Literature DB >> 33200772

Comparative effects of telephone versus in-office behavioral counseling to improve HIV treatment outcomes among people living with HIV in a rural setting.

Seth C Kalichman1, Harold Katner2, Lisa A Eaton1, Ellen Banas2, Marnie Hill2, Moira O Kalichman1.   

Abstract

With the expansion of telehealth services, there is a need for evidence-based treatment adherence interventions that can be delivered remotely to people living with HIV. Evidence-based behavioral health counseling can be delivered via telephone, as well as in-office services. However, there is limited research on counseling delivery formats and their differential outcomes. The purpose of this study was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of behavioral self-regulation counseling delivered by telephone versus behavioral self-regulation counseling delivered by in-office sessions to improve HIV treatment outcomes. Patients (N = 251) deemed at risk for discontinuing care and treatment failure living in a rural area of the southeastern USA were referred by their care provider. The trial implemented a Wennberg Randomized Preferential Design to rigorously test: (a) patient preference and (b) comparative effects on patient retention in care and treatment adherence. There was a clear patient preference for telephone-delivered counseling (69%) over in-office-delivered counseling (31%) and participants who received telephone counseling completed a greater number of sessions. There were few differences between the two intervention delivery formats on clinical appointment attendance, antiretroviral adherence, and HIV viral load. Overall improvements in health outcomes were not observed across delivery formats. Telephone-delivered counseling did show somewhat greater benefit for improving depression symptoms, whereas in-office services demonstrated greater benefits for reducing alcohol use. These results encourage offering most patients the choice of telephone and in-office behavioral health counseling and suggest that more intensive interventions may be needed to improve clinical outcomes for people living with HIV who may be at risk for discontinuing care or experiencing HIV treatment failure. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV treatment and care; Patient preference trial; Rural health; Telehealth

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33200772      PMCID: PMC8674789          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  41 in total

Review 1.  Cell Phone-Based and Adherence Device Technologies for HIV Care and Treatment in Resource-Limited Settings: Recent Advances.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Campbell; Jessica E Haberer
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  IAPAC Guidelines for Optimizing the HIV Care Continuum for Adults and Adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care       Date:  2015-11-02

3.  The care of HIV-infected adults in the United States. HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study Consortium.

Authors:  S A Bozzette; S H Berry; N Duan; M R Frankel; A A Leibowitz; D Lefkowitz; C A Emmons; J W Senterfitt; M L Berk; S C Morton; M F Shapiro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Randomized Factorial Trial of Phone-Delivered Support Counseling and Daily Text Message Reminders for HIV Treatment Adherence.

Authors:  Seth C Kalichman; Moira O Kalichman; Chauncey Cherry; Lisa A Eaton; Dean Cruess; Raymond F Schinazi
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Individual differences and day-to-day fluctuations in perceived self-regulation associated with daily adherence in late adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Cynthia A Berg; Deborah J Wiebe; Yana Suchy; Amy E Hughes; Jessica H Anderson; Elida I Godbey; Jonathan Butner; Christy Tucker; Emilie I Franchow; Andrea K Pihlaskari; Pamela S King; Mary A Murray; Perrin C White
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2014-07-25

6.  Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; Paul Meissner; Alain H Litwin; Julia H Arnsten; M Diane McKee; Alison Karasz; Paula McKinley; Colin D Rehm; Earle C Chambers; Ming-Chin Yeh; Judith Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 7.  Standard care impact on effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Marijn de Bruin; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Herman P Schaalma; Gerjo Kok; Charles Abraham; Harm J Hospers
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-08

Review 8.  From access to engagement: measuring retention in outpatient HIV clinical care.

Authors:  Michael J Mugavero; Jessica A Davila; Christa R Nevin; Thomas P Giordano
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.078

9.  Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care.

Authors:  Victoria Hammersley; Eddie Donaghy; Richard Parker; Hannah McNeilly; Helen Atherton; Annemieke Bikker; John Campbell; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Cost-effectiveness of a telephone-delivered intervention for physical activity and diet.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Adrian G Barnett; Kate A Halton; Jacob L Veerman; Elisabeth Winkler; Neville Owen; Marina M Reeves; Alison Marshall; Elizabeth Eakin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.