Andrea Piazzolla1, Davide Bizzoca2,3, Giuseppe Solarino4, Marco Brayda-Bruno5, Giuseppe Tombolini6, Alessio Ariagno7, Biagio Moretti4. 1. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Orthopaedic, Trauma and Spine Unit, UOSD Spinal Deformity Center, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, AOU Consorziale "Policlinico", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70100, Bari, Italy. 2. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Orthopaedic, Trauma and Spine Unit, UOSD Spinal Deformity Center, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, AOU Consorziale "Policlinico", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70100, Bari, Italy. da.bizzoca@gmail.com. 3. Orthopaedic and Trauma Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Spine Unit, University of Bari Aldo Moro, AOU Consorziale "Policlinico", Bari, Italy. da.bizzoca@gmail.com. 4. Orthopaedic and Trauma Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Spine Unit, University of Bari Aldo Moro, AOU Consorziale "Policlinico", Bari, Italy. 5. Spine Surgery III, Scoliosis Department, IRCCS Orthopaedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. 6. Tombolini Officine Ortopediche, San Giorgio Jonico, TA, Italy. 7. Officine Ortopediche Maria Adelaide, Torino, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This prospective observational study aims to assess the MA brace effectiveness in hyperkyphosis correction, focusing also on patients' compliance of bracing and its psychological impact. METHODS: Patients referring to our spine outpatient department with Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) from January 2011 to January 2017 were prospectively recruited. Patients were divided into two groups, according to their global thoracic kyphosis (TK): Group-A TKT0 < 60°, Group-B TKT0 ≥ 60°. The MA brace was prescribed according to SRS criteria. Full spine X-rays were analyzed at conventional times: at the beginning of treatment (T0), at 6-months follow-up (T1, in-brace X-rays), at the end of treatment (T2) and at 2-year minimum follow-up from bracing removal (T3). At T0, T2 and T3 all the patients were assessed using the Italian Version of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire (I-SRS22). Variability between and within-groups was assessed; a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 192 adolescents (87 girls and 105 boys, mean age 13.1) were recruited. The mean global TK at recruitment was 61.9° ± 11.3°, the mean follow-up time was 57.4 months. A good patients' reported compliance was observed: 84.9% of patients used the brace as scheduled. A mean in-brace correction (in-brace TK%) of 37.4% was observed and a mean final correction (TK%T3) of 31.6%. At final follow-up (T3), curve reduction (ΔTK ≤ - 5°) was observed in 60.4% of patients and curve stabilization (- 5° < ΔTK < 5) in 29.7% of patients. At baseline, worse SRS22-mental health (p = 0.023) and self-image mean scores (p = 0.001) were observed in Group-B, compared with Group-A. At the end of treatment (T2), an improvement of all items was observed, wit significantly better improvement of self-image domain in Group-B. CONCLUSION: The MA brace has shown to be effective in the management of SK; good patients' reported compliance and a positive effect on the patients' mental status were recorded.
PURPOSE: This prospective observational study aims to assess the MA brace effectiveness in hyperkyphosis correction, focusing also on patients' compliance of bracing and its psychological impact. METHODS:Patients referring to our spine outpatient department with Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) from January 2011 to January 2017 were prospectively recruited. Patients were divided into two groups, according to their global thoracic kyphosis (TK): Group-A TKT0 < 60°, Group-B TKT0 ≥ 60°. The MA brace was prescribed according to SRS criteria. Full spine X-rays were analyzed at conventional times: at the beginning of treatment (T0), at 6-months follow-up (T1, in-brace X-rays), at the end of treatment (T2) and at 2-year minimum follow-up from bracing removal (T3). At T0, T2 and T3 all the patients were assessed using the Italian Version of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire (I-SRS22). Variability between and within-groups was assessed; a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 192 adolescents (87 girls and 105 boys, mean age 13.1) were recruited. The mean global TK at recruitment was 61.9° ± 11.3°, the mean follow-up time was 57.4 months. A good patients' reported compliance was observed: 84.9% of patients used the brace as scheduled. A mean in-brace correction (in-brace TK%) of 37.4% was observed and a mean final correction (TK%T3) of 31.6%. At final follow-up (T3), curve reduction (ΔTK ≤ - 5°) was observed in 60.4% of patients and curve stabilization (- 5° < ΔTK < 5) in 29.7% of patients. At baseline, worse SRS22-mental health (p = 0.023) and self-image mean scores (p = 0.001) were observed in Group-B, compared with Group-A. At the end of treatment (T2), an improvement of all items was observed, wit significantly better improvement of self-image domain in Group-B. CONCLUSION: The MA brace has shown to be effective in the management of SK; good patients' reported compliance and a positive effect on the patients' mental status were recorded.
Authors: Eyal Behrbalk; Ofir Uri; Ruth M Parks; Michael Paul Grevitt; Marcus Rickert; Bronek Maximilian Boszczyk Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Angelo G Aulisa; Francesco Falciglia; Marco Giordano; Giuseppe Mastantuoni; Andrea Poscia; Vincenzo Guzzanti Journal: Scoliosis Spinal Disord Date: 2016-10-14
Authors: A M Zaidman; M N Zaidman; E L Strokova; A V Korel; E V Kalashnikova; T V Rusova; M V Mikhailovsky Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Davide Bizzoca; Andrea Piazzolla; Lorenzo Moretti; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti; Giuseppe Solarino Journal: World J Orthop Date: 2022-05-18