| Literature DB >> 33195405 |
Fouad Mehraban1, Saeed Rayati2, Vahid Mirzaaghaei3, Arefeh Seyedarabi1.
Abstract
In autohemotherapy, it is important to find a way to lower the effects of oxidation, especially at high concentrations of ozone. One of the parameters, other than ozone concentration, which can have a significant effect on the stability and rate of decomposition of ozone at high concentrations, is the presence of ions in water. A number of spectroscopic techniques including intrinsic fluorescence, circular dichroism and UV-VIS were used as well as SDS-PAGE, Native-PAGE dynamic light scattering and water ion analysis, in order to investigate the effects of two relatively high concentrations of ozone on purified human hemoglobin (Hb) in phosphate buffer and diluted versions with deionized, double distilled and tap water in vitro. Purified human Hb and not whole blood human Hb was used in this study, since the addition of water to the whole blood would have caused the RBCs to lyse, affecting the purification of Hb for further analysis. Therefore, using purified Hb, it was possible to investigate the effects of dilution of 50 mM phosphate buffer to 10 mM phosphate buffer with different water types including non-ion containing deionized and double distilled water as well as ion-containing tap water, when ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone. The fundamental changes in the secondary and tertiary structures of Hb were seen to be related to non-ozonated Hb samples diluted with deionized and double distilled waters, respectively. Generally, Hb oligomerization was more likely to occur at the higher concentration of ozone (80 μg/ml) and in samples where phosphate buffer was diluted with non-ion containing deionized and double distilled waters and not the ion-containing tap water. This could be explained by the presence of water alkalinity or bicarbonate ions in tap water, which can scavenge free radicals and reduce Hb oxidation/oligomerization. Therefore, it was concluded that Hb could best withstand high concentrations of ozone in the presence of the undiluted 50 mM phosphate buffer followed by phosphate buffer diluted with tap water, containing bicarbonate ions.Entities:
Keywords: autohemotherapy; bicarbonate ions; human hemoglobin; oxidation; ozone; phosphate buffer; various water types; water alkalinity
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195405 PMCID: PMC7580503 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.543960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
Analysis of various parameters of phosphate buffer and tap water.
| Parameters | Phosphate buffer | Tap water |
| EC (μS/cm) | 4.4 | 0.2 |
| Total Hardness (mg/Lit CaCO3) | – | 170 |
| Temporary Hardness (mg/Lit CaCO3) | – | 113 |
| Permanent Hardness (mg/Lit CaCO3) | – | 57 |
| Alkalinity (mg/Lit CaCO3) | – | 113 |
| Chloride (mg/Lit CaCO3) | – | 50 |
| Sulfate (mg/Lit CaCO3) | – | 90 |
Investigating pH changes of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types.
| Hb buffer Or various water types | pH of Non-ozonated Hb | pH of Hb ozonated at 55 μg/ml | pH of Hb ozonated at 80 μg/ml |
| Phosphate buffer | 7.46 | 7.49 | 7.47 |
| Dio water | 7.46 | 7.46 | 7.47 |
| DD water | 7.44 | 7.42 | 7.43 |
| Tap water | 7.60 | 7.51 | 7.51 |
FIGURE 1The effect of syringe volume on human Hb precipitation during ozonation. Top row: Hb ozonated at 55 μg/ml ozone (samples 5 to 8) and 80 μg/ml of ozone (samples 9 to 12) with the larger 10 ml syringe. Bottom row: Hb ozonated at 55 μg/ml ozone (samples 5 to 8) and 80 μg/ml of ozone (samples 9 to 12) with the smaller 5 ml syringe. Samples 1 to 4, 5 to 8 and 9 to 12 are Hb in phosphate buffer, deionized water, double distilled water and tap water, respectively, whereas samples 1–4 are non-ozonated control samples.
FIGURE 2Intrinsic fluorescence spectra of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples at concentrations of 55 and 80 μg/ml in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types. The fluorescence spectra were measured after excitation at 280 nm. (A) Non-ozonated Hb in phosphate buffer and different water types. (B) Hb ozonated with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (C) Hb ozonated with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (D) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer. (E) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with deionized (Dio) Water. (F) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with double distilled (DD) Water. (G) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with Tap Water. (H) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types. (I) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types.
FIGURE 3Far-UV CD spectra of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types. (A) Non-ozonated Hb in phosphate buffer and different water types. (B) Hb ozonated with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (C) Hb ozonated with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (D) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer. (E) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with deionized (Dio) Water. (F) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with double distilled (DD) Water. (G) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with Tap Water. (H) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types. (I) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types.
FIGURE 4Near-UV CD spectra of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types. (A) Non-ozonated Hb in phosphate buffer and different water types. (B) Hb ozonated with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (C) Hb ozonated with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (D) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer. (E) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with deionized (Dio) Water. (F) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with double distilled (DD) Water. (G) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with Tap Water. (H) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types. (I) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types.
FIGURE 5Soret-UV CD spectra of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types. (A) Non-ozonated Hb in phosphate buffer and different water types. (B) Hb ozonated with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (C) Hb ozonated with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and different water types. (D) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer. (E) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with deionized (Dio) Water. (F) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with double distilled (DD) Water. (G) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer diluted with Tap Water. (H) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 55 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types. (I) Non-ozonated and ozonated Hb with 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer and diluted in various different water types.
FIGURE 6UV-Vis spectra of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types. (A) UV-Vis spectra comparing Hb in phosphate buffer with different water types in the presence and absence of two different concentrations of ozone. (I, II, III) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml in phosphate buffer and different water types, respectively (wavelength range 200–240 nm). (IV, V, VI) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml in phosphate buffer and different water types, respectively (wavelength range 240–360 nm). (VII, VIII, IX) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml in phosphate buffer and different water types, respectively (wavelength range 360–460 nm). (X, XI, XII) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml in phosphate buffer and different water types, respectively (wavelength range 460–660 nm). (B) UV-Vis spectra comparing the effects of two different ozone concentrations on Hb in the different solvents including phosphate buffer and the diluted versions of it with different water types. (I, II, III, IV) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer, Dio water, DD water and tap water, receptively (wavelength range 200–240 nm). (V, VI, VII, VIII) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer, deionized (Dio) water, double distilled (DD) water and tap water, respectively (wavelength range 240–360 nm). (IX, X, XI, XII) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer, Dio water, DD water and tap water, receptively (wavelength range 360–460 nm). (XIII, XIV, XV, XVI) Non-ozonated, Hb ozonated at 55 and 80 μg/ml ozone in phosphate buffer, Dio water, DD water and tap water, respectively (wavelength range 460–660 nm). In both panels (A) and (B), the first, second, third, and fourth rows indicate changes in peptide bonds, aromatic residues, B-band and Q-bands, respectively.
FIGURE 7SDS- and Native-PAGE analyses of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types. Samples 1 to 4: non-ozonated Hb samples in phosphate buffer, deionized water, double distilled water, and tap water, respectively. Samples 5 to 8: ozonated Hb samples at 55 μg/ml in phosphate buffer, deionized water, double distilled water, and tap water, respectively. Samples 9 to 12: ozonated Hb samples at 80 μg/ml in phosphate buffer, deionized water, double distilled water, and tap water, respectively. The samples in SDS-PAGE gels (A) and (B) are in the presence of DTT and in gels (C) and (D) in the absence of DTT. Samples in Native-PAGE gels (E) and (F) are under native conditions.
FIGURE 8Diameter size distribution of non-ozonated and ozonated Hb samples in the presence of phosphate buffer and diluted versions with different water types dio and dd water refer to deionized and double distilled water, respectively.
Size distribution analysis of Hb samples in number and intensity modes as well as percentage intensity and PDI values using DLS. Dio and Dd water refer to deionized and double distilled water, respectively.
| Samples | Ozone concentrations | Diameter (nm) (number mode) | Diameter (nm) (intensity mode) | Intensity% (intensity mode) | PDI |
| Oxy-Hb buffer | Non-ozone | 6.06 | 6.38 | 6.4 | 0.519 |
| 304 | 93.6 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Dio water | Non-ozone | 3.85 | 3.96 | 6.9 | 0.481 |
| 568 | 93.1 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Dd water | Non-ozone | 7.95 | 7.26 | 31.3 | 0.532 |
| 83.2 | 16.9 | ||||
| 368 | 51.7 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Tap water | Non-ozone | 13.1 | 13.3 | 6.6 | 0.662 |
| 103 | 93.4 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Buffer | 55 μg/ml | 10.2 | 10.7 | 5.9 | 0.540 |
| 375 | 94.1 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Dio water | 55 μg/ml | 2.69 | 2.77 | 5.4 | 0.416 |
| 8.91 | 9.46 | 30.2 | |||
| 46.8 | 64.4 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Dd water | 55 μg/ml | 8.36 | 8.82 | 27.6 | 0.230 |
| 44.8 | 72.4 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Tap water | 55 μg/ml | 13.8 | 13.9 | 7.2 | 0.318 |
| 127 | 92.8 | 0.318 | |||
| Oxy-Hb Buffer | 80 μg/ml | 4.85 | 5.17 | 24 | 0.778 |
| 27.7 | 8.3 | ||||
| 237 | 67.7 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Dio water | 80 μg/ml | 5.14 | 5.28 | 7 | 0.994 |
| 178 | 93 | ||||
| Oxy-Hb Dd water | 80 μg/ml | 5.49 | 6.02 | 44 | 0.493 |
| 12.2 | 13.2 | 56 | |||
| Oxy-Hb Tap water | 80 μg/ml | 7.65 | 8.97 | 10.3 | 0.946 |
| 214 | 84.8 | ||||
| 4860 | 4.9 |