| Literature DB >> 33192889 |
Óscar Barquero-Pérez1, Miguel Angel Cámara-Vázquez1, Alba Vadillo-Valderrama1, Rebeca Goya-Esteban1.
Abstract
Interest in improving advertisement impact on potential consumers has increased recently. One well-known strategy is to use emotion-based advertisement. In this approach, an emotional link with consumers is created, aiming to enhance the memorization process. In recent years, Neuromarketing techniques have allowed us to obtain more objective information on this process. However, the role of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in the memorization process using emotional advertisement still needs further research. In this work, we propose the use of two physiological signals, namely, an electrocardiogram (heart rate variability, HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA), to obtain indices assessing the ANS. We measured these signals in 43 subjects during the observation of six different spots, each conveying a different emotion (rational, disgust, anger, surprise, and sadness). After observing the spots, subjects were asked to answer a questionnaire to measure the spontaneous and induced recall. We propose the use of a statistical data-driven model based on Partial Least Squares-Path Modeling (PSL-PM), which allows us to incorporate contextual knowledge by defining a relational graph of unobservable variables (latent variables, LV), which are, in turn, estimated by measured variables (indices of the ANS). We defined four LVs, namely, sympathetic, vagal, ANS, and recall. Sympathetic and vagal are connected to the ANS, the latter being a measure of recall, estimated from a questionnaire. The model is then fitted to the data. Results showed that vagal activity (described by HRV indices) is the most critical factor to describe ANS activity; they are inversely related except for the spot, which is mainly rational. The model captured a moderate-to-high variability of ANS behavior, ranging from 38% up to 64% of the explained variance of the ANS. However, it can explain at most 11% of the recall score of the subjects. The proposed approach allows for the easy inclusion of more physiological measurements and provides an easy-to-interpret model of the ANS response to emotional advertisement.Entities:
Keywords: autonomic nervous system; electrodermal activity; emotion; heart rate variability; neuromarketing; partial least squares-path modeling; recall
Year: 2020 PMID: 33192889 PMCID: PMC7662410 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Time and frequency domain indices of HRV.
| SDNN | ms | Standard deviation of NN intervals. |
| RMSSD | ms | The Square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals. |
| pNN50 | Number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the entire recording divided by the total number of NN intervals. | |
| LF | Power in low frequency range. | |
| HF | Power in High frequency range. | |
| LF/HR | adim. | Ratio |
Figure 1PLS-PM model of the ANS activity and Recall. Dashed lines represent the links in the measurement model, and solid lines represent links in structure model.
Figure 2Recall-score distribution grouped by gender and for the different emotions conveyed in the advertisements. Emotions are represented in the same order as the subject watched the spots.
Figure 3Path coefficients in the structure model comparison between emotions conveyed by the advertisements. Values in y-axes should be interpreting as standardize linear regression weights so that a negative value indicates a negative correlation and the higher the value the higher the contribution of the LV.
Figure 4Results of fitted PLS-PM. The plots show R2, GoF, and β path coefficients for each spot. Significant coefficients are highlighted. Red arrows indicate a negative relationship, whereas black arrows represent a positive relationship. (A) Spot 1–Rational, (B) Spot 2–Disgust, (C) Spot 3–Anger, (D) Spot 4–Surprise, (E) Spot 5–Sadness, (F) Spot 6–Rational.
Figure 5Gender differences for Spot 1 (rational) on β path coefficients. Statistically significant differences are indicated with a *.