| Literature DB >> 33198656 |
Chengxu Long1, Shangfeng Tang2, Ruoxi Wang1, Lu Ji1, Yang Wang1, Tailai Wu1, Zhifei Li3, Zhanchun Feng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the incremental implementation of the essential public health services (EPHS) during the last decade, the goal of EPHS's equalization is impossible to cannot be achieved without appropriate policies targeting older migrants. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether the supply side meets the needs of older migrants and to explore the relationships among health status, the use of health services, and diverse factors.Entities:
Keywords: China; Essential public health services; Health services utilization; Older migrants
Year: 2020 PMID: 33198656 PMCID: PMC7670818 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01878-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Hypothetical framework. EPHS: essential public health services
Variables and assignments
| Variables | Assignments |
|---|---|
| Annually free physical examination | 0 = no; 1 = yes |
| Follow-up services | 0 = no; 1 = yes |
| Health record | 0 = no; 1 = yes |
| physical status | 1 = cannot self-care; 2 = unhealthy but can self-care; 3 = generally healthy; 4 = healthy; |
| hypertension/diabetes | 1 = no; 2 = yes |
| Monthly household income after tax | 1 = < ¥5000; 2 = ¥5000–10,000; 3= > ¥10,000 |
| migrating for employment | 1 = no; 2 = yes |
| migrating for offspring | 1 = no; 2 = yes |
| migrating duration | 1 = < 5 years; 2 = 5–10 years; 3= > 10 years |
| migrating range | 1 = cross-county;2 = cross-city; 3 = cross-provincial; 4 = cross-border |
| willingness for long-stay | 1 = no; 2 = yes |
| receiving care from offspring | 1 = no; 2 = yes |
| numbers of local friends | 1 = 0; 2 = 1–5; 3= > 5 |
Correlations of variables
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | physical examination | – | ||||||||||||
| 2 | health record | 0.340*** | – | |||||||||||
| 3 | follow-up service | 0.429*** | 0.302*** | – | ||||||||||
| 4 | physical status | 0.025** | −0.050*** | − 0.046* | – | |||||||||
| 5 | hypertension/diabetes | 0.022* | 0.006 | – | − 0.245*** | – | ||||||||
| 6 | monthly household income | −0.050*** | − 0.066*** | − 0.035* | 0.146 | 0.049*** | – | |||||||
| 7 | migrating for employment | −0.021* | − 0.041*** | 0.029 | 0.156*** | −0.117*** | − 0.158*** | – | ||||||
| 8 | migrating for offspring | −0.029** | − 0.039*** | − 0.090*** | 0.125*** | 0.015 | 0.242*** | −0.363*** | ||||||
| 9 | migrating duration | 0.007 | 0.049*** | −0.015 | −0.047*** | 0.048*** | −0.035*** | 0.043*** | −0.052*** | – | ||||
| 10 | migrating range | −0.128*** | −0.124*** | − 0.081*** | 0.109*** | 0.002 | 0.201*** | 0.020* | 0.096*** | 0.090*** | – | |||
| 11 | willingness for long-stay | 0.141*** | 0.303*** | 0.089 | 0.090* | −0.089* | −0.194*** | 0.006 | 0.148*** | 0.065 | – | – | ||
| 12 | care from offspring | −0.019 | 0.055** | 0.026 | 0.085*** | 0.004 | 0.054* | 0.005 | 0.010 | − 0.034 | − 0.053* | − 0.003 | – | |
| 13 | local friends | 0.140*** | 0.098*** | 0.094*** | 0.100*** | −0.043*** | −0.014 | 0.084*** | −0.044*** | 0.099*** | −0.068*** | 0.150*** | 0.040 | – |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001
Results of mediating effects
| IV | M | DV | IV-DV | IV-M | (IV + M)-DV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV | M | |||||
| Use of physical examination | ||||||
| status | hypertension/diabetes | PE | 0.035*** | −0.253*** | 0.044*** | 0.033** |
| status | household income | PE | 0.035*** | 0.144*** | 0.044*** | −0.062*** |
| status | migrating for employment | PE | 0.035*** | 0.157*** | 0.040*** | −0.028** |
| status | migrating for offspring | PE | 0.035*** | 0.138*** | 0.040*** | −0.034** |
| status | migrating range | PE | 0.035*** | 0.109*** | 0.049*** | −0.130*** |
| status | willingness for long-stay | PE | 0.035*** | 0.094* | 0.099* | 0.131** |
| status | local friends | PE | 0.035*** | 0.119*** | 0.018 | 0.143*** |
| Use of health record | ||||||
| status | household income | HR | −0.044*** | 0.144*** | −0.035*** | −0.066*** |
| status | migrating for employment | HR | −0.044*** | 0.157*** | −0.039*** | −0.035*** |
| status | migrating for offspring | HR | −0.044*** | 0.138*** | −0.039*** | −0.034*** |
| status | migrating duration | HR | −0.044*** | −0.049*** | − 0.042*** | 0.049*** |
| status | migrating range | HR | −0.044*** | 0.109*** | −0.032** | −0.115*** |
| status | willingness for long-stay | HR | −0.044*** | 0.094* | 0.076* | 0.296*** |
| status | care from offspring | HR | −0.044*** | 0.089*** | −0.040 | 0.059** |
| status | local friend | HR | −0.044*** | 0.119*** | −0.057*** | 0.107*** |
| Use of follow-up services | ||||||
| status | migrating for offspring | FS | −0.043* | 0.138*** | −0.023 | −0.084*** |
| status | migrating range | FS | −0.043* | 0.109*** | −0.032 | −0.077*** |
| status | local friend | FS | −0.043* | 0.119*** | −0.057** | 0.103*** |
IV independent variable; M mediator; DV dependent variable; PE physical examination; HR health record; FS follow-up services
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001
Results of moderating effects
| Independent variable | Physical Examination | Health Record | Follow-up services | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M1 | M2 | M1 | M2 | |
| physical status | 0.033*** | −0.142 | −0.032** | 0.032 | −0.036 | 0.089 |
| migrating for employment | −0.016 | −0.063* | ||||
| migrating range | −0.115*** | −0.003 | ||||
| household income | −0.030 | 0.171* | ||||
| Interaction | ||||||
| physical status*migrating for employment | 0.175* | |||||
| physical status*migrating range | −0.137** | |||||
| physical status*income | −0.265* | |||||
| R2 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| F | 8.413*** | 6.899*** | 85.035*** | 58.978*** | 3.538* | 4.559** |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001
Results of hypotheses testing
| Hypothesis | Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | HR | FS | |
| H1: Physical status → the use of EPHS (−) | X (+) | O | O |
| H2: Mediating effect of household income on the relationship between physical status and the use of EPHS | O | O | X |
| H3: Mediating effect of migrating for employment on the relationship between physical status and the use of EPHS | O | O | X |
| H4: Mediating effect of migrating for offspring on the relationship between physical status and the use of EPHS | O | O | O |
| H5: Mediating effect of willingness for long-stay on the relationship between physical status and the use of EPHS | O | O | X |
O supported; X unsupported; PE physical examination; HR Health Record; FS follow-up services