| Literature DB >> 33193878 |
Jing Li1, Zhijun Cao2, Lijie Mi3, Zhihua Xu4, Xiangmei Wu5.
Abstract
Objectives: Immunologic dysfunction occurred in most of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which worsened the overall survival (OS) of patients. Complement activation plays a significant role in abnormal activation of immune system. However, the prognostic value of complement components such as CH50 and sC5b-9 in NSCLC patients remains unclear. This study evaluated the risk factors of NSCLC and created a prediction model.Entities:
Keywords: CH50; non-small cell lung cancer; overall survival; prediction model; sC5b-9
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193878 PMCID: PMC7646172 DOI: 10.7150/jca.46721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1A flow chart of the screening process.
Study Participant Characteristics at Enrollment
| Variation | Total (n=928) | Cohort, median (IQR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH50<480,(n=464) | CH50>480,(n=464) | p.value | |||
| Age, (year) | 64(58,69) | 63(58,69) | 64(58,70) | 0.19 | |
| BMI, (kg/m2) | 22.86(20.44,24.86) | 22.76(20.44,24.97) | 22.98(20.52,24.78) | 0.803 | |
| Serum CEA level, (ng/ml) | 3.35(1.64,13.33) | 3.18(1.49,11.73) | 3.88(1.86,17.08) | 0.009** | |
| Serum CRP level, (umol/L) | 6.46(1.65,12.59) | 5.95(1.49,12.78) | 7.28(1.88,12.47) | 0.357 | |
| Albumin level, (g/L) | 40(36.6,43.62) | 40.1(36.6,43.52) | 40(36.5,43.73) | 0.915 | |
| Neutrophils count, (10^9/L) | 4.67(3.46,6.27) | 4.58(3.41,6.06) | 4.84(3.59,6.45) | 0.107 | |
| Lymphocytes count, (10^9/L) | 1.61(1.25,1.97) | 1.59(1.26,1.99) | 1.64(1.24,1.94) | 0.794 | |
| Hemoglobin level, (g/L) | 132(122,142) | 132(122,142.25) | 132(122,142) | 0.893 | |
| Platelet count, (10^9/L) | 223.5(179,279) | 219(174.75,275.5) | 228(182,279.25) | 0.131 | |
| PNI score | 48.5(44.2,53.05) | 48.7(44.2,52.85) | 48.38(44.14,53.26) | 0.781 | |
| NLR | 2.9(2.07,4.31) | 2.87(1.99,4.24) | 2.95(2.14,4.38) | 0.131 | |
| sC5b-9 (μmol/L) | 1422.18(1182.69,1620.32) | 1355.82(1084.96,1586.72) | 1466.33(1283.25,1650.99) | <0.001*** | |
| CH50 (μmol/L) | 480.56±110.07 | 391.11±62.73 | 570.01±65.46 | <0.001*** | |
| C3a | 570.61(488.22,650.37) | 545.03(466.06,636.14) | 595.89(522.21,666.22) | <0.001*** | |
| C5a | 664.47±115.42 | 641.85±119.72 | 687.09±106.37 | <0.001*** | |
| KPS score, IQR | 90(80,90) | 90(80,100) | 90(80,90) | 0.006** | |
| Gender, (n%) | 0.725 | ||||
| Female | 298(32) | 152(33) | 146(31) | ||
| Male | 630(68) | 312(67) | 318(69) | ||
| Pathologic type, (n%) | 0.974 | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 631(68) | 314(68) | 317(68) | ||
| Mixed lung cancer | 6(1) | 3(1) | 3(1) | ||
| Large cell lung cancer | 42(5) | 23(5) | 19(4) | ||
| Squamous carcinoma | 242(26) | 121(26) | 121(26) | ||
| Others | 7(1) | 3(1) | 4(1) | ||
| Metastasis, n(%) | 0.012* | ||||
| No | 419(45) | 229(49) | 190(41) | ||
| Yes | 509(55) | 235(51) | 274(59) | ||
| Stage of NSCLC | 0.002** | ||||
| Stage I | 136(15) | 84(18) | 52(11) | ||
| Stage II | 78(8) | 48(10) | 30(6) | ||
| Stage III | 207(22) | 98(21) | 109(23) | ||
| Stage IV | 507(55) | 234(50) | 273(59) | ||
| Surgery, (n%) | <0.001*** | ||||
| No | 572(62) | 249(54) | 323(70) | ||
| Yes | 356(38) | 215(46) | 141(30) | ||
| Therapy of radiation, (n%) | 0.026* | ||||
| No | 621(67) | 327(70) | 294(63) | ||
| Yes | 307(33) | 137(30) | 170(37) | ||
| Application of platinum, (n%) | 1 | ||||
| No | 33(4) | 16(3) | 17(4) | ||
| Yes | 895(96) | 448(97) | 447(96) | ||
| Chemotherapy | 0.863 | ||||
| AP | 436(47) | 221(48) | 215(46) | ||
| DP | 169(18) | 78(17) | 91(20) | ||
| EP | 50(5) | 25(5) | 25(5) | ||
| GP | 40(4) | 21(5) | 19(4) | ||
| Others | 233(25) | 119(26) | 114(25) | ||
| Target therapy, (n%) | 0.064 | ||||
| No | 600(65) | 314(68) | 286(62) | ||
| Yes | 328(35) | 150(32) | 178(38) | ||
| Application of TKI, (n%) | 0.046* | ||||
| No | 662(71) | 347(75) | 315(68) | ||
| TKI I | 206(22) | 92(20) | 114(25) | ||
| TKI II | 3(0) | 0(0) | 3(1) | ||
| TKI III | 57(6) | 25(5) | 32(7) | ||
| Application of VEGF inhibitor, n(%) | 1 | ||||
| No | 791(85) | 395(85) | 396(85) | ||
| Yes | 137(15) | 69(15) | 68(15) | ||
| Smoking, n(%) | 0.694 | ||||
| No | 471(51) | 239(52) | 232(50) | ||
| Yes | 457(49) | 225(48) | 232(50) | ||
| Hypertension, n(%) | 0.042* | ||||
| No | 577(62) | 304(66) | 273(59) | ||
| Yes | 351(38) | 160(34) | 191(41) | ||
| Diabetes, n(%) | 0.508 | ||||
| No | 837(90) | 415(89) | 422(91) | ||
| Yes | 91(10) | 49(11) | 42(9) | ||
| Hyperlipemia, n(%) | 0.726 | ||||
| No | 848(91) | 422(91) | 426(92) | ||
| Yes | 80(9) | 42(9) | 38(8) | ||
| Heart failure, n(%) | 0.34 | ||||
| No | 918(99) | 461(99) | 457(98) | ||
| Yes | 10(1) | 3(1) | 7(2) | ||
| ACS, n(%) | 0.812 | ||||
| No | 910(98) | 456(98) | 454(98) | ||
| Yes | 18(2) | 8(2) | 10(2) | ||
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range; CRP, C-reactive protein; PNI, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; TKI, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; ACS, acute coronary syndrome. ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05.
Cox Regression Analysis of Hazard Ratio on NSCLC patients
| Variation | Non-adjustment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | p.value | ||
| Gender, male vs. female | 1.53 [1.30, 1.79] | <0.001*** | |
| Age (year), ≥60 vs. <60 | 1.20 [1.03, 1.40] | 0.022* | |
| BMI, ≥22.86 kg/m2 vs. <22.86kg/m2 | 0.80 [0.69, 0.92] | 0.002** | |
| Serum CEA level, >3.35 ng/ml vs. ≤3.35 ng/ml | 1.63 [1.41, 1.89] | <0.001*** | |
| Serum CRP level, >6.46 μmol/L vs. ≤6.46 μmol/L | 1.75 [1.51, 2.03] | <0.001*** | |
| Albumin level, ≤40 g/L vs. >40 g/L | 1.70 [1.46, 1.96] | <0.001*** | |
| Neutrophils count, >4.67x10^9/L vs. ≤ 4.67x10^9/L | 1.59 [1.38, 1.84] | <0.001*** | |
| Lymphocytes count, >1.61x10^9/L vs. ≤ 1.61x10^9/L | 0.89 [0.77, 1.03] | 0.105 | |
| Hemoglobin level, >132 g/L vs. ≤ 132 g/L | 0.94 [0.81, 1.08] | 0.385 | |
| Platelet count, >223.5x10^9/L vs. ≤ 223.5x10^9/L | 1.24 [1.08, 1.44] | 0.003** | |
| PNI score, >48.5 vs. ≤48.5 | 0.61 [0.53, 0.71] | <0.001*** | |
| NLR, >2.9 vs. ≤2.9 | 1.78 [1.54, 2.06] | <0.001*** | |
| Pathologic type, Adenocarcinoma vs. others | 0.95 [0.81, 1.11] | 0.526 | |
| Metastasis, Yes vs. No | 1.56 [1.35, 1.81] | <0.001*** | |
| Stage of NSCLC, IV, III vs. II and I | 2.00 [1.65, 2.43] | <0.001*** | |
| Surgery, Yes vs. No | 0.30 [0.25, 0.35] | <0.001*** | |
| Therapy of radiation, Yes vs. No | 1.21 [1.04, 1.41] | 0.013* | |
| Application of platinum, Yes vs. No | 0.55 [0.38, 0.80] | 0.002** | |
| Target therapy, Yes vs. No | 1.22 [1.05, 1.42] | 0.009** | |
| Application of TKI, Yes vs. No | 1.20 [1.03, 1.40] | 0.022* | |
| Application of VEGF inhibitor, Yes vs. No | 1.08 [0.88, 1.33] | 0.442 | |
| Chemotherapy, AP vs. others | 0.85 [0.74, 0.99] | 0.035* | |
| Smoking, Yes vs. No | 1.61 [1.39, 1.87] | <0.001*** | |
| Hypertension, Yes vs. No | 1.05 [0.90, 1.22] | 0.524 | |
| Diabetes, Yes vs. No | 1.07 [0.84, 1.36] | 0.603 | |
| Hyperlipemia, Yes vs. No | 0.59 [0.45, 0.79] | <0.001*** | |
| Heart failure, Yes vs. No | 2.71 [1.40, 5.23] | 0.003** | |
| ACS, Yes vs. No | 1.30 [0.78, 2.17] | 0.311 | |
| KPS score, >80 vs. ≤ 80 | 0.43 [0.37, 0.50] | <0.001*** | |
| CH50, >480.56 μmol/L vs. ≤480.56 μmol/L | 2.00 [1.72, 2.32] | <0.001*** | |
| sC5b-9, >1422.18 μmol/L vs ≤1422.18 μmol/L | 3.11 [2.66, 3.63] | <0.001*** | |
Abbreviation: HR, hazard risk; BMI, Body Mass Index; CRP, C-reactive protein; PNI, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; TKI, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; ACS, acute coronary syndrome. ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05.
Figure 2Overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients in different levels of complement components. (A) OS of NSCLC patients with high or low level of CH50. (B) OS of NSCLC patients with high or low level of sC5b-9.
Figure 3Multivariate cox regression analysis of 5-year overall survival on data in the patients with NSCLC.
Figure 4Nomogram for overall survival (OS) risk estimation of NSCLC patients and its predictive performance. (A) Nomogram to estimate the OS risk of patients with NSCLC in different variations. To build the nomogram, find the position of each variable on the corresponding axis, draw a line to the points axis for the number of points, add the points from all of the variables, and draw a line from the total points axis to determine the OS probabilities at the lower line of the nomogram. (B) Validity of the predictive performance of the nomogram in estimating the OS risk of NSCLC patients.