Literature DB >> 33199489

Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of DNA Mismatch Repair-deficient Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma.

Alicia Latham1,2,3, Jinru Shia4, Zalak Patel1, Diane L Reidy-Lagunes1,2, Neil H Segal1,2, Rona Yaeger1,2, Karuna Ganesh1,2, Louise Connell1,2, Nancy E Kemeny1,2, David P Kelsen1,2, Jaclyn F Hechtman4, Garrett M Nash2,5, Philip B Paty2,5, Ahmet Zehir4, Kaitlin A Tkachuk1, Rania Sheikh1, Arnold J Markowitz1,2, Diana Mandelker4, Kenneth Offit1,2,3, Michael F Berger2,4,6,7, Andrea Cercek1,2, Julio Garcia-Aguilar2,5, Leonard B Saltz1,2, Martin R Weiser2,5, Zsofia K Stadler8,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prevalence and clinical characteristics of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA) in the setting of Lynch syndrome have not been well studied. We characterized SBA according to DNA mismatch repair and/or microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) and germline mutation status and compared clinical outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A single-institution review identified 100 SBAs. Tumors were evaluated for MSI via MSIsensor and/or corresponding MMR protein expression via IHC staining. Germline DNA was analyzed for mutations in known cancer predisposition genes, including MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Clinical variables were correlated with MMR/MSI status.
RESULTS: Twenty-six percent (26/100; 95% confidence interval, 18.4-35.4) of SBAs exhibited MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Lynch syndrome prevalence was 10% overall and 38.5% among MMR-D SBAs. Median age at SBA diagnosis was similar in non-Lynch syndrome MMR-D versus MMR-proficient (MMR-P) SBAs (65 vs. 61; P = 0.75), but significantly younger in Lynch syndrome (47.5 vs. 61; P = 0.03). The prevalence of synchronous/metachronous cancers was 9% (6/67) in MMR-P versus 34.6% (9/26) in MMR-D SBA, with 66.7% (6/9) of these in Lynch syndrome (P = 0.0002). In the MMR-P group, 52.2% (35/67) of patients presented with metastatic disease, compared with 23.1% (6/26) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.008). In MMR-P stage I/II patients, 88.2% (15/17) recurred, compared with 18.2% (2/11) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with MMR-P SBA, MMR-D SBA was associated with earlier stage disease and lower recurrence rates, similar to observations in colorectal cancer. With a 38.5% prevalence in MMR-D SBA, germline Lynch syndrome testing in MMR-D SBA is warranted. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33199489      PMCID: PMC7925361          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  40 in total

1.  Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Mustafa A Arain; Yi-Jen Chen; Kristen K Ciombor; Stacey A Cohen; Harry S Cooper; Dustin A Deming; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Jean L Grem; Sarah E Hoffe; Joleen Hubbard; Steven Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Natalie Kirilcuk; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Wells A Messersmith; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Eric D Miller; Mary F Mulcahy; Steven Nurkin; Michael J Overman; Aparna Parikh; Hitendra Patel; Katrina S Pedersen; Leonard B Saltz; Charles Schneider; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Alyse Johnson-Chilla; Kristina M Gregory; Lisa A Gurski
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Valérie Bonadona; Bernard Bonaïti; Sylviane Olschwang; Sophie Grandjouan; Laetitia Huiart; Michel Longy; Rosine Guimbaud; Bruno Buecher; Yves-Jean Bignon; Olivier Caron; Chrystelle Colas; Catherine Noguès; Sophie Lejeune-Dumoulin; Laurence Olivier-Faivre; Florence Polycarpe-Osaer; Tan Dat Nguyen; Françoise Desseigne; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Pascaline Berthet; Dominique Leroux; Jacqueline Duffour; Sylvie Manouvrier; Thierry Frébourg; Hagay Sobol; Christine Lasset; Catherine Bonaïti-Pellié
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Frequency of rearrangements in Lynch syndrome cases associated with MSH2: characterization of a new deletion involving both EPCAM and the 5' part of MSH2.

Authors:  Lucia Pérez-Cabornero; Mar Infante Sanz; Eladio Velasco Sampedro; Enrique Lastra Aras; Alberto Acedo Becares; Cristina Miner Pino; Mercedes Durán Domínguez
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-07-26

Review 4.  Hereditary colorectal cancer: risk assessment and management.

Authors:  H Hampel; P Peltomaki
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Christine M Ribic; Daniel J Sargent; Malcolm J Moore; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; Richard M Goldberg; Stanley R Hamilton; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Robert Gryfe; Lois E Shepherd; Dongsheng Tu; Mark Redston; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Wenche Sjursen; Bjørn Ivar Haukanes; Eli Marie Grindedal; Harald Aarset; Astrid Stormorken; Lars F Engebretsen; Christoffer Jonsrud; Inga Bjørnevoll; Per Arne Andresen; Sarah Ariansen; Liss Anne S Lavik; Bodil Gilde; Inger Marie Bowitz-Lothe; Lovise Maehle; Pål Møller
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Reliable Pan-Cancer Microsatellite Instability Assessment by Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Ahmet Zehir; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Sumit Middha; Liying Zhang; Khedoudja Nafa; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Donna Wong; Hyunjae R Kim; Justyna Sadowska; Michael F Berger; Deborah F Delair; Jinru Shia; Zsofia Stadler; David S Klimstra; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-10-03

8.  Prevalence and Penetrance of Major Genes and Polygenes for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Mark A Jenkins; James G Dowty; Antonis C Antoniou; Andrew Lee; Graham G Giles; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark Clendenning; Christophe Rosty; Dennis J Ahnen; Stephen N Thibodeau; Graham Casey; Steven Gallinger; Loïc Le Marchand; Robert W Haile; John D Potter; Yingye Zheng; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; John L Hopper; Robert J MacInnis
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Microsatellite instability has a positive prognostic impact on stage II colorectal cancer after complete resection: results from a large, consecutive Norwegian series.

Authors:  M A Merok; T Ahlquist; E C Røyrvik; K F Tufteland; M Hektoen; O H Sjo; T Mala; A Svindland; R A Lothe; A Nesbakken
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Small bowel adenocarcinoma phenotyping, a clinicobiological prognostic study.

Authors:  T Aparicio; M Svrcek; A Zaanan; E Beohou; A Laforest; P Afchain; Emmanuel Mitry; J Taieb; F Di Fiore; J-M Gornet; A Thirot-Bidault; I Sobhani; D Malka; T Lecomte; C Locher; F Bonnetain; P Laurent-Puig
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Correlation of mismatch repair deficiency with clinicopathological features and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Pei-Pei Qiao; Kai-Sai Tian; Li-Tao Han; Ben Ma; Cen-Kai Shen; Run-Yu Zhao; Yi Zhang; Wen-Jun Wei; Xiao-Ping Chen
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.925

2.  Immune profiling of pituitary tumors reveals variations in immune infiltration and checkpoint molecule expression.

Authors:  Yu Mei; Wenya Linda Bi; James Agolia; Changchen Hu; Alexandra M Giantini Larsen; David M Meredith; Sally Al Abdulmohsen; Tejus Bale; Gavin P Dunn; Malak Abedalthagafi; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Impacts of pembrolizumab therapy on immune phenotype in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Alexander W MacFarlane; Ho-Man Yeung; R Katherine Alpaugh; Essel Dulaimi; Paul F Engstrom; Arvind Dasari; Kerry S Campbell; Namrata Vijayvergia
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 6.630

4.  Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the non-ampullary duodenum with mismatch repair deficiency: a rare case report.

Authors:  Yumi Nozawa; Kazuyuki Ishida; Niki Maiko; Atsuko Takada-Owada; Masato Onozaki; Mina Takaoka; Kinichi Matsuyama; Yuhki Sakuraoka; Yoshimasa Nakazato; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.070

Review 5.  Localized Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma Management: Evidence Summary.

Authors:  Anthony Turpin; Mehdi El Amrani; Aziz Zaanan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Diagnostic yield and clinical relevance of expanded genetic testing for cancer patients.

Authors:  Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Yelena Kemel; Maksym Misyura; Umut Aypar; Sowmya Jairam; Ciyu Yang; Yirong Li; Nikita Mehta; Anna Maio; Angela Arnold; Erin Salo-Mullen; Margaret Sheehan; Aijazuddin Syed; Michael Walsh; Maria Carlo; Mark Robson; Kenneth Offit; Marc Ladanyi; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Zsofia K Stadler; Liying Zhang; Alicia Latham; Ahmet Zehir; Diana Mandelker
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 15.266

Review 7.  DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ruixue Huang; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-07-09

8.  Metastasis Pattern and Survival Analysis in Primary Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A SEER-Based Study.

Authors:  Yanmei Gu; Haixiao Deng; Daijun Wang; Yumin Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.