Literature DB >> 3321101

The role of reward pathways in the development of drug dependence.

R A Wise1.   

Abstract

In commenting on the discovery of "opiate" receptors, Goldstein (1976) said: "It seemed unlikely, a priori, that such highly stereospecific receptors should have been developed by nature to interact with alkaloids from the opium poppy" (p. 1081). Endogenous opioid peptides and opioid receptor systems have now been identified in invertebrates that are unlikely to have had ancestors exposed to opium poppies (Kavaliers et al., 1983; Kream et al., 1980; Leung and Stefano, 1984; Stefano et al., 1980). Moreover, endogenous opioids play a role in stress-induced feeding in the slug (Kavaliers and Hirst, 1986) just as they play a role in stress-induced feeding in rodents (Lowy et al., 1980; Morley and Levine, 1980). If we are to understand the actions of opiates and other drugs of abuse we must understand them in terms of their abilities to interact with neural systems that evolved in the service of primitive biological functions, long before any serious incidence of addiction itself. The most primitive axes of the biological substrates of behavior are the axes of approach and withdrawal. Addictive drugs appear to be able to activate the mechanisms of approach, which is termed "positive reinforcement" and to inhibit the mechanisms of withdrawal, which is termed "negative reinforcement." Anatomically distinct sets of pathways have evolved to serve these two forms of reward. Activation of the medial forebrain bundle and associated structures serves positive reinforcement and induces forward locomotion. Approach and forward locomotion are the unconditioned responses to positive reinforcing stimuli such as food and sex partners, and approach to environmental objects and positive reinforcement is induced by electrical stimulation of this structure. The locomotor stimulating effects and the positive reinforcing effects of opiates and psychomotor stimulants result from their activation of this mechanism; stimulants activate the mechanism at the level of dopaminergic synapses of the nucleus accumbens, frontal cortex, and perhaps other forebrain structures, while opiates activate the system at two points: at the level of the dopaminergic synapse and at the level of the afferents to the dopaminergic cell bodies. Ethanol, nicotine, caffeine and phencyclidine stimulate both locomotor activity and dopamine turnover, but their sites of interaction with reward pathways have not yet been identified. Benzodiazepines and barbiturates stimulate locomotor activity without stimulating dopamine turnover; they may interact with reward pathways at a synapse efferent to the dopaminergic link in the pathways.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3321101     DOI: 10.1016/0163-7258(87)90108-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   12.310


  99 in total

Review 1.  The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings.

Authors:  Yavin Shaham; Uri Shalev; Lin Lu; Harriet de Wit; Jane Stewart
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-10-26       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Distribution of amygdala input to the nucleus accumbens septi: an electrophysiological investigation.

Authors:  C W Callaway; R L Hakan; S J Henriksen
Journal:  J Neural Transm Gen Sect       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Motivational Processes Underlying Substance Abuse Disorder.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Christopher P King; Carrie R Ferrario
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

Review 4.  The ventral pallidum: Subregion-specific functional anatomy and roles in motivated behaviors.

Authors:  David H Root; Roberto I Melendez; Laszlo Zaborszky; T Celeste Napier
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 5.  Complex interactions between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli reveal multiple roles for nicotine in reinforcement.

Authors:  Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of d-fenfluramine and metergoline on responding for conditioned reward and the response potentiating effect of nucleus accumbens d-amphetamine.

Authors:  P J Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Steady-state methadone blocks cocaine seeking and cocaine-induced gene expression alterations in the rat brain.

Authors:  Francesco Leri; Yan Zhou; Benjamin Goddard; AnneMarie Levy; Derek Jacklin; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 8.  Alterations in the levels of heterotrimeric G protein subunits induced by psychostimulants, opiates, barbiturates, and ethanol: Implications for drug dependence, tolerance, and withdrawal.

Authors:  Nobue Kitanaka; Junichi Kitanaka; F Scott Hall; Tomohiro Tatsuta; Yoshio Morita; Motohiko Takemura; Xiao-Bing Wang; George R Uhl
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.562

9.  Withdrawal from chronic amphetamine elevates baseline intracranial self-stimulation thresholds.

Authors:  R A Wise; E Munn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Intravenous morphine self-administration by rats with low versus high saccharin preferences.

Authors:  B A Gosnell; K E Lane; S M Bell; D D Krahn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.