Literature DB >> 33206334

The Use of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.

Daiki Kasai1, Gaynor Parfitt2, Brett Tarca2, Roger Eston2, Margarita D Tsiros2.   

Abstract

In adults, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) can be used to predict maximal oxygen uptake, estimate time to exhaustion, assess internal training load and regulate exercise intensity. However, the utility of RPE in children is less researched and therefore, warrants investigation. The purpose of this scoping review is to map out the literature around the application of RPE specifically during aerobic exercise in paediatric populations. Seven bibliographic databases were systematically searched. Grey literature searching and pearling of references were also conducted. To be included for the review, studies were required to comply with the following: (1) participants aged ≤ 18 years asymptomatic of any injuries, disabilities or illnesses; (2) applied RPE in aerobic exercise, testing and/or training; (3) included at least one measure of exercise intensity; and (4) be available in English. The search identified 22 eligible studies that examined the application of RPE in children. These studies involved a total of 718 participants across ten different countries. Nine different types of RPE scales were employed. Overall, the application of RPE in paediatric populations can be classified into three distinct themes: prediction of cardiorespiratory fitness/performance, monitoring internal training loads, and regulation of exercise intensity. The utility of RPE in paediatric populations remains unclear due to the small body of available research and inconsistencies between studies. However, findings from the included studies in this scoping review may show promise. Further research focussing on child-specific RPE scales across various sports, subgroups, and in field-based settings is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33206334     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01374-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  41 in total

1.  A new rating scale of perceived exertion based on subjective estimation of exhaustion time: a preliminary study.

Authors:  M Garcin; H Vandewalle; H Monod
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  A new approach to monitoring exercise training.

Authors:  C Foster; J A Florhaug; J Franklin; L Gottschall; L A Hrovatin; S Parker; P Doleshal; C Dodge
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Use of ratings of perceived exertion in sports.

Authors:  Roger Eston
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.010

4.  Measuring training load in sports.

Authors:  Michael Ian Lambert; Jill Borresen
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.010

5.  Perceptually regulated training at RPE13 is pleasant and improves physical health.

Authors:  Gaynor Parfitt; Harrison Evans; Roger Eston
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Children's OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation.

Authors:  R J Robertson; F L Goss; N F Boer; J A Peoples; A J Foreman; I M Dabayebeh; N B Millich; G Balasekaran; S E Riechman; J D Gallagher; T Thompkins
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Validity of a perceived exertion scale for children: a pilot study.

Authors:  R G Eston; K L Lamb; A Bain; A M Williams; J G Williams
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-04

Review 8.  Prediction of maximal or peak oxygen uptake from ratings of perceived exertion.

Authors:  Jérémy B Coquart; Murielle Garcin; Gaynor Parfitt; Claire Tourny-Chollet; Roger G Eston
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Submaximal, Perceptually Regulated Exercise Testing Predicts Maximal Oxygen Uptake: A Meta-Analysis Study.

Authors:  Jeremy Coquart; Montassar Tabben; Abdulaziz Farooq; Claire Tourny; Roger Eston
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Reliability of ratings of perceived effort regulation of exercise intensity.

Authors:  R G Eston; J G Williams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  An Examination and Critique of Subjective Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity: The Talk Test, Feeling Scale, and Rating of Perceived Exertion.

Authors:  Daniel Bok; Marija Rakovac; Carl Foster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 11.928

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.