| Literature DB >> 33200656 |
Hongmei Zhang1, Kejun Zhang2, Liang Ning2, Dong Chen3, Fengyun Hao3, Peng Li4.
Abstract
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 (eIF5A2) plays an important role in tumor progression and prognosis evaluation. However, the potential role of eIF5A2 in human papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is unknown. In this study, we aim to investigate the association between eIF5A2 expression and PTC clinical outcomes and underlying its Biological function in PTC cells in vitro and in vivo. The expression of eIF5A2 was examined by immunohistochemistry in PTC tissues and its adjacent tissue (n = 39) from 207 PTC patients. Functional analysis of eIF5A2 was performed in PTC cell lines in vitro and in vivo. The results showed that eIF5A2 was overexpressed in PTC tissues compared with the adjacent tissues. Enhanced eIF5A2 expression was significantly correlated with extrathyroidal extension (p = 0.012), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002), TNM stage (p = 0.006), T classification (p = 0.047) and BRAF V600E mutation (p = 0.036). EIF5A2 inhibition prevented PTC cell growth, invasiveness and migration and induced cell apoptosis in vitro. Furthermore, eIF5A2 depletion inhibited tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. The data indicated that eIF5A2 could be employed as a novel prognostic marker and effective therapeutic target for PTC.Entities:
Keywords: Papillary thyroid cancer; apoptosis; eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2; metastasis; prognostic marker
Year: 2020 PMID: 33200656 PMCID: PMC8291881 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1848753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Figure 1.eIF5A2 is upregulated in human PTC samples. Representative images of eIF5A2 immunohistochemical staining in PTC and in normal thyroid tissue
Relationship between eIF5A2 and clinicopathological factors in PTC patients
| Groups | eIF5A2 expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Number ( | Negative ( | Positive ( | |
| Male | 57 | 28 (25.7%) | 29 (29.6%) | NS |
| Female | 150 | 81 (74.3%) | 69 (70.4%) | |
| Age (Year) | ||||
| ≤50 | 81 | 41 (37.6%) | 40 (41%) | NS |
| >50 | 126 | 68 (62.4%) | 58 (59%) | |
| Tumor size | ||||
| ≤1 cm | 97 | 49 (45.0%) | 48 (49.0%) | NS |
| >1 cm | 110 | 60 (55.0%) | 50 (51.0%) | |
| Extrathyroidal extension | ||||
| Yes | 78 | 32 (29.4%) | 46 (46.9%) | 0.012 |
| No | 129 | 77 (70.6%) | 52 (53.1%) | |
| Distant metastasis | ||||
| Yes | 6 | 1 (1%) | 5 (5.1%) | 0.29 |
| No | 201 | 108 (99%) | 93 (94.9%) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| Yes | 90 | 32 (29.4%) | 58 (59.2%) | 0.002 |
| No | 117 | 77 (70.6%) | 40 (40.8%) | |
| TNM stage | ||||
| I/II | 173 | 101 (92.7%) | 72 (73.5%) | 0.006 |
| III/IV | 34 | 8 (7.3%) | 26 (26.5%) | |
| T stage | ||||
| 1–2 | 166 | 90 (82.6%) | 76 (77.6%) | 0.047 |
| 3–4 | 41 | 19 (17.4%) | 22 (22.4%) | |
| BRAF V600E mutation | ||||
| Yes | 89 | 33 (30%) | 56 (57%) | 0.036 |
| No | 118 | 86 (70%) | 42 (43%) | |
| Multifocality | ||||
| Yes | 68 | 34 (31.2%) | 34 (34.7%) | NS |
| No | 139 | 75 (68.8%) | 64 (65.3%) | |
| Follicular variant | NS | |||
| Yes | ||||
| No | ||||
Figure 2.Knockdown of eIF5A2 suppresses BCPAP cell grow and induces apoptosis in vitro. (a) BCPAP cells were transiently transfected with either 20 nM siRNA (NC siRNA) control or eIF5A2 siRNA for 48 h. The cells were subjected to western blot assay for eIF5A2; (b) BCPAP cells were transiently transfected with either 20 nM siRNA (NC siRNA) control or eIF5A2 siRNA for 0–96 h. Cell viability was detected by MTT assay. Data represent at least three experiments performed in triplicate. (c) BCPAP cells were treated with either 20 nM siRNA (NC siRNA) control or eIF5A2 siRNA for 10 days and examined by colony formation assay. (d) BCPAP cells were treated with either 20 nM NC siRNA or eIF5A2 siRNA for 72 h, cell apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry
Figure 3.Knockdown of eIF5A2 suppresses BCPAP cell invasion and migration in vitro. BCPAP cells were transiently transfected with either 20 nM NC siRNA or eIF5A2 siRNA for 24 h. The cells were subjected to (a) cell invasion; (b) migration
Figure 4.Knockdown of eIF5A2 suppresses BCPAP tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. (a) BCPAP/Lv- shRNA or BCPAP/Lv-eIF5A2 shRNA cells were injected subcutaneously in 4–6 week old BALB/c nude mice. Tumors were measured as indicated. (b) Tissue sections of BCPAP/Lv- shRNA or BCPAP/Lv-eIF5A2 shRNA xenografts were subjected to immunohistochemistry assay for eIF5A2. (c) Tissue sections of BCPAP/Lv- shRNA or BCPAP/Lv-eIF5A2 shRNA xenografts were subjected to TUNEL assay. (d) Tissue sections of BCPAP/Lv- shRNA or BCPAP/Lv-eIF5A2 shRNA xenografts were subjected to immunohistochemistry assay for Ki-67. (e) The metastatic nodes were numbered in the lung