Katrien Latour1,2, Jan De Lepeleire2, Béatrice Jans1, Frank Buntinx2,3, Boudewijn Catry1,4. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium. 2. Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most frequently reported infections in older adults and the most common reason for antimicrobial prescribing in nursing homes (NHs). In this vulnerable population, both a good diagnosis and prevention of these infections are crucial as overuse of antibiotics can lead to a variety of negative consequences including the development of multidrug-resistant organisms. OBJECTIVE: To determine infection prevention and control (IPC) and diagnostic practices for UTIs in Belgian NHs. METHODS: Local staff members had to complete an institution-level questionnaire exploring the availability of IPC practices and resources and procedures for UTI surveillance, diagnosis, and urinary catheter and incontinence care. RESULTS: UTIs were the second most common infections in the 87 participating NHs (prevalence: 1.0%). Dipstick tests and urine cultures were routinely performed in 30.2% and 44.6% of the facilities, respectively. In non-catheterised residents, voided or midstream urine sampling was most frequently applied. Protocols/guidelines for urine sampling, urinary catheter care and incontinence care were available in 43.7%, 45.9% and 31.0% of the NHs, respectively. Indwelling catheters were uncommon (2.3% of the residents) and urinary retention (84.9%) and wound management (48.8%) were the most commonly reported indications. Only surveillance was found to significantly impact the UTI prevalence: 2.2% versus 0.8% in NHs with or without surveillance, respectively (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This survey identified key areas for improving the diagnosis and prevention of UTIs, such as education and training regarding the basics of urine collection and catheter care.
BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most frequently reported infections in older adults and the most common reason for antimicrobial prescribing in nursing homes (NHs). In this vulnerable population, both a good diagnosis and prevention of these infections are crucial as overuse of antibiotics can lead to a variety of negative consequences including the development of multidrug-resistant organisms. OBJECTIVE: To determine infection prevention and control (IPC) and diagnostic practices for UTIs in Belgian NHs. METHODS: Local staff members had to complete an institution-level questionnaire exploring the availability of IPC practices and resources and procedures for UTI surveillance, diagnosis, and urinary catheter and incontinence care. RESULTS: UTIs were the second most common infections in the 87 participating NHs (prevalence: 1.0%). Dipstick tests and urine cultures were routinely performed in 30.2% and 44.6% of the facilities, respectively. In non-catheterised residents, voided or midstream urine sampling was most frequently applied. Protocols/guidelines for urine sampling, urinary catheter care and incontinence care were available in 43.7%, 45.9% and 31.0% of the NHs, respectively. Indwelling catheters were uncommon (2.3% of the residents) and urinary retention (84.9%) and wound management (48.8%) were the most commonly reported indications. Only surveillance was found to significantly impact the UTI prevalence: 2.2% versus 0.8% in NHs with or without surveillance, respectively (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This survey identified key areas for improving the diagnosis and prevention of UTIs, such as education and training regarding the basics of urine collection and catheter care.
Authors: Lindsay E Nicolle; Suzanne Bradley; Richard Colgan; James C Rice; Anthony Schaeffer; Thomas M Hooton Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2005-02-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Carolyn V Gould; Craig A Umscheid; Rajender K Agarwal; Gretchen Kuntz; David A Pegues Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Carolyn T A Herzig; Patricia W Stone; Nicholas Castle; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Elaine L Larson; Andrew W Dick Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Peter H Van Ness; Luann Bianco; Andrea Rink; Sabina Rubeck; Sandra Ginter; Stephanie Argraves; Peter Charpentier; Denise Acampora; Mark Trentalange; Vincent Quagliarello; Peter Peduzzi Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nimalie D Stone; Muhammad S Ashraf; Jennifer Calder; Christopher J Crnich; Kent Crossley; Paul J Drinka; Carolyn V Gould; Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Ebbing Lautenbach; Mark Loeb; Taranisia Maccannell; Preeti N Malani; Lona Mody; Joseph M Mylotte; Lindsay E Nicolle; Mary-Claire Roghmann; Steven J Schweon; Andrew E Simor; Philip W Smith; Kurt B Stevenson; Suzanne F Bradley Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Katrien Latour; Boudewijn Catry; Brecht Devleesschauwer; Frank Buntinx; Jan De Lepeleire; Béatrice Jans Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2022-02-18