Literature DB >> 33210345

Patient Navigation to Improve Early Access to Supportive Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer in Resource-Limited Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis1, Yanin Chavarri-Guerra2, Wendy Alicia Ramos-Lopez1, Jacqueline Alcalde-Castro2, Alfredo Covarrubias-Gomez3, África Navarro-Lara4, Paulina Quiroz-Friedman5, Sofía Sánchez-Román5, Natasha Alcocer-Castillejos5, José Carlos Aguilar-Velazco1, Alexandra Bukowski6, Juan Alberto Chávarri-Maldonado7, Sergio Contreras-Garduño1, Lindsay Krush6, Itoro Inoyo6, Andrea Medina-Campos4, María Luisa Moreno-García1, Viridiana Perez-Montessoro1, María T Bourlon2, Roberto de la Peña-Lopez2, Héctor de la Mora-Molina2, Eucario León-Rodriguez2, Alejandro Mohar8, Paul E Goss9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The early integration of supportive care in oncology improves patient-centered outcomes. However, data are lacking regarding how to achieve this in resource-limited settings. We studied whether patient navigation increased access to multidisciplinary supportive care among Mexican patients with advanced cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between August 2017 and April 2018 at a public hospital in Mexico City. Patients aged ≥18 years with metastatic tumors ≤6 weeks from diagnosis were randomized (1:1) to a patient navigation intervention or usual care. Patients randomized to patient navigation received personalized supportive care from a navigator and a multidisciplinary team. Patients randomized to usual care obtained supportive care referrals from treating oncologists. The primary outcome was the implementation of supportive care interventions at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included advance directive completion, supportive care needs, and quality of life.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients were randomized: 67 to patient navigation and 67 to usual care. Supportive care interventions were provided to 74% of patients in the patient navigation arm versus 24% in usual care (difference 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.62; p < .0001). In the patient navigation arm, 48% of eligible patients completed advance directives, compared with 0% in usual care (p < .0001). At 12 weeks, patients randomized to patient navigation had less moderate/severe pain (10% vs. 33%; difference 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.38; p = .006), without differences in quality of life between arms.
CONCLUSION: Patient navigation improves access to early supportive care, advance care planning, and pain for patients with advanced cancer in resource-limited settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The early implementation of supportive care in oncology is recommended by international guidelines, but this might be difficult to achieve in resource-limited settings. This randomized clinical trial including 134 Mexican patients with advanced cancer demonstrates that a multidisciplinary patient navigation intervention can improve the early access to supportive and palliative care interventions, increase advance care planning, and reduce symptoms compared with usual oncologist-guided care alone. These results demonstrate that patient navigation represents a potentially useful solution to achieve the adequate implementation of supportive and palliative care in resource-limited settings globally.
© 2020 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance directives; Developing countries; Health resources; Palliative care; Patient navigation; Symptom assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33210345      PMCID: PMC7873328          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159            Impact factor:   5.837


  25 in total

1.  The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brittany M Bernardo; Xiaochen Zhang; Chloe M Beverly Hery; Rachel J Meadows; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Markus W Haun; Stephanie Estel; Gerta Rücker; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Matthias Villalobos; Michael Thomas; Mechthild Hartmann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-12

3.  Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Concurrent Palliative Oncology Care: Patient Outcomes in the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Marie A Bakitas; Tor D Tosteson; Zhigang Li; Kathleen D Lyons; Jay G Hull; Zhongze Li; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Jennifer Frost; Konstantin H Dragnev; Mark T Hegel; Andres Azuero; Tim A Ahles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Integrated outpatient palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jessica J Fulton; Thomas W LeBlanc; Toni M Cutson; Kathryn N Porter Starr; Arif Kamal; Katherine Ramos; Caroline E Freiermuth; Jennifer R McDuffie; Andrzej Kosinski; Soheir Adam; Avishek Nagi; John W Williams
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  [Validation of the Spanish version of the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with oncological pain].

Authors:  Xavier Badia; Clemente Muriel; Alfredo Gracia; Juan Manuel Núñez-Olarte; Núria Perulero; Rafael Gálvez; Joan Carulla; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 1.725

6.  Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening.

Authors:  David Cella; Elizabeth A Hahn; Kelly Dineen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Potential Role of Patient Navigation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries for Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra Bukowski; Yanin Chávarri-Guerra; Paul E Goss
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Symptom Assessment and Early Access to Supportive and Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors in Mexico.

Authors:  Mirza Jacqueline Alcalde-Castro; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Alfredo Covarrubias-Gómez; Sofía Sánchez-Román; Paulina Quiróz-Friedman; África Navarro-Lara; Wendy Alicia Ramos-Lopez; María Luisa Moreno-García; Sergio Contreras-Garduño; Viridiana Perez-Montessoro; Paul E Goss; Yanin Chávarri-Guerra
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 9.  Effect of specialist palliative care services on quality of life in adults with advanced incurable illness in hospital, hospice, or community settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Gaertner; Waldemar Siemens; Joerg J Meerpohl; Gerd Antes; Cornelia Meffert; Carola Xander; Stephanie Stock; Dirk Mueller; Guido Schwarzer; Gerhild Becker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-07-04

10.  Palliative Care in the Global Setting: ASCO Resource-Stratified Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Hibah Osman; Sudip Shrestha; Sarah Temin; Zipporah V Ali; Rumalie A Corvera; Henry D Ddungu; Liliana De Lima; Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz; Frank D Ferris; Nahla Gafer; Harmala K Gupta; Susan Horton; Graciela Jacob; Ruinuo Jia; Frank L Lu; Daniela Mosoiu; Christina Puchalski; Carole Seigel; Olaitan Soyannwo; James F Cleary
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Increasing access to psychosocial care for adolescents and young adults with cancer by integrating targeted navigation services.

Authors:  Rina S Fox; Brynn Fowler; Jennifer Bourneuf Carrera; Jennifer Reichek; Stacy D Sanford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 2.  Coordination Models for Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Buhle Lubuzo; Khumbulani W Hlongwana; Mbuzeleni Hlongwa; Themba G Ginindza
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.