Literature DB >> 33201493

Is the axial spinal cord classification predictive of intraoperative neurologic alert for pediatric scoliosis patients? An independent retrospective validation study.

Smitha E Mathew1, Todd A Milbrandt1, William J Shaughnessy1, Anthony A Stans1, A Noelle Larson2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether the axial spinal cord classification by Sielatycki et al. would be associated with increased intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts for pediatric scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery.
METHODS: Children less than age 19 with scoliosis undergoing PSF were retrospectively reviewed. Axial-T2 MRI of the thoracic apex was reviewed for spinal cord/CSF architecture as described by Sielatycki et al.: Type 1-circular cord with visible CSF, Type 2-circular cord but no visible CSF at apical concavity, and Type 3-cord deformed with no intervening CSF. Intraoperative neuromonitoring reports, operative records and preoperative radiographs were reviewed.
RESULTS: 90 patients met the inclusion criteria. Rate of neurologic events was Type 1: 2% (1/41 patients), Type 2: 14.3% (4/28), Type 3: 57.1% (12/21) (Type 1 vs 2 p = 0.06; Type 1 vs 3 p < 0.0001; Type 2 vs 3 p = 0.0017). Three patients with a Type 3 cord awoke with significant deficits. In comparison to Type 1 cords, Type 3 and Type 2 spinal cords were associated with increased coronal and total deformity angular ratios (Type 1 vs 3 p = 0.035 and 0.0054 respectively; Type 1 vs 2 p = 0.042 and 0.03 respectively). There was no difference in gender, diagnosis category, age at surgery, Cobb angle or kyphosis between the three groups.
CONCLUSION: The axial spinal cord classification correlated with IONM alerts and greater severity of spinal deformity in pediatric scoliosis patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deformity angular ratio; Neurologic alert; Scoliosis; Spinal cord

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201493     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00241-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  5 in total

1.  Impact of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spine deformity and potential risk factors for neurological monitoring changes.

Authors:  Bin Feng; Guixing Qiu; Jianxiong Shen; Jianguo Zhang; Ye Tian; Shugang Li; Hong Zhao; Yu Zhao
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-06

2.  Best Practices in Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spine Deformity Surgery: Development of an Intraoperative Checklist to Optimize Response.

Authors:  Michael G Vitale; David L Skaggs; Gregory I Pace; Margaret L Wright; Hiroko Matsumoto; Richard C E Anderson; Douglas L Brockmeyer; John P Dormans; John B Emans; Mark A Erickson; John M Flynn; Michael P Glotzbecker; Kamal N Ibrahim; Stephen J Lewis; Scott J Luhmann; Anil Mendiratta; B Stephens Richards; James O Sanders; Suken A Shah; John T Smith; Kit M Song; Paul D Sponseller; Daniel J Sucato; David P Roye; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2014-08-27

3.  The effect of increased T2 signal intensity in the spinal cord on the injury severity and early neurological recovery in patients with central cord syndrome.

Authors:  Gregory D Schroeder; Nik Hjelm; Alexander R Vaccaro; Michael S Weinstein; Christopher K Kepler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-01-08

Review 4.  Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: basic principles and recent update.

Authors:  Sung-Min Kim; Seung Hyun Kim; Dae-Won Seo; Kwang-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Evaluation of 354 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Vishal K Kundnani; Lisa Zhu; Hh Tak; Hk Wong
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.251

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.