| Literature DB >> 33194389 |
Pingfan Lu1, Xiaoqing Li1, Na Zhu1, Yuanjun Deng1, Yang Cai1, Tianjing Zhang1, Lele Liu1, Xueping Lin1, Yiyan Guo1, Min Han1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to assess the relationship between serum uric acid (SUA) level and the clinical, pathological phenotype of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), and to determine the role of SUA level in the progression and prognosis of IgAN.Entities:
Keywords: IgA nephropathy; Pathological progression; Prognosis; Serum uric acid
Year: 2020 PMID: 33194389 PMCID: PMC7646298 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
The histopathological grading schema in IgAN.
| M0 | Mesangial score |
| M1 | Mesangial score > 0.5 |
| E0 | absent |
| E1 | present |
| S0 | absent |
| S1 | present |
| T0 | ≤25% |
| T1 | 26%–50% |
| T2 | >50% |
| C0 | absent |
| C1 | present in ≥ 1 glomerulus |
| C2 | in >25% of glomeruli |
| no intimal thickening | |
| 1 | intimal thickened and <thickness of media |
| 2 | intimal thickened and >thickness of media |
| 0 | absent |
| 1 | 1–25% of arterioles present |
| 2 | 26%–50% of arterioles present |
| 3 | >50% of arterioles present |
Notes.
The glomerular mesangial area is the area between the glomerular capillary loops and is composed of mesangial cells and mesangial matrix. The mesangial hypercellularity score is calculated according to the mesangial cell count in per mesangial area: the scores of <4, 4–5, 6–7, ≥8 mesangial cells are 0, 1, 2, 3, respectively. The mean score of all glomerulus is the mesangial hypercellularity score.
The demographic and clinical data of patients.
| Age (years; mean ± SD) | 33.8 ± 10.7 |
| Gender (male/female) | 82/126 |
| Mean arterial pressure (mm Hg; mean ± SD) | 94.0 ± 11.7 |
| Treated with antihypertensive drugs, n (%) | 22 (10.58%) |
| Taking ACEI and/or ARB), n (%) | 30 (14.42%) |
| Underwent tonsillectomy, n (%) | 10 (4.81%) |
| Hematuria, n (%) | 207 (99.52%) |
| Albumin (g/l; mean ± SD) | 39.48 ± 5.77 |
| Uric acid (µmol/l; mean ± SD) | 348.00 ± 109.10 |
| Serum creatinine(µmol/l; mean ± SD) | 89.89 ± 41.49 |
| eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2; mean ± SD) | 82.23 ± 30.22 |
| 24-h urine protein (g/d; mean ± SD) | 1.35 ± 1.58 |
Notes.
eGFR was calculated with the CKD-EPI equation. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or number (%).
The comparison of clinical characteristics between normo-uricemia group and hyperuricemia group.
| Normo-uricemia | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients(n) | 138 | 70 | – |
| Gender (male/female) | 46/92 | 36/34 | |
| Age (years) | 33.7 ± 10.5 | 34.2 ± 11.2 | 0.7311 |
| Body weight (kg) | 59.7 ± 9.3 | 64.8 ± 12.9 | |
| MAP (mm Hg) | 91.8 ± 10.7 | 98.2 ± 12.5 | |
| White blood cells (*10°9/l) | 7.04 ± 1.85 | 7.55 ± 2.44 | 0.1248 |
| Hemoglobin (g/l) | 129.60 ± 16.75 | 130.30 ± 23.52 | 0.8214 |
| Platelet | 237.50 ± 62.07 | 239.10 ± 70.38 | 0.8704 |
| APTT(s) | 37.43 ± 3.66 | 37.57 ± 3.23 | 0.7833 |
| FDP (mg/l) | 3.23 ± 0.74 | 3.86 ± 1.38 | |
| Total protein(g/l) | 68.84 ± 7.08 | 67.80 ± 8.40 | 0.3497 |
| Albumin(g/l) | 40.03 ± 4.94 | 38.40 ± 7.05 | 0.0868 |
| Total cholesterol(mmol/l) | 4.53 ± 1.17 | 5.01 ± 1.55 | |
| Triglyceride(mmol/l) | 1.63 ± 1.02 | 2.54 ± 1.89 | |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.34 ± 0.49 | 1.14 ± 0.35 | |
| LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.73 ± 0.95 | 3.03 ± 1.41 | 0.1606 |
| Uric acid (µmol/l) | 290.00 ± 66.27 | 462.40 ± 83.46 | |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/l) | 5.12 ± 1.52 | 6.49 ± 1.95 | |
| Serum creatinine (µmol/l) | 80.40 ± 40.58 | 109.00 ± 36.54 | |
| eGFR (ml/min per 1.73mm2) | 98.98 ± 25.12 | 74.50 ± 29.52 | |
| 24-hour urine protein (g/d) | 1.05 ± 1.27 | 1.81 ± 1.67 | |
| IgA(g/l) | 3.22 ± 1.15 | 3.11 ± 1.00 | 0.5328 |
| IgG(g/l) | 2.91 ± 0.26 | 2.95 ± 0.38 | 0.1506 |
| IgM(g/l) | 1.56 ± 1.19 | 1.42 ± 0.67 | 0.3222 |
| C3(g/l) | 0.90 ± 0.22 | 1.00 ± 0.24 | |
| C4(g/l) | 0.20 ± 0.07 | 0.25 ± 0.12 |
Notes.
MAP, mean arterial pressure; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FDP, fibrin degradation products. eGFR was calculated with the CKD-EPI equation. Bold P-values indicate a statistical significance of P < 0.05.
Figure 1The comparisons of Oxford classification and arterial lesions between normo-uricemia and hyperuricemia patients in IgA nephropathy.
(A) Mesangial hypercellularity scores; (B) endocapillary hypercellularity scores; (C) segmental sclerosis scores; (D) tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis scores; (E) crescent scores; (F) MEST-C total scores; (G) arteriosclerosis score; (H) hyalinosis score; (I) the percent of glomerular sclerosis.
Figure 2Percentages of different types of crescents among the IgAN patients with normo-uricemia or hyperuricemia.
The proportion of total crescents (A), large crescents (B), small crescents (C), cellular crescents (D), fibrocellular crescents (E), and fibrous crescents (F).
Figure 3The fluorescence intensity scores of immune complex deposits in renal biopsy.
Fluorescence intensity scores of IgA deposition (A), IgG deposition (B), IgM deposition (C), C3 deposition (D), and FR A deposition (E).
Figure 4The value of the serum uric acid level in predicting renal prognosis.
The overall renal survival rate of IgAN(A). ROC curve analysis evaluates the predictive value of uric acid level for the poor renal outcomes in females (B) and in males(C) with IgAN.