Literature DB >> 33209181

Corneal bee sting: improvement in the acute stage in the absence of treatment.

Michael Carl Chen1,2,3, Veniamin Melnychuk3.   

Abstract

Bee sting injuries to the eye are relatively uncommon. The outcomes of corneal bee sting injuries are highly variable, and there is no consensus on the management at the time of initial presentation. We report a case of a 17-year-old male with a corneal bee sting injury that significantly improved in the acute stage without any treatment, which to the best of our knowledge is the first report in the literature documenting the natural history of a corneal bee sting injury in the acute stage. Copyright: Michael Carl Chen et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bee sting; cornea; eye; ophthalmology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33209181      PMCID: PMC7648483          DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.54.20267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pan Afr Med J


Introduction

Patients with a bee sting injury to the cornea usually present with pain and decreased vision associated with clinical findings of conjunctival injection, corneal infiltration, corneal edema, and anterior chamber inflammation [1-4]. The outcomes of corneal bee sting injuries are highly variable, with outcomes ranging from mild loss of vision to more serious sequelae requiring surgical intervention, such as corneal decompensation or scarring, cataract formation, and glaucoma [2]. There is no consensus on the management at the time of initial presentation, with recommendations consisting of medical management alone to recommendations that also include the surgical removal of the stinger [2-4]. We report a case of a corneal bee sting injury that significantly improved in the acute stage without any treatment.

Patient and observation

A 17-year-old male with no prior ocular history presented to Tenwek Hospital in Bomet, Kenya with redness, pain, photophobia, and decreased vision in the left eye. He reported his eye being stung by a bee the day before while working in the fields. His visual acuity was 6/6 RE and 6/9 LE. Intraocular pressure was 9 mm Hg RE and 10 mm Hg LE. Slit lamp examination of the left eye revealed grade 2 diffuse conjunctival injection with ciliary flush, a stinger associated with a 1.7 mm diameter infiltrate in the superotemporal cornea, moderate corneal stromal edema, grade 4 cell with fibrin, and a 1 mm hypopyon (Figure 1). Attempt was made to remove the stinger at the slit lamp under topical anesthesia with jeweler forceps without success. He was prescribed topical prednisolone, ciprofloxacin, econazole, chloramphenicol, and atropine. Three days later the patient returned for follow-up with improvement in symptoms. His visual acuity in the left eye was 6/6. Intraocular pressure was 10 mm Hg. The infiltrate had decreased in density and dimension to 1.5 mm diameter. There was improved corneal stromal edema. The anterior chamber cell had decreased to grade 1, and the hypopyon had resolved. The stinger was no longer visible, as likely it had been pushed deeper into the cornea stroma on failed attempted removal and was obscured by the remaining infiltrate (Figure 2). To the surprise of the author (M.C.), the patient had not obtained or used any eye drops that were prescribed at the previous visit. The patient was encouraged to follow through with the treatment recommended at the previous visit and to follow up in one week, but he did not return and was lost to follow-up.
Figure 1

slit lamp photos one day post injury, showing the stinger with associated infiltrate (thick arrow) and hypopyon (thin arrow)

Figure 2

slit lamp photos four days post injury, showing the improved infiltrate (thick arrow) and resolution of the hypopyon

slit lamp photos one day post injury, showing the stinger with associated infiltrate (thick arrow) and hypopyon (thin arrow) slit lamp photos four days post injury, showing the improved infiltrate (thick arrow) and resolution of the hypopyon

Discussion

The outcomes of corneal bee and wasp stings are highly variable and there is no consensus on the management at acute presentation. While some reports describe the surgical removal of the stinger [2], in the case that a stinger is not easily accessible, not in the visual axis, and is not associated with significant infiltration, close observation and medical management with topical/oral antibiotics, corticosteroids, and cycloplegics has also been described [4]. While there has been a description of a retained stinger inducing chronic keratouveitis [5], there has also been a description where a intralenticular stinger was retained for up to 28 years without any inflammatory complications [6]. The wide range of response may at least be in part due to the differences in venom composition among the different species of bees and wasps [7]. In such cases where the stinger was left retained without complications, it is postulated that after the venom becomes neutralized that the retained stinger becomes inert [8]. Rai et al. reported a case of a corneal bee sting injury where corticosteroids were withheld due to concern for infection, and significant improvement occurred after 5 days with antibiotics alone, in the presence of a retained stinger [3]. While the authors postulated that the underlying process was primarily infectious, the presence of infection was not confirmed, as cultures and PCR were not performed. In this present case, improvement in inflammation occurred within 3 days with a retained stinger and in the absence of treatment, supporting the theory that at least in some cases, the acute inflammatory insult is short-lived and the inflammation can improve without intervention. The potential long-term complications reported in the literature, such as corneal decompensation or scarring, cataract formation, and glaucoma [2], are unknown in this case, as unfortunately the patient was lost to follow-up.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature documenting the natural history of a corneal bee sting injury in the acute stage in the absence of treatment. While the outcomes of corneal bee sting injuries are highly variable and the outcomes of this case cannot be generalizable to other cases of corneal bee sting injuries, this case demonstrates that at least in some instances the acute inflammatory response is transient and can improve in the absence of treatment.
  8 in total

1.  Management of corneal bee sting: is surgical removal of a retained stinger always indicated?

Authors:  Peyman Roomizadeh; Hassan Razmjoo; Mohammad-Ali Abtahi; Seyed-Hossein Abtahi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Bee and wasp stings of the eye. Retained intralenticular wasp sting: A case report.

Authors:  M Gilboa; M Gdal-On; S Zonis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Comparative enzymology of venoms from stinging Hymenoptera.

Authors:  J O Schmidt; M S Blum; W L Overal
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  A Case Series of Bee Sting Keratopathy With Different Outcomes in Malaysia.

Authors:  Wen-Jeat Ang; Siti-Zakiah Md Kadir; Abdul-Jalil Fadzillah; Embong Zunaina
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-02-17

5.  Management of Corneal Bee Sting Injuries.

Authors:  Ruju R Rai; Luis A Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Thanos D Papakostas; Donna Siracuse-Lee; Robert Dunphy; Lisa Fanciullo; Tulay Cakiner-Egilmez; Mary K Daly
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.975

6.  Corneal bee sting misdiagnosed as viral keratitis.

Authors:  Vandana Jain; Debraj Shome; Sundaram Natarajan
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Management of corneal bee sting.

Authors:  Hassan Razmjoo; Mohammad-Ali Abtahi; Peyman Roomizadeh; Zahra Mohammadi; Seyed-Hossein Abtahi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-02

8.  Ocular manifestations of isolated corneal bee sting injury, management strategies, and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Hemalatha Gudiseva; Madhu Uddaraju; Sayali Pradhan; Manoranjan Das; Jeena Mascarenhas; M Srinivasan; N Venkatesh Prajna
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Management of bulbar conjunctival injury by honeybee sting: A case report of a retained honeybee stinger.

Authors:  Sarah Madison Duff-Lynes; Pamela Martin; Erich P Horn
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.