Literature DB >> 33210000

The alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone is related to heart rate during exercise recovery.

Dejana Popovic1, Bojana Popovic2, Stefan Seman3, Dragana Labudovic3, Ratko Lasica1, Djordje G Jakovljevic4,5, Ross Arena6, Svetozar S Damjanovic2.   

Abstract

Alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) is a part of the hormonal stress system with proven cardiovascular effects. Heart rate recovery (HRR) following exercise is strongly correlated to overall fitness and future adverse cardiovascular events. The current study examined the predictive value of alpha-MSH for HRR following exercise testing.Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a treadmill was used to measure HR and oxygen consumption (V̇O2) in 16 elite male wrestlers (W), 21 water polo player (WP) and 20 sedentary subjects (C) matched for age. Plasma levels of alpha-MSH were measured by radioimmunoassay technique in four phases of CPET: 1) 10 min pre-CPET at rest; 2) at the initation of CPET; 3) at peak CPET; and 4) at the third minute of recovery. The WP group had significantly higher HRR compared to than W and C groups, who did not have significantly different values. Significant difference in alpha-MSH measurements and patterns during CPET between groups was not observed (p > 0.05). When combining all three groups, we observed a significant correlation between V̇O2 recovery and alpha-MSH recovery/peak (r = -0.3, p = 0.022). HRR and ΔHRR/peak significantly correlated with alpha-MSH at all four measurment points (r = -0.4; p < 0.01 for all). On multiple regression analysis, which included anthropometric and hormonal measures, the best independent predictor of HRR and ΔHRR/peak was alpha-MSH during recovery (B = -1.0, -0.5; SE = 0.3, 0.1; CI = -1.5 to -0.4, -0.7 to -0.2; p = 0.001 respectively). In conclusion, alpha-MSH measured during exercise recovery holds predictive value for HRR and ΔHRR/peak, suggesting a contributing role to integrative regulation of overall cardiopulmonary performance. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Present study examined the predictive value of alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) for heart rate recovery (HRR) in elite male wrestlers, water polo players and sedentary subjects matched for age. Alpha-MSH measured during exercise recovery holds predictive value for HRR and ΔHRR/peak, suggesting a contributing role to integrative regulation of overall cardiopulmonary performance.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha-MSH; Athletes; Cardiology; Heart rate; Physiology; Recovery of exercise

Year:  2020        PMID: 33210000      PMCID: PMC7658700          DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heliyon        ISSN: 2405-8440


Introduction

The recovery period after exercise, rather than a simple return to preexercise physioglogic status, is a dynamic period in which many physiological changes develop [1]. Exercise is a critical stress that drives beneficial cardiovascular adaptations when performed routinely physical activity, yet it is during the exercise recovery period in which a number of these changes manifest. As such, the exercise recovery period is equally important to assess as the exercise period itself. Due to vagal reactivation during exercise recovery, cardiopulmonary parameters such as arterial blood pressure, heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (V̇O2) and carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2) decline [2]. Dynamics of these variables during the recovery phase is also related to the recovery of energy stores in active muscles [1, 3]. A direct link between blood lactate concentration built up during vigorous exercise and the amount of extra oxygen required to oxidize it, known as O2 debt, was found. The exercise recovery period is a time when this debt is repaid [4]. This, gas exchange pattern after exercise represents cellular respiration coupled by cardiovascular and ventilatory mechanisms [4]. Moreover, HR shortly after exercise cessation has been shown to be have robust prognostic value [5, 6, 7, 8]. Alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) is a peptide posttranslationally processed from proopiomelanocortin (POMC) released during stress and as such is a part of hormonal stress system [9, 10, 11]. Previously, it was considered as a primary regulator of energy balance that inhibits food intake, stimulates energy expenditure and regulates hair and skin pigmentation as well as reproductive and immune function [9, 10]. However, there are studies demonstrating a number of cardiovascular effects of alpha-MSH, including effects on heart rate (HR), systolic cardiac function, antiarrhythmic properties and an intensive dilatative stimulus on the coronary vasculature [9, 10, 11]. Alpha-MSH is also associated with mild sympathetic activation in the cardiovascular system that may influence systolic activity [11, 12]. To our knowledge, there are currently no studies assessing the role of alpha-MSH during exercise recovery period in athletes. As such, the aim of the current study was to examine the responses of alpha-MSH during exercise recovery in athletes and evaluate its’ relation to HR. We hypothesize that alpha-MSH responses during exercise stress test recovery, which is considered as an acute stress model, may have predictive value for HR responses during that period.

Materials and methods

Patients

Present study examined fifty-seven male subjects matched for age, that were already analysed and described in details in our previous work: 1) 21 elite water-polo players (WP); 2) 16 elite wrestlers (W); and 3) 20 sedentary controls (C) [13]. The athletes groups have trained professionaly for more than 10 years and all have been successfully competitive at the international level. Most subjects in the WP group were the members of the national team and all of members in the W group have won medals at the international level. Both WP and W groups performed combined strength and endurance training protocols and were in a period of preparation for internationl competition. The W group had 9 h of wrestling a week, 4 h of power training in the gym in order to improve the explosive strength, and 4 h of high intensity running a week (4 km per training, at HR 85–100% of maximal). The WP group trained 12 h a week in the pool, with at least 2 km of swimming per each training session, and three additional hours a week in the gym where they performed both power and endurance exercises. The C group was not engaged in sporting activities other than at the recreational level (less then 2 h a week for the last 10 years). Detailed personal and family medical history was obtained from all participants. No subjects included in the current study reported any diseases or associated risk factor for disease (e.g., hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, arrhythmias, diabetes, renal diseases, cardiac and other infections, smoking, anabolic steroids usage, etc.), which served as an exclusion criteria due to their influence on cardiopulmonary function. Physical examinations and blood tests showed that all subjects were healthy, normotensive and had a normal resting ECG. The participants underwent the study after giving an informed consent. The local Ethical Committee approved the study.

Anthropometry

Body weight, fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM) were obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis using Tanita weight (phase sensitive multi-frequency analyzer Data Input GmbH 2000, using software Nutri 3, Kowloon, Hong Kong). Body surface area (BSA) was calculated according to the Du Bois and Du Bois formula [14].

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

All the athletes underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on treadmill based with breath by breath ventilatory expired gas analysis according to current guidelines [15]. The protocol consisted of: 1) 3 min rest; 2) 2 min at speed 6 km/h and 2% inclination; 3) 2 min at speed 9 km/h and 2% inclination; 4) an increase of inclination for 2% every 2 min thereafter until criteria for maximal exertion was reached; and 5) 3 min recovery. The protocol was assessed prior to the study by testing 9 randomly chosen subjects in order to optimize the duration of the test (8–12 min), as recommended [14]. All subjects underwent CPET during the same time of the day. Ventilatory expired gas analysis was collected using a Cardiovit CS 200 (Schiller, Baar, Switzerland) throughout the assessment with four phases of primary interest: 1) 10 min before CPET at rest (phase 1); 2) at the beginning of CPET (phase 2); 3) at the peak effort (phase 3); and 4) at the 3rd min of recovery (phase 4). Recovery meant a complete cessation of movement. The following variables were determined from CPET: 1) HR; 2) oxygen uptake (V̇O2); 3) carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2); and 4) minute ventilation (V̇E). Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms were obtained at rest, each minute during exercise, and for at least 3 min during the recovery phase; blood pressure was measured using a standard cuff sphygmomanometer. Knowing that recovery of energy stores and repayment of the O2 deficit is most intensive during the first 30 s after exercise and that complete recovery of energy stores and acid-base status, as well as O2 uptake, may last several minutes and continues even after 24h after high intensity exercise, to achieve pre-exercise levels [1, 3, 4], we arbitarily chose the 3 min recovery timepoint for our analysis (180 s after peak exercise). HRR was considered HR after 3 min of recovery, and ΔHRR/peak the difference between HRR and HR peak. V̇E, V̇O2, and V̇CO2 were acquired breath-by-breath, averaged over 30 s, and printed using rolling averages every 10 s. Peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was calculated as the highest 10-second averaged sample obtained during the last 20 s of testing, and was ≥1.1 in all subjects. V̇E and V̇CO2 values, acquired from the initiation of exercise to peak, were input into spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Corp., Bellevue, WA) to calculate the V̇E/V̇CO2 slope via least squares linear regression (y = mx + b, m = slope).

Blood analysis

Subejcts were free of food and drink (except water) at least 3 h before collecting blood samples in order to avoid hormonal stimulation by needle punctuation. All blood samples were taken from intravenous cannula which was placed into the patient's brachial vein before the test. Blood was taken in five phases of the test, as follows: 1) 20 ml at rest, 10 min before CPET (phase 1); 2) 20 ml at the beginning of CPET (phase 2); 3) 20 ml at the maximal effort (phase 3); and 4) 20 ml at the 3rd min of recovery (phase 4). Samples were centrifuged on 4000 rpm and kept at -80 °C. Alpha-MSH was measured by radioimnunoessey technique (EURIA-α-MSH, Euro-Diagnostica, Malme, Sweden) with a lower sensitivity limit of 3 pmol/l; intra- and interassay coefficient of variation was less then 10%.

Statistics

The results are expressed by classic descriptive parameters such as mean and standard deviation for parametric variables, and median for non-normally distributed variables. To justify application of parametric analytical methods, the analysis of distribution of the observed variables was performed by Kolmogorov - Smirnov test. The differences between the groups were tested by analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA). Kruskal Wallis nonparametric ANOVA followed by the Man Whitney test was used for the variables that deviated from normal distribution. If equal variances were assumed, for post hoc multiple group comparisons was used Bonferroni's method; if equal variances were not assumed it was used Games-Howell method. Correlations between variables were performed by Pearson's correlation test and Spearman's rank correlation test. Multiple regression analysis was used to extricate predictive variables. The difference was considered significant when a p-value was less than 0.05, and highly significant when a p-value was less than 0.01. SPSS software (SPSS version 25, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the study groups are listed in Table 1. The participants did not have significantly different age and arterial blood pressure (p > 0.05). There were significant differences between subjects with respect to body weight, BSA, FM and FFM.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study groups.

ParameterC (n = 20)WP (n = 21)W (n = 16)WP vs W (p)WP vs C (p)W vs C (p)
Age (years)21.4 ± 2.121.4 ± 3.523.2 ± 3.5nsnsns
BW (kg)78.1 ± 7.288.2 ± 8.187.0 ± 1.3ns<0.0010.024
BSA (m2)2.0 ± 0.12.1 ± 0.12.1 ± 0.3ns0.0060.005
FFM (kg)67.9 ± 5.873.9 ± 5.477.8 ± 8.7ns0.015<0.001
FM (kg)10.1 ± 4.314.1 ± 4.99.2 ± 6.50.021nsns
SBP (mm Hg)121 ± 18130 ± 10130 ± 12nsnsns
DBP (mm Hg)79 ± 1282 ± 684 ± 8nsnsns

Resuts are presented as mean ± SD. C – controls, W – wrestlers, WP – water polo players, BW - body weight, BSA - body surface area, FFM - fat free mass, FM - fat mass, SBP - systolic arterial blood pressure, DBP - diastolic arterial blood pressure.

Baseline characteristics of the study groups. Resuts are presented as mean ± SD. C – controls, W – wrestlers, WP – water polo players, BW - body weight, BSA - body surface area, FFM - fat free mass, FM - fat mass, SBP - systolic arterial blood pressure, DBP - diastolic arterial blood pressure. Cardiopulmonary parameters are shown in Table 2 and Figures 1a and 1b. ECG abnormalities during CPET and recovery of CPET were not observed. HR at rest was higher in the C group compared to both WP and W groups, who did not have significantly different values. There was no difference in peak HR between groups (p > 0.05). The WP group had a significantly higher HRR values than the W and C, who did not have significantly different values. WP and C did not have significantly different ΔHRR/peak; both gropus had bigger ΔHRR/peak than W. Peak V̇O2 was the highest in the WP group, and higher in the W group compared to the C group; resting and recovery values were not significantly different in all groups. The V̇E/V̇CO2 slope was not significantly different amongst groups (p > 0.05).
Table 2

Cardiopulmonary parameters.

ParameterC (n = 20)WP (n = 21)W (n = 16)WP vs W (p)WP vs C (p)W vs C (p)
HR rest (min-1)77 ± 1163 ± 1067 ± 13ns<0.0010.017
Peak HR (min-1)194 ± 10192 ± 9189 ± 10nsnsns
HR recovery (min-1)99 ± 11108 ± 1198 ± 120.0090.015ns
ΔHR recovery (min-1)37 ± 1039 ± 529 ± 50.001ns0.011
V̇O2 rest (ml·min-1·kg-1)6.3 ± 2.45.7 ± 2.15.9 ± 2.1nsnsns
PeakV̇O2 (ml·min-1·kg-1)49.5 ± 1.159.3 ± 4.954.1 ± 2.70.024<0.0010.011
V̇O2 recovery (ml·min-1·kg-1)10.7 ± 3.011.4 ± 3.311.1 ± 2.4nsnsns
V̇E/V̇CO2 slope30.6 ± 3.728.5 ± 3.428.6 ± 1.8nsnsns

Results are presented as mean ± SD. C – controls, W – wrestlers, WP – water polo players, HR - heart rate, V̇O2 - oxygen consumption, V̇CO2 - carbon-dixide output, V̇E – minute ventilation.

Figure 1

a and b. The heart rate and oxygen consumption during CPET.

Cardiopulmonary parameters. Results are presented as mean ± SD. C – controls, W – wrestlers, WP – water polo players, HR - heart rate, V̇O2 - oxygen consumption, V̇CO2 - carbon-dixide output, V̇E – minute ventilation. a and b. The heart rate and oxygen consumption during CPET. We did not observe significant differences in alpha-MSH measurements and pattern during CPET between studied groups (p > 0.05) (Figure 2). There were also no significant correlations of alpha-MSH measurements and body composition variables (p > 0.05). In all three groups together, we observed significant correlation between V̇O2 recovery and Δalpha-MSH recovery/peak (r = -0.3, p = 0.022). HRR and ΔHRR/peak significantly correlated with alpha-MSH values observed in every of the four phases of the test (r = -0.4; p < 0.01 for all).
Figure 2

The alpha-MSH during CPET.

The alpha-MSH during CPET. On multiple regression analysis, which included anthropometric and hormonal variables (BW, BSA, FM, FFM, alpha-MSH at all four phases of the test) and combined all three groups, the best independent predictor of HRR and ΔHRR/peak was alpha-MSH recovery (F = 12.0, 13.3; r2 = 0.2, 0.2; B = -1.0, -0.5; SE = 0.3, 0.1; CI = -1.5 - -0.4, -0.7 - -0.2; p = 0.001, 0.001 respectively). Regression curves demonstrating correlation of HRR and ΔHRR/peak with alpha-MSH recovery are shown at Figures 3a and 3b.
Figure 3

a and b. Regression curves demonstrating correlations of HRR and ΔHRR/peak with alpha-MSH recovery in all three groups together.

a and b. Regression curves demonstrating correlations of HRR and ΔHRR/peak with alpha-MSH recovery in all three groups together.

Discussion

Present study revealed that HRR post maximal CPET behaved differently in two groups of athletes and a control population. While the WP group had a higher HRR compared to W and C groups, that latter two demonstrated similar values. Moreover, the WP and C groups had similar ΔHRR/peak, both significantly greater than the W group. However, significant differences in alpha-MSH measurements and pattern during CPET amongst the groups was not observed. The change of alpha-MSH recovery/peak correlated with V̇O2 recovery, yet alpha-MSH recovery was found to be a predictor of HRR and ΔHRR/peak. The recovery phase acutely following exercise has gained increasing attention in recent years [16]. HR during the recovery phase has consistently demonstrates prognostic value in specific patient groups as well as the general population [5, 6, 7, 8, 16]. During recovery from exercise, O2 deficit produced during effort should be repayed as O2 debt, keeping HR and V̇E higher than baseline resting values for a period of time [17]. The recovery kinetics of HR, a substantial part of V̇O2, are affected by physical conditioning, body position, type of exercise, hypoxia, metabolic disorders, vascular volume or peripheral resistance, ventricular dysfunction, blood volume, sinus node function and medications [16]. The abundance of HRR covariates implies complexity of regulatory mechanisms involved in the physiology of exercise recovery, supporting the prognostic importance of this singular and easily obtainable measure. The endocrine system plays a dominant regulatory role during times of stress, which includes exercise stress testing used as a laboratory acute stress model [18]. During stress system activation, pituitary POMC is secreted, and consequently its’ derivate alpha-MSH [11]. POMC secretion is altered during chronic stress, with certain variability depending on age, gender, race, genetic factors, nutrition, psychological factors, type of stress, and physical activity [13]. Biological effects of stress hormones are still not completely elucidated, although their role in complex interrelation of endocrine, immune, metabolic, neurological and cardiovascular system during times of stress is postulated [13]. Their actions lead to adaptation to stress, which can be analyzed in different groups of athletes who present with differing chronic physical stress adaptive models [13]. The adaptive changes in athletes move in the direction of whole body ability improvement, but these changes are different in different sport disciplines and levels of fitness, depending on the varying strength and endurance components of training for a specific sport [19]. In the present study, as expected, the control group and two different athletic chronic stress models, WP and W, demonstrated different cardiopulmonary adaptive changes. Athletes had higher peak V̇O2; WP demonstrated the highest level. Nonetheless, this study demonstrated that HRR behaved differently in two groups of athletes and control population, suggesting its' distinctive role in chronic stress exposure. The differences in cardiopulmonary parameters between study groups are adaptive response to metabolic demands with an important hormonal regulatory role. Stress axis activation is dependent on duration, type and intensity of training [13, 20]. This was explained as protective mechanism in conditions of repeated stress in order to keep the reserves of the body from exhaustion. Alpha-MSH has been shown to have effects on sympathetic activation in the cardiovascular system that may influence systolic activity, HR, blood pressure and physiologic responses of the coronary vasculature [10, 12], thus potentially playing a role during both acute and chronic physical stress. Animal studies demonstrate an increase in alpha-MSH after exercise [21, 22]. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that stress axis activation and alpha-MSH secretion during acute physical stress may differ in three groups of subjects studied, with distinctive patterns of chronic stress and consequent adaptive changes. However, our hypothesis was not confirmed as all examined groups had similar patterns of alpha-MSH during CPET. On the other hand, a significant correlation was found between V̇O2 recovery and the change of alpha-MSH during recovery of exercise, suggesting its' possible role in energy homeostasis during this period in all groups. The strong predictive value of alpha-MSH during the recovery phase for HRR and ΔHRR/peak are indicative of its important physiological role. Previous studies demonstreted tachycardic effects of alpha-MSH due to increased sympathetic and attenuated parasymphatetic activity, and by this mechanism indirectly affecting energy expenditure [23]. Modulation of autonomic nervous system tone attributed to alpha-MSH may be have an enormously important effect, since disorders of the autonomic nervous system is an underlying pathophysiological mechanism for major cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure [24]. Indeed, circulating alpha-MSH was found to be increased in patients with chronic heart failure [24]. Moreover, some studies demonstrate that chronic melanocortin activation may provide cardioprotective regulation by enhancing vagal nerve activity and baroreflex control of HR [24, 25]. Summarizing the observations from this study, it is noticeable that these findings potentially pave the way to quantify stress and its role in cardiovascular regulation and overall health, which could lead to the development of the novel hormonal therapeutic approaches to prevent or mitigate disease development or progression, by stress reduction. The exact knowledge of hormonal regulation of stress effects, as well as objective measurement of these effects, should enable reduction of stress by hormonal manipulation.

Limitations

It should be noted that our data are preliminary and further investigations of this topic in different populations and in a higher number of participants are needed. Our hypothesis should be tested on more diverse stress adaptive models.

Conclusion

Alpha-MSH during recovery holds predictive value for HRR and ΔHRR/peak, suggesting a contributing role to the integrative regulation of overall cardiopulmonary performance. This finding could lead to the development of the novel hormonal therapeutic approaches to reduce stress and prevent or mitigate disease.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

D. Popovic Conceived and designed the experiments; Wrote the paper. B. Popovic, S. Seman and D. Labudovic: Performed the experiments. R. Lasica: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data. D. Jakovljevic, R. Arena and S. Damjanovic: Analyzed and interpreted the data.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of interests statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.
  24 in total

1.  Acute and chronic effects of exercise on tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoids.

Authors:  M Duclos; C Gouarne; D Bonnemaison
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-10-25

Review 2.  ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  β-Endorphin antagonizes the effects of α-MSH on food intake and body weight.

Authors:  Roxanne Dutia; Kana Meece; Shveta Dighe; Andrea J Kim; Sharon L Wardlaw
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormone Response to Exercise, Twitching, Epinephrine Injection, Substance P Injection, and Prostaglandin-F Administration in Mares.

Authors:  Donald L Thompson; Nicole Arana Valencia; Neely L Walker; Erin L Oberhaus
Journal:  J Equine Vet Sci       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.583

5.  Heart Rate Recovery 10 Seconds After Cessation of Exercise Predicts Death.

Authors:  Yordi J van de Vegte; Pim van der Harst; Niek Verweij
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Oxygen consumption and carbon-dioxide recovery kinetics in the prediction of coronary artery disease severity and outcome.

Authors:  Dejana Popovic; Dejana Martic; Tea Djordjevic; Vesna Pesic; Marco Guazzi; Jonathan Myers; Reza Mohebi; Ross Arena
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 7.  Chemo- and ergoreflexes in health, disease and ageing.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Darrel P Francis; Mathias Rauchhaus; Karl Werdan; Massimo F Piepoli
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Genetic and pharmacological mouse models of chronic melanocortin activation show enhanced baroreflex control of heart rate.

Authors:  Petteri Rinne; Janne Harjunpää; Satu Mäkelä; Eriika Savontaus
Journal:  Regul Pept       Date:  2013-01-14

9.  Each-step activation of oxidative phosphorylation is necessary to explain muscle metabolic kinetic responses to exercise and recovery in humans.

Authors:  Bernard Korzeniewski; Harry B Rossiter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Heart Rate Recovery and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Shanhu Qiu; Xue Cai; Zilin Sun; Ling Li; Martina Zuegel; Juergen Michael Steinacker; Uwe Schumann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.