| Literature DB >> 33202618 |
Arleta Kruczek1, Marcelina Krupa-Małkiewicz2, Sabina Lachowicz3, Jan Oszmiański4, Ireneusz Ochmian1.
Abstract
There is a growing interest among the public in fruit with a positive impact on human health. Two goji berry cultivars ('No. 1' and 'New Big') were propagated in vitro, grown in an orchard and then evaluated for macro- and microelements and harmful heavy metals (i.e., Pb, Ni, and Cd). The leaves and fruit were also assessed for nutritional value, polyphenols and the antimicrobial activity of the leaves. 'New Big' was characterized by a higher content of macro elements in the leaves (in vitro and orchard) and a higher content of microelements in the fruit. The harmful substances content was below the minimum value. Furthermore, neither the fruit nor the leaves contained cadmium. This study also indicated that leaves had a higher content of polyphenols compared to the fruit. The fruits were characterized by their health-promoting capacities, while the leaves were characterized by their antibacterial activity. Among the Gram-positive bacteria, the most sensitive strain was Bacillus subtilis, and among the Gram-negative bacteria, it was Proteus vulgaris. Taking into consideration the Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) for minerals, goji berries can be declared to be a source of Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn and P.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; antioxidant; fruit; in vitro; leaves; mineral elements
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33202618 PMCID: PMC7696414 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Average values of macroelements in leaves and fruit of two cultivars of goji cultivated in orchard and in vitro condition.
| Compounds | Leaves | Fruit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | New Big | No. 1 | New Big | |||
| Orchard |
| Orchard |
| Orchard | ||
| N (22–32 2) | 42.08 ± 1.71a 1 | 57.14 ± 2.37b | 43.50 ± 1.98a | 77.92 ± 3.05c | 29.85 ± 1.30B | 24.32 ± 0.92A |
| P (19–30) | 7.85 ± 0.42a | 11.93 ± 0.56c | 8.52 ± 0.47b | 13.78 ± 0.51b | 5.38 ± 0.19B | 4.85 ± 0.15A |
| K (12–20) | 29.57 ± 1.17b | 57.06 ± 1.98d | 14.73 ± 0.52a | 52.06 ± 1.50c | 4.30 ± 0.13A | 3.98 ± 0.11 A |
| Ca (4–8) | 11.00 ± 0.52b | 3.87 ± 0.18a | 11.39 ± 0.48b | 4.00 ± 0.21a | 0.91 ± 0.04B | 0.75 ± 0.03A |
| Mg (2–4.4) | 5.89 ± 0.17b | 2.87 ± 0.09a | 7.50 ± 0.27c | 3.04 ± 0.11a | 1.11 ± 0.05A | 1.02 ± 0.05A |
| Na (no data) | 4.22 ± 0.23c | 2.17 ± 0.19b | 4.60 ± 0.25d | 1.82 ± 0.13a | 4.03 ± 0.19B | 3.82 ± 0.15A |
1 Means followed by the same letter in lines do not differ significantly at P = 0.05 according to Tukey multiple range/small letters for leaves, capital–fruit. 2 Optimal content for leaves according to Glonek and Komosa [15].
Average values of microelements in leaves and fruit of two cultivars of goji cultivated in orchard and in vitro conditions.
| Compounds | Leaves | Fruit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | New Big | No. 1 | New Big | |||
| orchard |
| Orchard |
| Orchard | ||
| Fe (40–60 2) | 120.13 ± 7.20c 1 | 71.00 ± 3.82a | 97.81 ± 4.07b | 77.44 ± 3.55a | 66.03 ± 2.04A | 79.44 ± 2.63B |
| Zn (8–14) | 18.62 ± 0.35b | 26.77 ± 0.47c | 14.53 ± 0.27a | 35.07 ± 0.31d | 8.16 ± 0.24A | 8.73 ± 0.19B |
| Mn (70–260) | 50.70 ± 1.04b | 176.89 ± 3.57c | 42.07 ± 0.88a | 244.64 ± 5.03d | 7.04 ± 0.12A | 7.74 ± 0.10B |
| Cu (5–20) | 8.42 ± 0.19d | 3.39 ± 0.16a | 6.06 ± 0.14c | 3.90 ± 0.11b | 4.72 ± 0.98A | 5.64 ± 1.25B |
| Se | 0.089 ± 0.005b | n.d. 3 | 0.062 ± 0.004a | n.d. | 0.012 ± 0.001B | 0.009 ± 0.001A |
| Pb | 0.034 ± 0.03a | n.d. | 0.054 ± 0.05b | n.d. | 0.017 ± 0.001A | 0.029 ± 0.002B |
| Cd | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ni | 0.019 ± 0.002b | n.d. | 0.011 ± 0.002a | n.d. | 0.007 ± 0.001B | 0.003 ± 0.000A |
1 Designation according to Table 1. 2 Optimal content for leaves according to Glonek and Komosa [15]. 3 n.d.—not detected.
Figure 1Dendrogram of cluster analysis of micro- and microelements (a) and polyphenols (b) in two cultivars of goji fruit and leaves (cut off—85 and 150).
The leaf area, color measurement and NAI and NDVI value in leaves and fruit of two cultivars of goji cultivated in orchard and in vitro condition.
| Compounds | Cultivar | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | New Big | No. 1 | New Big | ||||
| Leaves | Fruit | ||||||
| Orchard |
| Orchard |
| Orchard | |||
| Leaf area (cm2) | 3.53 ± 0.31c 1 | 2.11 ± 0.17a | 4.18 ± 0.39d | 2.78 ± 0.15b | - | - | |
| Color parameters | L* | 47.82 ± 2.55a | 42.36 ± 1.53b | 42.50 ± 2.71b | 34.57 ± 1.70c | 35.88 ± 1.45B | 44.72 ± 2.04A |
| −36.27 ± 3.08ab | −38.94 ± 1.98b | −33.84 ± 2.55a | −43.56 ± 2.12c | 25.63 ± 3.24A | 33.34 ± 3.42B | ||
| 30.63 ± 2.50c | 27.73 ± 1.45bc | 23.71 ± 2.26a | 25.25 ± 1.63ab | 27.05 ± 2.44A | 41.40 ± 2.79B | ||
| NAI | −0.76 ± 0.10b | −0.69 ± 0.06a | -0.82 ± 0.07c | −0.74 ± 0.05b | 0.62 ± 0.05A | 0.71 ± 0.05B | |
| NDVI | 0.69 ± 0.04a | 0.76 ± 0.05b | 0.84 ± 0.05c | 0.91 ± 0.03d | −0.46 ± 0.04B | −0.38 ± 0.03A | |
1 Designation according to Table 1.
Content of polyphenolic compounds in leaves and fruit of two cultivars of L. chinensis.
| Compounds | Leaves | Fruits | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | New Big | No. 1 | New Big | |||
|
| Orchard |
| Orchard | |||
| Quercetin-3- | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.80A 1 | 2.98B |
| Kaempferol-3- | n.d. | n.d. | 11.47a | 14.25b | n.d. | n.d. |
| Quercetin-3- | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 2.94B | 2.07A |
| Quercetin-3- | 12.73b | 14.65b | 4.42a | 24.03c | 0.24A | 2.31B |
| Kaempferol-3- | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 6.38A | 17.22B |
| Quercetin-3- | n.d. | n.d. | 2.37b | 0.72a | 3.05A | 3.50A |
| Quercetin-3- | 12.58a | 23.81b | 31.42c | 33.89c | 11.29B | 7.57A |
| Quercetin-3- | 0.22a | 0.48b | 1.04c | 0.58b | n.d. | n.d. |
| Kaempferol-3- | 0.77a | 0.95b | n.d. | n.d. | 0.18 | n.d. |
| Kaempferol-3- | 0.68a | 0.75a | 1.21c | 0.94b | n.d. | n.d. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Procyanidin B dimer | 0.99b | 3.04c | 0.49a | 8.01d | 0.62A | 0.51A |
| (+)-Catechin | n.d. | n.d. | 7.38a | 21.41b | 18.44B | 11.04A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tetragalloyl-glucose | 0.23a | 0.29a | 4.22c | 3.81b | n.d. | n.d. |
| Galloylquinic acid | 0.17a | 0.21a | 2.55c | 2.09b | n.d. | n.d. |
| Total hydrolyzable tannins | 0.40a | 0.50a | 6.77c | 5.9b | ||
| 5- | 0.41b | 0.30a | 1.77 | 1.60c | 0.56B | 0.21A |
| p-Coumaric acid | 1.66 | 1.52 | 2.15d | 1.06 | 8.29B | 6.35A |
| Caffeic acid | 0.64b | 0.82c | 0.37a | 0.34a | n.d. | n.d. |
| Caftaric acid | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.74A | 5.06B |
| p-Coumaroyl acid dihexoside | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 4.22B | 3.50A |
| 3- | 0.51c | 0.56c | 0.38b | 0.27a | 4.11A | 11.04B |
| 3- | 1.33d | 1.12c | 0.17a | 0.33b | 10.24B | 8.22A |
| 4- | 0.44b | 0.58c | 0.20a | 1.87d | n.d. | n.d. |
| 5- | 66.47c | 73.05d | 31.04a | 52.15b | n.d. | n.d. |
| 5- | 2.81d | 2.33c | 1.27b | 0.44a | 2.52A | 4.21B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL | 102.64A | 124.46B | 103.92A | 167.79C | 74.62A | 85.79B |
1 Designation according to Table 1.
Health-promoting capacities of leaves end fruit of two cultivars L. chinensis.
| Nutritional Value | Leaves | Fruit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | New Big | No. 1 | New Big | ||||
|
| Orchard |
| Orchard | Orchard | |||
| DPPH (mmol Trolox/100g) | 3.88c1 | 3.26b | 4.25d | 2.48a | 7.61B | 5.33A | |
| FRAP (mmol Trolox/100g) | 4.02c | 2.54a | 5.89d | 3.48b | 2.89A | 3.93B | |
| 112.6b | 75.1a | 172.9d | 134.0c | 33.45A | 37.01A | ||
| 25.41a | 22.05a | 42.28b | 37.06b | 8.36A | 7.44A | ||
| Soluble sugars (g/100 g DW) | fructose | 1.88c | 0.89a | 2.51d | 1.33b | 9.67A | 11.83B |
| glucose | 1.55c | 0.51a | 1.88d | 1.04b | 10.11A | 13.06B | |
| sucrose | 0.20b | 0.24c | 0.18b | 0.12a | 0.51A | 0.77B | |
| Organic acid | oxalic acid | 0.021a | 0.024a | 0.073b | 0.080b | n.d. | 0.362 |
| citric acid | 0.115b | 0.292c | 0.083a | 0.314d | 0.951A | 1.485B | |
| succinic acid | 0.027ab | 0.035bc | 0.021a | 0.042c | 0.547B | 0.322A | |
| fumaric acid | 0.019bc | 0.023c | 0.016ab | 0.014a | 0.078B | 0.066A | |
1 Designation according to Table 1.
Figure 2The principal component analysis (PCA) for mineral compositions and phytochemical content of goji leaves and fruit depending on growth conditions.
Antibacterial activity and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration of leaves extracts and antibiotics against bacterial species tested by disc diffusion assay.
| Inhibition Zone—IZ (mm) and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration—MIC (μg/mL) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial Strains | No. 1 | New Big | Standard Antibiotic | ||||||
| Orchard |
| Orchard |
| ||||||
| IZ | MIC | IZ | MIC | IZ | MIC | IZ | MIC | ||
|
| 9.6 ± 0.9 | >100 | 8.6 ± 0.6 | >100 | 10.5 ± 0.8 | 100 | 9.8 ± 0.8 | >100 | 12.5 |
|
| 12.2 ± 0.8 | 75 | 11.3 ± 0.9 | 75 | 14.3 ± 0.8 | 50 | 13.5 ± 0.9 | 100 | 17.0 |
|
| 14.7 ± 0.8 | 100 | 13.2 ± 1.0 | 100 | 16.7 ± 1.1 | 100 | 14.2 ± 0.8 | >100 | 21.4 |
|
| 9.0 ± 0.6 | 75 | 8.8 ± 0.9 | 100 | 9.6 ± 0.8 | 75 | 9.1 ± 0.7 | >100 | 14.6 |
|
| 10.3 ± 0.8 | 100 | 10.2 ± 0.7 | >100 | 10.9 ± 0.9 | 75 | 10.5 ± 0.4 | >100 | 18.6 |
Mineral composition of soil in which the two goji cultivars grew in orchard.
| N | P | K | Mg | Ca | Na | Fe | Mn | Zn | Cu | Cd | Pb | Ni | Se |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/kg | mg/kg | ||||||||||||
| 17.33 | 123.3 | 284.7 | 72.7 | 452 | 11.3 | 83.4 | 57.3 | 37.0 | 7.52 | 0.296 | 31.3 | 4.67 | 0.031 |