| Literature DB >> 33195559 |
Rongshan Tao1, Jie Chen2, Tianyu Zhao3, Chengyan Gong2, Hongjun Pan4, Rana Waseem Akhtar5, Xue Li4, Syed Aftab Hussain Shah6, Qingjie Li7, Jianjun Zhao8.
Abstract
Canine distemper (CD), caused by the CDV variant strain with HI542N/Y549H, has become an epidemic in fur-bearing animals in China since 2012. To well understand the genomic and replicated characteristics of the CDV variants, we determined the viral growth kinetics and completed the genome sequences of two CDV strains, namely SDZC(17)M2 and LNDL(17)M4, isolated from CDV-infected minks from Shandong and Liaoning province in China, in 2017. SDZC(17)M2 showed higher viral titers and extensive syncytia in BHK-minkSLAM (BMS) cells than LNDL(17)M4. Although both two strains belong to the Asia-1 genotype and clustered an independent clade in the phylogenetic tree, SDZC(17)M2, harboring I542N/Y549H substitutions in the H protein, shared high identity (99.3-99.6% nt) with the other variant strains, whereas LNDL(17)M4, with the only Y549H substitution, shared a lower identity (97.7%-97.9% nt) with the other variant strains. Furthermore, a novel R223K substitution was identified in the conserved cleavage site (RRQRR → RRQKR) of the F protein in the SDZC(17)M2 strain. However, it which did not significantly affect the cell to cell fusion activity when combined with the CDV H/minkSLAM in BHK-21 cells. The key variations in the genome contributed to the virulence and the evolutionary trend need to be determined in the future.Entities:
Keywords: F protein; canine distemper virus; complete genome; syncytia; variant strains
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195559 PMCID: PMC7658476 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.570277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Characterization of CDV strains in vitro. (A) Cell fusion after 48 h of infection. (B) Statistical analysis of mean syncytial number. (*) indicates a significant difference between CDV strains (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). (C) Cell-associated growth curves of SDZC(17)M2, SD (14)7, SD(14)11, LNDL(17)M4, and Hebei in BHK-mSLAM cells. BMS cells were infected with viruses at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, and cell-associated progeny viruses were collected at the designated time points. The virus titer was determined using VDS cells using a limiting dilution method and the Reed-Muench method. (*) indicates a significant difference between Hebei and SDZC(17)M2 (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). (#) indicates a significant difference between Hebei and SD(14)7 (#P < 0.05; P < 0.01). (※) indicates a significant difference between Hebei and SD (14)11 (※P < 0.05). (&) indicates a significant difference between LNDL(17)M4 and SDZC(17)M2 (&P < 0.05; &&P < 0.01). (§) indicates a significant difference between LNDL(17)M4 and SD(14)7 (§§P < 0.05).
Comparison of the full-length genomes of SDZC(17)M2 and LNDL(17)M4 to other representative CDV isolates (%).
| N | 98.9 | 98.2 | 99 | 98.5 | 99.4 | 99.2 | 98.7 | 98.2 | 100 | 99.9 | 100 | 98.2 | 99.6 | 99.6 | 98.7 | 98.0 |
| P | 98 | 98.4 | 96.6 | 97.9 | 97.8 | 98.6 | 98.2 | 98.6 | 98.8 | 99.3 | 98.8 | 98.6 | 99.0 | 99.0 | 97.4 | 98.3 |
| M | 98.8 | 98.2 | 99.1 | 98.5 | 99.4 | 99.1 | 99.4 | 98.7 | 99.7 | 99.4 | 99.7 | 98.7 | 99.1 | 99.0 | 99.4 | 98.3 |
| F | 96.8 | 97.1 | 97.4 | 97.8 | 98.3 | 98.7 | 97.0 | 97.6 | 98.9 | 99.4 | 99.7 | 97.6 | 98.9 | 99.3 | 96.1 | 96.7 |
| H | 97.7 | 97.5 | 97.7 | 97.8 | 98.5 | 98.5 | 97.0 | 97.6 | 99.5 | 99.8 | 99.5 | 97.6 | 99.2 | 99.4 | 97.5 | 97.4 |
| L | 99.2 | 98.2 | 99.0 | 98.3 | 99.4 | 99.0 | 98.4 | 97.1 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.9 | 97.1 | 99.7 | 99.5 | 99.3 | 98.2 |
| Total | - | 97.8 | - | 97.9 | - | 98.7 | - | 97.4 | - | 99.6 | - | 99.6 | - | 99.3 | - | 97.7 |
| N | 99.8 | 99.0 | 99.2 | 98.9 | 98.9 | 98.3 | 99.2 | 98.7 | 98.7 | 98.1 | 98.7 | 98.7 | 98.3 | 97.8 | 98.7 | 98.0 |
| P | 99 | 99.4 | 97.2 | 98.8 | 97.2 | 98.5 | 98.4 | 99.2 | 97.8 | 98.4 | 97.8 | 99.2 | 98 | 98.4 | 97.4 | 98.3 |
| M | 99.4 | 99.1 | 99.7 | 98.8 | 100 | 98.6 | 100 | 98.8 | 99.7 | 98.7 | 99.7 | 98.8 | 99.1 | 98.3 | 99.4 | 98.3 |
| F | 98.6 | 98.8 | 97.7 | 98.4 | 97.1 | 97.4 | 97.3 | 98.2 | 95.8 | 96.6 | 96.4 | 98.2 | 96.5 | 96.9 | 96.1 | 96.7 |
| H | 99.2 | 99.3 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 97.7 | 97.9 | 98.5 | 99.0 | 97.4 | 97.4 | 97.4 | 99.0 | 97.4 | 97.5 | 97.5 | 97.4 |
| L | 99.7 | 99.3 | 99.6 | 99.0 | 99.4 | 98.4 | 98.7 | 97.8 | 99.3 | 98.3 | 99.4 | 97.8 | 99.3 | 98.1 | 99.3 | 98.2 |
| Total | - | 99.1 | - | 98.9 | - | 98.1 | - | 98.2 | - | 97.9 | - | 97.8 | - | 97.8 | - | 97.7 |
Amino acid and nucleotide sequences differences between the translated region and untranslated region (UTR) of typical (CDV SY, Hebei, LN(10)1, HLJ1-06, LNDL(17)M4) and variant strains (SD(14)11, SD(14)7, SD16F, SDZC(17)M2).
| Gene | AA | typical strains → variant strains |
| N | 2 | Q442P, G507R |
| P | 1 | K98N (C) |
| M | 1 | G64S |
| F | 4 | N3S, I5T, K8N, R223K |
| H | 3 | P200S, M263I, I542N |
| L | 5 | H425Q, Y1169H, L1383V, L1585V, K1647Q |
| Total | 16 | |
| Gene | NT | typical strains → variant strains |
| 3′UTR | - | - |
| N - P | 1 | G1704A |
| P - M | 1 | A3345G |
| M - F | 4 | C4501T, C4751T, G4803A, C4813A |
| F - H | 2 | T6986C, A7039G |
| H - L | 1 | G8936T |
| 5′UTR | 2 | G15587A, T15613C |
| Total | 11 | |
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis of CDV full-length gene sequences with 21 representative strains. (A) The phylogenetic analysis of CDV full-length gene sequence. (B) The phylogenetic analysis of CDV H gene sequence. (C) The phylogenetic analysis of CDV F gene sequence. The Bayesian phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the maximum likelihood method using MrBayes version 3.2 running for 5 million generations with a sample frequency of 1,000 generations. The red line represents the new isolate strains in the study.
Figure 3(A) The amino acid residues 542 and 549 in the H protein of LNDL(17)M4 and SDZC(17)M2 isolates were compared with other reference CDV isolates. The amino acid residues 542 and 549 are marked using boxes. The black line represents the new isolate strains in this study. (B) Amino acid sequence alignments of F protein from LNDL(17)M4 and SDZC(17)M2 with 30 reference strains. The cleavage site is indicated by the box.
Figure 4Cell fusion assay. (A) BHK-21 cells were co-transfected with the respective F, LNDL(17)M4H or SDZC(17)M2 H, and minkSLAM protein expression plasmids. Cell fusion was observed after 24 hours transfection. (B) CDV F or mutation-expressing plasmid fusion assay in BHK-21 cells co-transfected with H and minkSLAM. BHK-21 cells co-transfected with the plasmids for F, H, and T7 polymerases were co-cultured with BHK cells transfected with pT7-EMCluc, pRL-TK, and minkSLAM. The relative fusion activity was determined as the ratio of the firefly luciferase to Renilla luciferase activity after 5 hours. (C) CDV F or mutation-expressing plasmid fusion assay in BHK cells transfected with SDZC(17)M2H and minkSLAM. The relative fusion activity is shown as mean ± S.E.M of three independent experiments.