Literature DB >> 33197574

The value of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) testing for the diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Niels A D Guchelaar1, Manon M Waling1, Anviti A Adhin1, Paul L A van Daele1, Marco W J Schreurs2, Saskia M Rombach3.   

Abstract

The testing of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) takes an important place in the diagnostic workup to ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Nowadays, it is recommended to screen for the presence of PR3 and MPO specific antibodies first using immunoassay, without the need for ANCA measurement by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). A literature search was performed to assess the diagnostic test value of ANCA IIF and PR3- and MPO-antibody immunoassay to diagnose AAV. This meta-analysis shows that the c-ANCA testing by IIF has a pooled sensitivity of 75.2% and a pooled specificity of 98.4%. For PR3-antibody immunoassay, the pooled sensitivity depended on the immunoassay method used, and ranged from 79.8% to 86.6%, whereas the pooled specificity ranged from 96.8% to 98.3%. For both p-ANCA IIF and MPO-antibody immunoassay (all methods) sensitivity varied considerably showing pooled values of respectively 46.3% and 58.1%, whereas respective pooled specificity was 91.4% and 95.6%. These findings support the 2017 international consensus that primary anti-PR3 and anti-MPO screening by immunoassay, based on superior immunoassay sensitivity without the need for IIF ANCA testing, improves the diagnostic workup of AAV.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANCA-associated vasculitis; Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; Diagnostic test; Immunoassay; Indirect immunofluorescence; Sensitivity and specificity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33197574     DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autoimmun Rev        ISSN: 1568-9972            Impact factor:   9.754


  4 in total

1.  Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation.

Authors:  Aram Al-Soudi; Yosta Vegting; Paul L Klarenbeek; Marc L Hilhorst
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 2.  ANCA Status or Clinical Phenotype - What Counts More?

Authors:  Martin Windpessl; Erica L Bettac; Philipp Gauckler; Jae Il Shin; Duvuru Geetha; Andreas Kronbichler
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Glomerulonephritis Associated with Infective Endocarditis Showing Serological Positivity for PR3-anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody and Anti-glomerular Basement Membrane Antibody.

Authors:  Yuki Chiba; Kei Takahashi; Rui Makino; Mai Yoshida; Yuji Oe; Tasuku Nagasawa; Hiroshi Sato; Mariko Miyazaki; Koji Okamoto
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 1.282

Review 4.  Neutrophils in ANCA-associated vasculitis: Mechanisms and implications for management.

Authors:  Shangqing Ge; Xingyu Zhu; Qinyao Xu; Junyan Wang; Cheng An; Ying Hu; Fan Yang; Xinyi Wang; Yipin Yang; Shuwen Chen; Ruimin Jin; Haiyan Li; Xinchen Peng; Yue Liu; Junnan Xu; Minhui Zhu; Zongwen Shuai
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.