Literature DB >> 33194100

Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture-Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?

Shivam Sinha1,2,3, Swarup Sarkar1, Ajit Singh1, Shyam K Saraf1, Amit Rastogi1, Tejbali Singh4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Complex elbow fractures are common injuries in young adults. Results in recent studies with various operative treatment protocols are equivocal. We compared the results of radial head arthroplasty, excision with osteosynthesis in such injuries at two follow-ups 1 year apart.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients of complex elbow fracture-dislocations including, posterior/anterior olecranon dislocation of elbow, terrible triad injury, anteromedial facet of coronoid fracture, Type IV Monteggia fracture-dislocation and unclassified elbow dislocation were enrolled. They were managed operatively by standardized protocol similar to McKee et al. radial head reconstruction with miniplates, lag screws or non-operative treatment for undisplaced fractures. Arthroplasty of radial head with cemented prosthesis + LCL repair with suture anchor/transosseous tunnel was done. Coronoid and olecranon fixation was always performed. Patients were evaluated as follows: Q-DASH score, MEPI, pain according to VAS, range of motion, complications and radiographic findings and fracture union, and elbow instability.
RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up among the patients was 18 months. There were statistically significant differences between the DASH score/MEPS between radial head excision and replacement/reconstruction. Instability was significantly reduced in those with LCL reconstruction. Excising the comminuted radial head without replacement had the worst outcome. Best PROM was reported in patients with osteosynthesis.
CONCLUSION: Provided a standard protocol is applied, radial head osteosynthesis has preferable outcomes in terms of patient-related outcomes as compared to arthroplasty, although not statistically significant. Radial head excision though has acceptable outcomes but there is a restriction of movements especially flexion-extension. Acceptable rate of complications major or minor warrants need of secondary surgical procedures or a staged treatment. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex elbow fracture–dislocation; Patient-related outcomes; Radial head arthroplasty; Radial head excision; Radial head osteosynthesis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33194100      PMCID: PMC7609614          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00136-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  19 in total

1.  Comparison between radial head replacement and open reduction and internal fixation in clinical treatment of unstable, multi-fragmented radial head fractures.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Si-cheng Wang; Lie-hu Cao; Guo-qing Yang; Ming Li; Jia-can Su
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Force transmission through the radial head.

Authors:  B F Morrey; K N An; T J Stormont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocations.

Authors:  Kevin Chan; Graham J W King; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

4.  The surgical treatment of isolated mason type 2 fractures of the radial head in adults: comparison between radial head resection and open reduction and internal fixation.

Authors:  Guido Zarattini; Stefano Galli; Marcella Marchese; Livio Di Mascio; Ugo Ernesto Pazzaglia
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Mid- to long-term results after bipolar radial head arthroplasty.

Authors:  Klaus Josef Burkhart; Stefan G Mattyasovszky; Martin Runkel; Christina Schwarz; Raphael Küchle; Martin H Hessmann; Pol M Rommens; Müller P Lars
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Open reduction and internal fixation of radial head fractures: do outcomes differ between simple and complex injuries?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Pike; Ruby Grewal; George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber; Graham J W King
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Standard surgical protocol to treat elbow dislocations with radial head and coronoid fractures. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Michael D McKee; David M W Pugh; Lisa M Wild; Emil H Schemitsch; Graham J W King
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Radial head replacement for acute complex fractures: what are the rate and risks factors for revision or removal?

Authors:  Andrew D Duckworth; Neil R Wickramasinghe; Nicholas D Clement; Charles M Court-Brown; Margaret M McQueen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A comparative study of internal fixation and prosthesis replacement for radial head fractures of Mason type III.

Authors:  Hong-Jiang Ruan; Cun-Yi Fan; Jun-Jian Liu; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Radial Head Resection versus Arthroplasty in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures Mason Type III and Type IV: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Catellani; Francesca De Caro; Carlo F De Biase; Vincenzo R Perrino; Luca Usai; Vito Triolo; Giovanni Ziveri; Gennaro Fiorentino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.