| Literature DB >> 33195009 |
Divambal Appavoo1, Nagarjuna Amarnath1, Bimlesh Lochab1.
Abstract
Olefin bonds participate in co-reaction with theEntities:
Keywords: cardanol; eugenol; flame retardant; halogen-free; phosphazene; polybenzoxazine; reactive flame retardant
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195009 PMCID: PMC7554585 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Structures of renewable phenols.
Scheme 1(A) Synthesis of EP and CP. (B) ORTEP diagram of EP.
Figure 21H NMR spectra stack of EP and eugenol (Solvent*: CDCl3).
Figure 313C NMR spectra of EP and eugenol (Solvent: CDCl3).
Figure 431P NMR spectra of EP and N3P3Cl6 (Solvent: CDCl3).
Figure 5FTIR spectra of eugenol and EP.
Figure 6Normalized FTIR spectra for CP1T3 heated at 50 °C, 160 °C and 230 °C.
Scheme 2Probable polymerization reactions: (A) self-crosslinking via double bonds, (B) oxazine ring-opening polymerization, (C) Copolymerization: Co-reaction of double bonds and oxazine ring.
Figure 7DSC thermograms of CP:C-trisapm monomer blends at different ratio, at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under N2 atmosphere.
Thermal properties of CP, EP, C-trisapm, and their respective blends.
| C-trisapm (T) | 207 | 254 | 271 | 108 | 427 | 442, 482, 709 | 8.3 | 0 | 70.40 | 20.82 | 54.6 |
| CP1T3 | 240 | 252 | 272 | 67 | 431.1 | 453, 482, 710 | 28.5 | 1.19 | 23.28 | 28.9 | 51.6 |
| CP3T1 | 226 | 234 | 265 | 38 | 403.2 | 405, 506, 710 | 42.7 | 3.56 | 69.83 | 34.58 | 47.5 |
| CP | – | – | – | – | 352 | 386, 503 | 29.3 | 4.75 | 93.10 | 29.22 | 34.01 |
| EP1T3 | 224 | 252 | 275 | 85 | 413.7 | 410, 487, 712 | 28.7 | 2.09 | 21.97 | 28.98 | 35.39 |
| EP3T1 | 260 | 261 | 285 | 7 | 361 | 361, 481, 709 | 28.5 | 6.26 | 65.92 | 28.9 | 39.83 |
| EP | – | – | – | – | 301.6 | 355, 458, 712 | 32.4 | 8.34 | 87.89 | 30.46 | 18.80 |
Figure 8Variation of intensity ratios of 1H NMR signals against heating time for CP and EP monomer.
Figure 9TGA (A,A′) and DTG (B,B′) traces of pristine polymers and their blends recorded at a heating rate of 20 °C/min.
Figure 10Plots of light absorption by sensor with time during burning of samples (a) XP, (b) X1T3, (c) X3T1, (d) C-trisapm. Plot (A) is for CP and (B) is for EP.
Figure 11Digital images of cured samples [l × w × h: (25.0 ± 0.1) x (25.5 ± 0.1) × 3.0 mm] of (a) poly(CP), (b) poly(CP3T1), (c) poly(CP1T3) before (a, b, c) and after burning (a′, b′, c′); SEM images of poly(CP), (b) poly(CP3T1), (c) poly(CP1T3) surfaces of residual char: exterior (d, e, f) and interior (as inset) (d′, e′, f′), respectively.