| Literature DB >> 33204121 |
Ying Chen1, Wei-Li Wang1, Wei Zhang1, Yun-Tao Zhang1, Sa-Xiao Tang1, Ping-Ping Wu1, Lei Zeng1, Chao Qian1, Ting-Bo Liang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection after liver transplantation (LT). Improved understanding of the risk factors and outcomes of CRE infections can help us to develop effective preventive strategies and even guide early treatment of high-risk LT patients.Entities:
Keywords: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; immunosuppression; infections; liver transplantation; mortality; risk factors
Year: 2020 PMID: 33204121 PMCID: PMC7666982 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S278084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.003
Comparison of Patients with and without CRE Infection Within 30 Days After Liver Transplantation
| Patients with CRE Infection, n=26 (6.7%) | Patients without CRE Infection, n=361 (93.3%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), median±SD) | 48.6 2±11.29 | 50.65±10.21 | 0.330 |
| Sex, male | 22 (84.6%) | 279 (77.3%) | 0.472 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.12±9.25 | 26.59±9.32 | 0.419 |
| MELD, median±SD) | 25.23±11.22 | 19.74±9.86 | 0.007 |
| Child-Pugh score | 9.88±2.37 | 9.26±2.58 | 0.229 |
| Pre-LT ICU stay | 6 (23.1%) | 38 (10.5%) | 0.052 |
| Underlying liver diseasea | |||
| HBV | 18 (69.2%) | 283 (78.4%) | 0.278 |
| HCC | 7 (26.9%) | 121 (33.5%) | 0.490 |
| Alcohol | 4 (15.4%) | 17 (4.7%) | 0.020 |
| AIH | 1 (3.8%) | 21 (5.8%) | 0.675 |
| PBC | 0 | 1 (0.3%) | 0.548 |
| Others | 2 (7.7%) | 42 (11.6%) | 0.541 |
| Graft type | 0.959 | ||
| DBCD | 4 (15.4%) | 49 (13.6%) | |
| DBD | 6 (23.1%) | 89 (24.6%) | |
| DCD | 16 (61.5%) | 223 (61.8%) | |
| Living donor | 0 | 0 | |
| Cold ischemia time (min), median±SD) | 590.26±162.39 | 550.26±180.99 | 0.305 |
| Hot ischemia time (min), median±SD) | 10.95±7.00 | 10.23±8.24 | 0.696 |
| Intraoperative bleeding ≥1500 mL | 14 (53.8%) | 91 (25.2%) | 0.002 |
| CRE rectal carriage within 30 days post-LT | 13 (50.0%) | 52 (14.4%) | 0.000 |
| Vascular complications | 3 (11.5%) | 5 (1.4%) | 0.000 |
| Biliary complications | 5 (19.2%) | 24 (6.6%) | 0.019 |
| Reoperation | 8 (30.8%) | 19 (5.3%) | 0.000 |
| Ventilated >72 h | 8 (30.8%) | 25 (6.9%) | 0.000 |
| Renal replacement therapy >3 days | 10 (38.5%) | 36 (10.0%) | 0.000 |
Note: aSome patient presented more than one cause of liver disease.
Abbreviations: AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; BMI, body mass index; CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; DBD, donation after brain death; DBCD, donation after brain death followed by circulatory death; DCD, donation after circulatory death; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; pre-LT ICU stay, pre-liver transplantation intensive care unit stay; SD, standard deviation.
Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for CRE Infection After Liver Transplantation
| OR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MELD | 1.006 | 0.950–1.065 | 0.842 |
| Alcoholic liver disease | 4.094 | 0.910–18.415 | 0.066 |
| Intraoperative bleeding ≥1500 mL | 3.666 | 1.407–9.550 | 0.008 |
| CRE rectal carriage within 30 days post-LT | 5.516 | 2.113–14.399 | 0.000 |
| Ventilated >72 h | 2.344 | 0.636–8.639 | 0.201 |
| Reoperation | 2.673 | 0.773–9.244 | 0.121 |
| Biliary complications | 3.779 | 1.033–13.831 | 0.045 |
| Vascular complications | 5.357 | 0.690–41.600 | 0.109 |
| Renal replacement therapy >3 days | 3.762 | 1.196–11.833 | 0.023 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; LT, liver transplantation; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 1Survival rates associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. (A) A Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated reduced 180-day survival for liver transplant (LT) recipients with CRE infections versus LT recipients without CRE infections (51.5% vs 92.4%, log-rank p<0.001). (B) A Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated reduced 180-day survival for LT recipients with CRE bloodstream infections versus LT recipients with other pathogen bloodstream infections (41.0% vs 91.4%, log-rank p<0.001).