| Literature DB >> 33207838 |
Calin Vasile Andritoiu1,2, Corina Elena Andriescu3,4, Constanta Ibanescu5, Cristina Lungu6, Bianca Ivanescu6, Laurian Vlase7, Cornel Havarneanu8, Marcel Popa5,9.
Abstract
The present paper aims to formulate and characterize four phytotherapeutic ointments based on Hippophae fructus, Calendulae flos, Bardanae folium, and Millefolii herba, which are included in a novel ointment base. In order to investigate the healing properties of the ointments, in vivo experimental wound models of linear incision, circular excision, and thermal burn were performed on Wistar rats. Topical treatment was performed daily for 21 days. Determination of the wound contraction rate (WCR), the period of reepithelization, and histopathological examination were achieved. Additionally, for the tested ointments, oscillatory and rotational rheological tests were carried out, and for the extracts, HPLC analysis was performed. The results demonstrate that the tested novel ointments are safe for use and the most effective ointment proved to be the one based on Arctium lappa, followed by that of Calendulae flos.Entities:
Keywords: Achillea millefolium L.; Arctium lappa L.; Calendula officinalis L.; HPLC analysis; Hippophae rhamnoides L.; rheological characterization; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33207838 PMCID: PMC7709045 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The total phenolic contents in hydro-alcoholic extracts (HR—Hippophae rhamnoides, CO—Calendula officinalis, AL—Arctium lappa, AM—Achillea millefolium).
Concentration of phenolic compounds (µg/mL) in the extracts.
| Polyphenols |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | Conc. | MS | Conc. | MS | Conc. | |
| Gentisic acid | * | |||||
| Caffeic acid | 0.74 | 1.63 | 1.74 | |||
| Chlorogenic acid | * | 339.06 | * | 238.57 | * | 46.35 |
| p-coumaric acid | * | - | ||||
| Ferulic acid | * | 0.153 | ||||
| Hyperoside | * | - | ||||
| Isoquercitrin | * | - | * | 9.905 | ||
| Rutoside | * | 99.279 | * | 1.599 | * | 7.983 |
| Quercitrin | * | 1.487 | * | - | ||
| Quercetin | * | 0.394 | ||||
| Luteolin | * | 7.796 | ||||
| Apigenin | * | 3.226 | ||||
* MS—MS qualitative determination; UV signal < LoQ (limit of quantification) does not allow the quantitative determination of these substances. Not found: kaempferol, fisetin, myricetin, patuletin, sinapic acid, and caftaric acid.
Concentration of methoxylated flavonoids (ng/mL) in the extracts.
| Methoxylated Flavonoids |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Acacetin | - | 107.12 | - |
| Casticin | - | 63.56 | - |
| Hispidulin | - | 877.78 | - |
Not found: eupatorin, eupatilin, and jaceosidin.
Concentration of sterols (µg/mL) in the extracts.
| Sterols |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Stigmasterol | - | 1.036 | 1.584 |
| Beta-sitosterol | 1.139 | 7.700 | 3.264 |
| Campesterol | - | 0.3121 | 0.116 |
| Brassicasterol | - | 0.166 | - |
Not found: ergosterol.
Figure 2Amplitude sweep for the phytotherapeutic products series.
Figure 3Frequency sweep of phytotherapeutic products series.
Figure 4Oscillatory rheological tests of phytotherapeutic products series.
Figure 5Flow curve of the analyzed ointments.
Evaluation of wound area, re-epithelialization area, and wound contraction rate for the excision model.
| Experimental Groups | Wound Area (mm2) | The Re-Epithelialization Area (mm) | WCR (%) (Mean ± SEM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 6 | Day 9 | Day 12 | Day 6 | Day 9 | |
| HR Group | 64 | 36 | 7.5 | 2 × 2.5 | 69.38 ± 0.83 | 88.23 ± 0.49 |
| (8 × 8) | (6 × 6) | (2.5 × 3) | ||||
| CO Group | 64 | 28 | 5 | 1.5 × 2 | 57.29 ± 1.80 * | 92.70 ± 0.47 * |
| (8 × 8) | (4 × 7) | (2 × 2.5) | ||||
| AL Group | 64 | 15 | 3.4 | 1 ×2 | 77.66 ± 0.68 | 94.29 ± 0.26 |
| (8 × 8) | (3 × 5) | (1.7 × 2) | ||||
| AM Group | 64 | 32.5 | 7.5 | 2 × 3 | 51.30 ± 1.14 | 87.50 ± 0.41 |
| (8 × 8) | (5 × 6.5) | (2.5 × 3) | ||||
| OB Group | 64 | 45.5 | 40.8 | - | 26.74 ± 2.13 * | 33.79 ± 2.21 * |
| (8 × 8) | (6.5 × 7) | (6 × 6.8) | ||||
| NC Group | 64 | 61.6 | 56.25 | - | 5.78 ± 1.86 | 14.85 ± 2.95 |
| (8 × 8) | (7.7 × 8) | (7.5 × 7.5) | ||||
* p < 0.001.
Histological evaluation of the tissue samples at day 3.
| Experimental Groups | Experimental Models | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Incision | Excision | Thermal Burn | |
| NC Group |
|
|
|
| abscess with epidermal ulceration, Score 3 | purulent exudate, Score 3 | ulceration and bacterial colonies, Score 3 | |
| OB Group |
|
|
|
| inflammatory infiltration in hypodermis, striated muscle, Score 1 | adipose tissue with inflammation, Score 2 | dermal edema, Score 1 | |
| HR Group |
|
|
|
| lymphocytes arranged around capillary and intramuscular blood vessels, Score 3 | numerous lymphocytes, polymorphonuclear cells, Score 3 | inflammatory infiltrate in the muscular layer, Score 1 | |
| CO Group |
|
|
|
| lymphocytes in superficial dermis, Score 1 | fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltration, Score 1 | ulcerated epithelium, Score 3 | |
| AL Group |
|
|
|
| vascular congestion and perivascular lymphocytes, Score 1 | inflammatory infiltrate in the hypodermis, Score 1 | periadnexal inflammatory infiltrate, Score 2 | |
| AM Group |
|
|
|
| perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, Score 1 | ulcerated epidermis, Score 3 | lymphocytes, hypodermis and muscle, Score 1 | |
Inflammatory infiltration scoring: Score 0 (no inflammatory infiltrate), Score 1 (mild inflammatory infiltrate), Score 2 (moderate inflammatory infiltrate), Score 3 (severe inflammatory infiltrate).
Histological evaluation of the tissue samples at day 6.
| Experimental Group | Experimental Models | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Incision | Excision | Thermal Burn | |
| NC group |
|
|
|
| vacuolar degeneration, epidermal acanthosis, Score 1 | spongiosis, edema, lymphocytes, fibroblasts, Score 1 | vacuolar degeneration in the epidermis, epidermal ulceration, Score 1 | |
| OB group |
|
|
|
| multinucleated foreign-body giant cells, Score 2 | epidermal ulceration, Score 3 | hemorrhage and abscess, Score 2 | |
| HR group |
|
|
|
| perivascular lymphocytes, Score 1 | lymphocytes, Score 1 | perivascular lymphocytes, Score 1 | |
| CO group |
|
|
|
| superficial dermal collagenization, Score 2 | area undergoing connective tissue organization, Score 2 | lymphocytes in the dermis, Score 1 | |
| AL group |
|
|
|
| normal striated muscle, Score 1 | granulation tissue in course of conjunctive organization, Score 1 | normal hair, detail in polarized light microscopy, Score 0 | |
| AM group |
|
|
|
| rare lymphocytes, Score 0 | residual myocytes and inflammatory infiltrate, Score 2 | rare lymphocytes, Score 1 | |
Inflammatory infiltration scoring: Score 0 (no inflammatory infiltrate), Score 1 (mild inflammatory infiltrate), Score 2 (moderate inflammatory infiltrate), Score 3 (severe inflammatory infiltrate).
Histological evaluation of the tissue samples at day 12.
| Experimental Groups | Experimental Models | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Incision | Excision | Thermal Burn | |
| NC group |
|
|
|
| lymphocytic infiltrate in the hypodermis, Score 2 | congestion, lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis, Score 2 | inflammatory infiltrate, striated muscle, Score 2 | |
| OB group |
|
|
|
| foreign body-type multinucleated giant cell, detail in polarized light microscopy, Score 1 | multinucleated giant cell, detail in polarized light microscopy, Score 1 | acanthosis and vacuolar degeneration, Score 1 | |
| HR group |
|
|
|
| lymphocytes, capillary congestion, Score 2 | lymphocytes, fibroblasts, Score 2 | dermal collagenization, Score 1 | |
| CO group |
|
|
|
| mild dermal collagenization (collagen fibers with a horizontal and homogenized arrangement), Score 1 | collagenization, Score 1 | significant dermal collagenization, Score 1 | |
| AL group |
|
|
|
| rectilinear epidermis; lymphocytes in the superficial dermis, Score 1 | residual myocytes, in the organized conjunctival area detail, Score 1 | lymphocytes in the superficial dermis, Score 1 | |
| AM group |
|
|
|
| mild dermal collagenization, Score 1 | significant dermal collagenization, detail in polarized light microscopy, Score 1 | dermal collagenization, Score 1 | |
Inflammatory infiltration scoring: Score 0 (no inflammatory infiltrate), Score 1 (mild inflammatory infiltrate), Score 2 (moderate inflammatory infiltrate), Score 3 (severe inflammatory infiltrate).
Histological evaluation of the tissue samples at the end of treatment (day 21).
| Experimental Groups | Experimental Models | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Incision | Excision | Thermal Burn | |
| NC group |
|
|
|
| rich inflammatory infiltrate, predominantly lympho-plasmacytic, Score 3 | dermal edema, Score 2 | vacuolar degeneration, Score 1 | |
| OB group |
|
|
|
| vascular congestion, Score 1 | mild edema, Score 1 | lymphocytes, Score 1 | |
| HR group |
|
|
|
| muscle, Score 1 | dermal collagenization, Score 1 | dermal collagenization, Score 1 | |
| CO group |
|
|
|
| moderate lymphocytic infiltrate; medium dermal collagenization, Score 1 | dermal collagenization, Score 1 | significant dermal collagenization, Score 1 | |
| AL group |
|
|
|
| mature granulation tissue, Score 2 | mature granulation tissue, Score 1 | mature granulation tissue, Score 1 | |
| AM group |
|
|
|
| dermal collagenization, Score 1 | dermal collagenization, Score 1 | dermal collagenization, Score 1 | |
Inflammatory infiltration scoring: Score 0 (no inflammatory infiltrate), Score 1 (mild inflammatory infiltrate), Score 2 (moderate inflammatory infiltrate), Score 3 (severe inflammatory infiltrate).