| Literature DB >> 33193758 |
S Alvarado-Ramos1,2, V J Lara-Díaz2, M R López-Gutiérrez1, M E Torcida-González1, J F Campos-Rodríguez2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to describe the evolution of hemodynamic parameters over time of patients with invasive placentation during their third trimester who were delivered via cesarean section and subsequently underwent obstetric hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193758 PMCID: PMC7641720 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1968354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anesthesiol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6962
Goal-directed therapy.
| Targets | Interventions | |
|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamic | ||
| Cardiac index1 | At least 2.5 L/min/m2 | Inotropes|Fluids |
| Systemic vascular resistance index2 | 1250–2500 dynes·sec·cm5/m2 | Vasopressor|Fluids |
| Central venous pressure3 | 6–12 mmHg | Fluids |
| Mean arterial pressure2 | 65–90 mmHg | Vasopressor|Fluids |
|
| ||
| Thromboelastography | ||
| R. Reaction time4 | 4–8 min | FFP 10 ml/kg |
| MA. Maximum amplitude5 | 62–84 mm | Cryoprecipitate 2 ml/Kg and platelet apheresis |
|
| ||
| Blood Test | ||
| Hemoglobin5 | 70–90 gr/L | Packed red blood cells |
| Platelets5 | <50 000 c/ | Platelet apheresis |
| Fibrinogen6 | <200 mg/dL | Cryoprecipitate 2 ml/Kg |
| Prothrombin time5 | <16 | FFP 10 ml/kg |
| International normalized ratio5 | <1.5 | FFP 10 ml/kg |
(1) C. Salzwedel, “Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: A multicenter, prospective, randomized study,” Crit. Care, vol. 17, 2013. (2) J. G. Ouzounian, D. I. Masaki, T. K. Abboud, and J. S. Greenspoon, “Systemic vascular resistance index determined by thoracic electrical bioimpedance predicts the risk for maternal hypotension during regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 174, pp. 1019–1025, 1996. (3) A. Donati, “Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients,” Chest, vol. 132, pp. 1817–1824, Dec. 2007. (4) K. M. Antony, “Establishing thromboelastography with platelet-function analyzer reference ranges and other measures in healthy term pregnant women,” Am. J. Perinatol., vol. 32, pp. 545–553, 2015. (5) D. R. Spahn, “Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline,” Crit. Care, vol. 17, pp. 1–45, 2013. (6) A. J. Butwick and L. T. Goodnough, “Transfusion and coagulation management in major obstetric hemorrhage,” Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., vol. 28, pp. 275–284, 2015.
Figure 1Hemodynamic trends (x̄, bold black line; σ, gray zone). Cardiac index (a) initially showed a mild hyperdynamic pattern, followed by an increase due to the epidural block, and it remained relatively stable during the surgery, with inferior values at the end when compared with the first ones. The systemic vascular resistance index (b) decreased after the epidural block. However, these fluctuations were maintained with minimal variance despite the bleeding. Mean arterial pressure (c) showed less variation and did not exhibit the changes recorded in the vascular resistance index.
Figure 2Hemodynamic trends (x̄, bold black line; σ, gray zone). (a) Increased variance (P=0.015) in the stroke volume index occurred within the measurements; the pattern could be explained by an increase in the variability between the individuals; however, these variances were more noticeable when the effect size (Cohen's d) was measured after 60 and 75 min. The heart rate (b) was expected to change due to cardiac and vascular adaptations caused by the epidural block neurovegetative effects and featured mild variance throughout the surgery. Central venous pressure (c) showed minor variations during the procedure. Initial increments correspond to the patients' lateral decubitus position for the epidural block.
Figure 3Effect size (Cohen's d) assessment. The bold black line represents the changes (Cohen's d) concerning the initial measurements; the differences between the time intervals are described in gray color. Cardiac index (a) undergoes small initial variations, secondary to vasodilation after epidural block and low variance afterward. At the end of the procedure, a moderate decrease in cardiac output was observed, which corresponds to the removal of the uterus from the systemic circulation. The cardiac work index (b) displayed more substantial changes at the end of the surgery. These fluctuations were followed by a mid-procedure stroke volume index adjustment (c). Despite these hemodynamic modifications, the stroke work index had (d) limited variation. Thus, we hypothesized that the noncardiac parts of the vascular system experience most of the adaptations, and the cardiac work investment is relatively the same for every stroke.
Figure 4Study profile.
Sample demographic characteristics of the participants.
| Mean, standard deviation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age | Years | 29.2 ± 3.4 |
| Body Mass index | kg/m2 | 29.8 ± 2.8 |
| Weeks of pregnancy | — | 35.4 ± 1.7 |
| Previous gestations | — | 3.7 ± 1.7 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Surgical procedure | Min | 131.11 ± 26 |
| Anesthesia | Min | 198.8 ± 29 |
| Ringer's lactate solution | mL | 2966.67 ± 878.92 |
| Saline 0.9% | mL | 857.14 ± 377.96 |
| Ephedrine boluses 5 mg | — | 3.5 ± 2.8 |
| Fresh frozen plasma | U | 4.25 ± 0.46 |
| Packed red blood cells | U | 4 ± 1.22 |
| Cryoprecipitate | U | 10.8 ± 1.79 |
| Platelet apheresis | U | 5.1 ± 1.9 |
| Blood loss | mL | 3177.78 ± 733 |
| Intensive care | Days | 2.5 ± 1.2 |
| Hospital stay | Days | 3 ± 0.9 |
∗Bag platelet concentrate content.
Hemodynamic parameters (mean, standard deviation).
| Minutes | 0 | 5 | 15 | 30 | 60 | 75 | 105 | 120 | 135 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 7.8 ± 2.2 | 7.4 ± 2.7 | 7.9 ± 2.3 | 8.2 ± 2.2 | 7.8 ± 2 | 7.6 ± 2.1 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 7.1 ± 2 | 7.2 ± 1.9 | 0.0494 |
| CI | 4.5 ± 1.3 | 4.3 ± 1.6 | 4.6 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 4.5 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 1 | 4 ± 1.1 | 4 ± 1.1 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 0.0571 |
| SV | 83.5 ± 24.6 | 79.8 ± 27.1 | 80.8 ± 23.5 | 84 ± 22.1 | 90.1 ± 27.6 | 93.9 ± 25.8 | 86 ± 30.3 | 87.1 ± 31.5 | 83.2 ± 25.7 | 0.0062 |
| SVI | 47.7 ± 14.5 | 46.5 ± 15.8 | 46.8 ± 13.5 | 48.8 ± 13.1 | 51.6 ± 15.3 | 53.3 ± 13.8 | 49.3 ± 17.7 | 49.6 ± 18.4 | 47.3 ± 15.2 | 0.015 |
| HR | 91.8 ± 15.9 | 93.7 ± 16 | 100.8 ± 16 | 100.3 ± 18 | 89.3 ± 18 | 83.6 ± 18 | 83.6 ± 17 | 85.2 ± 19 | 90 ± 21 | 0.0998 |
| SVV | 12.8 ± 10.8 | 10.8 ± 6 | 10.1 ± 4.8 | 9.5 ± 4.8 | 10.9 ± 5.6 | 11.4 ± 4.5 | 11.9 ± 5.3 | 11.8 ± 6.8 | 12.7 ± 7.2 | 0.6554 |
| SVR | 997 ± 344.2 | 1055 ± 393 | 887 ± 327 | 755 ± 250 | 844 ± 320 | 862 ± 266 | 920 ± 268 | 870 ± 239 | 927 ± 475 | 0.2593 |
| SVRI | 1973 ± 408 | 1786 ± 434 | 1517 ± 564 | 1288 ± 448 | 1471 ± 569 | 1502 ± 460 | 1592 ± 460 | 1524 ± 140 | 1621 ± 749 | 0.2501 |
| MAP | 92.6 ± 14.6 | 91.9 ± 15.5 | 90.9 ± 15.7 | 84.4 ± 13.7 | 87.2 ± 14 | 83.4 ± 11 | 82.8 ± 12.9 | 82.1 ± 14.3 | 85.6 ± 13.6 | 0.9583 |
| CVP | 11.6 ± 7.7 | 9.6 ± 7.7 | 10 ± 6.6 | 9.7 ± 4.9 | 10.6 ± 6.6 | 8.4 ± 5.6 | 7.5 ± 5.1 | 7.5 ± 4.7 | 8.1 ± 4.9 | 0.4886 |
| CW | 10.5 ± 3.5 | 9.8 ± 4.1 | 10.4 ± 3.5 | 10 ± 2.8 | 10 ± 3.5 | 9.2 ± 2.9 | 8.3 ± 2.7 | 8.6 ± 3.1 | 8.9 ± 2.8 | 0.0653 |
| CWI | 6 ± 1.9 | 5.7 ± 2.3 | 6 ± 2 | 5.8 ± 1.6 | 5.6 ± 1.7 | 5.2 ± 1.5 | 4.7 ± 1.5 | 4.9 ± 1.7 | 5 ± 1.6 | 0.0533 |
| SW | 111.6 ± 35.8 | 105.3 ± 39.1 | 107.6 ± 33.2 | 101.9 ± 28.3 | 114.9 ± 41 | 115.5 ± 38.7 | 105.1 ± 43.6 | 107.4 ± 47.2 | 104.2 ± 38.8 | 0.2363 |
| SWI | 63.9 ± 20.5 | 61.1 ± 22 | 62.1 ± 19.1 | 59.2 ± 16.2 | 65.4 ± 21.7 | 65.6 ± 21.1 | 60.6 ± 25.3 | 61.6 ± 27.5 | 59.3 ± 22.8 | 0.2116 |
Cardiac output, CO (L/min/m2); cardiac index, CI (L/min/m2); systolic volume, SV (mL), systolic volume index, SVI (mL/m2); heart rate, HR (b/min), stroke volume variation, SVV (%), systemic vascular resistance, (dynes·sec/·cm5); systemic vascular resistance index, SVRI (dynes·sec/cm5/m2); mean arterial pressure, MAP (mmHg); central venous pressure, CVP (mmHg); cardiac work, CW (kg × m); cardiac work index, CWI (kg × m/m2); stroke work, SW (gr × min); stroke work index, SWI (gr × min/m2). Repeated measures ANOVA. Post hoc <0.025.