Literature DB >> 33204151

Clinical Significance of Down-Regulated CD70 and CD27 Expression in Poor Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Ting-Ting Shan1, Xuan Zhao2, Zhen Zhang2, Jing-Pu Wang1, Yi Zhang2, Yang Yang1, Song Zhao1,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: CD27 is a co-stimulatory immune checkpoint molecule in the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. CD27 regulates the generation and maintenance of T cell immunity by binding to CD70 and regulating B-cell activation and immunoglobulin synthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CD27 and CD70 expression were assessed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) compared to normal tissue samples in the GSE53625 dataset of 179 paired cases and in 153 Chinese cases using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry. The correlation was also investigated between CD27 and CD70 expression and immune-related pathways, including CD8+ T cell recruitment, function, and other inhibitory immune checkpoints.
RESULTS: Levels of both CD27 and CD70 expression were down-regulated in ESCC compared to the paired normal tissues. CD27 and CD70 expression was mainly present in lymphocytes surrounding and infiltrating the tumor lesions but rarely expressed in tumor cells. Lost expression of CD27 and CD70 was associated with clinicopathological features, including depth of tumor invasion and better patient survival. Furthermore, CD27 expression was significantly associated with levels of CD8A, GZMB, IFNG, the CD8+ T cell recruitment-associated chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11), and CD8 receptors (CCR5, CXCR6, and CXCR3), while CD70 expression was inversely associated with levels of immunosuppressive checkpoints (PD-L1, PD-L2, and HHLA2).
CONCLUSION: Detection of CD70/CD27 expression could be further verified as a biomarker for ESCC early detection and prognosis prediction.
© 2020 Shan et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD27; CD70; biomarker; esophageal cancer; prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33204151      PMCID: PMC7660989          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S241377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


Introduction

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world.1,2 Histologically, esophageal cancer can be classified into adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)3 with a 5-year survival rate between 15% and 25%.4 Esophageal SCC (ESCC) is a major subtype of esophageal cancer, with a very high incidence rate, especially in Eastern and Central Asia; approximately 90–95% of all esophageal cancers diagnosed in the world are ESCC.5 To date, treatment of ESCC is limited to surgery for early stage diseases and adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy,6 and immune-targeted therapy is limited for ESCC patients.7 Thus, there is an urgent need to identify and evaluate novel ESCC diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options. In recent years, the discovery of the signal axis of immune checkpoints, like the CTLA4 and CD274 (PD-L1)/PDCD1 (PD-1) axes, has brought a new era for cancer immunotherapy. Evidence in anti-tumor activity of the immunological checkpoint inhibitors is also accumulating.8 In this regard, understanding the regulation of the CD27 and CD70 interaction could be a novel strategy for cancer immunotherapy.9 CD27 is a co-stimulatory immune checkpoint molecule in the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily and functions to generate and maintain T cell immunity. Specifically, upon binding to CD70, CD27 can regulate B cell activation and immunoglobulin synthesis.10 After binding to CD70, CD27 can promote cell survival, enhance T cell and B cell receptor-mediated proliferation signals, and increase effector function.10 In addition, CD27 signaling can increase production of the T cell growth/survival factor IL-2,11,12 leading to either improved T cell function or dysfunction, depending on CD27 expression level, duration, and ability to bind to CD70.13–15 Thus, CD70 expression is strictly regulated and CD70 transient expression occurs only in activated T cells and B cells, or in antigen presenting dendritic cells (DC) and natural killer (NK) subpopulations.10 However, compared to very limited CD70 expression in normal cells, CD70 was reported to be up-regulated in human cancers16,17 or in chronic viral infections.13 Accumulating evidence supports the notion that the CD27–CD70 interaction enhances anti-tumor immunity.18 In this study, we first analyzed CD70 and CD27 expression in ESCC and para-cancerous tissues using the online GSE53625 dataset and then associated their expression with clinicopathological features and outcomes in ESCC patients. We then confirmed these data using our cohort of patients.

Materials and Methods

GSE53625 Dataset

We first retrieved the GSE53625 dataset of esophageal cancer from the GEO website (), which included differentially expressed genes in esophageal cancer compared to normal tissues, as well as clinicopathological parameters, like age, sex, pathological staging, T staging, N staging, and M staging. This dataset contains two cohorts of normal and cancerous esophageal tissue samples, for a total of 179 cases; however, this dataset did not specify ESCC localizations. We collected and analyzed data on CD27 and CD70 mRNA levels (see below).

Tissue Samples

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) and written informed consent was received before each patient according to the Declaration of Helsinki. We consecutively collected 153 patients into this study from the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University between November 2013 and January 2015. The patients underwent thoracic surgery to remove ESCC that was diagnosed according to the tumor nodule metastasis (TNM) staging system.19 No patients received any preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Fresh normal mucosa and ESCC tissue samples were collected after their surgical resection for qRT-PCR analysis. In addition, we obtained paraffin blocks from 126 ESCC patients for immunohistochemical analysis.

Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

Both tumor and normal esophageal tissue specimens were acquired following surgery, transferred to the lab, and immediately washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice. Total cellular RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was then synthesized using the reduction-assisted first-chain c-DNA synthesis kit (Symbid Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The upper limit mRNA level of repeated use was quantified using Stratagene Mx3005P (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). qPCR was amplified using a premixed Tap Kit (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and GAPDH mRNA was used as the loading control. The qPCR conditions were an initial 95°C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min using the Primescript TM RT reagent kit (Takara, Primescript TM RT reagent Kit, Beijing, China). Each sample was amplified in triplicate and repeated at least once. The data were quantified and normalized to the control using the 2ΔΔCq method.20 The primer sequences were CD70, 5ʹ-CGTCCCACCCAAGTGACTC-3ʹ and 5ʹ-GCTTTGGTCCCATTGGTCG-3ʹ; CD27, 5ʹ-CGGTATGCAAGGATCACACTG-3ʹ and 5ʹ-CAGAGAGGCACTACTGGGCT-3ʹ; GAPDH, 5ʹ-GGAGGAGATCCCTCCAAAT-3ʹ and GGCTGTTGTCTACTTCTGG-3ʹ, which were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin blocks were retrieved from the Pathology Department and sectioned into 4-µm thick sections for immunohistochemistry. In brief, the tissue sections were dewaxed and re-hydrated and then, incubated with an antigen retrieval solution. The tissue sections were then treated with 3% H2O2 and 5% goat serum. Next, the sections were incubated with an anti-CD27 or anti-CD70 antibody [CD27 Clone EPR8569, Abcam (Cambridge, UK); CD70 Clone #301731, R&D Systems/Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA)] at 4°C overnight. After rewarming to room temperature for 1 h, the sections were incubated with a secondary biotinylated antibody, and diaminobenzidine was used as a chromogen. Hematoxylin was used for nuclear counterstaining. The sections were observed using light microscopy and all images were acquired at 200× magnification and assessed by two pathologists independently using a semi-quantitative immunoreactivity score (IRS). According to the proportion of positive tumor cells examined, the tissues were scored based on percent positive staining as follows: 0 (0%), 1 (0–25%), 2 (26 −50%), 3 (51 −75%), and 4 (76–100%). Staining intensity was scored as 0 (no staining), 1 (week staining), 2 (intermediate staining), or 3 (strong staining). IRS was calculated as staining intensity × proportion of positive tumor cells, ranging between 0 and 12. Patients with a total score < 4 were considered low expressing and those with a total score ≥ 4 were considered high expressing. Accordingly, we divided patients into two groups for each marker: high CD27 group (n = 46) and low CD27 group (n = 80), and high CD70 group (n = 40) and low CD70 group (n = 86).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The paired t test was used to compare expression of CD27 and CD70 between tumor and adjacent normal tissues, while CD70 and CD27 expression in each group were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test and association of their expression with clinicopathological parameters from patients was analyzed using the chi-square test. The Kaplan–Meier curves and the Log-rank test were used to determine associations between CD27 and CD70 expression with overall survival of patients. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA Levels with Clinicopathological Parameters from ESCC Patients in the GSE53625 Dataset

We first assessed CD27 and CD70 expression and their association with clinicopathological parameters from ESCC patients using the GSE53625 dataset (). This dataset contains two cohorts of ESCC patients: 119 and 60 pairs of ESCC and normal esophageal tissues. Our analysis showed that levels of CD27 and CD70 mRNA were lower in ESCC tissues than in the paired normal tissues, while CD27 expression was inversely associated with depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.026), but CD27 and CD70 expression were not associated with other clinicopathological parameters (Table 1).
Table 1

Association of CD27 and CD70 Expression with Clinicopathological Data from the GSE53626 Dataset

Clinical ParametersNumberCD27 Expressionp-valueCD70 Expressionp-value
LowHighLowHigh
Age, years0.330.50
 ≤609946534752
 >608043374238
Gender0.180.31
 Male13667697076
 Female4322211914
T staging0.026*0.22
 T1125748
 T22713141413
 T311063476050
 T4308221119
N staging0.850.22
 N011352614340
 N14222203032
 N22210121111
 N3125757
TNM staging0.630.053
 I106455
 II7740374126
 III9243494359
Living staging0.690.69
 Survival7335383538
 Death10654525452
Total17989908990

Abbreviations: CD27, calcyphosine; CD70, calcyphosine; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Association of CD27 and CD70 Expression with Clinicopathological Data from the GSE53626 Dataset Abbreviations: CD27, calcyphosine; CD70, calcyphosine; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Association of CD27 and CD70 Expression with Prognosis of ESCC Patients

We then analyzed CD27 and CD70 levels in our cohort of 153 ESCC patients and found that both CD27 and CD70 mRNA levels were significantly lower in ESCC tissues compared to para-cancer normal tissues (P < 0.0043 and P < 0.0029, respectively; Figure 1A and B). Our Kaplan–Meier curves and Log-rank test showed that both CD27 and CD70 expression were significantly associated with better overall survival of ESCC patients (P = 0.0027 and P = 0.045; Figure 1C and D).
Figure 1

Expression and association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA with survival of ESCC patients. (A) Level of CD27 mRNA in GSE53625 data. (B) Level of CD70 mRNA in GSE53625 data. (C) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD27 expression in GSE53625 data. (D) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD70 expression in GSE53625 data.

Expression and association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA with survival of ESCC patients. (A) Level of CD27 mRNA in GSE53625 data. (B) Level of CD70 mRNA in GSE53625 data. (C) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD27 expression in GSE53625 data. (D) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD70 expression in GSE53625 data.

Association of CD27 and CD70 Expression with Clinicopathological Parameters from Our Cohort of ESCC Patients

Next, we determined the association of CD27 and CD70 expression with clinicopathological parameters from our patients and found that CD27 expression was inversely associated with tumor T stage and N stage, while CD70 expression was inversely associated with tumor N stage (Table 2).
Table 2

Association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA Levels with Clinicopathological Data from 153 Patients

Clinical ParametersNumberCD27 Expressionp-valueCD70 Expressionp-value
LowHighLowHigh
Age, years0.520.48
 ≤604822262622
 <6010554515055
Gender0.560.64
 Male10249535250
 Female5127242427
T staging0.043*0.35
 T11851373
 T25223291620
 T38348355454
 T400000
N staging0.027*0.048*
 N010856525256
 N13512232213
 N2108228
 N300000
TNM staging0.360.91
 I117454
 II10146544141
 III4324193032
Living staging0.0870.22
 Survival10758493543
 Death4618284134
Total15376777677

Abbreviations: CD27, calcyphosine; CD70, calcyphosine; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA Levels with Clinicopathological Data from 153 Patients Abbreviations: CD27, calcyphosine; CD70, calcyphosine; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Expression of CD27 and CD70 Proteins in ESCC Tissues and Association with Overall Survival

Since protein is the functional unit of any protein-coding gene, we measured CD27 and CD70 protein expression using immunohistochemistry in 126 paired surgical tissue samples from ESCC patients. We divided the patients into CD27 low-expressing tumors (n = 70; Figure 2A) and CD27 high expressing tumors (n = 56; Figure 2B), and CD70 low-expressing tumors (n = 86; Figure 2C) and CD70 high expressing tumors (n = 40; Figure 2D). We found that both CD27 and CD70 protein expression were significantly lower in ESCC tissues compared to normal esophageal tissues (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively; Figure 2E and F). Moreover, CD27 and CD70 expression were significantly associated with better overall survival of patients (P = 0.0071 and P = 0.0022, respectively; Figure 2G and H).
Figure 2

Expression and association of CD27 and CD70 protein with survival of ESCC patients. (A–D) Immunohistochemistry. Tissue specimens were immunostained with an anti-CD27 or CD7- antibody and scored and photographed. (E) Level of CD27 immunostaining data in our cohort of ESCC patients. (F) Level of CD70 immunostaining data in our cohort of ESCC patients. (G) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD27 expression in our cohort of ESCC patients. (H) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD70 expression in our cohort of ESCC patients. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared between normal and tumor tissues.

Expression and association of CD27 and CD70 protein with survival of ESCC patients. (A–D) Immunohistochemistry. Tissue specimens were immunostained with an anti-CD27 or CD7- antibody and scored and photographed. (E) Level of CD27 immunostaining data in our cohort of ESCC patients. (F) Level of CD70 immunostaining data in our cohort of ESCC patients. (G) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD27 expression in our cohort of ESCC patients. (H) Kaplan-Meier curve stratified by CD70 expression in our cohort of ESCC patients. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared between normal and tumor tissues.

Association of CD27 and CD70 Protein Expression with Clinicopathological Parameters from ESCC Patients

We associated CD27 and CD70 protein expression with clinicopathological parameters from ESCC patients and found that CD27 protein expression was inversely associated with tumor T and N stages, while CD70 protein expression was inversely associated with tumor T stage, clinical stage, and N stage (Table 3).
Table 3

Association of CD27 and CD70 Protein Expression with Clinicopathological Data from 126 ESCC Patients

Clinical ParametersNumberCD27 Expressionp-valueCD70 Expressionp-value
LowHighLowHigh
Age, years0.110.17
 <605230225822
 ≥607440342818
Gender0.220.09
 Male7545304516
 Female5125263524
T staging0.480.019*
 T16035251818
 T25932276020
 T3/T473482
N staging<0.001*<0.001*
 N07236363536
 N1+N254450514
TNM stage<0.001*0.003*
 I/II9964355638
 III27621302
Living state0.259<0.0001*
 Survive7145263636
 Death653520504
Total12680468640

Abbreviations: CD27, calcyphosine; CD70, calcyphosine; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Association of CD27 and CD70 Protein Expression with Clinicopathological Data from 126 ESCC Patients Abbreviations: CD27, calcyphosine; CD70, calcyphosine; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

CD27 and CD70 Expression and Association with Prognosis Using the GSE53625 Dataset

To confirm our current data, we searched, retrieved, and analyzed GSE53625 data for CD27 and CD70 mRNA levels in ESCC samples. We found that both CD27 and CD70 mRNA levels were significantly lower in ESCC tissues compared to para-cancer normal tissues (both P < 0.0001; Figure 3A and B), which was consistent with our cohort of Chinese patients. The Kaplan–Meier curves and the Log-rank test showed that CD70 mRNA levels were significantly associated with better overall survival of patients (P=0.041; Figure 3C. P = 0.047; Figure 3D).
Figure 3

GSE53625 dataset for expression and association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA with survival of ESCC patients. (A) CD27 mRNA level from GSE53625 dataset on ESCC. (B) CD70 mRNA level from GSE53625 dataset on ESCC. (C) Kaplan-Meier curve of GSE53625 dataset stratified by CD27 expression. (D) Kaplan-Meier curve of GSE53625 dataset stratified by CD70 expression.

GSE53625 dataset for expression and association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA with survival of ESCC patients. (A) CD27 mRNA level from GSE53625 dataset on ESCC. (B) CD70 mRNA level from GSE53625 dataset on ESCC. (C) Kaplan-Meier curve of GSE53625 dataset stratified by CD27 expression. (D) Kaplan-Meier curve of GSE53625 dataset stratified by CD70 expression.

Association of CD27 and CD70 Expression with the Recruitment, Function, and Inhibitory Immune Checkpoints of CD8T Cells

We further determined the association of CD27 and CD70 mRNA expression with the recruitment, function, and inhibitory immune checkpoints of CD8 T cells. Our data showed that CD27 expression was significantly associated with CD8A (Figure 4A), GZMB (Figure 4C), and IFNG (Figure 4B), as well as with CD8 T cell recruitment of related chemokines CXCL9 (Figure 4D), CXCL10 (Figure 4E), and CXCL11 (Figure 4F), and their receptors CCR5 (Figure 4G), CXCR6 (Figure 4H), and CXCR3 (Figure 4I). However, CD70 expression was inversely associated with levels of immunosuppression checkpoint markers PD-L1 (Figure 4J), PD-L2 (Figure 4K), and HHLA2 (Figure 4L).
Figure 4

Association of CD27 and CD70 with levels of other proteins related to the recruitment, function, and inhibitory immune checkpoints of CD8 T cells. (A) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CD8A level. (B) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and IFNG level. (C) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and GZMB level. (D) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCL9 level. (E) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCL10 level. (F) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCL11 level. (G) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CCR5 level. (H) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCR3 level. (I) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCR6 level. (J) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and PD-L1 level. (K) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and PD-L2 level. (L) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and HHLA2 level.

Association of CD27 and CD70 with levels of other proteins related to the recruitment, function, and inhibitory immune checkpoints of CD8 T cells. (A) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CD8A level. (B) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and IFNG level. (C) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and GZMB level. (D) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCL9 level. (E) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCL10 level. (F) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCL11 level. (G) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CCR5 level. (H) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCR3 level. (I) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and CXCR6 level. (J) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and PD-L1 level. (K) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and PD-L2 level. (L) GSE53625 data for association between CD27 and HHLA2 level.

Discussion

Immunotherapy has gained increasing attention in the field of cancer research. Specifically, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)-targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, or PDL-1 have shown clinical potential for effectively controlling and treating human cancers.21 Abnormal expression of CD70 has also been documented in blood malignancies and solid tumors as a marker of adverse clinical outcomes,16,22-24 indicating a novel target for cancer treatment. ESCC is one of the most aggressive cancers in the world due to lack of early detection and effective treatment options.25 In the current study, we analyzed CD27 and CD70 expression in ESCC and found that their mRNA levels were frequently reduced in ESCC tissues compared to para-cancer tissues. Our immunohistochemical staining also confirmed that expression of CD27 and CD70 proteins was also decreased in ESCC, which was associated with poor overall survival of ESCC patients. CD27 signaling can inhibit tumor growth. For example, mice that overexpressed and constitutively expressed CD70 on CD11c-positive cells exhibited a stronger tumor-specific CD8+ T cell response and rejection of tumor cells compared to wild-type mice.26,27 Approximately one-third of patients with Hodgkin’s or diffuse large B cell lymphoma had CD27 or CD70 germline defects,28–30 and CD70 somatic mutations or deletions were common in diffuse large B cell lymphomas and Burkitt lymphomas,31,32 further suggesting that reduced activity of CD27 and CD70 signaling could contribute to development of these malignancies in humans. Other previous studies reported that a monoclonal antibody against CD27 helped to promote the rejection of CD8+ T-cell-dependent tumors in mice,33–35 which was consistent with CD40-mediated dendritic cell dependence and subsequent CD8+ T-cell initiation of CD70 signaling.36–38 In the tumor microenvironment, agonistic anti-CD27 antibodies were able to potently boost multiple aspects of endogenous responses and tumor immunity,35 while Varlilumab, a monoclonal antibody against human CD27, caused CD8+ T-cell-dependent tumor rejection in transgenic mice of human CD27 protein and enhanced human T cells in vitro.39,40 A previous study also showed that CD27 levels were lower in cancer patients compared to healthy donors,41 but there are no reports of CD70 expression in ESCC. Taken together, these studies all confirmed that CD27 and CD70 have anti-tumor properties in human cancers and in animal models. Our current data also showed that CD27 and CD70 expression was reduced in ESCC tissues, which was associated with unfavorable ESCC prognosis. To better understand the association of CD27 and CD70 expression with ESCC prognosis, we confirmed our data using the GSE53625 dataset. Both our data and the dataset showed reduced CD27 and CD70 expression in ESCC and poor survival of ESCC patients. In our analysis, we first optimized our cut-off point for both CD27 and CD70 by dividing CD27 and CD70 expression using median criteria: median for high vs low level of CD27 and CD70 mRNA levels, and median for high vs low CD27 and CD70 protein expression. Although these criteria are arbitrary, they are frequently used in the literature for semi-quantifying RT-qPCR or immunohistochemical data. We found that loss of CD27 and CD70 expression was significantly associated with unfavorable ESCC prognosis. However, a previous study of serum CD27 levels in 96 lung cancer patients showed that high CD27 levels were associated with poorer lung cancer prognosis compared to those with low serum CD27 levels.41 However, screening of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) showed that approximately 90% of cell lines had no or very low expression of CD27, CEACAM1, CTLA4, LRIG1, PDCD1LG2, or TNFRSF18, which was associated with poor survival phenotypes.42 Moreover, another previous study reported that CD70 expression in tumor-associated fibroblasts was associated with poor survival of colorectal cancer patients,43 while an additional study showed an association of CD70 expression with breast cancer to lung-specific metastasis, and that CD70+ cells (but not CD70− cells) possessed self-renewal and differentiation potential.44 To date, there are no publications listed in PubMed showing an association of CD27/CD70 expression in human esophageal cancer tissues, although a previous study reported dysregulated expression of immune checkpoints, including CD27, in T cells of esophageal cancer patients.45 Thus, our current study is novel and demonstrates an association of reduced CD27/Cd70 expression with poor survival of ESCC patients. We acknowledge that our data may be inconsistent with some previous studies of other solid tumors, and thus future studies with larger sample sizes from multiple institutions are needed to confirm our current data. Furthermore, we speculated that the reduced level of CD27 and CD70 expression in ESCC could lead to inhibition of the effector T cells in the ESCC microenvironment. We, therefore, analyzed levels of CD8+ T lymphocyte recruitment and function, as well as inhibitory immune checkpoint-related proteins in ESCC tissues and found that CD27 levels were significantly associated with CD8A levels, functional molecules (GZMB and IFNG), CD8T cell recruitment related chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11), and receptors (CCR5, CXCR6, and CXCR3), whereas CD70 levels were inversely associated with levels of immunosuppression checkpoint markers PD-l1, PD-l2, and HHLA2. Thus, these results suggest that down-regulated CD27 and CD70 expression may be accompanied by decreased CD8 T cell recruitment, function, and inhibitory immune checkpoint markers, which in turn affects ESCC prognosis. Indeed, CD27 is a co-stimulatory molecule that is expressed on CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes as an important factor for immune activation. A previous study using a novel CD27 agonist antibody (αhCD27) and peptide vaccine showed their efficacy on active cancer immunotherapy.46 Furthermore, PD-1 blockade and CD27 stimulation activated and synergized CD8+ T-cell-driven antitumor immunity in multiple tumor models.47 CD70–CD27 interactions are important for the regulation of adaptive immunity. However, further research is needed to confirm our current findings. There are limitations to our current study. First, we used an ex vivo model and did not explore the association of CD27 and CD70 using functional experiments. Moreover, we only detected CD27/CD70 expression in ESCC and para-tumor tissues without assessing their expression in stromal cells. These deficiencies limit our data interpretation.

Conclusion

In our current study, we demonstrated that CD27 and CD70 mRNA levels and protein expression were down-regulated in ESCC tissues and that CD27 and CD70 expression were associated with better overall survival of ESCC patients. Thus, CD27 and CD70 may be useful as biomarkers for ESCC early detection and prognosis.
  47 in total

1.  7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Eugene H Blackstone; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Requirement for CD70 in CD4+ Th cell-dependent and innate receptor-mediated CD8+ T cell priming.

Authors:  Vadim Y Taraban; Tania F Rowley; David F Tough; Aymen Al-Shamkhani
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Enhanced formation and survival of CD4+ CD25hi Foxp3+ T-cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Margot Jak; Rogier Mous; Ester B M Remmerswaal; René Spijker; Annelieke Jaspers; Adriana Yagüe; Eric Eldering; René A W Van Lier; Marinus H J Van Oers
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2009-05

4.  Expression of costimulatory ligand CD70 on steady-state dendritic cells breaks CD8+ T cell tolerance and permits effective immunity.

Authors:  Anna M Keller; Anita Schildknecht; Yanling Xiao; Maries van den Broek; Jannie Borst
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 31.745

5.  Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.

Authors:  Farin Kamangar; Graça M Dores; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Elimination of chronic viral infection by blocking CD27 signaling.

Authors:  Matthias Matter; Bernhard Odermatt; Hideo Yagita; Jean-Marc Nuoffer; Adrian F Ochsenbein
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Inherited CD70 deficiency in humans reveals a critical role for the CD70-CD27 pathway in immunity to Epstein-Barr virus infection.

Authors:  Kazushi Izawa; Emmanuel Martin; Claire Soudais; Julie Bruneau; David Boutboul; Rémy Rodriguez; Christelle Lenoir; Andrew D Hislop; Caroline Besson; Fabien Touzot; Capucine Picard; Isabelle Callebaut; Jean-Pierre de Villartay; Despina Moshous; Alain Fischer; Sylvain Latour
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  CD27 stimulation unveils the efficacy of linked class I/II peptide vaccines in poorly immunogenic tumors by orchestrating a coordinated CD4/CD8 T cell response.

Authors:  Katherine A Riccione; Li-Zhen He; Peter E Fecci; Pamela K Norberg; Carter M Suryadevara; Adam Swartz; Patrick Healy; Elizabeth Reap; Tibor Keler; Qi-Jing Li; Kendra L Congdon; Luis Sanchez-Perez; John H Sampson
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  Tumor intrinsic immunity related proteins may be novel tumor suppressors in some types of cancer.

Authors:  Donghai Xiong; Yian Wang; Ming You
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.