Amit Surve1, Daniel Cottam2, Christina Richards1, Walter Medlin1, Legrand Belnap1. 1. Bariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA. 2. Bariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA. drdanielcottam@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The long-term effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is unknown. PURPOSE: Compare the long-term outcomes. SETTING: Single private institute, USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 1254 patients who underwent primary RYGB or SADI-S were used for a retrospective matched cohort. Data were obtained by matching every RYGB patient to a SADI-S patient of the same sex, body mass index (BMI), and weight. Only patients out 5 years and had at least one > 5-year follow-up visit were included. RESULTS: The matched cohort included 61 RYGB and 61 SADI-S patients. There was no statistical, demographic difference between the two groups. At 5 years, a 100% follow-up was available in each group. The intraoperative outcomes were significantly better with SADI-S. The 30-day readmission, reoperation, emergency department (ED) visits, and complication rates were statistically similar between the two groups. The long-term complication rates, Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications, and number of patients with more than one complication were significantly lower with SADI-S. Weight loss was significantly greater in the SADI-S group at 5 years. The long-term weight-loss failure rate was significantly higher in the RYGB group. The SADI-S procedure was associated with fewer reintervention through 6 years (14.7% patients vs. 39.3% patients, p = 0.001). Conversion or reversal of the procedure was required only in the RYGB group. There also was no significant difference in nutritional outcomes between the two procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that problems, including long-term complications, reinterventions, weight-loss failure, and conversion, were more often associated with RYGB than with SADI-S. The SADI-S may be considered one of the viable alternatives to RYGB.
BACKGROUND: The long-term effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is unknown. PURPOSE: Compare the long-term outcomes. SETTING: Single private institute, USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 1254 patients who underwent primary RYGB or SADI-S were used for a retrospective matched cohort. Data were obtained by matching every RYGB patient to a SADI-S patient of the same sex, body mass index (BMI), and weight. Only patients out 5 years and had at least one > 5-year follow-up visit were included. RESULTS: The matched cohort included 61 RYGB and 61 SADI-S patients. There was no statistical, demographic difference between the two groups. At 5 years, a 100% follow-up was available in each group. The intraoperative outcomes were significantly better with SADI-S. The 30-day readmission, reoperation, emergency department (ED) visits, and complication rates were statistically similar between the two groups. The long-term complication rates, Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications, and number of patients with more than one complication were significantly lower with SADI-S. Weight loss was significantly greater in the SADI-S group at 5 years. The long-term weight-loss failure rate was significantly higher in the RYGB group. The SADI-S procedure was associated with fewer reintervention through 6 years (14.7% patients vs. 39.3% patients, p = 0.001). Conversion or reversal of the procedure was required only in the RYGB group. There also was no significant difference in nutritional outcomes between the two procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that problems, including long-term complications, reinterventions, weight-loss failure, and conversion, were more often associated with RYGB than with SADI-S. The SADI-S may be considered one of the viable alternatives to RYGB.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatrics; Long term; Matched cohort; RYGB; SADI-S; Versus
Authors: Shanu N Kothari; Andrew J Borgert; Kara J Kallies; Matthew T Baker; Brandon T Grover Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Amit Surve; Ravi Rao; Daniel Cottam; Aditya Rao; Leila Ide; Samuel Cottam; Benjamin Horsley Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Amit Surve; Daniel Cottam; Andres Sanchez-Pernaute; Antonio Torres; Joshua Roller; Yong Kwon; Joshua Mourot; Bleu Schniederjan; Bo Neichoy; Paul Enochs; Michael Tyner; Jon Bruce; Scott Bovard; Mitchell Roslin; Muhammad Jawad; Andre Teixeira; Myur Srikanth; Jason Free; Hinali Zaveri; David Pilati; Jamie Bull; LeGrand Belnap; Christina Richards; Walter Medlin; Rena Moon; Austin Cottam; Sarah Sabrudin; Samuel Cottam; Aneesh Dhorepatil Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Wayne J English; Eric J DeMaria; Stacy A Brethauer; Samer G Mattar; Raul J Rosenthal; John M Morton Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 4.734