| Literature DB >> 33195604 |
Carmen Niehaus1,2, Manuel Spínola3, Chunlei Su4, Norman Rojas5, Oscar Rico-Chávez6, Carlos N Ibarra-Cerdeña7, Janet Foley8, Gerardo Suzán6, Gustavo A Gutiérrez-Espeleta1, Andrea Chaves1,8.
Abstract
The apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) has been found in more than 350 species of homoeothermic vertebrates in diverse climates and geographic areas. In most animals, T. gondii produces mild or asymptomatic infection. However, acute and hyperacute toxoplasmosis is associated with high mortality rates observed in Neotropical primates (NP) in captivity. These primates are distributed in 20 countries across the Americas, and although infection has been reported in certain countries and species, toxoplasmosis in the wild and its impact on NP population survival is unknown. Differences among species in exposure rates and disease susceptibility may be due in part to differences in host behavior and ecology. Four species of NP are found in Costa Rica, i.e., howler (Alouatta palliata), spider (Ateles geoffroyi), capuchin (Cebus imitator), and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii). This study reports NP exposure to T. gondii using the modified agglutination test in 245 serum samples of NP (198 wild and 47 from captivity) from Costa Rica. Associations of serostatus with environmental (forest cover, annual mean temperature), anthropogenic (human population density), and biological (sex) variables in howler and capuchin monkeys were evaluated. The seroprevalence among wild NP was 11.6% (95% CI = 7.7-17.34), compared with 60% in captive monkeys (95% CI = 44.27-73.63), with significant differences between species (X 2 = 20.072; df = 3, p = 0.000164), suggesting an effect of behavior and ecology. In general, antibody titers were low for wild NP (<1:128) and high for captive NP (>1:8192), suggesting higher exposure due to management factors and increased life span in captivity. Seropositivity in howler monkeys was positively related to forest cover and inversely related to annual rainfall. For capuchins, annual rainfall was inversely related to seropositivity. Surveillance of T. gondii exposure in NP in captivity and in the wild is required to understand drivers of the infection and develop novel strategies to protect them.Entities:
Keywords: Alouatta palliata; Ateles geoffroyi; Cebus imitator; Latin America; Saimiri oerstedii; endoparasites; serology
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195604 PMCID: PMC7642457 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.583032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Map of Toxoplasma gondii seropositive wild Neotropical primates (NP) from Costa Rica from 2000 to 2015: (A) Protected areas, (B) Forest Cover, (C) Precipitation. Gray circles: seronegative NP, pink circles: seropositive NP. Gulf of Nicoya (GN), Provinces: Alajuela (A), Cartago (C), Guanacaste (G), Heredia (H), Limón (L), San José (SJ), Puntarenas (P).
Independent variables chosen for Generalized Linear Models (GLM) Toxoplasma gondii exposure in wild Alouatta palliata and Cebus imitator.
| Intrinsic, Exposure | Sex | Female/male | Field data |
| Environmental, Oocyst survival | Forest cover percentage (in buffer) | % | Costa Rica Digital Atlas, 2014 |
| Annual average temperature (buffer) | °C | 1 km resolution. Worldclim | |
| Annual precipitation (in buffer) | mm | 1 km resolution. Worldclim | |
| Anthropogenic, Oocyst dispersion | Distance to towns | m | Costa Rica Digital Atlas, 2014 |
| Human population (district, year) | Number of people | Population survey. INEC, 2011 | |
| Human population density (district, year) | Number of people/area | Population survey. INEC, 2011 |
Generalized Linear Models that explain intrinsic, environmental, and anthropogenic attributes on Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in Alouatta palliata and Cebus imitator.
| 1 | Forest cover + precipitation | 3 | 44.784 | 0 | 0.242 |
| 2 | Precipitation | 2 | 44.827 | 0.04 | 0.237 |
| 3 | Population density + precipitation | 3 | 46.103 | 1.32 | 0.125 |
| 4 | Population density + forest cover + precipitation | 4 | 46.241 | 1.46 | 0.117 |
| 5 | Sex + precipitation | 4 | 46.683 | 1.9 | 0.094 |
| 6 | Sex + forest cover + precipitation | 5 | 46.784 | 2 | 0.089 |
| 7 | Sex + population density + precipitation | 5 | 47.885 | 3.1 | 0.051 |
| 8 | Sex + population density + forest cover + precipitation | 6 | 48.238 | 3.45 | 0.043 |
| 9 | Sex | 3 | 73.590 | 28.8 | 1.35E-07 |
| 10 | Sex + forest cover | 4 | 73.770 | 29 | 1.23E-07 |
| 11 | Sex + population density | 4 | 74.368 | 29.6 | 9.13E-08 |
| 12 | Forest cover | 2 | 75.220 | 30.4 | 5.97E-08 |
| 13 | Sex + population density + forest cover | 5 | 75.235 | 30.45 | 5.92E-08 |
| 14 | Null | 1 | 75.616 | 30.8 | 4.89E-08 |
| 15 | Population density | 2 | 76.804 | 32 | 2.70E-08 |
| 16 | Population density + forest cover | 3 | 76.958 | 32.2 | 2.50E-08 |
| 1 | Precipitation | 2 | 39.724 | 0 | 0.303 |
| 2 | Forest cover + precipitation | 3 | 40.815 | 1.09 | 0.176 |
| 3 | Population density + precipitation | 3 | 41.223 | 1.5 | 0.143 |
| 4 | Sex + precipitation | 4 | 41.457 | 1.7 | 0.127 |
| 5 | Sex + forest cover + precipitation | 5 | 42.524 | 2.8 | 0.075 |
| 6 | Population density + forest cover + precipitation | 4 | 42.774 | 3.05 | 0.066 |
| 7 | Sex + population density + precipitation | 5 | 42.993 | 3.3 | 0.059 |
| 8 | Sex + population density + forest cover + precipitation | 6 | 44.449 | 4.7 | 0.028 |
| 9 | Null | 1 | 47.033 | 7.3 | 7.8E-03 |
| 10 | Forest cover | 2 | 48.636 | 8.9 | 3.5E-03 |
| 11 | Population density | 2 | 49.026 | 9.3 | 2.9E-03 |
| 12 | Sex | 3 | 49.032 | 9.3 | 2.9E-03 |
| 13 | Population density + forest cover | 3 | 50.490 | 10.77 | 1.4E-03 |
| 14 | Sex + forest cover | 4 | 50.636 | 10.9 | 1.3E-03 |
| 15 | Sex + population density | 4 | 51.025 | 11.3 | 1.07E-03 |
| 16 | Sex + population density + forest cover | 5 | 52.489 | 12.8 | 5.1E-04 |
K = Number of parameters per model, including the intercept.
Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in captive and wild Neotropical primates in Costa Rica according to species and sex.
| 17/29–58.6% | 9/15–60% | 26/44–59.1% | |
| (IC = 38.94–76.47) | (IC = 32.29–83.66) | (IC = 43.25–73.66) | |
| 1/2–50% | 1/1–100% | 2/3–67% | |
| (IC = 1.26–98.74) | (IC = 2.5–100) | (IC = 9.43–99.16) | |
| 18/31–58.06% | 10/16–62.5% | 28/47–59.6% | |
| (IC = 39.07–75.45) | (IC = 35.43–84.8) | (IC = 44.27–73.63) | |
| 8/76–10.53% | 2/75–2.66% | 10/151–6.62% | |
| (IC = 4.65–19.69) | (IC = 0.32–9.3) | (IC = 3.22–11.84) | |
| 2/3–66.67% | 0/2–0% | 2/5–40% | |
| (IC = 9.43–99.16) | (IC = 0–84.19) | (IC = 5.27–85.34) | |
| 3/10–30% | 8/27–29.63% | 11/37–29.73% | |
| (IC = 6.67–65.24) | (IC = 13.75–50.18) | (IC = 15.88–46.98) | |
| Total | 13/89–14.6% | 0/104–9.61% | 193–11.92% |
| (IC = 8.01–23.68) | (IC = 4.7–16.97) | (IC = 7.7–17.34) | |
Samples of Saimiri oerstedii (n = 5) were excluded.
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in captive Neotropical Primates from Costa Rica according to site and species.
| Alajuela | Cap 1 | 13/19 | 68.40 | |
| Cap 2 | 0/1 | 0 | ||
| Cap 3 | 1/2 | 50 | ||
| Cap 4 | 3/3 | 100 | ||
| Guanacaste | Cap 5 | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Heredia | Cap 6 | 1/2 | 50 | |
| Cap 7 | 1/1 | 100 | ||
| Limon | Cap 8 | 1/1 | 100 | |
| Cap 9 | 1/2 | 50 | ||
| Puntarenas | Cap 10 | 3/7 | 42.80 | |
| Cap 11 | 4/6 | 66.70 | ||
| San Jose | Cap 12 | 0/1 | 0 | |
| 26/44 | 59.10 | |||
| 2/3 | 66.70 | |||
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in wild Neotropical Primates from Costa Rica according to sample site and species.
| Alajuela | Los Chiles | Cano Negro | 0/1 | 0 | |
| San Ramon | Angeles | 0/4 | 0 | ||
| Guanacaste | Bagaces | Bagaces | 1/19 | 5.26 | |
| Bagaces | Bagaces | 0/1 | 0 | ||
| Canas | Bebedero | 0/2 | 0 | ||
| Carrillo | Sardinal | 0/3 | 0 | ||
| Nicoya | Mansion | 1/11 | 9 | ||
| Nicoya | Quebrada Honda | 0/8 | 0 | ||
| Santa Cruz | Tempate | 0/7 | 0 | ||
| Heredia | Sarapiqui | Horquetas | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Sarapiqui | La Virgen | 0/1 | 0 | ||
| Sarapiqui | La Virgen | 2/2 | 100 | ||
| Sarapiqui | La Virgen | 0/3 | 0 | ||
| Sarapiqui | Puerto Viejo | 0/11 | 0 | ||
| Sarapiqui | Puerto Viejo | 0/1 | 0 | ||
| Limon | Guacimo | Rio Jimenez | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Siquirres | Cairo | 0/5 | 0 | ||
| Talamanca | Cahuita | 4/28 | 14 | ||
| Puntarenas | Chomes | Chomes | 0/9 | 0 | |
| Garabito | Tarcoles | 0/1 | 0 | ||
| Garabito | Tarcoles | 2/2 | 100 | ||
| Golfito | Puerto Jimenez | 0/3 | 0 | ||
| Golfito | Puerto Jimenez | 0/2 | 0 | ||
| Golfito | Puerto Jimenez | 0/5 | 0 | ||
| Osa | Bahia Ballena | 0/6 | 0 | ||
| Puntarenas | Barranca | 1/4 | 25 | ||
| Puntarenas | Cobano (IslaN) | 0/2 | 0 | ||
| Puntarenas | Cobano (Curu) | 4/11 | 36.40 | ||
| Puntarenas | Isla Chira | 1/2 | 50 | ||
| Puntarenas | Pitahaya | 0/4 | 0 | ||
| Puntarenas | San Lucas | 3/23 | 13 | ||
| Quepos | Quepos | 0/3 | 0 | ||
| Quepos | Quepos | 3/7 | 42.86 | ||
| Quepos | Savegre | 1/4 | 25 | ||
| 9/151 | 6 | ||||
| 2/5 | 40 | ||||
| 11/37 | 29.70 | ||||
| 0/5 | 0 | ||||
Figure 2Antibody titers of Toxoplasma gondii IgG in Neotropical primates of Costa Rica.
Figure 3Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies were found in 59.6% (28/47) of captive NP and 11.6% (23/198) of wild NP. The model that best accounted for seropositivity among Aloutta palliata with a positive relationship between forest cover and seropositivity and inverse relationship with annual precipitation. The model that best accounted for seropositivity among Cebus imitator with an inverse relationship with annual precipitation.