Literature DB >> 33210289

M-EA (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin) and EMA-CO (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin / cyclophosphamide, vincristine) regimens as first-line treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Kam Singh1, Sarah Gillett1, Jane Ireson1, Anne Hills1, John A Tidy1, Robert E Coleman1, Barry W Hancock1, Matthew C Winter1.   

Abstract

High-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is highly chemosensitive with an excellent prognosis with treatment. Historically in the United Kingdom, the high-risk regimens used have been M-EA (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin) (Sheffield) and EMA-CO (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin / cyclophosphamide, vincristine) (Charing Cross, London) with prior published data suggesting no difference in survival between these. Our Sheffield treatment policy changed in 2014, switching from M-EA to EMA-CO, aiming to reduce time in hospital, and harmonise UK practice. We aimed to report the toxicities, response rates and survival outcomes for 79 patients with high-risk GTN treated in the first-line setting with either M-EA (n = 59) or EMA-CO (n = 20) from 1998 to 2018. Median duration of treatment was similar (M-EA, 17.3 weeks (IQR 13.9-22.6) and 17.6 weeks (IQR 13.4-20.7) with EMA-CO. For M-EA, overall human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) complete response (CR) rate was 84.7% (n = 50/59). Two patients died of drug-resistant disease after several lines of multiagent chemotherapy; overall survival is 96.6% (median follow-up 10.4 years). For EMA-CO, overall hCG CR rate was 70%, overall survival is 100% (median follow-up 4 years). In our experience, patients treated with EMA-CO experienced an apparent increased incidence of neutropenia, non-neutropenic Grade 3-4 infection, peripheral neuropathy and more treatment delays and nights in hospital. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, after both EMA and CO arms, titrated to baseline neutrophil count improved the toxicity profile. Both treatment regimens are associated with excellent prognosis; selection of regimen may be further guided by individual patients' personal, social and family circumstances. There is further rationale to explore whether these regimens can be refined, such as 2-weekly EMA, to optimise patient experience and reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy.
© 2020 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMA-CO chemotherapy; M-EA; high-risk GTN; toxicity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33210289     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  2 in total

1.  Efficacies of FAEV and EMA/CO regimens as primary treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Mingliang Ji; Shiyang Jiang; Jun Zhao; Xirun Wan; Fengzhi Feng; Tong Ren; Junjun Yang; Yang Xiang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 2.  Current Evidence on Immunotherapy for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN).

Authors:  Giorgia Mangili; Giulia Sabetta; Raffaella Cioffi; Emanuela Rabaiotti; Giorgio Candotti; Francesca Pella; Massimo Candiani; Alice Bergamini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.