Literature DB >> 33200356

Visualizing "featureless" regions on mammograms classified as invasive ductal carcinomas by a deep learning algorithm: the promise of AI support in radiology.

Daiju Ueda1, Akira Yamamoto2, Tsutomu Takashima3, Naoyoshi Onoda3, Satoru Noda3, Shinichiro Kashiwagi3, Tamami Morisaki3, Shinichi Tsutsumi4, Takashi Honjo2, Akitoshi Shimazaki2, Takuya Goto2, Yukio Miki2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate how artificial intelligence (AI) can expand radiologists' capacity, we visualized the features of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) that our algorithm, developed and validated for basic pathological classification on mammograms, had focused on.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IDC datasets were built using mammograms from patients diagnosed with IDCs from January 2006 to December 2017. The developing dataset was used to train and validate a VGG-16 deep learning (DL) network. The true positives (TPs) and accuracy of the algorithm were externally evaluated using the test dataset. A visualization technique was applied to the algorithm to determine which malignant findings on mammograms were revealed.
RESULTS: The datasets were split into a developing dataset (988 images) and a test dataset (131 images). The proposed algorithm diagnosed 62 TPs with an accuracy of 0.61-0.70. The visualization of features on the mammograms revealed that the tubule forming, solid, and scirrhous types of IDCs exhibited visible features on the surroundings, corners of the masses, and architectural distortions, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We successfully showed that features isolated by a DL-based algorithm trained to classify IDCs were indeed those known to be associated with each pathology. Thus, using AI can expand the capacity of radiologists through the discovery of previously unknown findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Diagnosis; Invasive ductal carcinoma; Mammogram; Visualization

Year:  2020        PMID: 33200356     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-020-01070-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  6 in total

1.  Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search.

Authors:  David Silver; Aja Huang; Chris J Maddison; Arthur Guez; Laurent Sifre; George van den Driessche; Julian Schrittwieser; Ioannis Antonoglou; Veda Panneershelvam; Marc Lanctot; Sander Dieleman; Dominik Grewe; John Nham; Nal Kalchbrenner; Ilya Sutskever; Timothy Lillicrap; Madeleine Leach; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Thore Graepel; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Technical and clinical overview of deep learning in radiology.

Authors:  Daiju Ueda; Akitoshi Shimazaki; Yukio Miki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology.

Authors:  Koichiro Yasaka; Hiroyuki Akai; Akira Kunimatsu; Shigeru Kiryu; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Histological classification of breast tumors in the General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Recording of Breast Cancer (18th edition).

Authors:  Hitoshi Tsuda
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 6.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-07
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Development and validation of a deep learning model for detection of breast cancers in mammography from multi-institutional datasets.

Authors:  Daiju Ueda; Akira Yamamoto; Naoyoshi Onoda; Tsutomu Takashima; Satoru Noda; Shinichiro Kashiwagi; Tamami Morisaki; Shinya Fukumoto; Masatsugu Shiba; Mina Morimura; Taro Shimono; Ken Kageyama; Hiroyuki Tatekawa; Kazuki Murai; Takashi Honjo; Akitoshi Shimazaki; Daijiro Kabata; Yukio Miki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Ishiwata; Kentaro Miura; Mayuko Kishimoto; Koichiro Nomura; Shungo Sawamura; Shigeru Magami; Mizuki Ikawa; Tsuneo Yamashiro; Daisuke Utsunomiya
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.