| Literature DB >> 33204692 |
Ling Ling1, Kaibao Ji2, Ping Li3, Zhe Hu2, Yiqiao Xing2, Yifeng Yu4, Wentian Zhou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the current meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of microcatheter-assisted circumferential trabeculotomy (Group 1) with that of conventional trabeculotomy (Group 2) for the treatment of childhood glaucoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33204692 PMCID: PMC7657706 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3716859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flow diagram of literature search procedure for meta-analysis.
Baseline characteristics and quality of the eligible studies.
| Study, year | Place | Mean age (months or years) | Study type | Number of eyes | Gender (female/male) | Baseline IOP (mmHg) | Outcomes | Quality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celea et al. 2016 [ | Romania | 5.37 ± 6.32 | Retrospective study | Group 1: 41 | None | Group 1: 27.29 ± 4.86 | Postoperative IOP | ∗∗∗∗∗∗ |
| Shi et al. 2016 [ | China | 33.2 ± 33.8 | Retrospective case-control study | Group 1: 22 | 7/13 | Group 1: 33.1 ± 6.1 | Postoperative IOP, complete success rate, qualified success rate, number of medications | ∗∗∗∗∗∗ |
| Lim et al. 2015 [ | USA | 0.61 ± 0.42 (years) | Retrospective study | Group 1: 14 | None | Group 1: 30.36 ± 6.05 | Postoperative IOP, number of medications | ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ |
| El Sayed and Gawdat 2017 [ | Egypt | 5.6 ± 4.8 | Randomized controlled study | Group 1: 30 | 11/19 | Group 1: 25.1 ± 6.4 | Postoperative IOP, complete success rate, qualified success rate, number of medications | 4 points |
| Shakrawal et al. 2017 [ | India | 6.52 ± 3.94 | Randomized controlled study | Group 1: 20 | None | Group 1: 24.70 ± 3.90 | Postoperative IOP, complete success rate, qualified success rate | 4 points |
Group1: microcatheter-assisted circumferential trabeculotomy; Group2: conventional trabeculotomy; IOP: intraocular pressure.
Figure 2Forest plot showing postoperative IOP between two groups.
Figure 3Forest plot for postoperative complete success rates between two groups.
Figure 4Forest plot for postoperative qualified success rates between two groups.
Figure 5Forest plot for postoperative antiglaucoma medication use between two groups.
Figure 6Forest plot for postoperative complication between two groups.