Literature DB >> 33197576

Efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in myocarditis: A 30-year systematic review and meta analysis.

Chun-Yan Cheng1, Gang-Yi Cheng2, Zhong-Gui Shan2, Anna Baritussio1, Giulia Lorenzoni3, Agata Tyminska4, Krzysztof Ozieranski4, Sabino Iliceto1, Renzo Marcolongo5, Dario Gregori3, Alida L P Caforio6.   

Abstract

AIMS: Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle, due to infectious, toxic or autoimmune causes. Literature reported controversial results in relation to the effect of immunosuppression (IS)/immunomodulation (IM). We aimed at assessing the effect of IS/IM by meta analysis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using the P.R.I.S.M.A. approach, two researchers searched for relevant studies on PubMed, Embase, and the Central Registry of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library. Proposed MeSH terms were: "immunotherapy OR immune therapy OR immune modeling OR Immunosuppressive Agents" AND "combination OR combined with OR plus" AND "myocarditis OR cardiomyopathies OR inflammatory cardiomyopathy". The language was restricted to English. Reference lists of included articles and those relevant to the topic were hand searched for the identification of additional, potentially relevant articles. The cutoff date was from 1987 until 30th Nov 2019. Reported survival or mortality events or change of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after IS/IT were primary outcomes of the study; in addition, improvement of New York Heart Association class, follow-up biopsy (Bx) findings, viral genome clearance on Bx and recurrence of myocarditis were recorded if reported. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3; 5452 studies were screened, of these 73 were assessed for eligibility, including 8 randomized control studies, 26 retrospective studies, 2 prospective studies and 1 case control study, 34 case reports and 2 case series. In prospective studies, the difference in mortality between the IS and control groups tended to be lower in the combined IS groups (12.5% vs. 18.2%) (95% CI of odds ratio 0.7(0.3, 1.64)) and the pooled difference of the increase of LVEF between the IS and control groups tended to be higher in the combined IS groups (95% CI 7.26 (-2.29, 16.81)). In retrospective studies, the difference of survival between the IS and control group was significantly in favor of IS (95%CI Hazard ratio 0.82(0.69, 0.96)).
CONCLUSIONS: A tailored IS may be considered in myocarditis, depending on the phase of the disease, and the type of underlying autoimmune or immune-mediated form.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoimmunity; Immunomodulation; Immunosuppressive therapy; Inflammatory cardiomyopathy; Myocarditis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33197576     DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autoimmun Rev        ISSN: 1568-9972            Impact factor:   9.754


  3 in total

Review 1.  Personalized Management of Myocarditis and Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Agata Tymińska; Krzysztof Ozierański; Aleksandra Skwarek; Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka; Anna Baritussio; Marcin Grabowski; Renzo Marcolongo; Alida Lp Caforio
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-30

2.  Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis.

Authors:  Enrico Ammirati; Emanuele Bizzi; Giacomo Veronese; Matthieu Groh; Caroline M Van de Heyning; Jukka Lehtonen; Marc Pineton de Chambrun; Alberto Cereda; Chiara Picchi; Lucia Trotta; Javid J Moslehi; Antonio Brucato
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-07

3.  Immunosuppressive therapy in virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy: 20-year follow-up of the TIMIC trial.

Authors:  Cristina Chimenti; Matteo Antonio Russo; Andrea Frustaci
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 35.855

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.