| Literature DB >> 33193738 |
Anna Sowińska-Seidler1, Paweł Sztromwasser2,3, Katarzyna Zawadzka3, Dawid Sielski3, Ewelina Bukowska-Olech1, Paweł Zawadzki3,4, Kazimierz Kozłowski5, Aleksander Jamsheer1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pyle disease is a rare autosomal recessive bone dysplasia characterized by the broadening of metaphyses with generalized cortical thinning. Homozygous truncating mutations in secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (SFRP4) were, to date, the only known variants causative for this type of skeletal disorder. SFRP4 controls cortical and trabecular bone remodeling by differential regulation of the canonical and non-canonical WNT signaling in both bone compartments. Loss-of-function mutations in the SFRP4 gene lead to the protein deficiency causing skeletal phenotype typical for Pyle disease.Entities:
Keywords: Pyle disease; SFRP4; WGS; WNT signaling; metaphyseal dysplasia; rare disease
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193738 PMCID: PMC7646522 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.593407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Skeletal malformations observed in the female proband (A–D) and her brother (E,F). (A) bilateral genua valga with a severe broadening of the knee joints. (A,F) Radiographs of the legs showing wide metaphyses and thin cortex of the femoral and tibial bones. (B,E) Radiographs of the upper extremities showing broadening of the proximal two-thirds of the humeri and the distal portion of the radial bone. The inward deviation of the distal one-third of the humeri was also noted (E). (C) Radiographs of the spine showing thoracolumbar scoliosis. (D) Radiograph of the feet showing broadened metatarsals. ID: 1, proband, ID: 2, affected sibling.
FIGURE 2Representation of compound heterozygous SFRP4 mutations identified in the examined family by means of whole genome sequencing (WGS). The proband (ID: 1) and her brother (ID: 2) were both demonstrated to carry two missense heterozygous variants c.161C>A and c.373T>A. Mutation c.161C>A (A) was present in heterozygosity in the unaffected mother, whereas variant c.373T>A (B) was shown in heterozygosity in the healthy father. Targeted Sanger sequencing validation of WGS results was represented by corresponding electropherograms for (A,B). Mutations were depicted with “M” and indicated by an arrow.
The overview of variants found in the SFRP4 gene available from online tools.
| c.161C>A p.(Ala54Asp) | c.373T>A p.(Cys125Ser) | |
| gDNA level | Chr7(GRCh38):g.379 16377G>T | Chr7(GRCh38):g.379 16165A>T |
| dbSNP rs number | rs758308395 | rs1344808304 |
| Exon | 1 | 1 |
| Protein domain | Frizzled domain | Frizzled domain |
| gnomAD (v2.1.1) | ALL: 0.00080%, NFE: 0.0018% | ALL: 0.00040%, NFE: 0.00090% |
| gnomAD (v3) | – | – |
| SIFT (v6.2.0) | Deleterious (score: 0) | Deleterious (score: 0) |
| PolyPhen-2 (v2) | Probably damaging (score: 1) | Probably damaging (score: 1) |
| CADD Phred | Deleterious (score: 35) | Deleterious (score: 34) |
| DANN (v2014) | Damaging (score: 0.9971) | Damaging (0.9946) |
| FATHMM (dbNSFP v4.0) | Damaging (score: -1.55) | Damaging (score: -3.22) |
| LRT (dbNSFP v4.0) | Damaging (score: 0) | Deleterious (score: 0) |
| DEOGEN2 (dbNSFP v4.0) | Damaging (score: 0.9279) | Damaging (score: 0.9335) |
| EIGEN (dbNSFP v4.0) | Pathogenic (score: 0.995) | Pathogenic (score: 0.8743) |
| MutationTaster (v2013) | Disease causing (accuracy: 1) | Disease causing (accuracy: 1) |
| PROVEAN (dbNSFP v4.0) | Damaging (score: -5.3) | Damaging (score: -8.74) |
| PhastCons100way (dbNSFP v4.0) | Conserved (score: 1) | Conserved (score: 1) |
| PhyloP100way (dbNSFP v4.0) | Conserved (score: 9. 936) | Conserved (score: 7.433) |
| GERP (v2010) | Conserved (score: 4.6199) | Conserved (score: 4.28) |
| mCSM: Protein stability Change (ΔΔG) | Highly destabilizing (-2.641 Kcal/mol) | Highly destabilizing (-2.412 Kcal/mol) |
FIGURE 3SFRP4 protein structure and conservation. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of SFRP4 protein in 11 species available from Alamut® Visual software. Variants p.Ala54Asp and p.Cys125Ser are shown in green boxes. Residues with high conservation among species are shown in navy blue, whereas with lower conservation in blue and gray. (B) 3D prediction of p.Ala54Asp and p.Cys125Ser mutation sites and the corresponding WT loci. Red and blue colors indicate negatively and positively charged amino acids. Note the change of charge at position p.54 from non-polar—alanine to negatively charged—aspartic acid. Sulfhydryl side chains of cysteines at positions p.125 and p.101 are indicated in yellow. Disulfide bond is represented by a yellow bar. Note the absence of the disulfide bond in the mutated (p.Cys125Ser) protein. (C) Schematic representation of SFRP4 protein. Previously reported mutations are marked in black. The mutations identified in this study are marked in red. SP, signal peptide; FZ, frizzled domain; NTR, netrin-like domain.