| Literature DB >> 33193524 |
Xian He1, Tianxiang Liu1, Ke Ren1, Jie Chen1, Gaokun Zhao1, Binbin Hu1, Anchuan Xu1, Yan Jin1, Yanmei Zhu2, Congming Zou1.
Abstract
Salicylic acid (SA) can induce plants to actively enhance abiotic stress resistance. Spraying SA to prevent cold stress in flue-cured tobacco fields can provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the actual protection from cold stress in fields at high altitude in Yunnan. The experiment was performed in Jianchuan County Yunnan Province, China. Honghuadajinyuan, a flue-cured tobacco variety with cold resistance, was used as the research object. SA was tested at two concentrations (0.05 [SA-1] and 0.1 [SA-1] mol L-1) relative to an untreated control (Control) to compare the quality of fresh tobacco leaves, curing characteristics, enzyme activity of antioxidants, and quality of the first-cured tobacco leaves. The tissue structure thickness, SPAD, and plastid pigment content of fresh tobacco leaves were least in the control; there was no significant difference between SA-1 and SA-2. The change of moisture content during curing was SA-1 > SA-2 > Control, and the water loss rate was Control > SA-2 > SA-1, and both varied greatly at 38-48°C. In each curing stage, the carbon and nitrogen metabolites and polyphenols changed most rapidly at 38°C, and the sugar metabolites changed as follows: Control > SA-1 > SA-2. The activities of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase in fresh tobacco leaves were SA-1 > SA-2 > Control. Malondialdehyde content and the inactivation rate of antioxidant enzymes during curing was Control > SA-2 > SA-1. The economic character and sensory smoking quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves were SA-1 > SA-2 > Control. In high-altitude tobacco planting areas prone to cold stress in the field, early warning weather forecast and field spraying 0.05 mol L-1 SA are beneficial to protect and improve the quality of fresh tobacco leaves, curing characteristics, antioxidant system enzyme activities, and the quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves.Entities:
Keywords: abiotic stress; carbon metabolites; nitrogen metabolites; physiology and biochemistry; yield
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193524 PMCID: PMC7661750 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.580597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Common curing technology for bulk curing barns in tobacco-growing areas in Laojun Mountain Town, Jianchuan County (variety: Honghuadajinyuan).
FIGURE 2Daily precipitation, the highest and lowest temperatures from August 01 to 31 in Jianji village, Laojun Mountain Town, Jianchuan County.
FIGURE 3Dynamic symptoms of tobacco after cold stress.
FIGURE 4Comparison of leaf appearance in fresh tobacco leaves treated with different salicylic acid concentrations.
FIGURE 5Tissue structure of fresh tobacco leaves treated with different salicylic acid concentration.
Tissue structure parameters of fresh tobacco leaves treated with different salicylic acid concentration.
| Treatment | Thickness of upper epidermis (μm) | Palisade tissue thickness (μm) | Sponge tissue thickness (μm) | Thickness of lower epidermis (μm) | Blade thickness (μm) | Palisade tissue thickness/sponge tissue thickness (μm) |
| Control | 12.54B | 62.72B | 80.29C | 10.75B | 166.31C | 0.78A |
| SA-1 | 30.88A | 174.26A | 176.72A | 22.16A | 404.03A | 0.99A |
| SA-2 | 32.32A | 149.8A | 141.46B | 24.59A | 348.17B | 1.06A |
FIGURE 6Change of moisture content during bulk curing of flue-cured tobacco with different salicylic acid concentrations. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the same stage (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the same treatments at different curing stages. Data are presented as means ± standard error (n = 3).
FIGURE 7Change in water loss rate during bulk curing of flue-cured tobacco with different salicylic acid concentrations. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the same stage (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the same treatments at different curing stages. Values represent the averages of three biological replicates. Data are presented as means ± standard error (n = 3).
Changes of SPAD and chloroplast pigments in different curing stages with different salicylic acid concentrations.
| Treatment | Sampling temperature (°C) | Continuous curing time (h) | SPAD | Chlorophyll | Chlorophyll | Lutein (μg/g) | β-Carotene (μg/g) |
| Control | Fresh tobacco leaves | – | 35.6Aa | 154.04Ba | 78.27Ba | 137.73Aa | 2,089.93Aa |
| 38 | 23.5 | 8.7Abc | 24.9Ab | 13.21Ab | 129.38Aa | 2,046.98Ba | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 5.8Ac | 16.41Bb | 10.54Ab | 142.05Ba | 2,170.23Ba | |
| 48 | 15 | 6.2Ac | 9.81Ab | 4.45Ab | 127.61Aa | 2,351.72Aa | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 12.9Ab | 11.5Ab | 7.06Ab | 128.42Aa | 2,173.94Aa | |
| Initially flue-cured tobacco leaves | – | 11.32Ab | 7.77Ab | 136.5Aa | 2,350.62Ba | ||
| SA-1 | Fresh tobacco leaves | – | 40.8Aa | 238.05Aa | 142.1Aa | 170.07Ab | 2,116.48Ac |
| 38 | 23.5 | 6.6Ab | 28.79Abc | 16.4Ab | 186.32Ab | 2,357.03ABbc | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 5.5Ab | 111.49Ab | 56.93Ab | 291.5Aa | 4,048.59Aa | |
| 48 | 15 | 5.9Ab | 7.46Ac | 4.32Ab | 146.93Ab | 2,648.99Abc | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 4.5Bb | 3.27Ac | 2.83Ab | 197.09Ab | 3,077.14Aabc | |
| Initially flue-cured tobacco leaves | – | 12.08Ac | 7.45Ab | 199.85Ab | 3,386.15ABab | ||
| SA-2 | Fresh tobacco leaves | – | 40.2Aa | 232.35ABa | 161.56Aa | 196.78Aa | 2,544.12Aab |
| 38 | 23.5 | 10.9Ab | 57.55Ab | 22.84Ab | 197.26Aa | 3,265.91Aab | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 5.9Ab | 12.28Bb | 6.36Ab | 142.36Ba | 2,664.09Bab | |
| 48 | 15 | 10.8Ab | 6.35Ab | 2.88Ab | 141.25Aa | 2,531.51Aab | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 8.8ABb | 4.85Ab | 4.14Ab | 149.45Aa | 2,193.89Ab | |
| Initially flue-cured tobacco leaves | – | 8.8Ab | 5.63Ab | 209.69Aa | 3,559.81Aa |
Contents of chemical compounds during bulk curing of flue-cured tobacco with different salicylic acid concentrations.
| Treatment | Sampling temperature (°C) | Curing time (h) | Total sugar (%) | Reducing sugar (%) | Total nitrogen (%) | Nicotine (%) | Potassium oxide (%) | Water soluble chlorine (%) | Starch (%) | Protein (%) | Ratio of sugar to alkali (%) | Ratio of nitrogen to alkali (%) |
| Control | Fresh tobacco | – | 6.32Ab | 4.55Ab | 1.69Aa | 2.26ABb | 1.58Aa | 0.24Ab | 41.36Aa | 8ABa | 3.01Ac | 0.77Aa |
| 38 | 23.5 | 37.04Aa | 24.53Aa | 1.74Ba | 1.84Bb | 1.68Aa | 0.49Aab | 8.86Abc | 5.83Bb | 22.48Aa | 1.16Aa | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 36.45Aa | 25.85Aa | 1.69Ba | 2.14Bb | 1.42Ca | 0.29Bb | 9.58Ab | 6.17Ab | 18.44Aab | 0.83Aa | |
| 48 | 15 | 34.06Aa | 22.6Aa | 2.04Aa | 3.23Aa | 1.77Aa | 0.41Aab | 5.19Ac | 6.49Ab | 10.58Abc | 0.64Aa | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 34.77Aa | 20.99Aa | 1.75Aa | 2.2Ab | 1.92Aa | 0.62Aa | 7.81Abc | 6.11Ab | 15.95Aab | 0.8Aa | |
| Primary tobacco leaf | – | 33.61Aa | 23.52Aa | 1.94ABa | 2.59Aab | 1.7Ba | 0.46Aab | 7.95Abc | 6.44Bb | 13.04Aab | 0.76Aa | |
| SA-1 | Fresh tobacco | – | 7.62Ac | 4.98Ac | 1.62Ab | 1.66Bb | 1.45Ac | 0.31Ab | 41.91Aa | 6.9Ba | 4.89Aa | 0.98Aa |
| 38 | 23.5 | 32.07ABa | 19.75ABa | 1.94Bab | 2.85Aa | 1.8Abc | 0.56Aab | 8.61ABb | 6.13Ba | 11.37Ba | 0.68Ba | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 20.75Bb | 12.9Bb | 2.2Aa | 3.1Aa | 3.06Aa | 0.87Aa | 3.07Bcd | 7.04Aa | 7.08Ba | 0.71Aa | |
| 48 | 15 | 35.25Aa | 21.95Aa | 1.87Aab | 3Aa | 1.58Abc | 0.55Aab | 4.02Acd | 5.88Aa | 11.85Aa | 0.63Aa | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 32.62Aa | 18.41Aab | 2.01Aab | 2.84Aa | 2.16Ab | 0.52Aab | 1.79Bd | 5.79Aa | 12.05Aa | 0.72Aa | |
| Primary tobacco leaf | – | 31.72ABa | 22.01ABa | 1.92Bab | 2.4Aab | 2.12ABb | 0.59Aab | 6.97Abc | 6.64Ba | 13.21Aa | 0.8Aa | |
| SA-2 | Fresh tobacco | – | 4.39Ac | 2.42Ab | 1.98Aab | 2.65Ab | 1.43Ab | 0.36Aa | 35.94Ba | 8.9Aa | 1.64Ab | 0.75Aa |
| 38 | 23.5 | 28.03Bab | 16.79Ba | 2.59Aa | 3.59Aa | 1.95Aab | 0.68Aa | 4.32Bb | 7.9Aabc | 7.92Bab | 0.72Ba | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 27.63Bab | 19.48Aa | 2.31Aab | 3.18Aab | 2.07Bab | 0.54ABa | 5.03Bb | 7.28Aabc | 8.83Bab | 0.73Aa | |
| 48 | 15 | 34.19Aa | 20.49Aa | 1.93Ab | 2.96Aab | 1.81Aab | 0.53Aa | 3.68Ab | 6.11Ac | 11.71Aa | 0.65Aa | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 33.13Aa | 21.35Aa | 1.96Aab | 3.08Aab | 1.91Aab | 0.48Aa | 3.62ABb | 6.72Abc | 12.91Aa | 0.67Aa | |
| Primary tobacco leaf | – | 25.35Bb | 16.82Ba | 2.35Aab | 3.08Aab | 2.34Aa | 0.68Aa | 4.41Ab | 8.28Aab | 8.28Aab | 0.76Aa |
Contents of polyphenols during bulk curing of flue-cured tobacco with different salicylic acid concentrations.
| Treatment | Sampling temperature (°C) | Curing time (h) | Neochlorogenic acid (mg/g) | Chlorogenic acid (mg/g) | Caffeic acid (mg/g) | Scopoletin (mg/g) | Rutin (mg/g) | Kaempferol-3- |
| Control | Fresh tobacco | – | 0.82Ad | 8.78Ab | 0.13ABc | 0.23Aa | 7.39Ab | 0.08Bb |
| 38 | 23.5 | 1.85Ac | 16.59Ba | 0.17Abc | 0.08Ab | 11.35Ba | 0.17Aa | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 2.08Bbc | 13.68Aab | 0.18Abc | 0.07Ab | 12.16Ba | 0.08ABb | |
| 48 | 15 | 2.95Aa | 18.43Aa | 0.28Aa | 0.11Ab | 12.88Aa | 0.09Ab | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 2.54Aabc | 17.61Aa | 0.28Aa | 0.06ABb | 12.71Aa | 0.08Ab | |
| Primary tobacco leaf | – | 2.69Aab | 18.22Aa | 0.25Aab | 0.1Ab | 12.25Aa | 0.06Ab | |
| SA-1 | Fresh tobacco | – | 1.02Ab | 10.05Ac | 0.18Ac | 0.15Ba | 7.64Ac | 0.13Ab |
| 38 | 23.5 | 2.46Aa | 18.46ABab | 0.17Ac | 0.09Aab | 13.17ABab | 0.19Aa | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 2.99Aa | 10.91Ac | 0.17Ac | 0.09Aab | 10.32Bbc | 0.12Abc | |
| 48 | 15 | 2.88Aa | 21.72Aa | 0.28Aa | 0.12Aab | 14.16Aa | 0.08Ac | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 3.01Aa | 13.7Abc | 0.19Bbc | 0.12Aab | 10.12Abc | 0.1Abc | |
| Primary tobacco leaf | – | 2.83Aa | 17.25Aab | 0.27Aab | 0.06Ab | 11.97Aab | 0.08Ac | |
| SA-2 | Fresh tobacco | – | 0.68Ac | 5.53Ac | 0.08Bb | 0.18ABa | 6.82Ab | 0.09ABb |
| 38 | 23.5 | 2.28Ab | 22.06Aa | 0.22Aa | 0.12Aabc | 15.42Aa | 0.19Aa | |
| 42 | 16.5 | 2.95Aab | 15.74Ab | 0.2Aa | 0.14Aab | 16.34Aa | 0.07Bb | |
| 48 | 15 | 2.93Aab | 19.38Aab | 0.23Aa | 0.09Abc | 15.29Aa | 0.08Ab | |
| 54 | 22.5 | 3Aab | 17.24Aab | 0.27ABa | 0.04Bc | 13.3Aa | 0.06Ab | |
| Primary tobacco leaf | – | 3.11Aa | 17.97Aab | 0.22Aa | 0.1Abc | 13.68Aa | 0.08Ab |
FIGURE 8Antioxidant enzyme system and polyphenol oxidase activity during bulk curing of flue-cured tobacco with different salicylic acid concentrations. (A) Effect of treatment with different salicylic acid concentrations on SOD activity at different curing stages. (B) Effect of treatment with different salicylic acid concentrations on POD activity at different curing stages. (C) Effect of treatment with different salicylic acid concentrations on CAT activity at different curing stages. (D) Effect of treatment with different salicylic acid concentrations on the content of MDA at different curing stages. (E) Effect of treatment with different salicylic acid concentrations PPO activity at different curing stages. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the same stage (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the same treatments at different curing stages. Data are presented as means ± standard error (n = 3).
FIGURE 9Comparison of appearance of flue-cured tobacco after curing with different salicylic acid concentrations.
Economic properties of flue-cured tobacco with different salicylic acid concentrations.
| Treatment | Yield (kg ⋅ ha–1) | Output value (dollar ⋅ ha–1) | Proportion of middle and top grade tobacco (%) | Average price (dollar ⋅ kg–1) |
| Control | 1,979B | 5,778B | 57B | 2.92B |
| SA-1 | 2,392A | 9,407A | 87A | 3.93A |
| SA-2 | 2,464A | 8,738A | 71AB | 3.55AB |
Sensory evaluation of smoking quality of flue-cured tobacco with different salicylic acid concentrations.
| Treatment | Aroma note (10) | Aroma quality (15) | Aroma volume (15) | Concentration (10) | Mixed gas (10) | Irritancy (15) | Strength (5) | Cleanliness (10) | Moisture (5) | Taste (5) | Total score (100) |
| Control | 6 | 12 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 6 | 3 | 3.5 | 72B |
| SA-1 | 8.5 | 14 | 13 | 8 | 6.5 | 13 | 4 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 84A |
| SA-2 | 8.5 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 14.5 | 4.5 | 8.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 87.5A |