| Literature DB >> 33198698 |
Wen Liu1, Zhankun Wang2, Shuai Liu1, Yu Yao1, Yong Liu1, Guiming Zhang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Performance of urinary cytology is recommended as the part of a standard diagnostic workup and base surveillance regimens in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the effect of positive voided urine cytology (VUC) on UTUC prognosis, compared with negative VUC, has not been fully demonstrated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative VUC on predicting intravesical recurrence, disease recurrence, and mortality in patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy (RNU).Entities:
Keywords: Nephroureterectomy; Recurrence; Survival; Upper urinary tract; Urine cytology; Urothelial carcinoma
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33198698 PMCID: PMC7670807 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07623-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Association of voided urine cytology with clinicopathological characteristics in UTUC patients
| Urine Cytology | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (%) | Positive (%) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 126 (41.1) | 66 (34.7) | 0.27 |
| Female | 88 (58.9) | 35 (65.3) | |
| Age (years) | |||
| <65 | 88 (41.1) | 33 (32.4) | 0.15 |
| ≥ 65 | 126 (58.9) | 68 (67.3) | |
| Smoking history | |||
| No | 141 (65.9) | 64 (63.4) | 0.7 |
| Yes | 73 (34.1) | 37 (36.6) | |
| Alcohol history | |||
| No | 164 (76.6) | 70 (69.3) | 0.17 |
| Yes | 50 (23.4) | 31 (30.7) | |
| Hematuria | |||
| No | 45 (21.0) | 8 (7.9) | 0.004 |
| Yes | 169 (79.0) | 93 (92.1) | |
| Hypertension | |||
| No | 139 (65.0) | 55 (54.5) | 0.074 |
| Yes | 75 (35.0) | 46 (45.5) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | |||
| No | 182 (85.0) | 84 (83.2) | 0.7 |
| Yes | 32 (15) | 17 (16.8) | |
| Body mass index | |||
| <30 | 194 (90.7) | 93 (92.1) | 0.7 |
| ≥ 30 | 20 (9.3) | 8 (7.9) | |
| Hydronephrosis | |||
| No | 76 (35.5) | 40 (39.6) | 0.5 |
| Yes | 138 (64.5) | 61 (60.4) | |
| Multifocality | |||
| Unifocal | 200 (93.5) | 86 (85.1) | 0.017 |
| Multifocal | 14 (6.5) | 15 (14.9) | |
| Size | |||
| ≤ 2 CM | 59 (27.6) | 25 (24.8) | 0.6 |
| >2 CM | 155 (72.4) | 76 (75.2) | |
| Bladder instillation | |||
| No | 49 (22.9) | 26 (25.7) | 0.6 |
| Yes | 165 (77.1) | 75 (74.3) | |
| Pathologic tumor stage | |||
| ≤ T2 | 114 (53.3) | 45 (44.6) | 0.15 |
| ≥ T3 | 100 (46.7) | 56 (55.4) | |
| Tumor grade | |||
| Low grade | 61 (29.2) | 15 (15.5) | 0.010 |
| High grade | 148 (70.8) | 82 (84.5) | |
| Location | |||
| Renal pelvis | 101 (48.1) | 54 (57.4) | 0.13 |
| Ureter | 109 (51.9) | 40 (42.6) | |
| Preoperative URS | |||
| No | 160 (74.8) | 84 (83.2) | 0.10 |
| Yes | 54 (25.2) | 17 (16.8) | |
| LVI | |||
| No | 62 (59.0) | 35 (64.8) | 0.5 |
| Yes | 43 (41.0) | 19 (35.2) | |
LVI Lymphovascular invasion; CM Centimeter; URS Ureteroscopy
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meier curves for intravesical RFS (a), RFS (b), CSS (c), and OS (d) stratified by preoperative voided urine cytology in 315 UTUC patients
Fig. 2Positive outcomes of multivariable Cox regression models for intravesical RFS (a), RFS (b), CSS (c), and OS (d)
Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses of all patients for intravesical recurrence-free survival, recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival
| Factors | Intravesical RFS | RFS | CSS | OS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable | Multivariablea | Univariable | Multivariableb | Univariable | Multivariablec | Univariable | Multivariablec | |||||
| HR(95%CI) | HR(95%CI) | HR(95%CI) | HR(95%CI) | |||||||||
| Tumor stage (≥T3 VS. ≤T2) | 0.5 | 0.28 | <0.001 | 3.10 (1.74–5.52) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 4.42 (2.38–8.23) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 3.23 (1.80–5.78) | <0.001 | |
| Age (≥65 VS. <65) | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.001 | 2.45 (1.32–4.53) | 0.004 | 0.002 | 2.05 (1.08–3.90) | 0.029 | 0.002 | 2.09 (1.11–3.93) | 0.022 | |
| Bladder irrigation (Yes VS. No) | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.050 | 0.51 (0.29–0.90) | 0.021 | 0.024 | 0.53 (0.31–0.89) | 0.017 | ||
| LVI (Yes VS. No) | 0.19 | 0.051 | <0.001 | 2.66 (1.32–5.34) | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.076 | 0.003 | 2.22 (1.14–4.33) | 0.019 | ||
| Hydronephrosis (Yes VS. No) | 0.13 | 0.8 | 0.061 | 1.89 (1.04–3.43) | 0.036 | 0.094 | 2.45 (1.30–4.60) | 0.005 | 0.23 | 0.17 | ||
| DM (Yes VS. No) | 0.7 | – | 0.10 | 0.46 (0.21–0.99) | 0.047 | 0.6 | – | 0.6 | – | |||
| Location (ureter VS. pelvis) | 0.028 | 3.00 (1.32–6.85) | 0.009 | 0.21 | 0.4 | 0.23 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | |||
| Hypertension (Yes VS. No) | 0.26 | – | 0.049 | 0.10 | 0.044 | 0.13 | 0.022 | 1.71 (1.01–2.86) | 0.044 | |||
| Gender (Male VS. Female) | 0.7 | – | 0.8 | – | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.21 | 0.091 | ||||
| Smoking (Yes VS. No) | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||||
| BMI (≥30 VS. <30) | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.18 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.23 | 0.4 | ||||
| Multifocality (Yes VS. No) | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.034 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.7 | ||||
| Size (>2 CM VS. ≤2 CM) | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.9 | ||||
| Tumor grade (high VS. low) | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.014 | 0.11 | 0.018 | 0.063 | 0.027 | 0.23 | ||||
| Hematuria (Yes VS. No) | 0.034 | 0.054 | 0.7 | – | 0.6 | – | 0.4 | – | ||||
| Alcohol history (Yes VS. No) | 0.050 | 0.073 | 0.9 | – | 1 | – | 0.5 | – | ||||
| Preoperative URS | 0.20 | 0.6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||
Note: a Adjusted for tumor stage, age, bladder irrigation, LVI, hydronephrosis, location, smoking, BMI, multifocality, size, tumor grade, hematuria, alcohol history, and URS;
b Adjusted for tumor stage, age, bladder irrigation, LVI, hydronephrosis, DM, location, hypertension, smoking, BMI, multifocality, size, and tumor grade;
c Adjusted for tumor stage, age, bladder irrigation, LVI, hydronephrosis, location, hypertension, gender, smoking, BMI, multifocality, size, and tumor grade;
Abbreviations: RFS Recurrence-free survival, CSS Cancer-specific survival; OS Overall survival, DM Diabetes mellitus; BMI Body mass index; LVI Lymphovascular invasion; URS Ureteroscopy, HR Hazard ratio
Fig. 3To investigate the risk factors for high-grade UTUC by multivariable logistic regression analysis (a), Kaplan–Meier curves for RFS (b), and CSS (c) were stratified by tumor grade in UTUC patients