| Literature DB >> 33209810 |
N Divyalalitha1, Sunayana Manipal1, V V Bharatwaj1, D Prabu1.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of reinforced oral health awareness program to the children, parents and Anganwadi workers on the oral hygiene and oral health status of the children in Anganwadi centers functioning under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) services all around Chennai city, Tamil Nadu, India.Entities:
Keywords: Child; health education; oral health; oral hygiene; parents; prevalence
Year: 2020 PMID: 33209810 PMCID: PMC7652184 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_239_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Figure 1Distribution of study participants based on three groups
Figure 2Mean debris scores of study participants based on groups
One-way ANOVA comparing mean debris scores of the study population in different time periods
| Debris scores | Groups | Mean | SD | SE | 95% CI for mean | Minimum | Maximum | F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||||||
| Baseline | Group A | 192 | 18.53 | 10.642 | 0.768 | 17.02 | 20.05 | 0 | 40 | 1.030 | 0.358 |
| Group B | 152 | 19.35 | 10.007 | 0.812 | 17.75 | 20.95 | 2 | 40 | |||
| Group C | 167 | 19.93 | 6.470 | 0.501 | 18.94 | 20.92 | 4 | 40 | |||
| Total | 511 | 19.23 | 9.276 | 0.410 | 18.42 | 20.04 | 0 | 40 | |||
| 3 weeks | Group A | 192 | 7.70 | 3.996 | 0.288 | 7.13 | 8.27 | 0 | 22 | 9.111 | 0.0005** |
| Group B | 152 | 7.61 | 3.399 | 0.276 | 7.06 | 8.15 | 0 | 14 | |||
| Group C | 167 | 9.04 | 2.729 | 0.211 | 8.62 | 9.46 | 2 | 14 | |||
| Total | 511 | 8.11 | 3.500 | 0.155 | 7.81 | 8.41 | 0 | 22 | |||
| Re-intervention | Group A | 192 | 4.84 | 2.608 | 0.188 | 4.47 | 5.22 | 0 | 16 | 0.865 | 0.422 |
| Group B | 152 | 4.61 | 2.447 | 0.198 | 4.21 | 5.00 | 0 | 10 | |||
| Group C | 167 | 4.95 | 2.085 | 0.161 | 4.63 | 5.27 | 0 | 8 | |||
| Total | 511 | 4.81 | 2.399 | 0.106 | 4.60 | 5.02 | 0 | 16 | |||
| Final (1 year) | Group A | 192 | 2.43 | 1.855 | 0.134 | 2.16 | 2.69 | 0 | 8 | 0.1.8 | 0.898 |
| Group B | 152 | 2.39 | 1.562 | 0.127 | 2.14 | 2.65 | 0 | 8 | |||
| Group C | 167 | 2.48 | 1.443 | 0.112 | 2.26 | 2.70 | 0 | 8 | |||
| Total | 511 | 2.43 | 1.640 | 0.073 | 2.29 | 2.58 | 0 | 8 | |||
*Significant P<0.05, **Highly significant P<0.001. CI: Confidence interval, SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error
Figure 3Prevalence of decayed, missing, filled teeth in the study participants before and after intervention
Fisher’s exact test comparing the baseline and 1 year prevalence of dental diseases in the study participants
| Dental diseases | Status | Baseline | 1 year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental caries | Present | 245 (47.9) | 115 (22.5) | 0.0005** |
| Absent | 266 (52.1) | 396 (77.5) | ||
| Filled with caries | Present | 1 (99.8) | 2 (0.4) | 0.563 |
| Absent | 510 (0.2) | 509 (99.6) | ||
| Filled with no caries | Present | 2 (0.4) | 170 (33.3) | 0.0000** |
| Absent | 509 (99.6) | 341 (66.7) | ||
| Missing teeth | Present | 65 (12.7) | 21 (4.1) | 0.0000** |
| Absent | 446 (87.3) | 490 (95.9) | ||
| Gingival bleeding | Present | 281 (55) | 132 (25.8) | 0.0005** |
| Absent | 230 (45) | 379 (74.2) | ||
| Dental fluorosis | Present | 2 (0.4) | 2 (0.4) | 1.000 |
| Absent | 509 (99.6) | 509 (99.6) | ||
| Dental Erosion | Present | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 0.317 |
| Absent | 510 (99.8) | 511 (100) | ||
| Trauma | Present | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.2) | 1.000 |
| Absent | 510 (99.8) | 510 (99.8) | ||
| Oral mucosal lesion | Present | 9 (1.8) | 0 (0) | 0.002** |
| Absent | 502 (98.2) | 511 (100) |
*Significant P<0.05, **Highly significant P<0.001