| Literature DB >> 33193189 |
Ian S Acuña-Rodríguez1, Alexander Galán2,3,4, Cristian Torres-Díaz5, Cristian Atala6, Marco A Molina-Montenegro1,2,7.
Abstract
Plant-fungi interaEntities:
Keywords: Antarctic vascular plants; endophytes; nitrogen; ornithogenic soils; plant-fungi interactions
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193189 PMCID: PMC7645117 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.575563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Antarctic plant community growing near a big penguin colony in the study site (Admiralty bay, King George Island, South Shetland, Antarctica).
FIGURE 2Temporal smooth functions (solid lines) and their approximate 95% confidence intervals (shaded area) for E− (gray) and E+ (green) individuals of either Antarctic vascular plant species Colobanthus quitensis or Deschampsia antarctica, as derived from a GAMM fitted model. Confidence interval overlapping can be considered to dilute any significant difference between splines during the respective time. As a reference, dashed lines represent the simplest (i.e., linear) model fit for each experimental group. The respective coefficients were, for C. quitensis: slope E− = 0.093, SE E− = 0.015, df E− = 66; slope E+ = 0.161, SE E+ = 0.016, df E+ = 66 and for D. antarctica: slope E− = 0.071, SE E− = 0.009, df E− = 66; slope E+ = 0.091, SE E+ = 0.010, df E+ = 66. All linear regression slopes were statistically different from zero (data not shown).
FIGURE 3Biomass increase percentage of endophyte free (E−, in gray) and endophyte-infected (E+, in green) individuals of C. quitensis and D. antarctica, expressed as the percentage of the average final dry biomass of the E− group of each species. Dots represent individual values (n = 7), while boxplots the data inter-quartilic distribution per group. Different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments and/or species, as determined by the Tukey a-posteriori pairwise comparison test.
FIGURE 4d15N signatures observed on the foliar tissues of C. quitensis and D. antarctica growing without fungal endophytes (E−, in gray), or inoculated with their most abundant root endophyte (E+, in green). Dots represent individual values (n = 10), while boxplots the data inter-quartilic distribution per group. Different letters imply significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments and/or species, as determined by the Tukey a-posteriori pairwise comparison test. The blue dashed line denotes the isotopic signature of the initial substrate (d15N = 3.7‰). The zero represent outcome among the enrichment / depletion of the 15N isotopic, relative to the standard (i.e., the atmospheric 15N/14N ratio).
FIGURE 5Proposed model of the DSE-Plant interaction for N uptake in the vascular Antarctic plants Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis, determined by the d15N signature in soil and leaves. E denote non-infected plants while E+ their DSE-infected counterpart. Arrow’s width imply preferred N-substrates uptaked/assimilated while their color represents its form in the soil (blue: organic; red/yellow: inorganic). The proportion of the urea added (8 g/kg) was equivalent to the previously estimated total N content of the experimental substrate (see methods for details). ∗ Note that the urea added to the incubations are much more 15N depleted than the Antarctic soil used. Eliminado: Mineralization of organic N as described by the accumulation of NH4+ in the substrate of endophyte free (E−, in gray) and endophyte-infected (E+, in green) individuals of the two Antarctic vascular plant species. Boxplots represent the inter-quartilic distribution of the data (n = 7), different letters denote significant differences after a factorial pairwise comparison using Estimated-Marginal Means (EMMs) analysis with a 0.95 confidence level.