| Literature DB >> 33193174 |
Ki Hyeong Park1, Seung-Yoon Oh2, Shinnam Yoo1, Jonathan J Fong3, Chang Sun Kim4, Jong Won Jo4, Young Woon Lim1.
Abstract
Trees in forest ecosystEntities:
Keywords: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; ectomycorrhizal fungi; plant-soil interaction; soil fungal community; temperate forest
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193174 PMCID: PMC7655983 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.572706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Alpha diversity of soil fungal communities from Carpinus cordata and Fraxinus rhynchophylla forests. (A) Overall alpha diversity of the rhizospheric soil under the dominant tree species in each forest and (B) Seasonal variation in alpha diversity in C. cordata and F. rhynchophylla: W (winter), Sp (spring), Su (summer), and A (autumn). Richness is represented by the number of OTUs and Chao1. Diversity and equitability were estimated with Shannon’s index. Significant differences in alpha diversity indices were tested using Kruskall-Wallis test with LSD Fisher post hoc test adjusted by the Bonferroni method. The box indicates the first and third quartiles, and black line in the middle indicates the median value.
Figure 2Taxonomic distribution of soil fungal communities in Carpinus cordata and Fraxinus rhynchophylla forests. The average relative abundances of genera in soil fungal communities of (A) C. cordata and (B) F. rhynchophylla forests are represented according to seasonal change. The genera with relative abundances less than 1% are not shown. (C) Average relative abundance of taxa belonging to each trophic mode in fungal communities of C. cordata and F. rhynchophylla forests. Unknown = taxonomic groups with unassigned trophic modes.
Average relative abundance, trophic mode, and guild of major genera (>1%) in the fungal communities of rhizospheric soil in Carpinus cordata and Fraxinus rhynchophylla forests.
| Tree | Genus | Relative abundance (%) | Trophic mode | Guild |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.981 | Sym | Ectomycorrhizal | ||
| 8.792 | Sym | Ectomycorrhizal-orchid mycorrhizal-root associated biotroph | ||
| 6.992 | Sap-Sym | Endophyte-litter saprotroph-soil saprotroph-undefined saprotroph | ||
| 5.176 | Sym | Ectomycorrhizal | ||
| 4.056 | Sym | Ectomycorrhizal | ||
| 2.082 | Pat-Sap-Sym | Animal pathogen-dung saprotroph-endophyte-epiphyte-plant saprotroph-wood saprotroph | ||
| 1.654 | Pat | Animal pathogen | ||
| 1.581 | Pat | Plant pathogen | ||
| 1.502 | Sap | Wood saprotroph | ||
| 1.379 | Sym | Ectomycorrhizal | ||
| 1.303 | Unk | Unknown | ||
| 1.253 | Pat-Sap-Sym | Ectomycorrhizal-fungal parasite-soil saprotroph-undefined saprotroph | ||
| 1.212 | Pat | Plant pathogen | ||
| 1.158 | Sap-Sym | Undefined saprotroph-undefined biotroph | ||
| 1.063 | Pat-Sap | Leaf saprotroph-plant pathogen-undefined saprotroph-wood saprotroph | ||
| 1.022 | Sap | Undefined saprotroph | ||
| 11.832 | Sap-Sym | Endophyte-litter saprotroph-soil saprotroph-undefined saprotroph | ||
| 5.471 | Sym | Ectomycorrhizal-orchid mycorrhizal-root associated biotroph | ||
| 4.193 | Sap | Undefined saprotroph | ||
| 2.525 | Pat-Sap-Sym | Animal pathogen-dung saprotroph-endophyte-epiphyte-plant saprotroph-wood saprotroph | ||
| 1.641 | Pat | Animal pathogen | ||
| 1.577 | Sap | Wood saprotroph | ||
| 1.344 | Sap | Undefined saprotroph | ||
| 1.199 | Sym | Ectomycorrhizal | ||
| 1.169 | Unk | Unknown | ||
| 1.085 | Sap | Undefined saprotroph | ||
| 1.085 | Pat | Plant pathogen | ||
| 1.068 | Sap | Undefined saprotroph | ||
| 1.061 | Pat | Plant pathogen |
Sap, saprotroph; Sym, symbiotroph; Pat, pathotroph; Unk, unknown.
Trophic modes and guilds were assigned according to FUNGuild database (Nguyen et al., 2016).
Figure 3Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots using Bray-Curtis distances matrices of (A) Carpinus cordata and (B) Fraxinus rhynchophylla soil fungal communities. Dot colors represent seasons: purple (Winter), green (Spring), blue (Summer), and red (Autumn). Soil parameters with significant relationships (p < 0.05) are indicated by red arrows.
Figure 4Soil properties of Carpinus cordata (red) and Fraxinus rhynchophylla (blue) forests separated by seasons. Measured soil properties are pH, TOC (Total Organic Carbon, %), TN (Total Nitrogen, %), NH4+ (ammonium ion, mg/kg), TP (Total Phosphorus, mg/kg), water (Water Content, %), TK (Total Potassium, mg/kg), and C/N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio, TOC/TN). Letters (a–e) were used as labels to indicate significant differences between means of each soil property in Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.
The result of Spearman correlation coefficient test between alpha diversity indices, relative abundance of trophic modes and soil properties in (A) Carpinus cordata and (B) Fraxinus rhynchophylla forests.
| Alpha diversity | Number of OTU | −0.147 | −0.538 | −0.28 | 0.371 | 0.035 | 0.648 | 0.72 | −0.245 |
| Chao1 | −0.111 | −0.594 | −0.266 | 0.273 | 0.203 | 0.634 | 0.832 | −0.364 | |
| Diversity | −0.011 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.021 | 0.070 | 0.224 | 0.49 | −0.014 | |
| Equitability | −0.011 | 0.077 | 0.063 | −0.084 | 0.126 | 0.091 | 0.420 | −0.084 | |
| Trophic Mode (relative abundance) | Sym | 0.132 | 0.462 | −0.161 | −0.063 | −0.238 | −0.119 | 0.042 | 0.727 |
| Sap | 0.200 | −0.364 | 0.224 | −0.063 | 0.329 | 0.067 | 0.336 | −0.664 | |
| Sap-Sym | −0.429 | −0.21 | −0.294 | 0.021 | −0.105 | 0.305 | 0.014 | 0.189 | |
| Pat | 0.347 | −0.056 | 0.490 | −0.154 | 0.497 | −0.207 | 0.000 | −0.643 | |
| Pat-Sym | −0.261 | −0.811 | −0.629 | 0.490 | −0.231 | 0.364 | 0.371 | −0.196 | |
| Pat-Sap | −0.197 | −0.182 | −0.028 | −0.308 | 0.070 | −0.165 | 0.273 | −0.357 | |
| Pat-Sap-Sym | 0.143 | −0.483 | −0.014 | 0.399 | 0.371 | 0.298 | −0.035 | −0.545 | |
| Alpha diversity | Number of OTU | 0.300 | −0.34 | −0.399 | 0.308 | −0.455 | 0.263 | 0.629 | −0.049 |
| Chao1 | 0.536 | −0.62 | −0.608 | 0.606 | −0.231 | 0.585 | 0.692 | −0.245 | |
| Diversity | 0.427 | −0.273 | −0.175 | 0.256 | −0.294 | 0.175 | 0.706 | −0.07 | |
| Equitability | 0.406 | −0.287 | −0.182 | 0.266 | −0.287 | 0.182 | 0.741 | −0.084 | |
| Trophic Mode (relative abundance) | Sym | −0.423 | 0.025 | −0.161 | −0.179 | −0.427 | −0.2 | −0.112 | 0.308 |
| Sap | 0.250 | −0.298 | −0.182 | 0.186 | −0.147 | 0.256 | 0.252 | −0.224 | |
| Sap-Sym | −0.215 | 0.417 | 0.608 | −0.399 | 0.399 | −0.469 | −0.238 | −0.175 | |
| Pat | 0.134 | −0.179 | 0.077 | 0.025 | 0.049 | 0.053 | 0.028 | −0.35 | |
| Pat-Sym | 0.490 | −0.413 | −0.378 | 0.578 | 0.392 | 0.599 | 0.497 | −0.455 | |
| Pat-Sap | −0.279 | 0.483 | 0.406 | −0.41 | −0.147 | −0.431 | −0.559 | 0.413 | |
| Pat-Sap-Sym | 0.511 | −0.375 | 0.014 | 0.525 | 0.657 | 0.494 | 0.280 | −0.72 | |
Indicate significant correlation (p < 0.05).
TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; NH4+, Ammonium ion; TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium; C/N, carbon to nitrogen ratio (TOC/TN); Sap, saprotroph; Sym, symbiotroph; Pat, pathotroph.