Literature DB >> 33203742

Dynamic Content Reactivation Supports Naturalistic Autobiographical Recall in Humans.

Adrian W Gilmore1, Alina Quach2, Sarah E Kalinowski2, Stephen J Gotts2, Daniel L Schacter3, Alex Martin2.   

Abstract

Humans can vividly recall and re-experience events from their past, and these are commonly referred to as episodic or autobiographical memories. fMRI experiments reliably associate autobiographical event recall with activity in a network of "default" or "core" brain regions. However, as prior studies have relied on covert (silent) recall procedures, current understanding may be hampered by methodological limitations that obscure dynamic effects supporting moment-to-moment content retrieval. Here, fMRI participants (N = 40) overtly (verbally) recalled memories for ∼2 min periods. The content of spoken descriptions was categorized using a variant of the Autobiographical Interview (AI) procedure (Levine et al., 2002) and temporally re-aligned with BOLD data so activity accompanying the recall of different details could be measured. Replicating prior work, sustained effects associated with autobiographical recall periods (which are insensitive to the moment-to-moment content of retrieval) fell primarily within canonical default network regions. Spoken descriptions were rich in episodic details, frequently focusing on physical entities, their ongoing activities, and their appearances. Critically, neural activity associated with recalling specific details (e.g., those related to people or places) was transient, broadly distributed, and grounded in category-selective cortex (e.g., regions related to social cognition or scene processing). Thus, although a single network may generally support the process of vivid event reconstruction, the structures required to provide detail-related information shift in a predictable manner that respects domain-level representations across the cortex.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans can vividly recall memories of autobiographical episodes, a process thought to involve the reconstruction of numerous distinct event details. Yet how the brain represents a complex episode as it unfolds over time remains unclear and appears inconsistent across experimental traditions. One hurdle is the use of covert (silent) in-scanner recall to study autobiographical memory, which prevents experimenter knowledge of what information is being retrieved, and when, throughout the remembering process. In this experiment, participants overtly described autobiographical memories while undergoing fMRI. Activity associated with the recall and description of specific details was transient, broadly distributed, and grounded in category-selective cortex. Thus, it appears that as events unfold mentally, structures are dynamically reactivated to support vivid recollection.
Copyright © 2021 Gilmore et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autobiographical interview; autobiographical memory; fMRI; reactivation; spoken recall

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33203742      PMCID: PMC7786205          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1490-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  89 in total

1.  The representation of object concepts in the brain.

Authors:  Alex Martin
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

3.  Similarities and differences in the default mode network across rest, retrieval, and future imagining.

Authors:  B Bellana; Z-X Liu; N B Diamond; C L Grady; M Moscovitch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Differentiating BOLD and non-BOLD signals in fMRI time series using multi-echo EPI.

Authors:  Prantik Kundu; Souheil J Inati; Jennifer W Evans; Wen-Ming Luh; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Specifying the core network supporting episodic simulation and episodic memory by activation likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Roland G Benoit; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  GRAPES-Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain.

Authors:  Alex Martin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 7.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory.

Authors:  D L Schacter; K A Norman; W Koutstaal
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 8.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Integrated strategy for improving functional connectivity mapping using multiecho fMRI.

Authors:  Prantik Kundu; Noah D Brenowitz; Valerie Voon; Yulia Worbe; Petra E Vértes; Souheil J Inati; Ziad S Saad; Peter A Bandettini; Edward T Bullmore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Individual differences in the relationship between episodic detail generation and resting state functional connectivity vary with age.

Authors:  Stephanie Matijevic; Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Aubrey A Wank; Lee Ryan; Matthew D Grilli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  A Role for the Anterior Hippocampus in Autobiographical Memory Construction Regardless of Temporal Distance.

Authors:  Sam Audrain; Adrian W Gilmore; Jenna M Wilson; Daniel L Schacter; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Hippocampus and temporal pole functional connectivity is associated with age and individual differences in autobiographical memory.

Authors:  Roni Setton; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Signy Sheldon; Gary R Turner; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  A data-driven functional mapping of the anterior temporal lobes.

Authors:  Andrew S Persichetti; Joseph M Denning; Stephen J Gotts; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Evidence supporting a time-limited hippocampal role in retrieving autobiographical memories.

Authors:  Adrian W Gilmore; Alina Quach; Sarah E Kalinowski; Estefanía I González-Araya; Stephen J Gotts; Daniel L Schacter; Alex Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  A Comparison of Single- and Multi-Echo Processing of Functional MRI Data During Overt Autobiographical Recall.

Authors:  Adrian W Gilmore; Anna M Agron; Estefanía I González-Araya; Stephen J Gotts; Alex Martin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.