Masahide Sato1. 1. Information Media Center, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan.
Abstract
Assuming that the interaction between particles is given by the Kern-Frenkel potential, Monte Carlo simulations are performed to study the clusters and structures formed by one-patch particles in a thin space between two parallel walls. In isothermal-isochoric systems with a short interaction length, tetrahedral tetramers, octahedral hexamers, and pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers are created with increasing patch area. In isothermal-isobaric systems, the double layers of a triangular lattice, which is the (111) face of the face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice, form when the pressure is high. For a long interaction length, a different type of cluster, trigonal prismatic hexamers, is created. The structures in the double layers also changed as follows: a simple hexagonal lattice or square lattice, which is the (100) face of the fcc structure, is created in isothermal-isobaric systems.
Assuming that the interaction between particles is given by the Kern-Frenkel potential, Monte Carlo simulations are performed to study the clusters and structures formed by one-patch particles in a thin space between two parallel walls. In isothermal-isochoric systems with a short interaction length, tetrahedral tetramers, octahedral hexamers, and pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers are created with increasing patch area. In isothermal-isobaric systems, the double layers of a triangular lattice, which is the (111) face of the face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice, form when the pressure is high. For a long interaction length, a different type of cluster, trigonal prismatic hexamers, is created. The structures in the double layers also changed as follows: a simple hexagonal lattice or square lattice, which is the (100) face of the fcc structure, is created in isothermal-isobaric systems.
Patchy
particles are the particles having several patch areas,
whose properties are different from other surface areas. The patchy
particles are potential materials because the anisotropy caused by
patch areas makes various structures which are not formed by isotropic
particles. Many groups[1−33] tried to create various types of self-assemblies with patchy particles.
For example, triple helix strings formed by one-patch particles[6] and the kagome lattice formed by triblock Janus
spherical particles[7] were observed by Chen
and coworkers. Using silica particles with a gold patch, Iwashita
and Kimura[17] observed the clusters formed
by one-patch particles on a two-dimensional plane. The authors examined
how the cluster shape changed and how the ordering of direction of
the patch area depended on the size of patch area.In simulations
and theoretical studies,[9,10,14−21,24] the Kern–Frenkel (KF)
potential[34] has been often used as the
interaction potential between patchy particles. Many kinds of clusters
and crystal structures were predicted by controlling the interaction
length and the size of the patch area. Previously, assuming that one-patch
particles move on a two-dimensional plane rotating three-dimensionally,
isothermal–isobaric Monte Carlo (MC) simulations[35] were performed to study the dependence of two-dimensional
structures formed by one-patch particles on the interaction length
in the KF potential. The author showed that square tetramers, which
do not form with a short interaction length, were produced when the
interaction length was long.[35]For
one-patch particles in the thin space constructed by two walls,
crystal structures and the orientational order of patch direction
were studied experimentally.[20,24] In the experiments,
the thickness of the space between the two walls changed gradually
because the two walls were set to be tilted with a small angle. The
structures formed in the thin space depended on the patch area. The
orientational order of the direction of patch area changed with the
change in crystal structures. MC simulations were also performed by
the same papers,[20,24] and the ordering of the direction
of patch area was studied for several crystal structures observed
in the experiment. The results of the simulations agreed well with
those of the experiment. In their simulations,[20,24] however, the orientational order of the direction of patch area
was studied only for supposed structures. The possibility of the formation
of other structures was not examined, and the reason why the crystal
structures observed in their experiment were created is not clear
yet.In previous simulations,[20,24] it was assumed
that
the interaction length between patchy particles was short. The assumption
was reasonable because silica particles with a gold patch were kept
in mind as one-patch particles. In a previous study on spherical one-patch
particles constructed in a two-dimensional plane,[35] clusters and structures which were not created with a short
interaction length formed when the interaction range was long. Also,
a study on a free three-dimensional system by another group[21] showed that cluster shapes and crystal structures
were strongly affected by the interaction length. Experimentally,
long-range interactions may be possible to be synthesized by some
fabrication methods. For example, the interaction length may be controlled
if DNA strands are used in the patchy area because DNA strands are
designed freely.[36−53] Thus, it is also interesting to study how the interaction length
affects clusters and structures formed by patchy particles in thin
systems.In this paper, considering the spherical one-patch
particles constructed
in the thin space between two parallel walls, how the cluster types
and structures formed by one-patch particles depend on the patch area
and the interaction length is studied. First, the model used is introduced.
Second, the results of the simulations are shown. Isothermal–isochoric
MC simulations are performed in dilute systems to show how the cluster
shape depends on the interaction length, the interaction strength,
and the patch area. Then, isothermal–isobaric MC simulations
are performed and how the structures formed by one-patch particles
change with pressure is shown. Finally, the results are summarized
in Conclusions.
Results and Discussion
In the simulations, the z-axis is set perpendicular
to the two parallel walls and the xy-plane is parallel
to them. The periodic boundary conditions are used in both x- and y-directions. In constructed systems,
walls affect structures formed by the particles with an isotropic
interaction. The structures which are not expected by the free three-dimensional
system are reported[55−60] when the distance between the two walls is smaller than twice the
value of the particle diameter. To avoid the strong effect of walls,
the distance between the two parallel walls l is set to 2.1σ, which is a little
larger than twice the value of the particle diameter. The number of
particles used in the simulations N is 512. The diameter
of the particles σ is set to unity.
Clusters Forming in Isothermal–Isochoric
Systems
First, by performing isothermal–isochoric
MC simulations,
the dependence of the cluster size on the interaction energy, the
interaction length, and the patch area is studied for a short interaction
length. The particle density πσ3N/(6lll) and the interaction length Δ are set to 0.2 and σ/10,
respectively. The relationship between θ and cluster types is
examined by changing θ every 10° from 20 to 100° for
ϵ/kBT = 8.0, 6.0,
4.0, and 2.0. Initially, particles are put at random. In one MC trial,
the translation and rotation are tried for one particle. To avoid
making the success rate of MC trials too low, the maximum values of
translation and rotation of particles are tuned every 100N MC trials.[61]
Clusters with a Short Interaction
Length
Figure shows how the number of clusters
depends on θ and the cluster size, that is, the number of particles
in a cluster. The color strength is proportional to kN(k), where N(k) is the number of clusters with the cluster size k. N(k) is averaged over 10 times
every 106N MC trials after 3N × 107 MC trials. For ϵ/kBT = 8.0 Figure a), the distribution of the cluster size
is narrow as the effect of thermal fluctuations is small, and the
appropriate cluster size is determined by the patch area. For θ
< 60° or χ < 2.5 × 10–1, the
cluster size increases with increasing θ. When θ ≥
70° or χ ≥ 3.3 × 10–1, the
clusters smaller than 30 particles are not seen because many particles
assemble and long string-like clusters form.
Figure 1
Dependence of the number
of clusters on the cluster size and θ
for Δ = σ/10, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show kN(k), where N(k) is the number of clusters with the
cluster size k.
Dependence of the number
of clusters on the cluster size and θ
for Δ = σ/10, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show kN(k), where N(k) is the number of clusters with the
cluster size k.For ϵ/kBT =
6.0 (Figure b), the
distribution of cluster size is similar to that for ϵ/kBT = 8.0 when θ ≤
60°, but the distribution is broader than that with ϵ/kBT = 8.0 and various sizes
of clusters from when θ = 70°. The formation of these clusters
is caused by thermal fluctuations. As they make the rotation and translation
of particles frequent, the connections in clusters are cut easily
and the long string-like clusters are broken into small clusters.
For ϵ/kBT = 4.0
(Figure c) and ϵ/kBT = 2.0 (Figure d), the distribution starts
to be broad with a small θ owing to the further increase in
the effect of thermal fluctuations.Figure shows several
typical snapshots for ϵ/kBT = 8.0, where the system is seen from the positive z-direction. Figure shows the zoomed snapshots of several clusters in Figure . When θ =
40° or χ = 1.2 × 10–1 (Figure a),most numerous
clusters are tetrahedral tetramers such as A (Figure A). As l is set to 2.1σ in the simulations, l is large enough for the tetrahedral
tetramers to rotate freely in the thin space. Thus, the tetrahedral
tetramers orient in many directions. For the KF potential,[34] the interaction energy is simply proportional
to the number of interacting particles. As each particle in the observed
tetrahedral tetramers interacts with other three particles, the interaction
energy per particle for the tetrahedral tetramers, U4, satisfies U4/kBT = −3ϵ/(2kBT) = 12.0.
Figure 2
Typical snapshots for
a short interaction length, where ϵ/kBT = 8.0 and θ is set
to (a) 40, (b) 60, (c) 70, and (d) 100°. χ is given by
(a) 1.7 × 10–1, (b) 2.5 × 10–1, (c) 3.3 × 10–1, and (d) 5.9 × 10–1. The interaction length is set to Δ = σ/10.
Figure 3
Zoomed snapshots for clusters (A–C) in Figure . The upper figures
show the
zoomed snapshots for the clusters. The lower figures show the connections
in the clusters, where the connections are drawn with yellow lines.
Red and yellow particles are put at the centers of patchy particles
whose z-coordinates are larger and lower than L/2, respectively.
Typical snapshots for
a short interaction length, where ϵ/kBT = 8.0 and θ is set
to (a) 40, (b) 60, (c) 70, and (d) 100°. χ is given by
(a) 1.7 × 10–1, (b) 2.5 × 10–1, (c) 3.3 × 10–1, and (d) 5.9 × 10–1. The interaction length is set to Δ = σ/10.Zoomed snapshots for clusters (A–C) in Figure . The upper figures
show the
zoomed snapshots for the clusters. The lower figures show the connections
in the clusters, where the connections are drawn with yellow lines.
Red and yellow particles are put at the centers of patchy particles
whose z-coordinates are larger and lower than L/2, respectively.When θ = 60° or χ = 2.5 × 10–1 (Figure b), two
types of clusters, octahedral hexamers such as B (Figure B) and pentagonal dipyramidal
heptamers such as C (Figure C), coexist in the system. For the octahedral hexamers, each
particle in a cluster connects with other four particles, while for
the pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers, each particle in the pentagonal
plane connects with four neighboring particles and the two vertexes
connect with all the particles in the pentagonal plane. The interaction
energies per particle for the octahedral hexamers, U6, and the pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers, U7, satisfy U6/kBT = −2ϵ/(kBT) = 16.0 and U7/kBT = −3ϵ/(kBT) = 24.0. As the number of
connections per particle in the pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers is
slightly larger than that in the octahedral hexamers, the pentagonal
dipyramidal heptamer is considered to be more energetically favorable
than the octahedral hexamer. However, the latter was more numerous
than the former: the average numbers of octahedral hexamers and pentagonal
dipyramidal heptamers were 45 and 24, respectively.The unexpected
relationship between the two cluster numbers is
caused by small l. When
one of the triangular planes in octahedral hexamers is parallel to
the xy-plane as observed in my simulations, the octahedral
hexamers have enough space in the z-direction. Thus,
they can move without bumping against the walls by thermal fluctuations.
On the other hand, the pentagonal planes in the pentagonal dipyramidal
heptamers are a bit tilted from the xy-plane, as
seen in Figure b,
which means that l is
too narrow compared with the distance between two vertexes of the
pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers and that the heptamers probably bump
against the walls with a small motion. Thus, the dipyramidal heptamers
cannot move freely in the systems and may be easily broken by thermal
fluctuations.When θ = 70° or χ = 3.3 ×
10–1 (Figure c), one
large cluster is created. The shape of this cluster is like a mesh
formed by meandering strings. The z-coordinates of
particles are separated into two levels. The patch direction of almost
all the lower side particles is the positive z-direction
and that of almost all the upper side particles is the negative z-direction. Taking into account the patch area, it can
be observed that the particles cannot connect with the neighbors in
the same z-level as the patch direction is parallel
to the z-axis.The mesh-like pattern formed
by string-like clusters is also created
for θ = 80 and 90°. The cluster shape is different from
the string-like one for θ = 100° or χ = 5.9 ×
10–1 (Figure d): the cluster shape becomes compact and the number of voids
decreases compared with that in Figure c. As the system sizes in our simulations are not so
large, all the particles gather and one large island with some voids
is created. As the patch area is sufficiently large, the particles
can connect with the neighbors at the same z-level.
The particles in each z-level make a triangular lattice
to increase the number of connected particles as much as possible.
In the triangular lattice, particles connect with nine particles,
six particles in the same z-level and three particles
in a different z-level. The interaction energy per
particle UΔ satisfies UΔ/kBT = −9ϵ/(2kBT) = 36.0.The effect of thermal fluctuations on the cluster
shape for string-like
clusters is shown. Figure shows snapshots (Figure a,c) and the connections between particles (Figure b,d) with ϵ/kBT = 6.0 and 4.0 for θ
= 70°. A long string-like cluster forms when ϵ/kBT = 8.0 (Figure c), but the cluster shape becomes
short when ϵ/kBT = 6.0 (Figure a,b).
The short string-like clusters seem to be formed by the connection
of a few pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers. For ϵ/kBT = 4.0 (Figure c,d), the size of string-like clusters is
smaller than that with ϵ/kBT = 6.0 and the form of the unit of sting-like clusters
becomes obscure as the effect of thermal fluctuations increases.
Figure 4
Typical
snapshots and connections between particles in these snapshots
with θ = 70° for Δ = σ/10. ϵ/kBT is 6.0 (a,b) and 4.0 (c,d).
The connections are drawn with yellow lines. In (a,b), the orange
area is the patch area. In (c,d), red particles and yellow particles
are put at the centers of patchy particles in the lower and upper
regions, respectively.
Typical
snapshots and connections between particles in these snapshots
with θ = 70° for Δ = σ/10. ϵ/kBT is 6.0 (a,b) and 4.0 (c,d).
The connections are drawn with yellow lines. In (a,b), the orange
area is the patch area. In (c,d), red particles and yellow particles
are put at the centers of patchy particles in the lower and upper
regions, respectively.
Clusters with a Long Interaction
Length
In a previous
study,[35] the author studied how the two-dimensional
structures formed by one-patch particles depend on the interaction
length. When the interaction length is Δ = σ/2 and the
pressure is low, two types of square tetramers form, which are not
created with a short interaction length. Here, assuming that Δ
= σ/2 simulations are performed to study how the interaction
length affects the cluster shape in thin systems.First, how
the distribution of cluster size depends on the interaction length
is examined. Figure shows the distribution of cluster size for the long interaction
length. For ϵ/kBT = 2.0 (Figure c)
and ϵ/kBT = 4.0
(Figure d), the distributions
seem to be similar to those with the short interaction length (Figure c,d). On the other
hand, for ϵ/kBT = 8.0 (Figure a)
and 6.0 (Figure b),
the distributions are broader and clusters forming with the long interaction
length are larger, compared to the system with a sticky type of short
interaction length.
Figure 5
Dependence of the number of clusters on the cluster size
and θ
for Δ = σ/2, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show kN(k), where N(k) is the number of clusters with the
cluster size k.
Dependence of the number of clusters on the cluster size
and θ
for Δ = σ/2, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show kN(k), where N(k) is the number of clusters with the
cluster size k.To clarify the effect of the difference in the interaction length
in more detail, snapshots for ϵ/kBT = 8.0 in Figure and also zoomed snapshots of several clusters observed
in Figure are shown.
When θ ≤ 30° or χ = 6.7 × 10–2, polyhedral clusters hardly form, and dimers and trimers from instead.
As the polyhedral clusters also do not form in systems with a short
interaction length, the effect of the difference in the interaction
length on the cluster shape is small in this θ region. When
θ = 40° or χ = 1.2 × 10–1 (Figure a), trigonal prismatic
hexamers such as A, which are not observed in systems with a short
interaction length (Figure a), are created. In cluster A (Figure A), particle (i) connects with all the other
particles in the same cluster expect for particle (ii) as the interaction
length Δ is long. Thus, the interaction energy per particle, U6p, satisfies U6p/kBT = −5ϵ/(2kBT) = 20.0, which is larger
than U6.
Figure 6
Typical snapshots for Δ = σ/2,
where ϵ/kBT = 8.0
and θ is set
to (a) 40, (b) 50, (c) 60, and (d) 80°. Yellow area represents
the patch area.
Figure 7
Zoomed snapshots for clusters (A–E) shown
in Figure , where
the connections in
the clusters are also shown by yellow lines. Red and yellow particles
are put at the centers of patchy particles whose z-coordinates are larger and lower than L/2, respectively.
Typical snapshots for Δ = σ/2,
where ϵ/kBT = 8.0
and θ is set
to (a) 40, (b) 50, (c) 60, and (d) 80°. Yellow area represents
the patch area.Zoomed snapshots for clusters (A–E) shown
in Figure , where
the connections in
the clusters are also shown by yellow lines. Red and yellow particles
are put at the centers of patchy particles whose z-coordinates are larger and lower than L/2, respectively.The number of connections per particle is four in the cluster.
Hexamers also form when θ = 50° (Figure b), but their shape is a tetrahedron such
as B (Figure B). Owing
to the increase in the patchy area, each particle in the cluster connects
with all the other particles. As the number of connections per particle
is five, the tetrahedral clusters are energetically preferred to the
trigonal prismatic clusters.When θ = 60° or χ
= 2.5 × 10–1 (Figure c), clusters
like the chains of trigonal prismatic form. As l is not too small, both types of clusters
such as C (Figure C) and D (Figure D) form. In cluster C, particle (i) does not connect with particle
(ii) because the patch area is not so large. The number of connections
per particle is five in both C and D. The difference in these two
types of clusters is the orientation; the type of C is the same as
that of D when cluster C is rotated by 90°. These two types of
clusters are energetically equivalent to each other.When θ
= 80° or χ = 4.1 × 10–1 (Figure d), one
large cluster, which seems to be an island with a few large voids,
is created. This cluster consists of a region with a simple hexagonal
lattice and region E (Figure E). Taking into account the patch area and the interaction
length, the number of connections per particle is estimated to six
in region E and seven in the simple hexagonal lattice. As the region
with the simple hexagonal lattice is more energetically favorable
than region E, it is reasonable that the area of the former region
is larger than that of the latter region. Because the system size
is not so large in our simulations, only one island is created in
the systems. If simulations are performed in larger systems, some
island-like clusters consisting of the mixture of the hexagonal lattice
and the structure such as region E should be created.How the
types of mainly formed clusters change with ϵ/kBT and θ is summarized
in Figure , where
the cluster types remarked in the snapshots are indicated for each
set of parameters. When Δ = σ/10 (Figure a), the θ region with dimers increases
with decreasing ϵ/kBT. When ϵ/kBT ≤
4.0, the monomers are included in the region with dimers. As the interaction
energy is not sufficiently large, the creation and separation of dimers
are probably repeated in these energies. When ϵ/kBT > 2.0, polygonal clusters with
clear
shapes are created when 40° < θ < 70°. When
θ = 60θ and ϵ/kBT = 8.0, octahedral hexamers and pentagonal
dipyramidal heptamers are created as we have already shown in Figure b; when ϵ/kBT = 2.0, those polygonal clusters
do not form and the region with monomers and dimers expands. Island-like
clusters are not created and the connection between particles in chain-like
clusters is looser than that with ϵ/kBT > 2.0. When Δ = σ/2 (Figure b), trigonal prismatic clusters,
which are not observed for Δ = σ/10, are created with
ϵ/kBT = 8.0 because
of the long interaction length. As the long interaction length makes
the connection between particles easier, polygonal clusters become
looser than those with the short interaction length. Thus, the shapes
of hexamers and tetramers are irregular with ϵ/kBT ≤ 6.0. Another effect of the
long interaction length is to increase the region with island-like
clusters. The structure in the island-like clusters is the mixture
of a simple hexagonal structure and a square lattice, while the island-like
clusters consist of a triangular lattice with a short interaction
length.
Figure 8
Dependence of the cluster type on ϵ/kBT and θ for (a) Δ = σ/10
and (b) Δ = σ/2.
Dependence of the cluster type on ϵ/kBT and θ for (a) Δ = σ/10
and (b) Δ = σ/2.
Structures Forming in Isothermal–Isobaric Systems
In previous sections, isothermal–isochoric MC simulations
are performed and the dependence of cluster shape on θ and ϵ/kBT is studied. Hereafter, performing
MC simulations controlling pressure, how structures formed by one-patch
particles in a thin space depend on the interaction energy and pressure
is studied. In the simulations, the scaled pressure Pσ3/kBT is changed every 5 from 5 to 50. Initially, the particle density
is set to 0.2 and the particle positions are at random. During the
simulations, the lengths of systems in x- and y-directions are changed isotropically in each MC trial,
while l is kept as 2.1σ.
Structures Forming in Isothermal–Isobaric Systems with
a Short Interaction Length
If the pressure is sufficiently
high and the interaction length Δ is short, the double layers
of a triangular lattice, which is the same as the (111) face of the
face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice, should be formed to make the particle
density high. In each plane, the six-fold rotational symmetry is expected
to be high if the triangular lattice is created. Thus, to estimate
the six-fold rotational symmetry, ϕ6 is introduced,
which is given bywhere nN(i) is the number of neighboring particles in the same z-level for the ith particle, θ represents the angle between and the x-axis, and ∑′ is the summation
of the neighboring particles in the same z-level.
In the simulations, the ith and jth particles are considered to be in the same z-level
when the difference in their z-coordinates is smaller
than 0.2σ, and the ith and jth particles are regarded as neighbors when r is smaller than 1.1σ. The interaction
length is σ/10 as a short interaction length.Figure shows the dependence
of ϕ6 on Pσ3/kBT and θ. When ϵ/kBT is small, which means that
the effect of thermal fluctuations is large (Figure d), ϕ6 is large in the high-pressure
region. With the increase of the interaction energy, the region with
small ϕ6 decreases because particles aggregate easily
owing to the attractive interaction, especially in the large θ
region (Figure c).
However, with a further increase in ϵ/kBT, ϕ6 starts to decrease
again (Figure a,b)
in the low-pressure region. When ϵ/kBT = 8.0 (Figure a), the increase in the low ϕ6 region
is remarked for 50° ≤ θ ≤ 90° or 1.8
× 10–1 ≤ χ ≤ 0.5. The decrease
in ϕ6 in this θ region is related to the anisotropy
in the attractive interaction. The clusters such as octahedral hexamers
and pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers form in this θ region.
These clusters do not have the six-fold symmetry, and they are stable
because the number of connections per particle is large. Thus, it
is hard to break them, and a large pressure is necessary to form the
triangular lattice with a large ϕ6.
Figure 9
Dependence of ϕ6 on Pσ3/kBT and θ
for Δ = σ/10, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show the value of ϕ6.
Dependence of ϕ6 on Pσ3/kBT and θ
for Δ = σ/10, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show the value of ϕ6.For ϵ/kBT =
8.0, the change in ϕ6 is more drastic than that with
other interaction energies. To clarify the relationship between ϕ6 and the structures formed in the systems with this energy,
several typical snapshots for ϵ/kB = 8.0 are shown in Figure and the interactions between particles in Figure . For θ = 40° or
χ = 1.2 × 10–1, and Pσ3/kBT = 10, a snapshot is shown in Figure a and the connections between particles
in Figure a. From
these figures, one can find that tetrahedral tetramers form in the
system with these parameters. ϕ6 should be large
if the tetrahedral tetramers are arranged regularly, but ϕ6 is low in the simulations because the pressure is not too
large to enable the tetramers placed in a regular manner.
Figure 10
Typical snapshots
for Δ = σ/10, where ϵ/kBT = 8.0 and θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively,
set to (a) 40° and 10, (b)40°
and 30, (c) 60° and 5, and (d) 100° and 35. χ is given
by (a,b) 1.2 × 10–1, (c) 2.5 × 10–1, and (d) 5.9 × 10–1. Orange
area represents the patch area.
Figure 11
Interactions
between particles in Figure , where θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively,
set to (a) 40° and 10, (b) 40° and 30, (c) 60° and
5, and (d) 100° and 35. χ is given by (a,b) 1.2 ×
10–1, (c) 2.5 × 10–1, and
(d) 5.9 × 10–1. Yellow lines represent connections
between particles. Red particles and yellow particles are put at the
centers of patchy particles in the lower and upper regions, respectively.
Typical snapshots
for Δ = σ/10, where ϵ/kBT = 8.0 and θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively,
set to (a) 40° and 10, (b)40°
and 30, (c) 60° and 5, and (d) 100° and 35. χ is given
by (a,b) 1.2 × 10–1, (c) 2.5 × 10–1, and (d) 5.9 × 10–1. Orange
area represents the patch area.Interactions
between particles in Figure , where θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively,
set to (a) 40° and 10, (b) 40° and 30, (c) 60° and
5, and (d) 100° and 35. χ is given by (a,b) 1.2 ×
10–1, (c) 2.5 × 10–1, and
(d) 5.9 × 10–1. Yellow lines represent connections
between particles. Red particles and yellow particles are put at the
centers of patchy particles in the lower and upper regions, respectively.When θ is kept the same and Pσ3/kBT is increased
(Figure b), the
double layers of a triangular lattice with a large ϕ6, which is the same as the (111) face of the fcc lattice, are created.
The connections between particles in this system shown in Figure b are quite different
from those with low pressures shown in Figure a: the connections in tetrahedral tetramers
are broken and almost all the particles connect with their three nearest
neighbors in the different z-level, while in both
structures, the number of interacting particles per particle is three
and the interaction energy is estimated as 3ϵ/(2kBT) = 12.0. When θ = 60° or
χ = 2.5 × 10–1, and Pσ3/kBT = 5 (Figures c
and 11c), many octahedral hexamers and a few
pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers form. These clusters are stable as
the number of connections per particle is large. As the rotational
symmetry of pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers is not six-fold, the
regular triangular lattice does not form easily, so that ϕ6 is low even with high pressures.For θ = 100°
or χ = 5.9 × 10–1 (Figures d and 11d), the patch area is so large that the particles
can attract not only particles in the different z-level but also those in the same z-level if the
patch direction is almost parallel to the z-axis.
When the double layers of the triangular lattice form, the number
of connections per particle is nine: the connections with the particles
in the same z-level are six and those with the particles
in the different z-level are three. Thus, the interaction
energy per particle is estimated as 9ϵ/(2kBT) = 36.0. As the number of connections is
large, the double layers of the triangular lattice are created even
with low pressures.In previous studies,[20,24] structures formed by
one-patch particles in thin systems were studied. The system width
was thinner than our simulations, but the double layers of the triangular
lattice were observed. In the systems, the structure given by Figure b and the regular
structure formed by octahedral hexamers are created. In those studies,
the structures formed by patchy particles with θ > 90°
were not studied. However, if experiments are performed with patchy
particles with θ > 90°, the structure such as in Figure d may be observed.
Structures Forming in Isothermal–Isobaric Systems with
a Long Interaction Length
We also examine what kinds of structures
form in the thin systems for Δ = σ/2 and show how the
interaction length affects the structures created in the systems. Figure shows how ϕ6 depends on Pσ3/kBT and θ. For ϵ/kBT = 2.0 (Figure d), ϕ6 is
small with low pressures and the dependence of ϕ6 on θ seems to be small. Except that ϕ6 is
small in the small pressure region even with a large θ, and
the difference between Figures d and 9d is small.
Figure 12
Dependence
of ϕ6 on Pσ3/kBT and θ
for Δ = σ/2, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show the value of ϕ6.
Dependence
of ϕ6 on Pσ3/kBT and θ
for Δ = σ/2, where ϵ/kBT is set to (a) 8.0, (b) 6.0, (c) 4.0, and (d) 2.0.
The color bars show the value of ϕ6.For ϵ/kBT =
4.0 (Figure c),
ϕ6 is small when θ is small and the pressure
is low or when θ = 100°. Small ϕ6 with
a low pressure and a small θ is also observed for the short
interaction length (Figure c), but a small ϕ6 with θ = 100°
is observed only for the long interaction length. ϕ6 is also small in these two regions for larger energies, and the
areas with a small ϕ6 spread with increasing ϵ/kBT (Figure a,b).Several snapshots are shown
to clarify why ϕ6 change,
as shown in Figure , and how ϕ6 is related to the structures created
in the thin systems. Figures and 14 show snapshots with ϵ/kBT = 8.0 for a long interaction
length and the connections between particles in these snapshots, respectively.
For θ = 20° or χ = 3.0 × 10–2 (Figure a), double
layers of triangular lattices are created when the pressure is high.
These double layers are the (111) face of the fcc lattice, which is
the same as that formed for Δ = σ/10. As particles in
the double layers form dimers, the interaction energy per particle
is given by ϵ/(2kBT) = 4.0. The directions of the connections between particles are
at random as shown in Figure a.
Figure 13
Typical snapshots for Δ = σ/2, where ϵ/kBT = 8.0, and θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively, given by (a) 20° and 40, (b) 30°
and 10, (c) 30° and 40, and (d) 100° and 10. χ is
given by (a) 3.0 × 10–2, (b,c) 6.7 × 10–2, and (d) 5.9 × 10–1. Yellow
area represents the patch area.
Figure 14
Interactions
between particles in Figure , where θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively,
given by (a) 20° and 40, (b) 30° and 10, (c) 30° and
40, and (d) 100° and 10. χ is given by (a) 3.0 × 10–2, (b,c) 6.7 × 10–2, and (d)
5.9 × 10–1. Red particles and yellow particles
are put at the centers of patchy particles in the lower and upper
regions, respectively.
Typical snapshots for Δ = σ/2, where ϵ/kBT = 8.0, and θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively, given by (a) 20° and 40, (b) 30°
and 10, (c) 30° and 40, and (d) 100° and 10. χ is
given by (a) 3.0 × 10–2, (b,c) 6.7 × 10–2, and (d) 5.9 × 10–1. Yellow
area represents the patch area.Interactions
between particles in Figure , where θ and Pσ3/kBT are, respectively,
given by (a) 20° and 40, (b) 30° and 10, (c) 30° and
40, and (d) 100° and 10. χ is given by (a) 3.0 × 10–2, (b,c) 6.7 × 10–2, and (d)
5.9 × 10–1. Red particles and yellow particles
are put at the centers of patchy particles in the lower and upper
regions, respectively.For θ = 30°
or χ = 6.7 × 10–2, with a low pressure
(Figure b), the
double layers are created, but their structures
are more irregular than those in Figure a: the mixture of short rows of triangles
such as A (Figure b) and those of squares such as B (Figure b) forms in a plane. The cause of the formation
of these structures is evident when one sees the connection of particles
in the thin system. As shown in Figure b, the mixture of those rows is created
by trigonal prismatic hexamers, whose shape is the same as that of
cluster A in Figure a. The normal directions of the bases of almost all the trigonal
prismatic hexamers are in the xy-plane. As the rows
of prismatic hexamers one of whose side faces appears in the lower
layer and in the upper layer alternatively, the rows of triangles
such as A (Figures b and 14b) and those of squares such as B
(Figures b and 14b) are created.If the pressure is slightly
larger, arrays of the trigonal prismatic
hexamers probably become more regular, and the long rows of triangles
and those of squares should appear alternatively. However, when the
pressure becomes further higher in Figures c and 14c, those
arrays of triangular prismatic hexamers are broken, and the double
layers of a simple hexagonal lattice, whose structure is the same
as D in Figure c,
are created. For 30° < θ < 80° with sufficiently
large pressures, similar double layers are observed because the particle
density can be high with the structure.For θ ≥
90° or χ ≥ 0.5, as the double
layers of the simple hexagonal lattice are not created, ϕ6 is small irrespective of the pressure. In each layer, the
mixture of a square lattice, which is the (100) face of the fcc lattice,
and a triangular lattice, which is one of the bases of a simple hexagonal
lattice, forms even in the high pressure region (Figures d and 14d). When the patch directions of all the particles are parallel to
the z-axis for θ = 100° or χ = 5.9
× 10–1, the number of connections per particle
for the (100) face of the fcc lattice is fourteen: the particles connect
with eight neighbors in the same layer and six neighbors in a different
layer. On the other hand, the number of connections per particle for
the simple hexagonal lattice is thirteen; particles connect six neighbors
in the same layer and seven neighbors in a different layer. The number
of connections per particle in the square lattice, which is the (100)
face of the fcc structure, is larger than that in the triangular lattice,
which is the basal plane of the simple hexagonal lattice. The internal
energy per particle in the square lattice Ufcc is estimated as Ufcc = −7ϵ,
and that in the triangular lattice UhP is estimated as UhP = −13ϵ/2.
Thus, owing to the benefit of energy gain, the double layers of the
square structure become dominant in high pressures.
Conclusions
In this paper, MC simulations were performed and the clusters and
structures formed by one-patch particles in a thin system were studied.
In the isothermal–isochoric simulations, the type of numerous
clusters changed into dimers, tetrahedral tetramers, octahedral hexamers,
and pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers with the increase of the patch
area for a short interaction length. Taking into account the increase
in the connections between particles, it is natural that the cluster
size increased with increasing patch area. When the patch area was
increased further, the string-like clusters which consist of the connections
of the pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers formed. Finally, the double
layers of island-like clusters, in which the direction of the patch
area of almost all the particles is parallel to the z-axis, were created when θ = 100° or χ = 5.9 ×
10–1.For the long interaction length, the
cluster size also increased
with increasing patch area, but different types of clusters were created:
pentagonal bipyramidal heptamers did not form, but triangular prismatic
hexamers formed. When , the particles in the diagonal positions
in a regular hexahedron with the lattice constant σ can attract
each other. Thus, one can expect that the hexahedral octamers probably
form to increase the energy gain.The difference in the interaction
length also affected the structures
in the isothermal–isobaric systems. For the short interaction
length, the double layers of a triangular lattice, which were the
(111) face of the fcc lattice, formed when the pressure was high.
When θ was around 70°, the double layers of triangular
lattice were difficult to form, which was because the pentagonal dipyramidal
heptamers observed in the isothermal isochoric simulations were stable.
Probably, much higher pressure is needed to turn the system with pentagonal
dipyramidal heptamers into a simple hexagonal structure. For the long
interaction length, the double layers of the simple hexagonal lattice
did not form when θ ≥ 90°. Instead of this structure,
the double layers of a square lattice, which is the (100) face of
the fcc lattice, were created to increase the energy gains. As the
difference in the interaction energies per particles between the two
structures was small, the mixture of the two structures was created
in my simulations. However, only the double layers of the square lattice
can be created if the pressure is higher. In these simulations, the
interaction energy was set to ϵ/kBT ≤ 8.0, which is not so large compared with
that of the experiment,[12] but the system
size was not large. Thus, one cannot completely wipe away the concern
that the systems were trapped in quasistable states. To avoid the
possibility that the systems did not reach the equilibrium states,
it might be better to use other algorithms[14,19,21,62−65]In these simulations, the width between the two walls l was set to 2.1σ. The
restriction
in the z-direction affected the orientation of clusters.
For example, one of the triangular planes in octahedral hexamers and
the pentagonal plane in the pentagonal dipyramidal heptamers which
were observed for the short interaction length were almost parallel
to the xy-plane. When l was thinner than that in the simulations, the orientation
of other clusters can be probably controlled. The direction of the
basal plane in the trigonal prismatic hexamer, which is observed in Figure a, may be restricted
to the xy-plane. In Figure c, clusters such as C and D formed, but only
clusters such as C are probably created in a thinner system.Even for systems where the interaction between particles is simple
and isotropic, structures created in thin systems constructed by two
parallel walls are strongly affected by the width between the two
walls.[55−60] Structures which are not expected from the free three-dimensional
system are created in both experiments and simulations. When the attraction
is anisotropic like patchy particles, more various unique structures
may form when l is controlled.
The author intended to study how the cluster shapes and structures
formed by patchy particles depend on l.
Computational Methods
As shown in Figure , spherical patchy
particles with one patch on their surface constructed
in two parallel walls were considered. It is assumed that the interaction
between the particles and the walls is hard-core repulsion. The interaction
potential between particles is given by the KF potential; the interaction
potential between the ith and jth
particles, UKF(r), is expressed as[34]where denotes the center
of mass for the ith particle, = – , r = ||, and = /r. The first term Urep(r)
represents the hard-core repulsive potential given bywhere σ is
the diameter of spherical
patchy particles. The second term in eq represents the attractive part in the KF potential. Uatt(r) is the square-well potential given bywhere ϵ is the positive parameter representing
the strength of attraction and Δ is the interaction length.
The anisotropy of attraction caused by the patch area is given by f(,,), which is defined as
Figure 15
One-patch particles between two parallel walls. Orange
area is
the patch area which causes the attractive interaction between particles.
The xy-plane is parallel to the walls and the z-axis is perpendicular to them.
One-patch particles between two parallel walls. Orange
area is
the patch area which causes the attractive interaction between particles.
The xy-plane is parallel to the walls and the z-axis is perpendicular to them.When the diameter of patchy particles is σ, the patch area S is estimated as S = πσ2(1 – cos θ)/2. The ratio of patch area on the
whole surface χ is related to θ as χ = (1 –
cos θ)/2. χ changed from 3.0 × 10–1 to 5.9 × 10–2 as θ was changed from
20 and 100°.
Authors: Sung Yong Park; Abigail K R Lytton-Jean; Byeongdu Lee; Steven Weigand; George C Schatz; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Nature Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Laura Filion; Matthieu Marechal; Bas van Oorschot; Daniël Pelt; Frank Smallenburg; Marjolein Dijkstra Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Sunita Srivastava; Dmytro Nykypanchuk; Masafumi Fukuto; Jonathan D Halverson; Alexei V Tkachenko; Kevin G Yager; Oleg Gang Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Abhishek B Rao; James Shaw; Andreas Neophytou; Daniel Morphew; Francesco Sciortino; Roy L Johnston; Dwaipayan Chakrabarti Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 15.881