| Literature DB >> 33204371 |
Osman Ciloglu1, Evren Karaali1, Feride Fatma Gorgulu1, Timur Ekiz2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the thickness and stiffness of the diaphragm, using ultrasound (US) and strain elastography (SE) in patients with hyperkyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fracture.Entities:
Keywords: diaphragm; musculoskeletal ultrasound; osteoporosis; sonoelastography
Year: 2020 PMID: 33204371 PMCID: PMC7654313 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2020.99751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Figure 1B-mode ultrasound image showing the diaphragm. The diaphragm (D) is visualised between the peritoneum and pleura (thin arrows). The upper and lower white lines correspond to the pleura and peritoneum, respectively
Figure 2Diaphragm strain ratio measurement using the strain elastography. While measuring the spectral reflectance, the circular region of interest (ROI) was selected at 1-3 mm intervals, and the first ROI was placed in the intercostal muscle as a reference point (strain 1) near the diaphragm (strain 2)
Clinical and demographic features
| Variables | Kyphosis group | Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 81.10 ± 6.3 | 81.00 ± 5.5 | 0.945 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 14 (33.3) | 11 (30.6) | 0.793 | |
| Female | 28 (66.7) | 25 (69.4) | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.68 ± 2.1 | 24.56 ± 1.6 | 0.783 | |
| Baecke Physical Activity Score | 6.79 ± 0.3 | 6.78 ± 0.4 | 0.880 | |
| COBB | 77.33 ± 5.4 | 37.86 ± 6.7 | < 0.001 | |
| FEV1 predicted (lt) | 1.77 ± 0.1 | 2.14 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 | |
| FEV1 (%) | 90.86 ± 5.4 | 105.36 ± 1.9 | < 0.001 | |
| FVC predicted (lt) | 2.17 ± 0.1 | 2.31 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 | |
| FVC (%) | 104.24 ± 3.1 | 115.68 ± 3.1 | < 0.001 | |
| Diaphragm thickness | ||||
| End-expirium (mm) | 1.83 ± 0.1 | 1.84 ± 0.1 | 0.553 | |
| End-inspirium (mm) | 2.97 ± 0.2 | 3.58 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 | |
| Change level (mm) | 1.13 ± 0.1 | 1.74 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 | |
| Thickening ratio (%) | 61.84 ± 9.6 | 95.29 ± 4.3 | < 0.001 | |
| Strain ratio | ||||
| End-expirium | 2.25 ± 0.1 | 2.26 ± 0.1 | 0.153 | |
| End-inspirium | 3.56 ± 0.1 | 2.88 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 | |
| Change level | 1.31 ± 0.2 | 0.61 ±0.1 | < 0.001 | |
| Strain ratio (%) | 0.58 ± 0.1 | 0.27 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 | |
| Strain elastography – end-expirium | ||||
| Grade 1 (red to yellow) | 6 (14.3) | 33 (91.7) | < 0.001 | |
| Grade 2 (green) | 34 (81.0) | 3 (8.3) | ||
| Grade 3 (blue) | 2 (4.8) | 0 (0) | ||
| Strain elastography – end-expirium | ||||
| Grade 1 (red to yellow) | 3 (7.1) | 27 (75.0) | < 0.001 | |
| Grade 2 (green) | 27 (64.3) | 9 (25.0) | ||
| Grade 3 (blue) | 12 (28.6) | 0 (0) | ||
FEV1 – forced expiratory volume in the first second, FVC – forced vital capacity. The data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). Bold p values denote significance.
Correlation analyses
| Variables | Number of vertebra fracture | COBB angle | FEV1 (%) | FVC (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness end-expirium | 0.086 | 0.453 | 0.052 | 0.651 | -0.104 | 0.365 | –0.131 | 0.252 |
| Thickness end-inspirium | –0.774 | < 0.001 | –0.931 | < 0.001 | 0925 | < 0.001 | 0.787 | < 0.001 |
| Thickening ratio | –0.772 | < 0.001 | –0.922 | < 0.001 | 0.924 | < 0.001 | 0.795 | < 0.001 |
| Strain ratio | 0.782 | < 0.001 | 0.905 | < 0.001 | –0.929 | < 0.001 | –-0.791 | < 0.001 |
Figure 3The diaphragm thickening ratio values correlated positively with the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1, %) (r = 0.924, p < 0.001) and forced vital capacity (FVC, %) (r = 0.795, p < 0.001) values. The strain ratio values correlated inversely with the FEV1 (%) (r = –0.929, p < 0.001) and FVC (%) values (r = –0.791, p < 0.001)