| Literature DB >> 33195020 |
Devendra Jain1, Ali Asger Bhojiya1,2, Himmat Singh3, Hemant Kumar Daima4, Mandeep Singh5, Santosh Ranjan Mohanty6, Bjorn John Stephen7, Abhijeet Singh6.
Abstract
Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles have attracted significant interest in a number of applications ranging from electronics to biomedical sciences due to their large exaction binding energy (60 meV) and wide bandgap of 3.37 eV. In the present study, we report the low-cost bacterium based "eco-friendly" efficient synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by using the zinc-tolerant bacteria Serratia nematodiphila. The physicochemical characterization of ZnO nanoparticles was performed by employing UV-vis spectroscopy, XRD, TEM, DLS, Zeta potential, and Raman spectroscopy. The antimicrobial and antifungal studies were investigated at different concentrations using the agar well-diffusion method, whereby the microbial growth rate decreases with the increase in nanoparticle concentration. Further, photocatalytic performance studies were conducted by taking methyl orange (MO) as a reference dye.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; photocatalytic dye degradation; physiochemical; zinc oxide nanoparticles; zinc tolerant bacteria
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195020 PMCID: PMC7554571 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rDNA sequence of the ZTB15 strain used for the green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 2(A) UV-VIS absorption spectra from 300 to 600 nm. (B) XRD analysis. (C) TEM micrograph. (D) SAED pattern of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by zinc-tolerant bacteria.
Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using various microbes.
| Bacteria | 44.5 nm and spherical morphology | Jayabalan et al., | |
| 35 to 80 and spherical | Singh et al., | ||
| Fungi | 10 to 42 nm and hexagonal | Mohamed et al., | |
| 8–38 nm and nanorod | Mohamed et al., | ||
| Algae | 40-50 and spherical | Ali et al., | |
| 30-57 and hexagonal | Azizi et al., |
Figure 3(A) DLS analysis and (B) Zeta potential analysis. (C) Raman spectra of ZnO nanoparticle synthesized using ZTB.
Figure 4Antibacterial activities of ZnO nanoparticles against Xanthomonas oryzae. (A) Disc diffusion method with ZnO nanoparticles concentration of (a) 25 μg ml−1; (b) 50 μg ml−1; (c) 75 μg ml−1; and (d) 100 μg ml−1. (B) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles along with standard antibiotics (a) ZnO nanoparticles 100 μg ml−1; (b) Rifampicin 5 μg ml−1; (c) Nystatin 50 μg ml−1; and (d) Penicillin 10 μg ml−1.
Figure 5Antifungal activities of green-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles against Alternaria sp. (A) Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on mycelial growth by poison food technique (a) Control; (b) 50 μg ml−1; (c) 100 μg ml−1; (d) 150 μg ml−1; (e) 200 μg ml−1; and (f) 250 μg ml−1ZnO nanoparticles. (B) Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on spore germination inhibition by pour plate technique C = crude spore suspension & T = 250 μg ml−1ZnO nanoparticles. (C) Microscopic studies of spore germination inhibition assay C = Control, T = 250 μg ml−1 ZnO nanoparticles.
Effect of varying concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles on in vitro mycelial growth and spore germination of phytopathogenic fungi Alternaria.
| Control | ND | ND |
| 50 μg ml−1 | 21.67 ± 0.71 | 18.18 ± 1.45 |
| 100 μg ml−1 | 41.44 ± 0.21 | 36.84 ± 1.51 |
| 150 μg ml−1 | 60.07 ± 010 | 54.54 ± 1.73 |
| 200 μg ml−1 | 69.96 ± 0.15 | 69.47 ± 0.77 |
| 250 μg ml−1 | 85.93 ± 0.25 | 92.22 ± 1.03 |
Each value is a mean of 3 replicates from 2 experiments. Mean ± SD followed by the same letter in a column of each treatment is not a significant difference at p = 0.05 by the Tukey–Kramer HSD test, % inhibition rate was calculated compared to the germination of the control (0%). Control without any formulation. ND, Not defined.
Figure 6(A) UV–vis absorption spectra of reactive methyl orange dye in the presence of ZnO nanoparticles. (B) Percentage degradation of methyl orange dye with and without ZnO nanoparticles.