| Literature DB >> 33205903 |
Lan Zhang1, Caiwu Li2, Yaru Zhai1, Lan Feng1, Keke Bai1, Zhizhong Zhang2, Yan Huang2, Ti Li2, Desheng Li2, Hao Li1, Pengfei Cui1, Danyu Chen1, Hongning Wang1, Xin Yang1.
Abstract
In this study, a total of 14 vaginal samples (GPV1-14) from giant pandas were analyzed. These vaginal samples were divided into two groups as per the region and age of giant pandas. All the vaginal samples were analyzed using metagenomic sequencing. As per the outcomes of metagenomic analysis, Proteobacteria (39.04%), Firmicutes (5.27%), Actinobacteria (2.94%), and Basidiomycota (2.77%) were found to be the dominant phyla in the microbiome of the vaginal samples. At the genus level, Pseudomonas (21.90%) was found to be the most dominant genus, followed by Streptococcus (3.47%), Psychrobacter (1.89%), and Proteus (1.38%). Metastats analysis of the microbial species in the vaginal samples of giant pandas from Wolong Nature Reserve, Dujiangyan and Ningbo Youngor Zoo, and Ya'an Bifengxia Nature Reserve was found to be significantly different (p < 0.05). Age groups, that is, AGE1 (5-10 years old) and AGE2 (11-16 years old), also demonstrated significantly different inter-group microbial species (p < 0.05). For the first time, Chlamydia and Neisseria gonorrhoeae were detected in giant pandas' reproductive tract. GPV3 vaginal sample (2.63%) showed highest Chlamydia content followed by GPV14 (0.91%), and GPV7 (0.62%). GPV5 vaginal sample (7.17%) showed the highest Neisseria gonorrhoeae content, followed by GPV14 (7.02%), and GPV8 (6.50%). Furthermore, we employed eggNOG, CAZy, KEGG, and NCBI databases to investigate the functional significance of giant panda's vaginal microbial community. The outcomes indicated that giant panda's vaginal microbes were involved in biological processes. The data from this study will help in improving the reproductive health of giant pandas.Entities:
Keywords: giant panda; metagenomic sequencing; vaginal microbiome
Year: 2020 PMID: 33205903 PMCID: PMC7755806 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
The sample group information.
| Basis of grouping | Group name | Sample serial number |
|---|---|---|
| 5–10 years old | AGE1 | GPV1‐GPV7 |
| 11–16 years old | AGE2 | GPV8‐GPV12 |
| 17–23 years old | AGE3 | GPV13‐GPV14 |
| Wolong Nature Reserve | WL | GPV1, GPV2, GPV8, GPV13, GPV14 |
| Dujiangyan Base and Ningbo Youngor Zoo | DN | GPV3, GPV6, GPV7 |
| Ya'an Bifengxia Nature Reserve | YA | GPV4,GPV5,GPV9,GPV10,GPV11,GPV12 |
FIGURE 1Clustering tree based on Bray–Curtis distance. (a) Clustering tree based on Bray–Curtis distance in the regional groups. (b) Clustering tree based on Bray–Curtis distance in the age groups.
FIGURE 2The relative abundance of features based on metagenome sequencing reads on the genus level. (a) Genus level relative abundance in all the samples. (b) Genus level relative abundance in regional groups. (c) Genus level relative abundance in age groups.
FIGURE 3Clustering heat map based on the relative abundance of features based on metagenome sequencing at the genus level. (a) Genus level relative abundance clustering heat map in regional groups. (b) Genus level relative abundance clustering heat map in age groups.
FIGURE 4PCA and NMDS analysis of microorganisms composition at the phylum level. (a) PCA analysis of microorganisms composition in regional groups. (b) NMDS analysis of microorganisms composition in regional groups. (c) PCA analysis of microorganisms composition in age groups. (d) NMDS analysis of microorganisms composition in age groups.
FIGURE A1LDA value distribution map and evolutionary branch diagram of different microorganisms composition in regional and age groups. (a) LDA value distribution map of different microorganisms composition in regional groups. (b) LDA value distribution map of different microorganisms composition in age groups.
FIGURE 5Annotated gene number statistics graphs and cluster trees based on Bray–Curtis distance for each database. (a) EggNOG's Unigenes annotation number statistical graph (level 1). (b) CAZy Unigenes annotation number statistical graph (level 1). (c)The number of functional annotations of genes at KEGG (level 1).
FIGURE A2Relative abundances of the top 10 KEGG pathways in the region and age groups. (a) Relative abundances of the top 10 KEGG pathways in the region group (level 3). (b) Relative abundances of the top 10 KEGG pathways in the age group (level 3).
FIGURE 6Cluster the trees according to the Bray‐Curtis distance of the KEGG database. (a) Clustering tree based on Bray–Curtis distance in the regional groups. (b) Clustering tree based on Bray–Curtis distance in the age groups.
FIGURE A3PCA analysis diagram based on functional abundance. PCA results show that the abscissa represents the first principal component and the percentage represents the contribution of the first principal component to the sample difference. The vertical axis represents the second principal component, and the percentage represents the contribution of the second principal component to the sample difference. Each dot in the diagram represents a sample, and the samples in the same group are shown in the same color.