Literature DB >> 33208131

Effects of STIP1 and GLCCI1 polymorphisms on the risk of childhood asthma and inhaled corticosteroid response in Chinese asthmatic children.

Juan Huang1,2, Xiaolei Hu3, Xiangrong Zheng4, Jian Kuang1, Chentao Liu1, Xia Wang1, Yongjun Tang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common chronic lung disease in children. We aimed to determine the associations between stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 (STIP1) and glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1 (GLCCI1) polymorphisms and susceptibility of childhood asthma and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) response in children.
METHODS: A total of 263 Chinese Han asthmatic children were recruited from the Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Pulmonary function tests were performed before the treatment and 3 months after the treatment. One hundred fifty non-asthmatic children were recruited. Each participant's DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood and Method of MassARRAY was used to genotype the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
RESULTS: STIP1 rs2236647 wild-type homozygote (CC) was associated with increased asthma risk of children (OR = 1.858, 95% CI:1.205-2.864), but not associated with the ICS response. GLCCI1 rs37969, rs37972 and rs37973 polymorphisms were not associated with the risk of childhood asthma. However, rs37969 mutant genotypes (TT/GT) were significantly associated with less improvement in PD20 (p = 0.028). We also found significant associations between rs37969, rs37972 and rs37973 mutant genotypes and less improvement in maximal midexpiratory flow (MMEF) after ICS treatment for 3 months (p = 0.036, p = 0.010 and p = 0.003, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: STIP1 rs2236647 was associated with asthma risk of children and GLCCI1 rs37969 mutant genotypes were associated with less improvement in airway hyper-responsiveness. GLCCI1 rs37969, rs37972 and rs37973 polymorphisms might be associated with pulmonary function in childhood asthma patients after ICS treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood asthma; GLCCI1; Polymorphism; Pulmonary function; STIP1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33208131      PMCID: PMC7677774          DOI: 10.1186/s12890-020-01332-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pulm Med        ISSN: 1471-2466            Impact factor:   3.317


Background

Asthma is one of the most common chronic lung diseases in children and adults. Approximately 358 million individuals suffer from asthma in the world [1]. The average global prevalence of adult asthma is 4.3%, up to 21.0% in Australia [2]. Simultaneously, the global prevalence of asthma in children aged 6 to 7 years and in those aged 13 to 14 years are respectively 11.6 and 13.7% [3]. In developed countries, the prevalence increased more obviously in the past few years. Meanwhile, the clinical control of asthma is not promising. Uncontrolled asthma accounts for 53.4% in Asian pediatric asthma and 45% in European adult asthma [4, 5]. In China, only 28.7% of patients achieved complete asthma control [6]. Asthma is an important contributor to the burden of families and society around the world. Therefore, reducing the prevalence of asthma and improving asthma control will significantly decrease the global medical burden and meaningfully promote the development of global health care. The current perspective is that the drug response of asthma in children and adults are closely associated with genetic factors. Studies have shown that genetic factors contribute about 70% of the variability in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) response [7, 8]. There are more than 1000 candidate genes had been discovered in the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [9], and approximately 50 genes have been replicated identified [10]. Many of the replicated genes were involved in the steroid molecular pathway and one of the important genes in the steroid molecular pathway is stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 (STIP1). STIP1 contains 14 exons and encodes heat shock organizing proteins (hops) that participate in the activation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR). GR is usually inactive and activated with the help of hop-hsp90 complex [11, 12]. Then, the GR-glucocorticoid complex can suppress airway inflammation, inhibit the activation of inflammatory genes, and regulate the activity and transcription of airway remodeling genes. In short, the STIP1 gene can affect the binding process of glucocorticoid (GC) and GR, thereby affecting the efficacy of GC. 3 STIP1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs4980524, rs6591838 and rs2236647) were found to be associated with ICS response in a white adult population [13] and another study found STIP1 rs2236647 polymorphism was also associated with the risk of asthma in adult population of Arab descent [14]. Besides, no association was found between STIP1 SNPs and change in FEV1 after ICS treatment in the study of childhood asthma in Korea and adult asthma in Japan [15]. Glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1(GLCCI1) also plays a key role in steroid biology and involved essentially in asthma signaling [16]. GLCCI1 contains 8 exons and encodes glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1 that promotes the anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids [17]. A GWAS study indicated that GLCCI1 rs37972 polymorphism was associated with ICS response in white childhood asthma patients and replicated their findings in three adult clinical trials and a Network childhood asthma trial (Data from the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes, dbGaP) [16]. However, the result was not repeated in north European asthmatic children [18]. Hu C et al. found that GLCCI1 variations (rs37972, rs37973 and rs11976862 polymorphisms) were associated with ICS response and asthma susceptibility in Chinese adult [19]. A recent study indicated that GLCCI1 variants (rs37972 and rs37973 polymorphisms) could serve as asthma risk biomarkers in a Tunisian adult population [20]. Figure 1 summarizes the advances of STIP1 rs2236647 and GLCCI1 rs37972 /rs37973 polymorphisms in asthma researches. And currently, the studies on the above two genes (STIP1 and GLCCI1) and Chinese childhood asthma are still rarely reported. The aim of our study is to investigate the effects of STIP1 and GLCCI1 polymorphisms on the risk of childhood asthma and ICS response in Chinese asthmatic children.
Fig. 1

Current research status of STIP1 rs2236647 and GLCCI1 rs37972 /rs37973 polymorphisms in asthma of different populations. ICS: Inhaled corticosteroid

Current research status of STIP1 rs2236647 and GLCCI1 rs37972 /rs37973 polymorphisms in asthma of different populations. ICS: Inhaled corticosteroid

Methods

Subjects

Two hundred sixty-three Chinese Han asthmatic children and 150 controls were recruited from the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. All the asthmatic patients received ICS treatment for 3 months (inclusion and exclusion criteria of all cases are listed in Table 1). These subjects all come from Hunan, China.
Table 1

Inclusion criteria for enrollment in case-control study and the treatment trial

Asthmatics inclusion criteria
1. Meets the 2017 GINA guidelines on the diagnostic criteria for asthma.
2. No history of respiratory infections and systemic infections within 1 month.
3. No history of hospitalization for asthma exacerbation within 1 month.
4. No regular history of using ICS within 1 month.
5. No following diseases: congenital lung malformations; airway obstruction or extraluminal oppression; congenital heart disease; active tuberculosis; bronchiectasis; severe systemic diseases.
Controls inclusion criteria
Without the following diseases: Bronchial asthma; Bronchiolitis; Allergic diseases such as eczema, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis; Severe systemic diseases; Family history of allergic diseases.
Inclusion criteria for enrollment in case-control study and the treatment trial

Pulmonary function test

Pulmonary function was performed using the Jaeger Masterscope spirometry system (Jaeger, Wuerzburg, Germany). All asthmatic children over 6 years of age had pulmonary function measured at their first visit and after 3 months of ICS treatment. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/pre, FEV1/Forced vital capacity (FVC), Peak expiratory flow (PEF)/pre, Forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25/pre, FEF 75/pre and Maximal midexpiratory flow (MMEF)/pre were used to evaluate the pulmonary function. The provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PD20) was used to represent airway hyper-responsiveness.

Selection of SNPs

In this study, 4 SNPs in two genes (rs2236647 in STIP1; rs37969, rs37972, and rs37973 in GLCCI1) were investigated for their associations with asthma in children of China. The studied genes were selected based on their known biological functions in lung and their role in ICS response. These SNPs were selected from previous studies and database information (NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed).

Genotyping

Genotyping was performed using the iPlex MassARRAY genotyping platform (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA). DNA was extracted from 1 mL of the collected blood using a DNA extraction kit (SQ Blood DNA KitII, Omega, USA). The primers were designed by AssayDesigner3.1 (Details are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1).

Statistical methods

Statistical analyses were performed using PLINK 1.07 and SPSS v.18.0 (SPSS Inc., Tokyo, Japan). p > 0.05 was considered to be consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The chi-squared test was used to calculate significant differences in allele and genotype frequencies between asthmatics and controls. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for asthma susceptibility in relation to the SNPs were performed by logistic regression analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for age and gender. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and t-test were used to determine the influence of genotype on spirometry. p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Subject characteristics

We recruited 263 asthmatics (188 males, 75 females, mean age 8.18 ± 2.73 years) and 150 non-asthmatic controls (97 males, 53 females; mean age 8.20 ± 2.28 years) in our study. There was no difference between 2 groups in age, gender and smoking exposure (p-value: 0.725, 0.150 and 0.135, respectively). All patients received ICS treatment. Two hundred nine patients were over 6 years of age and 54 were under 6 years of age. In the patients over 6 years of age, 134 completed the 3-months follow-up. Other patients did not have follow-up or substandard treatment. The detailed baseline demographics of subjects are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Baseline demographics of subjects involved in the study

CharacteristicsN (%)P-value
Asthma patientsControls
Total263150
Age (year)
 < 654(20.53)33(22.00)0.725
 ≥ 6209(79.47)117(78.00)
Gender
 Boys188(71.48)97(64.67)0.150
 Girls75(28.52)53(35.33)
Smoking exposure
 Yes154(58.56)99(66.00)0.135
 No109(41.44)51(34.00)
Allergies
 Yes172(65.40)0(0.00)
 No91(34.60)150(100.00)
Family history of asthma
 Yes89(33.84)0(0.00)
 No174(66.16)150(100.00)
Baseline demographics of subjects involved in the study

STIP1 rs2236647 was associated with the risk of childhood asthma

All the SNPs involved in our study were in HWE (Additional file 1: Table S2). The allele and genotype frequencies of the 4 SNPs in asthmatics and controls were listed in Table 3. We found allele frequencies and genotype frequencies of STIP1 rs2236647 in asthmatics and controls were significantly different (p = 0.008 and p = 0.018, respectively; Table 3). Children with STIP1 rs2236647 CC genotype showed increased risk of asthma compared with the other two genotypes (p = 0.005, Table 3). After adjusting for age and gender, we found that rs2236647 CC genotype was still associated with increased the risk of childhood asthma (OR = 1.929; Table 4). However, similar associations were not found in rs37969, rs37972, and rs37973 polymorphisms (Table 3).
Table 3

The allele and genotype frequency of 4 SNPs in asthmatics and controls

GeneSNPGenotype / AlleleCases (n = 263)Controls (n = 150)P-value/Corrected p-valueaRECb modelp-value/Corrected p-valueaDOMc modelp-value/Corrected p-valuea
STIP1rs2236647TT38(14.44%)29(19.33%)0.018/0.0720.195/0.7800.005/0.020
TC113(42.97%)78(52.00%)
CC112(42.59%)43(28.67%)
T189(35.93%)136(45.33%)0.008/0.032
C337(64.07%)164(54.67%)
GLCCI1rs37969TT53(20.15%)34(22.67%)0.820/1.0000.547/1.0000.708/1.000
GT130(49.43%)73(48.67%)
GG80(30.42%)43(28.67%)
T236(44.87%)141(47.00%)0.554/1.000
G290(55.13%)159(53.00%)
rs37972TT47(17.88%)28(18.67%)
TC121(46.01%)70(46.67%)0.952/1.0000.840/1.0000.766/1.000
CC95(36.12%)52(34.67%)
T215(40.87%)126(42.00%)0.752/1.000
C311(59.13%)174(58.00%)
rs37973GG54(20.53%)36(24.00%)0.675/1.0000.412/1.0000.550/1.000
GA128(48.67%)72(48.00%)
AA81(30.80%)42(28.00%)
G236(44.87%)144(48.00%)0.385/1.000
A290(55.13%)156(52.00%)

The values p ≤ 0.05 were in bold

aCorrected by Bonferroni multiple adjustment; bREC means (AA + Aa) vs aa; cDOM means AA vs (Aa + aa); “A” is the major allele and “a” is the minor allele

Table 4

Association (OR, 95% CI) between gene SNPs and childhood asthma susceptibilitya

SNPOROR corr b
rs2236647CC vs (TC + TT)1.846(1.201–2.838) ⁎⁎1.929(1.247–2.986) ⁎⁎

aTable only shows SNPs that are associated with asthma susceptibility through logistic regression analysis of alleles and different genotypes

bOR corr: the p value after adjusting age, gender and smoking exposure as covariates; OR: Odds ratio (reference group designated with an OR of 1.0)

⁎ p ≤ 0.05; ⁎⁎ p ≤ 0.01

The allele and genotype frequency of 4 SNPs in asthmatics and controls The values p ≤ 0.05 were in bold aCorrected by Bonferroni multiple adjustment; bREC means (AA + Aa) vs aa; cDOM means AA vs (Aa + aa); “A” is the major allele and “a” is the minor allele Association (OR, 95% CI) between gene SNPs and childhood asthma susceptibilitya aTable only shows SNPs that are associated with asthma susceptibility through logistic regression analysis of alleles and different genotypes bOR corr: the p value after adjusting age, gender and smoking exposure as covariates; OR: Odds ratio (reference group designated with an OR of 1.0) ⁎ p ≤ 0.05; ⁎⁎ p ≤ 0.01

4 candidate SNPs were not associated with baseline lung function measures

Baseline lung function of different genotypes is shown in Table 5 and we found four SNPs (rs2236647, rs37969, rs37972, and rs37973) were not associated with baseline lung function measures (FEV1/pre, FEV1/FVC, PEF/pre, FEF 25/pre FEF 75/pre and MMEF/pre; Table 5). We also did not observe significant associations between baseline PD20 and the 4 SNPs (Table 5).
Table 5

Baseline lung function of different genotypes

GeneSNPAlleleFEV1/pre (%)FEV1/FVCPEF/pre (%)FEF 25/pre (%)FEF 75/pre (%)MMEF/pre (%)PD20 (mg)
STIP1rs2236647CT + TT93.18 ± 11.7494.69 ± 9.6488.73 ± 13.2480.36 ± 17.6756.78 ± 20.5366.32 ± 18.950.76 ± 0.76
CC93.80 ± 14.7895.27 ± 9.3086.89 ± 16.3383.25 ± 22.7055.48 ± 21.6766.18 ± 21.960.83 ± 0.86
GLCCI1rs37969GT + TT93.93 ± 12.9095.10 ± 10.1588.07 ± 15.2582.36 ± 20.8257.3 ± 22.3267.06 ± 20.890.84 ± 0.84
GG92.24 ± 12.8694.44 ± 7.9488.07 ± 12.4779.29 ± 16.5954.16 ± 17.3264.53 ± 18.010.66 ± 0.69
rs37972CT + TT92.97 ± 12.8494.69 ± 10.4687.33 ± 14.5780.63 ± 20.2856.17 ± 22.6565.79 ± 21.010.74 ± 0.77
CC94.09 ± 13.0095.23 ± 7.7489.29 ± 14.1582.65 ± 18.5156.55 ± 17.8167.05 ± 18.400.84 ± 0.84
rs37973AG + GG93.82 ± 12.7595.00 ± 10.0187.53 ± 14.5281.09 ± 19.657.38 ± 22.0966.68 ± 20.350.79 ± 0.80
AA92.41 ± 13.2494.66 ± 8.2489.34 ± 14.1982.13 ± 19.7753.81 ± 17.6865.29 ± 19.360.75 ± 0.80
Baseline lung function of different genotypes

3 SNPs in GLCCI1 were associated with the change in MMEF after ICS treatment

Significant associations were identified between rs37969, rs37972, and rs37973 and the change in MMEF after 3 months of ICS treatment compared with baseline. MMEF improved by a more percentage change in subjects who were rs37969 wild-type homozygotes (GG) as compared with those who were mutant genotype (TT/GT) (20.79 ± 20.65%, 13.23 ± 18.39%, p = 0.036; Table 6, Fig. 2). Similar results were found in rs37972 (21.08 ± 21.03%, 12.23 ± 17.58%, p = 0.010; Table 6, Fig. 2) and rs37973 (23.22 ± 21.52%, 12.36 ± 17.52%, p = 0.003; Table 6, Fig. 2). However, this phenomenon was not repeated in rs2236647. Besides, there was also no associations between the change in FEV1/FVC and the 4 SNPs.
Table 6

Changes in lung function after treatment with different genotypesa

SNPBiomarkerMajor genotype/other genotypesBiomarker changes in major genotype (min, max)Biomarker changes in other genotypes (min, max)
rs37969MMEFGG/(GT + TT)20.79(−19.2, 75.2)13.23(−25.8, 64.8)
rs37969PD20GG/(GT + TT)0.77(−0.93, 2.19)0.44(−2.19,2.19)
rs37972MMEFCC/(CT + TT)21.08(−19.2, 75.2)12.23(−25.8, 64.8)
rs37973MMEFAA/(AG + GG)23.22(−19.2, 75.2)12.36(−25.8, 64.8) ⁎⁎

aTable only shows the SNPs that are associated with asthma susceptibility through logistic regression analysis of alleles and different genotypes

⁎ p ≤ 0.05; ⁎⁎ p ≤ 0.01

Fig. 2

Association between GLCCI1 SNPs and change in pulmonary function after ICS treatment for 3 months

Changes in lung function after treatment with different genotypesa aTable only shows the SNPs that are associated with asthma susceptibility through logistic regression analysis of alleles and different genotypes ⁎ p ≤ 0.05; ⁎⁎ p ≤ 0.01 Association between GLCCI1 SNPs and change in pulmonary function after ICS treatment for 3 months

GLCCI1 rs37969 was associated with the change in airway hyper-responsiveness

In our study, we found the mutant genotypes (TT/GT) for the GLCCI1 rs37969 had less improvement in PD20 compared with wild-type homozygotes (GG) (0.44 ± 0.82 mg, 0.77 ± 0.74 mg; p = 0.028) (Fig. 3). However, we did not find the associations between the other 3 SNPs (rs2236647, rs37972, and rs37973) and the improvement in airway hyper-responsiveness.
Fig. 3

Association between the GLCCI1 rs37969 genotype and change in PD20 after ICS treatment for 3 months

Association between the GLCCI1 rs37969 genotype and change in PD20 after ICS treatment for 3 months

Discussion

Currently, the association studies between genetic variations and asthma susceptibility in population of Chinese children are still limited. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that confirmed the rs2236674 SNP in STIP1 gene is significantly associated with the risk of Chinese asthmatic children. We also report here that GLCCI1 rs37969, rs37972, and rs37973 were associated with the response to ICS treatment in Chinese children with asthma. An Arab study has indicated that the STIP1 rs2236647 C allele can be used as an asthma marker for adult [14]. However, according to the currently reported GWAS, the STIP1 gene has not been found to be associated with asthma sensitivity, whether in African American, Asian, Caucasian or Latino [21, 22]. In our study, C is the major allele of rs2236647 polymorphism and the frequency of wild-type homozygote (CC) in asthmatics was lower than controls. After adjusting the gender and age, we found CC homozygote children had an increased risk of asthma compared with CT/TT genotype. The previous studies were focused on adult asthma and no similar results have been reported in childhood asthma. Our finding demonstrated that CC homozygotes of STIP1 rs2236647 polymorphism might be an asthma susceptibility marker in Chinese childhood asthma. Moreover, a white adult asthma study identified that STIP1 rs2236647 was associated with change in lung function after ICS treatment for 4 weeks [13]. But in our study, there was no association between STIP1 rs2236647 and the change of lung function after ICS treatment for 3 months in Chinese children. We suspected that the differences between childhood asthma and adult asthma were probably due to the age and different underlying pathophysiological basis [23, 24]. Besides, racial differences might also play important roles in these differences. However, the underlying mechanism for these differences is still unclear, and more studies are urgently needed to further explain the reasons. In a Saudi Arabian study, 2 GLCCI1 SNPs, (rs37972 and rs37973), were found to be unrelated to adult asthma susceptibility [25]. Similarly, we found GLCCI1 rs37969, rs37972, and rs37973 polymorphisms were all irrelevant to the risk of childhood asthma in the current study. In 2011, Tantisira et al. discovered that the GLCCI1 SNPs, (rs37972 and rs37973), was associated with change in lung function after ICS treatment in 1053 asthmatic patients [16]. Then, GLCCI1 rs37972 and rs37973 variant genotypes were found to be related to less improvement in the FEV1 after ICS treatment for 12 weeks in Chinese patients [19]. Similar results were replicated in another Chinese study [26]. Associations also were found between GLCCI1 rs37973 and ICS response in Japanese adult asthmatics [27]. However, a non-Hispanic white study discovered that rs37973 was not associated with the change in FEV1 after treatment with ICS [28]. Negative results were showed in a Saudi Arabian study and a recent GWAS study [25, 29]. Most of the above studies were conducted on adult asthma and there are fewer studies on these SNPs in children with asthma. In our study, we found there were no associations between GLCCI1 polymorphisms and the improvement in FEV1/pre and FEV1/FVC after ICS treatment in childhood asthma. However, GLCCI1 rs37969, rs37972, and rs37973 mutant genotypes were found to be associated with less improvement of the MMEF after ICS treatment. MMEF may be more sensitive than FEV1 when assessing the lung function of asthmatics [30, 31]. Therefore, our study in Chinese Han childhood asthma population support the perspective that GLCCI1 might be considered as a predictor of ICS response to a certain extent. However, there are fewer studies on these SNPs in children with asthma compared with adults. More studies on childhood asthma are urgently needed to enrich the current theories, and studies of larger sample size and different populations are also needed to reproduce these results. It is especially noticed that asthmatic children with GLCCI1 rs37969 mutant genotypes have lower ICS response compared with the wild-gene homozygote in our study. Rs37969 is located in the intron region of GLCCI1 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/). The current data on GLCCI1 rs37969 is extremely lacking, especially in childhood asthma. More basic experimental studies are needed to confirm whether the mutation affects the expression of GLCCI1. There are still several limitations in this study. First, the follow-up for asthmatic children in this study was only 3 months. The follow-up period could be extended in the future. Second, the number of participants was small for a genetic study, especially in the follow-up group. Third, this study focuses on the effect of single SNPs on childhood asthma. Gene-gene interaction, epigenetics, and environment need to be considered in the future [32, 33].

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found significant associations between the STIP1 rs2236647 polymorphism and the risk of childhood asthma, and GLCCI1 SNPs are related to the improvement of lung function in Chinese Han childhood asthma patients who received ICS for 3 months. Our results indicated that STIP1 might be considered as an asthma marker in children, while GLCCI1 might be used to predict the ICS response in childhood asthma and Fig. 4 summarizes the main findings of the current study. It is worth mentioning that we are the first to report the function of STIP1 rs2236647 and GLCCI1 rs37969 in childhood asthma patients and more studies are required to repeat our findings.
Fig. 4

Main findings of the current study. MMEF: Maximal midexpiratory flow; ICS: Inhaled corticosteroid

Main findings of the current study. MMEF: Maximal midexpiratory flow; ICS: Inhaled corticosteroid Additional file 1: Table S1. Primers used in genes genotyping. Table S2. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. Table S3. Interaction between SNPs of our candidate genes and corticosteroid response in patients with asthma.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and their importance in asthma.

Authors:  A García-Sánchez; M Isidoro-García; V García-Solaesa; C Sanz; L Hernández-Hernández; J Padrón-Morales; F Lorente-Toledano; I Dávila
Journal:  Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.667

2.  Candidate gene analysis of asthma in a population of Arab descent: a case-control study in Jordan.

Authors:  Basima A Almomani; Laith N Al-Eitan; Shaher M Samrah; Mohammed N Al-Quasmi; Amy J McKnight
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Global burden of asthma among children.

Authors:  I Asher; N Pearce
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  GLCCI1 and STIP1 variants are associated with asthma susceptibility and inhaled corticosteroid response in a Tunisian population.

Authors:  Mariem Salhi; Oussama Lahmar; Marwa Ouled Salah; Ivana Banić; Bao Binghao; Waqar Malik; Kamel Hamzaoui; Mirjana Turkalj; Agnes Hamzaoui
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.515

5.  Evaluation of asthma control and patient's perception of asthma: findings and analysis of a nationwide questionnaire-based survey in China.

Authors:  Nan Su; Jiangtao Lin; Ping Chen; Jing Li; Changgui Wu; Kaisheng Yin; Chuntao Liu; Yiqiang Chen; Xin Zhou; Yadong Yuan; Xingang Huang
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.515

Review 6.  The environment, epigenome, and asthma.

Authors:  Ivana V Yang; Catherine A Lozupone; David A Schwartz
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 30.700

8.  The all age asthma cohort (ALLIANCE) - from early beginnings to chronic disease: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver Fuchs; Thomas Bahmer; Markus Weckmann; Anna-Maria Dittrich; Bianca Schaub; Barbara Rösler; Christine Happle; Folke Brinkmann; Isabell Ricklefs; Inke R König; Henrik Watz; Klaus F Rabe; Matthias V Kopp; Gesine Hansen; Erika von Mutius
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  Korean childhood asthma study (KAS): a prospective, observational cohort of Korean asthmatic children.

Authors:  Dong In Suh; Dae Jin Song; Hey-Sung Baek; Meeyong Shin; Young Yoo; Ji-Won Kwon; Gwang Cheon Jang; Hyeon-Jong Yang; Eun Lee; Hwan Soo Kim; Ju-Hee Seo; Sung-Il Woo; Hyung Young Kim; Youn Ho Shin; Ju Suk Lee; Jisun Yoon; Sungsu Jung; Minkyu Han; Eunjin Eom; Jinho Yu; Woo Kyung Kim; Dae Hyun Lim; Jin Tack Kim; Woo-Sung Chang; Jeom-Kyu Lee
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 10.  Lessons Learned From GWAS of Asthma.

Authors:  Kyung Won Kim; Carole Ober
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.764

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics: A Step forward Precision Medicine in Childhood Asthma.

Authors:  Giuliana Ferrante; Salvatore Fasola; Velia Malizia; Amelia Licari; Giovanna Cilluffo; Giorgio Piacentini; Stefania La Grutta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  GLCCI1 reduces collagen deposition and airway hyper-responsiveness in a mouse asthma model through binding with WD repeat domain 45B.

Authors:  Qiufen Xun; Jiulong Kuang; Qing Yang; Wei Wang; Guofeng Zhu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.310

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.