| Literature DB >> 33203003 |
Juliene G C Dechichi1, Igor M Mariano1, Jéssica S Giolo1, Jaqueline P Batista1, Ana Luiza Amaral1, Paula A B Ribeiro2, Erick P de Oliveira3, Guilherme M Puga1.
Abstract
Physical exercise and isoflavone supplementation are potential strategies to prevent and treat cardiovascular diseases in postmenopausal women. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are additive effects of isoflavone supplementation when associated with combined aerobic and resistance exercise on resting and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and in blood pressure variability (BPV). Thirty-one non-obese postmenopausal women were randomly allocated into two groups: placebo and exercise (Placebo n = 19); and isoflavone supplementation (100 mg/day) and exercise (isoflavone n = 19). ABPM and BPV were evaluated before and after 10 weeks of moderate combined (aerobic and resistance) exercise training. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) with Bonferroni correction and intention-to-treat analysis was used to compare the effects of interventions on resting BP, ABPM and BPV. Combined exercise training decreased resting systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and reduced 24 h and awake ambulatory SBP, DBP and mean blood pressure over time, with no additional effects of isoflavone supplementation. No changes were observed in sleep period, or in BPV indexes (Standard Deviation of 24 h (SD), daytime and nighttime interval (SDdn) and average real variability (ARV) in both groups. We conclude that isoflavone supplementation does not potentiate the effects of combined training on resting and ambulatorial systolic and diastolic blood pressure in non-obese postmenopausal women.Entities:
Keywords: aerobic exercise; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure variability; menopause; soy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33203003 PMCID: PMC7697944 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flowchart of study participants.
Characteristics of participants (n = 31).
| Clinical Characteristics | PLA | ISO |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53 ± 5 | 56 ± 5 | 0.08 |
| Time after menopause (years) | 4 ± 4 | 7 ± 5 | 0.14 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.9 ± 0.7 | 26.2 ± 0.2 | 0.51 |
| Physical activity level-MET (min/week) | 954 ± 990 | 1268 ± 869 | 0.35 |
PLA: placebo and exercise; ISO: isoflavone and exercise; MET: metabolic equivalent of task. Unpaired t-test was used to compare groups. Data were described on average e standard deviation.
Comparison of clinical, anthropometric and strength characteristics at baseline and after 10 weeks combined exercise training moments between groups using placebo + exercise (PLA − n = 14) and isoflavone + exercise (ISO − n = 17) interventions.
| Baseline Mean ± Standard Error | 10 Weeks Mean ± Standard Error | Change Mean | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body Mass (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 64.7 ± 2.1 | 65.7 ± 2.3 | 0.12 | 0.91 | 0.46 | 1.1 (−1.2 to 3.3) |
| ISO | 65.3 ± 2.0 | 65.7 ± 2.0 | 0.4 (−0.6 to 1.4) | |||
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | ||||||
| PLA | 26.9 ± 0.7 | 25.1 ± 1.9 | 0.28 | 0.54 | 0.66 | −1.80 (−6.53 to 2.92) |
| ISO | 26.2 ± 0.8 | 26.5 ± 0.8 | 0.24 (−0.21 to 0.69) | |||
| Total Lean Mass (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 41.7 ± 1.0 | 42.6 ± 1.0 | 0.04 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.9 (0.5 to 1.6) |
| ISO | 44.2 ± 0.9 | 42.2 ± 0.8 | −0.6 (−0.5 to 0.4) | |||
| Fat Mass (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 23.8 ± 1.3 | 23.0 ± 1.4 | 0.22 | 0.89 | 0.13 | −0.8 (−1.7 to 0.1) |
| ISO | 23.6 ± 1.5 | 23.7 ± 1.6 | 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.8) | |||
| Waist Circumference (cm) | ||||||
| PLA | 92.8 ± 1.9 | 91.9 ± 2.0 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 0.49 | 0.9 (−2.9 to 0.9) |
| ISO | 93.2 ± 2.3 | 91.2 ± 1.8 | −1.9 (−4.0 to 0.6) | |||
| 1RM leg press (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 164.9 ± 8.0 | 249.7 ± 10.1 | <0.01 | 0.30 | 0.54 | 84.8 (69.5 to 100.1) |
| ISO | 154.8 ± 10.3 | 232.6 ± 12.0 | 78.5 (65.4 to 91.5) | |||
| 1RM bench press (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 27.1 ± 1.0 | 37.2 ± 1.0 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 10.1 (8.2 to 12.0) |
| ISO | 25.0 ± 1.2 | 32.2 ± 1.3 | 7.2 (4.8 to 9.5) | |||
| 1RM lat pull down (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 31.3 ± 1.7 | 41.2 ± 2.5 | <0.01 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 9.9 (6.0 to 13.7) |
| ISO | 30.1 ± 0.9 | 37.7 ± 1.5 | 7.4 (5.3 to 9.6) | |||
| 1RM peck deck (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 20.0 ± 1.3 | 31.1 ± 1.4 | <0.01 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 11.1 (9.0 to 13.2) |
| ISO | 19.3 ± 1.0 | 28.5 ± 1.1 | 9.2 (7.2 to 11.3) | |||
| 1RM seated row (kg) | ||||||
| PLA | 57.7 ± 2.1 | 74.5 ± 1.5 | <0.01 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 16.8 (13.7 to 19.9) |
| ISO | 56.5 ± 2.8 | 71.1 ± 2.1 | 14.6 (11.0 to 18.2) | |||
PLA: placebo and exercise; ISO: isoflavone and exercise; WT6: 6−minute walk test; 1RM: 1 maximum repetition test. GEE with Bonferroni correction was used to compare groups, time and interaction (group*time). Data were described on average e standard error.
Figure 2Intention-to-treat analysis of resting and ambulatory blood bressure monitoring AMBP results during 24 h, night-time and daytime periods (mean ± SD). PLA: placebo and exercise group; ISO: isoflavone and exercise group; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; MBP: mean blood pressure; Pre: Measures pre interventions; Post: Measures post interventions.
Intention-to-treat analysis of ambulatory blood pressure variability evaluated before (baseline) and after 10 weeks of exercise training in both placebo + exercise (PLA) and Isoflavone + exercise (ISO) groups.
| Blood Pressure Variability | Baseline | 10 Weeks | Change Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARV SBP (mmHg/min) | ||||||
| PLA | 9.42 ± 0.47 | 9.45 ± 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.06 | 0.63 | 0.03 (−0.90 to 0.95) |
| ISO | 10.96 ± 0.62 | 10.63 ± 0.60 | −0.32 (−1.40 to 0.76) | |||
| ARV DBP (mmHg/min) | ||||||
| PLA | 6.67 ± 0.32 | 6.90 ± 0.31 | 0.83 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.23 (−0.35 to 0.81) |
| ISO | 7.77 ± 0.36 | 7.44 ± 0.45 | −0.33 (−1.10 to 0.40) | |||
| ARV MBP (mmHg/min) | ||||||
| PLA | 6.46 ± 0.28 | 6.63 ± 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.94 | 0.17 (−0.36 to 0.70) |
| ISO | 7.24 ± 0.32 | 7.38 ± 0.44 | 0.14 (−0.57 to 0.85) | |||
| SD24h SBP (mmHg) | ||||||
| PLA | 12.50 ± 0.98 | 12.03 ± 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.21 | 0.74 | −0.47 (−2.14 to 1.19) |
| ISO | 13.62 ± 0.64 | 13.53 ± 0.86 | −0.10 (−1.53 to 1.33) | |||
| SD24h DBP (mmHg) | ||||||
| PLA | 9.56 ± 0.46 | 9.70 ± 0.48 | 0.97 | 0.26 | 0.69 | 0.14 (−0.91 to 1.18) |
| ISO | 10.44 ± 0.53 | 10.28 ± 0.64 | −0.16 (−1.23 to 0.90) | |||
| SD24h MBP (mmHg) | ||||||
| PLA | 9.61 ± 0.63 | 9.50 ± 0.54 | 0.96 | 0.24 | 0.83 | −1.12 (−1.42 to 1.18) |
| ISO | 10.31 ± 0.48 | 10.39 ± 0.62 | 0.07 (−1.06 to 1.21) | |||
| SDdn SBP (mmHg) | ||||||
| PLA | 10.52 ± 0.66 | 10.32 ± 0.58 | 0.84 | 0.18 | 0.73 | −0.21 (−1.32 to 0.90) |
| ISO | 11.41 ± 0.54 | 11.47 ± 0.62 | 0.06 (−0.96 to 1.08) | |||
| SDdn DBP (mmHg) | ||||||
| PLA | 7.69 ± 0.35 | 8.33 ± 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.63 (−0.31 to 1.58) |
| ISO | 8.79 ± 0.42 | 8.71 ± 0.46 | −0.08 (−1.01 to 0.84) | |||
| SDdn MBP (mmHg) | ||||||
| PLA | 7.70 ± 0.40 | 8.00 ± 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.15 | 0.96 | 0.29 (−0.71 to 1.30) |
| ISO | 8.38 ± 0.33 | 8.63 ± 0.45 | 0.26 (−0.61 to 1.12) | |||
SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; MBP: mean blood pressure; PLA: placebo group; ISO: isoflavone group; ARV: average real variability; SDdn: standard deviation of daytime and nighttime; SD24h: standard deviation for 24 h. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) with Bonferroni correction and intention-to-treat analysis was used to compare groups, time and interaction (group*time). Data were described on average e standard deviation.
Figure 3Values of serum NO2− variation in both placebo (PLA) and isoflavone (ISO) groups. EXE: exercise; Δ: final minus baseline values. ANOVA two way was used to compare groups and time. Student t-test was used to compare delta values.