Literature DB >> 33197451

Optical transmittance and ultrastructure of SMILE-derived lenticules subjected to three different preservative methods.

Fei Xia1, Jing Zhao1, Dan Fu1, Ye Xu1, Peijun Yao1, Meiyan Li1, Aruma Aruma1, Xingtao Zhou2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the optical transmittance and ultrastructure of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)-derived lenticules preserved via three different methods.
METHODS: A total of 90 lenticules obtained from myopic patients undergoing SMILE surgery were divided into control and experimental groups. Fresh lenticules served as the control. The preserved lenticules of the experimental group were randomly divided into three subgroups according to different storage conditions: anhydrous glycerol, silicone oil and allochroic silica gel groups. Optical transmittance was evaluated, histological changes were analysed by haematoxylin eosin (HE) staining, and collagen fibril densities and necrotic response were assessed via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at 48 h, 14 days and 4 weeks.
RESULTS: After storage for 4 weeks, the mean percentage transmittance values in glycerol and silicone oil groups significantly decreased (P = 0.034 and P = 0.042, respectively), but the lenticules preserved in silica gel remained unchanged when compared with the control lenticules. In all the groups, HE staining results showed a regular arrangement of collagen fibers with a few keratocytes and several cavitation bubbles. TEM revealed that the fibril densities in the glycerol group (273.70 ± 31.42/μm2) after 4 weeks were significant less than those in the other two groups (silicone oil, 335.20 ± 33.09/μm2; silica gel, 371.80 ± 37.60/μm2) and control group (340 ± 33.61/μm2) (all P < 0.001). In each group, a few necrotic and apoptotic keratocytes were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: All the three agents, namely glycerol, silicone oil and silica gel, could be used for lenticule preservation. Silica gel facilitates better maintenance of optical transmittance than the other two agents.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33197451     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  3 in total

Review 1.  Preservation of corneal stromal lenticule: review.

Authors:  Martina Nemcokova; Jakub Dite; Yun Min Klimesova; Magdalena Netukova; Pavel Studeny
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Effect of corneal stromal lenticule customization on neurite distribution and excitatory property.

Authors:  Gary Hin-Fai Yam; Francisco Bandeira; Yu-Chi Liu; Kavya Devarajan; Nur Zahirah Binte M Yusoff; Hla-Myint Htoon; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 12.822

3.  Comparison of the Effects of Temperature and Dehydration Mode on Glycerin-Based Approaches to SMILE-Derived Lenticule Preservation.

Authors:  Fei Xia; Jing Zhao; Dan Fu; Bing Qin; Zhi Chen; Yu Zhao; Yang Shen; Jiayun Hou; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.651

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.