| Literature DB >> 33209776 |
Chubalemla Longkumer1, Chandan Kr Nath1, Bhupen Barman2, Alice Abraham Ruram1, Vizovonuo Visi3, M D Yasir1, Merrycka Agitok Sangma4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There has been a lot of confusion in management of apparently healthy individuals whose post prandial plasma glucose levels were lower than fasting levels. It has been observed that many clinicians do send for repeat tests to rule out analytical error since there is common knowledge that post prandial glucose should be higher than fasting glucose level. Blood glucose level is regulated by a fully integrated mechanism with complex interplay of hormones and enzymes on metabolic pathways. Increase or decrease of thyroid hormones can break this equilibrium leading to alterations of carbohydrate metabolism. The objective for this study was to look for subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) and insulin resistance (IR) in Idiopathic Post prandial glucose lowering and the correlation between thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) with IR in them.Entities:
Keywords: Idiopathic post prandial glucose lowering; insulin resistance; subclinical hypothyroidism; thyroid stimulating hormone
Year: 2020 PMID: 33209776 PMCID: PMC7652208 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_867_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Age and sex distribution of the study group/ respondents
| Study Group | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | |||||
| % | % | % | ||||
| Age in years | ||||||
| 18-30 | 8.8 | 3 | 11.8 | 4 | 10.3 | 7 |
| 31-40 | 44.1 | 15 | 20.6 | 7 | 32.4 | 22 |
| 41-50 | 26.5 | 9 | 41.2 | 14 | 33.8 | 23 |
| 51-60 | 20.6 | 7 | 26.5 | 9 | 23.5 | 16 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 35.3 | 12 | 52.9 | 18 | 44.1 | 30 |
| Female | 64.7 | 22 | 47.1 | 16 | 55.9 | 38 |
| Total | 100.0 | 34 | 100.0 | 34 | 100.0 | 68 |
Prevalence of the subclinical hypothyroidism and insulin resistance by study group
| Parameter | Study Group | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | |||||
| % | % | % | ||||
| TSH | ||||||
| Hypo | 76.5 | 26 | 0.0 | 0 | 35.3 | 24 |
| Normal | 23.5 | 08 | 100.0 | 34 | 64.7 | 44 |
| HOMA_IR | ||||||
| High | 61.8 | 21 | 0.0 | 0 | 30.9 | 21 |
| Normal | 91.2 | 13 | 97.1 | 33 | 67.6 | 46 |
| Low | 0.0 | 0 | 2.9 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 |
| Total | 100.0 | 34 | 100.0 | 34 | 100.0 | 68 |
Figure 1Correlation test was done between TSH and HOMA-IR among the cases and was found to be positively associated (r = 0.55) and significant at 0.01 level
Mean with standard deviation (SD) in case and control groups
| Parameter | Study Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Cases ( | Control ( | |
| AGE (Mean±SD) | 40.23±9.51 | 44±8.5 |
| TSH (Mean±SD) | 5.01±1.52 | 1.87±0.913 |
| FT4 (Mean±SD) | 0.83±0.11 | 0.81±0.13 |
| FT3 (Mean±SD) | 3.32±0.44 | 2.94±0.28 |
| HOMA-IR (Mean±SD) | 1.94±0.99 | 0.68±0.16 |
| FBS (Mean±SD) | 98.32±10.70 | 84.32±6.5 |
| PPBS (Mean±SD) | 85.32±9.8 | 112.67±17.13 |
| T. CHOL (Mean±SD) | 195±26 | 154±27 |
| TRIG (Mean±SD) | 150.7±42 | 93±29 |
| HDL (Mean±SD) | 48±12 | 43±10 |
| LDL (Mean±SD) | 115±21 | 91±20 |
TSH=Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, FT4=Free Thyroxine, FT3=Free Triiodothyronine; HOMA-IR=Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance, FBS=fasting Blood Sugar; PPBS=Post Prandial Blood Sugar, T. CHOL=total cholesterol; TRIG=triglyceride, HDL=High Density Lipoprotein, LDL=Low Density Lipoprotein