| Literature DB >> 33203114 |
Iwona Pełech1, Daniel Sibera1,2, Piotr Staciwa1, Urszula Narkiewicz1, Robert Cormia3.
Abstract
In this work, low-pressure synthesis of carbon spheres from resorcinol and formaldehyde using an autoclave is presented. The influence of reaction time and process temperature as well as the effect of potassium oxalate, an activator, on the morphology and CO2 adsorption properties was studied. The properties of materials produced at pressureless (atmospheric) conditions were compared with those synthesized under higher pressures. The results of this work show that enhanced pressure treatment is not necessary to produce high-quality carbon spheres, and the morphology and porosity of the spheres produced without an activation step at pressureless conditions are not significantly different from those obtained at higher pressures. In addition, CO2 uptake was not affected by elevated pressure synthesis. It was also demonstrated that addition of the activator (potassium oxalate) had much more effect on key properties than the applied pressure treatment. The use of potassium oxalate as an activator caused non-uniform size distribution of spherical particles. Simultaneously higher values of surface area and total pore volumes were reached. A pressure treatment of the carbon materials in the autoclave significantly enhanced the CO2 uptake at 25 °C, but had no effect on it at 0 °C.Entities:
Keywords: autoclave; carbon dioxide adsorption; carbon nanospheres; carbon spheres; low-pressure synthesis; pressureless; resorcinol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33203114 PMCID: PMC7698224 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1SEM images of the materials obtained under different experimental conditions. (a) ARF_15 min/120; (b) ARF_ 1 h/120; (c) ARF_ 12 h/120; (d) ARF_15 min/200; (e) ARF_1 h/200; (f) ARF_7/1_15 min/120; (g) ARF_7/1_1 h/120; (h) ARF_7/1_12 h/200; (i) RF; (j) RF_7/1.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples without addition of potassium oxalate and treated under different experimental conditions (a) and the samples not treated in the autoclave (b).
Figure 3Thermogravimetric curves of the tested samples.
Physicochemical properties of the tested samples.
| Designation of the Sample | SBET | Total Pore Volume | CO2 Adsorption at 0 °C | CO2 Adsorption at 25 °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (m2/g) | (cm3/g) | (mmol/g) | (mmol/g) | |
|
| ||||
| RF | 472 | 0.25 | 3.59 | 2.52 |
| ARF_15 min/120 | 476 | 0.25 | 3.61 | 2.46 |
| ARF_15 min/200 | 478 | 0.26 | 3.53 | 2.49 |
| ARF_1 h/120 | 474 | 0.26 | 3.78 | 2.52 |
| ARF_1 h/200 | 483 | 0.27 | 3.73 | 2.52 |
| ARF_12 h/120 | 470 | 0.26 | 3.60 | 2.46 |
| ARF_20 h/120 | 486 | 0.28 | 3.59 | 2.44 |
| ARF_12 h/200 | 462 | 0.25 | 3.70 | 2.52 |
| ARF_20 h/200 | 473 | 0.29 | 3.51 | 2.55 |
|
| ||||
| RF_7/1 | 904 | 0.49 | 6.25 | 3.74 |
| ARF_7/1_15 min/120 | 903 | 0.49 | 5.96 | 4.41 |
| ARF_7/1_1 h/120 | 969 | 0.51 | 6.35 | 4.60 |
| ARF_7/1_12 h/120 | 847 | 0.46 | 6.08 | 4.06 |
| ARF_7/1_20 h/120 | 831 | 0.45 | 6.02 | 4.08 |
| ARF_7/1_12 h/200 | 923 | 0.49 | 6.07 | 4.14 |
| ARF_7/1_20 h/200 | 986 | 0.54 | 6.03 | 4.55 |
Figure 4Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for the samples obtained without (a) and with (b) addition of potassium oxalate.
Figure 5Exemplary CO2 adsorption isotherms at 0 °C for the unmodified samples (a) and samples modified with potassium oxalate (b).
Comparison of the CO2 adsorption values for potassium salt-activated carbon materials from different precursors at 1 bar.
| Carbon Precursor | CO2 Adsorption at 0 °C | CO2 Adsorption at 25 °C | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resorcinol-formaldehyde resin | 6.30 | 4.70 | [ |
| Coal tar pitch | 6.00 | 4.03 | [ |
| Fern leaves | 4.52 | 4.12 | [ |
| Carrot peels | 5.64 | 4.18 | [ |
| Starch | 4.40 | 3.40 | [ |
| Pinecone biochar | 7.90 | [ | |
| Waste coffee grounds | 7.50 | 4.21 | [ |
Figure 6Comparison of the pore size distribution (PSD) of unmodified sample and sample modified with potassium oxalate and without heat treatment.
Figure 7Pore size distributions of the unmodified samples.
Figure 8Pore size distributions of the samples modified with potassium oxalate.