.2)45 704 (8.4)46 977 (4.3)
Moderate or severe liver disease312 (0.0)271 (0.0)93 (0.0)69 (0.0)
Concomitant medications
NSAID1 320 149 (70.8)1 981 676 (57.5)399 491 (73.0)637 033 (58.2)
Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor109 255 (5.9)116 482 (3.4)10 403 (1.9)10 057 (0.9)
Diuretics110 069 (5.9)82 726 (2.4)23 816 (4.4)14 620 (1.3)
β blocker562 675 (30.2)422 771 (12.3)165 160 (30.2)99 407 (9.1)
Calcium channel blocker689 995 (37.0)484 919 (14.1)161 410 (29.5)78 019 (7.1)
ACEI323 946 (17.4)214 744 (6.2)85 419 (15.6)39 014 (3.6)
ARB244 197 (13.1)152 546 (4.4)50 829 (9.3)23 021 (2.1)
Statin194 973 (10.5)143 263 (4.2)47 871 (8.8)26 071 (2.4)
Insulin65 232 (3.5)32 230 (0.9)15 304 (2.8)5557 (0.5)
Metformin258 452 (13.9)182 368 (5.3)65 237 (11.9)33 954 (3.1)
Sulfonylurea288 704 (15.5)210 248 (6.1)75 612 (13.8)40 329 (3.7)
Thiazolindinedione51 313 (2.8)32 085 (0.9)13 574 (2.5)6225 (0.6)
DPP-4 inhibitor3048 (0.2)1696 (0.1)0 (0)0 (0)
GLP-1 analogue0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
PPI, oral59 858 (3.2)74 582 (2.2)14 450 (2.6)18 217 (1.7)
H2 blocker, oral435 570 (23.4)586 866 (17.0)128 248 (23.4)179 711 (16.4)
Outpatient visits
Mean (SD)20 (17.4)12 (13.8)17 (15.4)10 (11.1)
Median (IQR)15 (8-27)8 (3-17)13 (7-23)6 (2-14)
Hospitalization episodes
Mean (SD)0.17 (0.54)0.08 (0.36)0.13 (0.47)0.06 (0.3)
Median (IQR)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)
Total admission days
Mean (SD)12 (30.7)13 (63.2)12 (45.3)14 (79.1)
Median (IQR)6 (3-11)5 (3-10)5 (3-10)4 (3-8)
Emergency department visits
Mean (SD)0.36 (0.98)0.17 (0.57)0.33 (0.96)0.15 (0.54)
Median (IQR)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)

Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; H2, histamine 2 receptor; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

Low-dose aspirin prescriptions were considered for primary prevention if there were no cardiovascular-related disease diagnoses prior to cohort entry date.

Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; H2, histamine 2 receptor; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPI, proton pump inhibitor. Low-dose aspirin prescriptions were considered for primary prevention if there were no cardiovascular-related disease diagnoses prior to cohort entry date. Among the study cohort, 547 068 patients (11.6%) initiated low-dose aspirin at the age of 40 to 59 years, and 1 094 136 age-sex frequency-matched individuals who did not use aspirin were identified; 145 131 (13.3%) in the nonuse group subsequently initiated low-dose aspirin, resulting in study size of 1 496 073. Among them, median (IQR) age for the low-dose aspirin initiator group and the nonuse group was 51 (46-55) years and 50 (45-54) years, respectively. Angina and peripheral vascular diseases were the most likely reasons for the subcohort patients to initiate low-dose aspirin; 508 478 (92.9%) of the low-dose aspirin initiator group from the subcohort had no cardiovascular indications before initiating low-dose aspirin. Baseline characteristics of the subcohort were generally similar to the full study cohort study but with a lower proportion of the low-dose aspirin initiator group having hypertension in the subcohort vs the full cohort (185 146 [33.8%] vs 774 363 [41.5%]).

CRC Case and Control Groups

From the study cohort, 79 095 CRC cases (1.7% of total) and 316 380 individuals in the control group were identified. In both groups, the median (IQR) age was 71 (63-78) at the time of diagnosis, and 233 820 (59.1%) were men. Cancer stage information was available for 57 675 patients (72.9%) in the CRC group through TCR; 13 305 (16.8%), 16 365 (20.7%), and 12 100 (15.3%) were diagnosed at stage II, III, and IV, respectively. Prevalence of gastrointestinal diseases, gastrointestinal medications, and health care facility visits were higher in the CRC group. There were 18 349 individuals in the CRC group and 73 396 individuals in the control group in the subcohort aged 40 to 59 years; median (IQR) age at time of diagnosis was 60 (55-63) years, and 56 210 (61.3%) were men. The CRC group of the subcohort had similar proportions of patients with hypertension and diabetes but a slightly higher proportion with mild liver disease (Table 2).
Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of CRC Case and Control Groups, 1 Year Prior to Case-Control Index Date

CharacteristicNo. (%)
Full study cohortSubcohort of individuals aged 40-59 y
CRC case group (n = 79 095)Control group (n = 316 380)CRC case group (n = 18 349)Control group (n = 73 396)
Long-term current aspirin use3294 (4.2)12 747 (4.0)689 (3.8)2786 (3.8)
Episodic aspirin use30 224 (38.2)113 154 (35.7)6192 (33.7)27 142 (37.0)
Nonuse45 577 (57.6)190 479 (60.2)11 468 (62.5)43 468 (59.2)
Men46 764 (59.1)187 056 (59.1)11 242 (61.3)44 968 (61.3)
Age
Mean (SD)71 (10.6)71 (10.6)59 (5.7)59 (5.7)
Median (IQR)71 (63-78)71 (63-78)60 (55-63)60 (55-63)
CRC stage
Unknowna6447 (8.2)NA1678 (9.1)NA
05964 (7.5)NA2054 (11.2)NA
I9941 (12.6)NA2789 (15.2)NA
II13 305 (16.8)NA2648 (14.4)NA
III16 365 (20.7)NA3917 (21.3)NA
IV12 100 (15.3)NA2483 (13.5)NA
Missingb14 973 (18.9)NA2780 (15.2)NA
Comorbidities
Congestive heart failure4866 (6.2)13 640 (4.3)634 (3.5)1561 (2.1)
Hypertension37 663 (47.6)136 350 (43.1)7420 (40.4)25 763 (35.1)
Chronic pulmonary disease9270 (11.7)32 863 (10.4)1191 (6.5)4009 (5.5)
Diabetes18 811 (23.8)59 606 (18.8)4326 (23.6)13 237 (18.0)
Kidney failure3839 (4.9)10 075 (3.2)694 (3.8)1691 (2.3)
Mild liver disease6586 (8.3)18 878 (6.0)1867 (10.2)5340 (7.3)
Moderate or severe liver disease210 (0.3)334 (0.1)56 (0.3)73 (0.1)
Risk factors
Gastrointestinal bleeding10 397 (13.1)8168 (2.6)1945 (10.6)1383 (1.9)
Peptic ulcer disease exclude bleeding10 941 (13.8)23 518 (7.4)1970 (10.7)4291 (5.8)
Familial adenomatous polyposis3314 (4.2)1632 (0.5)897 (4.9)402 (0.5)
Ulcerative colitis61 (0.1)127 (0.0)15 (0.1)30 (0.0)
Crohn disease571 (0.7)583 (0.2)91 (0.5)109 (0.1)
Concomitant medications
NSAID49 174 (62.2)187 996 (59.4)11 800 (64.3)45 180 (61.6)
Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor7361 (9.3)29 788 (9.4)901 (4.9)3413 (4.7)
Diuretics4065 (5.1)13 933 (4.4)584 (3.2)1826 (2.5)
β blocker20 863 (26.4)74 078 (23.4)4702 (25.6)16 312 (22.2)
Calcium channel blocker31 287 (39.6)108 790 (34.4)5813 (31.7)19 359 (26.4)
ACEI10 141 (12.8)34 795 (11.0)1840 (10.0)6086 (8.3)
ARB19 903 (25.2)70 639 (22.3)4181 (22.8)14 207 (19.4)
Statin13 316 (16.8)49 942 (15.8)3426 (18.7)12 222 (16.7)
Insulin7297 (9.2)12 583 (4.0)1271 (6.9)2491 (3.4)
Metformin12 648 (16.0)40 732 (12.9)3115 (17.0)9719 (13.2)
Sulfonylurea12 121 (15.3)38 781 (12.3)2817 (15.4)8560 (11.7)
Thiazolindinedione2268 (2.9)7690 (2.4)617 (3.4)2078 (2.8)
DPP-4 inhibitor3385 (4.3)10 255 (3.2)951 (5.2)2766 (3.8)
GLP-1 analogue11 (0.0)27 (0.0)9 (0.0)18 (0.0)
PPI, oral14 112 (17.8)20 178 (6.4)2562 (14.0)4303 (5.9)
H2 blocker, oral28 111 (35.5)77 790 (24.6)5985 (32.6)17 193 (23.4)
Anticholinergic agents58 468 (73.9)153 493 (48.5)12 427 (67.7)33 187 (45.2)
Outpatient visits
Mean (SD)23 (17.9)19 (17.7)19 (15.6)16 (15.4)
Median (IQR)18 (10-30)15 (7-26)15 (8-25)12 (5-21)
Hospitalization episodes
Mean (SD)0.52 (0.99)0.24 (0.74)0.34 (0.83)0.15 (0.6)
Median (IQR)0 (0-1)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)0 (0-0)
Total admission days
Mean (SD)21 (41.3)18 (63.2)16 (26.9)15 (50.1)
Median (IQR)12 (5-24)7 (4-15)8 (4-18)5 (3-11)
Emergency department visits
Mean (SD)0.7 (1.42)0.37 (1.08)0.5 (1.19)0.26 (0.85)
Median (IQR)0 (0-1)0 (0-0)0 (0-1)0 (0-0)

Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CRC, colorectal cancer; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; H2 blocker, histamine 2 receptor; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

Unknown, staging variable coded as 999, 888, 998, BBB, X, or XXX are considered unknown stage in the long-form database.

Missing, incident cancer cases not reported to long-form database in the cancer registry and thus available information on staging provided.

Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CRC, colorectal cancer; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; H2 blocker, histamine 2 receptor; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPI, proton pump inhibitor. Unknown, staging variable coded as 999, 888, 998, BBB, X, or XXX are considered unknown stage in the long-form database. Missing, incident cancer cases not reported to long-form database in the cancer registry and thus available information on staging provided.

Aspirin Use and CRC Risk

More than half of individuals in the case group (45 577 [57.6%]) and control group (190 479 [60.2%]) did not use low-dose aspirin before the index date; a small proportion of the case group used low-dose aspirin regularly (3294 [4.2%]) (Table 3). More than one-third of individuals in the case group (30 224 [38.2%]) and control group (113 154 [35.7%]) were exposed to low-dose aspirin episodically. Comparing long-term current low-dose aspirin use vs nonuse for CRC risk, the crude OR was 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.13), and the adjusted OR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) after adjusting for clinical attributes and health care utilization. A similar magnitude of association with lower CRC risk was observed among the episodic low-dose aspirin use group (adjusted OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89). Adjusted ORs were within the range of 0.87 to 0.92 with at least 1 to 10 years of low-dose aspirin use. Comparing those who discontinued low-dose aspirin use 1 year or longer before index date and those who had current long-term low-dose aspirin use, the adjusted OR was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.02) (Table 3). Among the CRC case and control groups in the subcohort of patients initiating low-dose aspirin at a younger age, long-term current low-dose aspirin use was associated with 31% lower CRC risk (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.76), and episodic low-dose aspirin use was associated with 36% lower risk (adjusted OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.67). At least 1 year to 5 years of low-dose aspirin use showed similar levels of association with CRC risk (adjusted ORs ranged from 0.66 to 0.71), and a smaller strength of association was observed for those with at least 10 years of use (adjusted OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.95). Similar to the full study cohort, discontinuation of low-dose aspirin 1 year or longer before index date was not associated with CRC risk compared with long-term current aspirin use (adjusted OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.10) (Table 3).
Table 3.

Association Between Low Dose Aspirin Use and CRC

CharacteristicNo. (%)Odds ratio (95% CI)
CRC case groupControl groupCrudeAdjustedaAdjustedb
Full study cohort
No.79 095316 380NANANA
Main analysis
Long-term current aspirin use3294 (4.2)12 747 (4.0)1.08 (1.04-1.13)0.93 (0.89-0.97)0.89 (0.85-0.93)
Episodic aspirin use30 224 (38.2)113 154 (35.7)1.12 (1.10-1.14)0.91 (0.90-0.93)0.88 (0.86-0.89)
Nonuse45 577 (57.6)190 479 (60.2)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Duration, y
≥14394 (5.6)17 120 (5.4)1.08 (1.04-1.11)0.93 (0.89-0.96)0.87 (0.84-0.90)
≥23797 (4.8)14 714 (4.7)1.08 (1.04-1.12)0.93 (0.89-0.97)0.89 (0.85-0.93)
≥52352 (3.0)9156 (2.9)1.08 (1.03-1.13)0.93 (0.88-0.97)0.89 (0.85-0.94)
≥10715 (0.9)2659 (0.8)1.13 (1.04-1.23)0.95 (0.87-1.04)0.92 (0.84-1.01)
045 577 (57.6)190 479 (60.2)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Discontinuation period, yc
≥116 965 (21.4)67 238 (21.3)0.98 (0.94-1.02)0.91 (0.87-0.95)0.97 (0.93-1.02)
≥213 544 (17.1)54 307 (17.2)0.96 (0.92-1.01)0.91 (0.87-0.95)0.97 (0.93-1.02)
≥310 844 (13.7)43 890 (13.9)0.96 (0.91-1.00)0.90 (0.86-0.94)0.97 (0.93-1.02)
Long-term current aspirin use3294 (4.2)12 747 (4.0)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Subcohort of participants aged 40-59 y
No.18 34973 396NANANA
Main analysis
Long-term current aspirin use689 (3.8)2786 (3.8)0.93 (0.86-1.02)0.72 (0.66-0.79)0.69 (0.63-0.76)
Episodic aspirin use6192 (33.7)27 142 (37.0)0.86 (0.83-0.89)0.66 (0.64-0.69)0.64 (0.61-0.67)
Nonuse11 468 (62.5)43 468 (59.2)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Duration, y
≥1860 (4.7)3578 (4.9)0.91 (0.84-0.98)0.70 (0.64-0.76)0.66 (0.60-0.72)
≥2778 (4.2)3147 (4.3)0.93 (0.86-1.01)0.72 (0.66-0.79)0.69 (0.63-0.76)
≥5536 (2.9)2135 (2.9)0.95 (0.86-1.05)0.73 (0.66-0.81)0.71 (0.64-0.78)
≥10216 (1.2)766 (1.0)1.07 (0.92-1.25)0.83 (0.71-0.98)0.81 (0.68-0.95)
011 468 (62.5)43 468 (59.2)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Discontinuation period, yc
≥14074 (22.2)18 217 (24.8)0.91 (0.83-0.99)0.91 (0.83-0.998)0.96 (0.87-1.05)
≥23562 (19.4)15 731 (21.4)0.92 (0.84-1.00)0.93 (0.85-1.02)0.98 (0.89-1.08)
≥33105 (16.9)13 555 (18.5)0.93 (0.85-1.02)0.95 (0.86-1.05)1.01 (0.91-1.11)
Long-term current aspirin use689 (3.8)2786 (3.8)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; NA, not applicable.

Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, familial adenomatous polyposis, high-dose aspirin, intravenous aspirin, and health care utilization in the previous year.

Discontinuation period was measured for individuals in episodic use group who had stopped using aspirin at least 1 year before index date.

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; NA, not applicable. Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, and familial adenomatous polyposis. Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, familial adenomatous polyposis, high-dose aspirin, intravenous aspirin, and health care utilization in the previous year. Discontinuation period was measured for individuals in episodic use group who had stopped using aspirin at least 1 year before index date.

Aspirin Use and Different CRC Stages

For all study participants, low-dose aspirin use was associated with lower risk of stage II, III, and IV CRC, and no association was observed for stage 0 or I CRC (Table 4). Among patients who initiated aspirin use before age 60 years, a range of 25% to 40% lower CRC risk was observed across all stages of CRC in both long-term current and episodic low-dose aspirin use groups (Table 4).
Table 4.

Association Between Low Dose Aspirin Use and Staging of CRC

CharacteristicNo. (%)Odds ratio (95% CI)
CRC case groupControl groupCrudeAdjustedaAdjustedb
Full study cohort
Stage 0596423 856NANANA
Long-term current aspirin use287 (4.8)1034 (4.3)1.24 (1.08-1.42)0.97 (0.83-1.12)0.94 (0.80-1.09)
Episodic aspirin use2369 (39.7)8077 (33.9)1.31 (1.24-1.39)0.98 (0.91-1.05)0.97 (0.90-1.04)
Nonuse3308 (55.5)14 745 (61.8)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage I994139 764
Long-term current aspirin use537 (5.4)1698 (4.3)1.39 (1.26-1.54)1.05 (0.94-1.17)1 (0.90-1.12)
Episodic aspirin use3918 (39.4)13 951 (35.1)1.24 (1.18-1.30)0.94 (0.89-0.99)0.91 (0.86-0.96)
Nonuse5486 (55.2)24 115 (60.6)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage II13 30553 220
Long-term current aspirin use544 (4.1)2304 (4.3)0.94 (0.86-1.04)0.86 (0.78-0.95)0.82 (0.74-0.92)
Episodic aspirin use4883 (36.7)19 406 (36.5)1.01 (0.97-1.05)0.85 (0.81-0.89)0.81 (0.78-0.85)
Nonuse7878 (59.2)31 510 (59.2)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage III16 36565 460
Long-term current aspirin use674 (4.1)2736 (4.2)1 (0.91-1.09)0.91 (0.83-1.00)0.88 (0.80-0.97)
Episodic aspirin use5986 (36.6)23 476 (35.9)1.03 (0.99-1.07)0.88 (0.85-0.92)0.86 (0.82-0.89)
Nonuse9705 (59.3)39 248 (60.0)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage IV12 10048 400
Long-term current aspirin use443 (3.7)2091 (4.3)0.83 (0.74-0.92)0.75 (0.67-0.84)0.72 (0.64-0.81)
Episodic aspirin use4310 (35.6)17 541 (36.2)0.96 (0.92-1.00)0.83 (0.79-0.87)0.80 (0.76-0.84)
Nonuse7347 (60.7)28 768 (59.4)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Subcohort with individuals aged 40-59 y
Stage 020548216
Long-term current aspirin use80 (3.9)357 (4.3)0.86 (0.67-1.11)0.63 (0.48-0.83)0.60 (0.46-0.79)
Episodic aspirin use719 (35.0)3031 (36.9)0.91 (0.82-1.01)0.64 (0.57-0.73)0.65 (0.57-0.73)
Nonuse1255 (61.1)4828 (58.8)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage I278911 156
Long-term current aspirin use129 (4.6)448 (4.0)1.14 (0.93-1.40)0.80 (0.64-1.00)0.75 (0.60-0.93)
Episodic aspirin use1008 (36.1)4176 (37.4)0.95 (0.87-1.04)0.67 (0.60-0.74)0.64 (0.58-0.71)
Nonuse1652 (59.2)6532 (58.6)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage II264810 592
Long-term current aspirin use94 (3.5)419 (4.0)0.83 (0.66-1.04)0.67 (0.53-0.86)0.63 (0.49-0.81)
Episodic aspirin use845 (31.9)3855 (36.4)0.81 (0.74-0.89)0.66 (0.60-0.74)0.63 (0.56-0.70)
Nonuse1709 (64.5)6318 (59.6)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage III391715 668
Long-term current aspirin use140 (3.6)605 (3.9)0.83 (0.68-1.00)0.69 (0.56-0.84)0.7 (0.57-0.86)
Episodic aspirin use1213 (31.0)5837 (37.3)0.74 (0.69-0.80)0.61 (0.56-0.67)0.6 (0.55-0.65)
Nonuse2564 (65.5)9226 (58.9)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Stage IV24839932
Long-term current aspirin use78 (3.1)363 (3.7)0.78 (0.61-1.00)0.63 (0.48-0.83)0.63 (0.48-0.84)
Episodic aspirin use795 (32.0)3696 (37.2)0.78 (0.71-0.86)0.65 (0.58-0.73)0.65 (0.58-0.72)
Nonuse1610 (64.8)5873 (59.1)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; NA, not applicable.

Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, familial adenomatous polyposis, high-dose aspirin, intravenous aspirin, and health care utilization in the previous year.

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; NA, not applicable. Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, and familial adenomatous polyposis. Adjusted for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 blocker, antidiabetic agents, statin, antihypertensive agents, gastrointestinal cholinergic antagonist, gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, colonoscopy, familial adenomatous polyposis, high-dose aspirin, intravenous aspirin, and health care utilization in the previous year.

Sensitivity Analysis

Excluding those who were exposed to NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors 3 years prior to index date resulted in 10 124 individuals in the CRC case group and 40 496 individuals in the control group. A similar association between long-term current and episodic low-dose aspirin use and lower CRC risk as the full study cohort were observed (long-term current: adjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.02; episodic: adjusted OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84). Lower CRC risk was associated with long-term current low-dose aspirin use in CRC stage II and higher, with the lowest risk observed for stage IV (adjusted OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00). Strengths of association between episodic low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk were similar to what was observed in the main analysis (eTable in the Supplement).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date, with 79 095 individuals with CRC, to evaluate the association between low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk at population level. Long-term current and episodic low-dose aspirin use was associated with 11% and 12% lower CRC risk, respectively. Among patients initiating low-dose aspirin at the age of 40 to 59 years, long-term current and episodic low-dose aspirin use were associated with a 31% and 36% lower CRC risk, respectively. For different CRC stages, long-term current and episodic low-dose aspirin use were associated with lower risks of CRC among those who initiated low-dose aspirin between age 40 to 59 years. Aspirin use and CRC has been evaluated in randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up of more than 10 years. Among women aged 45 years or older who were randomized to 100 mg aspirin every other day, a 20% CRC risk reduction after 18 years was observed.[9,11] Such risk reduction effect was not observed in men, who were randomized to 325 mg every other day for 5 years[2]; however, decreasing CRC risk was implied in the 5-year and 12-year follow up.[2,5] On the other hand, aspirin use and lower CRC risk has been shown consistently in observational studies. Reported strengths of association stratified by aspirin recency, duration, and dose strengths are not consistent. In the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), registered nurses aged 30 to 55 years who took 2 tablets of 325 mg aspirin or equivalent doses per week experienced a greater than 30% lower CRC risk after 20 years of follow-up[3,8]; smaller relative risks were observed in the 8-year follow up in NHS and the 10-year follow up from Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort in an older population.[10] A 32-year follow-up report incorporating data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study and NHS indicated that regular aspirin use was associated with approximately 20% lower CRC risk.[16] The studies demonstrated that the magnitude of the association between aspirin use and lower CRC risk increased with longer duration and larger doses.[3,8,16] However, our findings did not support a correlation between longer low-dose aspirin use and lower CRC risk (Table 3). A nested case-control study using UK Clinical Practice Research Data Link did not show an association between CRC risk in individuals who currently or formerly used aspirin when compared with those who did not; however, 40% lower CRC risk was observed in the 300-mg tablet group.[7] Recent nested case-control studies using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) from the UK and electronic health records from Spain demonstrated a 20% or greater lower CRC risk associated with low-dose aspirin use.[12,22] In the THIN study, the magnitude of lower CRC risk appeared to be more prominent among recent and past users than among current users, and the risk of lower stage CRC (ie, Dukes A) was not found to be associated with aspirin, which are similar to our findings.[12] The observation that episodic aspirin use was associated with the same level of lower CRC risk as that for long-term aspirin use was intriguing, and it could be due to the stringent operational definition of long-term current use in this study, resulting in substantial number of individuals with a level of aspirin use that would be associated with lower CRC risk included in the episodic use group. A meta-analysis demonstrated a 27% lower CRC risk from 45 observational studies and a 14% lower risk from 11 nested case-control studies; low-dose aspirin (ie, 75 to 100 mg per day) was associated with a 10% lower CRC risk, which is similar to our finding.[23] Whether discontinuation of low-dose aspirin would immediately obviate any association with CRC incidence has not been adequately addressed in the literature, and our findings on the length of low-dose aspirin discontinuation before CRC were inconclusive. Capturing aspirin use in health insurance claims is a unique strength of the study. In 2 cohort studies using sampled NHI data from Taiwan, low-dose aspirin use was found to be associated with approximately 50% lower CRC risk among the general population[13] and among a population with diabetes.[14] A nested case-control study that used sampled NHI data demonstrated similar findings (adjusted OR, 0.94) for lower CRC risk as reported in our study.[15] The major strengths of our study compared with previous studies from Taiwan included the much larger study size, derived from the full population; longer follow-up; use of TCR for cancer ascertainment; CRC stage–specific analysis; and a range of sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the findings. We identified all eligible individuals with low-dose aspirin use from 2002 through 2010 in Taiwan and all CRC cases among them through 2015. Optimal methods were used to identify appropriate comparators. Working with the full NHI data necessitated a sampling scheme to identify individuals who were unexposed rather than individually matching members of the unexposed group to individuals with aspirin use. The nested case-control analysis allowed for efficient evaluation of the role of recency and duration of prior aspirin use. A biologic basis for decreased tumor formation with aspirin initiation at younger age has been proposed.[24] Although a modest level of lower CRC risk was observed in our study cohort, we found that in the subcohort in which low-dose aspirin was initiated among patients at age 40 to 59 years, the magnitude of the association with lower CRC risk was larger. This would be consistent with the US Preventive Service Task Force recommendation of added benefit for CRC risk reduction in a younger population.[25]

Limitations

This study has limitations. Given that the NHI data are insurance claims, we were unable to ascertain smoking and alcohol consumption as well as body mass index of participants, all of which are potential confounders that have been evaluated in other studies.[3,8,10,12,16,22] The CRC screening program in Taiwan only offers fecal occult blood tests for those aged 50 to 75 years, and the test results are not linked to NHI for research. Despite the high prevalence of low-dose aspirin use in Taiwan, adherence has been low, with only 4.2% of those who initiate low-dose aspirin having long-term use.

Conclusions

In this study, low-dose aspirin use was associated with an 11% lower CRC risk in an East Asian population, and this association was larger when low-dose aspirin use started before age 60 years. At least 3 years of low-dose aspirin use was associated with a 30% lower CRC risk.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Diet and cancer prevention: the concerted action polyp prevention (CAPP) studies.

Authors:  J Burn; P D Chapman; D T Bishop; J Mathers
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.297

2.  Aspirin use and colorectal cancer: post-trial follow-up data from the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  T Stürmer; R J Glynn; I M Lee; J E Manson; J E Buring; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Reduced incidence of colorectal adenoma among long-term users of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a pooled analysis of published studies and a new population-based study.

Authors:  L A García Rodríguez; C Huerta-Alvarez
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 4.  The Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, Screening, and Management.

Authors:  Elias F Onyoh; Wen-Feng Hsu; Li-Chun Chang; Yi-Chia Lee; Ming-Shiang Wu; Han-Mo Chiu
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-07-10

5.  Reduced risk of colorectal cancer among long-term users of aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

Authors:  L A García-Rodríguez; C Huerta-Alvarez
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  The association between low-dose aspirin use and the incidence of colorectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  W-K Huang; M-J Chiou; K-H Yu; Y-C Lin; T-S Yang; J-S Chen; C-F Kuo; L-C See
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Low-dose aspirin and incidence of colorectal tumors in a randomized trial.

Authors:  P H Gann; J E Manson; R J Glynn; J E Buring; C H Hennekens
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-08-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in women.

Authors:  E Giovannucci; K M Egan; D J Hunter; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Aspirin and the risk of colorectal and other digestive tract cancers: an updated meta-analysis through 2019.

Authors:  C Bosetti; C Santucci; S Gallus; M Martinetti; C La Vecchia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Data resource profile: the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).

Authors:  Liang-Yu Lin; Charlotte Warren-Gash; Liam Smeeth; Pau-Chung Chen
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2018-12-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of Platelet Count and New Cancer Diagnosis Over a 10-Year Period.

Authors:  Vasily Giannakeas; Joanne Kotsopoulos; Matthew C Cheung; Laura Rosella; Jennifer D Brooks; Lorraine Lipscombe; Mohammad R Akbari; Peter C Austin; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04

2.  Anticoagulant drugs with or without proton pump inhibitor and colorectal cancer risk: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Pei-Huan Ho; Hung-Chun Hsiao; Chun-Wei Chen; Hui-Ming Chen; Siew-Na Lim; Chau-Ting Yeh; Chia-Jung Kuo; Wey-Ran Lin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.847

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.