| Literature DB >> 33193402 |
Davide Quaresmini1, Michele Guida1.
Abstract
Neoangiogenesis is a recognized hallmark of cancer, granting tumor cells to dispose of metabolic substrates through a newly created vascular supply. Neoangiogenesis was also confirmed in melanoma, where vascular proliferation is associated with increased aggressiveness and poorer prognosis. Furthermore, melanoma cells show the so-called vascular mimicry, consisting in the assumption of endothelial-like features inducing the expression of pro-angiogenic receptors and ligands, which take part in the interplay with extracellular matrix (ECM) components and are potentiated by the ECM remodeling and the barrier molecule junction alterations that characterize the metastatic phase. Although neoangiogenesis was biologically proven and clinically associated with worse outcomes in melanoma patients, in the past anti-angiogenic therapies were employed with poor improvement of the already unsatisfactory results associated with chemotherapic agents. Among the novel therapies of melanoma, immunotherapy has led to previously unexpected outcomes of treatment, yet there is a still strong need for potentiating the results, possibly by new regimens of combination therapies. Molecular models in many cancer types showed mutual influences between immune responses and vascular normalization. Recently, clinical trials are investigating the efficacy of the association between anti-angiogenetic agents and immune-checkpoint inhibitors to treat advanced stage melanoma. This paper reviews the biological bases of angiogenesis in melanoma and summarizes the currently available clinical data on the use of anti-angiogenetic compounds in melanoma.Entities:
Keywords: antiangiogenics; combination strategy; immunotherapy; melanoma; neoangiogenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193402 PMCID: PMC7658002 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Clinical trials of the association of antiangiogenic treatments with old drugs in advanced melanoma.
| Reference | Phase | Clinical setting | Line of treatment in metastatic setting | Arm 1 | Arm 2 | Primary endpoints | Secondary endpoints | Further analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Del Vecchio et al. ( | II | Stage IV cutaneous melanoma. | 1st line | Bevacizumab + Fotemustine | None | CR 1/20 | TTP 8 m | Reduction of VEGF levels post-therapy |
| Tarhini et al. ( | II | Stage III unresectable or stage IV cutaneous melanoma. | 1st line or further | Aflibercept | None | ORR 7.5% | PFS 4 m | Hypertension correlated with OS |
| Von Moos et al. ( | II | Stage IV cutaneous melanoma. | 1st line | Bevacizumab + Temozolomide | None | SD 52% | ORR 16% | OS higher in BRAF wt 12 vs 9 m |
| Kim et al. ( | II | Stage IV melanoma. | 1st line | Carboplatin + Paclitaxel | Carboplatin | PFS 4 vs 5 m | OS 9 vs 12 m | |
| Schuster et al. ( | II | Stage IV melanoma. No brain metastases. | 2nd line | Bevacizumab | None | DCR 31% | PFS 2 m | |
| Minor et al. ( | II | Stage IV melanoma. | 2nd line or further. No prior immunotherapy. | Sunitinib | None | ORR 3/4 in mutated cKIT pts; 1/6 in amplified or overexpressed cKIT pts. | ||
| Mahalingam et al. ( | II | Stage III unresectable or stage IV cutaneous melanoma. | 2nd or 3rd line | Bevacizumab + Sorafenib | None | ORR 0% | PFS 8 m | Low VEGF values correlated with longer PFS |
| Ferrucci et al. ( | II | Stage IV cutaneous melanoma. No brain metastases. | 1st line | Bevacizumab + Dacarbazine | None | ORR 19% | TTP 5 m | |
| NCT02158520 | II | Stage IV melanoma. | 1st line or further | Nab-Paclitaxel + | Ipilimumab | PFS 129 vs 94 days | OS 18 vs 27 m | Recruitment completed. |
Clinical trials on the association of antiangiogenic with immunotherapy or anti-BRAF/anti-MEK targeted therapy in advanced melanoma.
| Reference | Phase | Clinical setting | Line of treatment in metastatic setting | Arm 1 | Arm 2 | Primary endpoints | Secondary endpoints | Further details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hodi et al. ( | I | Stage III unresectable or stage IV melanoma. No brain metastases | 1st or 2nd line | Ipilimumab + Bevacizumab | None | ORR 8 PR, 22 SD | DCR 67% | |
| NCT01950390 | II randomized | Stage III unresectable or IV cutaneous melanoma. | 1st or 2nd line | Ipilimumab | Ipilimumab | OS | PFS | Active, not recruiting. Results pending |
| Taylor et al. ( | IB/II | Advanced solid tumors including melanoma | 2nd or 3rd line | Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib | None | Safety | ORR at week 24 48% in melanoma (1 CR and 9 PR) | |
| Arance et al. ( | II | Stage III unresectable or IV cutaneous melanoma. | 2nd or further line (103 pts) | Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib | None | ORR 21.4% | PFS 4.2 m | |
| NCT03820986 | III | Stage III unresectable or IV cutaneous melanoma. | 1st or 2nd line | Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib | Pembrolizumab + Placebo | PRS | ORR | Active, recruiting |
| NCT01495988 | II | Stage IIIC unresectable or stage IV melanoma. BRAF V600E/V600K positive. | 1st or further line (10 pts enrolled, vs initially designed 180 pts) | Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib + Bevacizumab | Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (arm 1) | PFS | OS | Slow accrural, toxicity, change in priorities |
| NCT04356729 | II | Stage III unresectable or IV cutaneous melanoma | Any line (no prior immunotherapy) | Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab | None | ORR | OS | Not yet recruiting |
| NCT03175432 | II | Stage IV melanoma with brain metastases. BRAF wt | Progression after anti-PD1 | Atezolizumab + | None | Intracranial ORR | ORR | Recruiting. Estimated 60 pts |
| NCT02681549 | II | Stage IV melanoma or NSCLC with brain metastases | 2nd or further line | Pembrolizumab + Bevacizumab | None | Intracranial ORR | Need for steroids | Recruiting. Estimated 53 pts |
| NCT03239145 | I | Advanced solid tumors. | 2nd or further line | Pembrolizumab + Trebananib | None | Maximum dose | ORR | Recruiting. Estimated 60 pts |